RESUMEN
Purpose: To explore the effect of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection on neonates in plateau regions. Methods: Cases of newborns born to pregnant women infected with COVID-19 who received prenatal care or treatment at the Women and Children's Hospital of the Tibet Autonomous Region and the Lhasa People's Hospital between January 2020 and December 2022 (infected group) and newborns born to healthy pregnant women (non-infected group) who were included by age, underlying disease and length of hospital stay were retrospectively collected. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 381 patients in the infected group and 314 patients in the non-infected group were included in the study. Results: The results of multivariate analysis showed that admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (OR = 3.342, 95% CI = 1.564-6.764), shortness of breath (OR = 2.853, 95% CI = 1.789-3.154), irregular breathing (OR = 2.465, 95% CI = 1.879-4.112) and neonatal jaundice (OR = 2.324, 95% CI = 1.989-2.445) were the factors influencing the low Apgar scores of neonates in the infected group (all P < 0.05). Conclusion: Neonates born to pregnant women infected with COVID-19 had lower Apgar scores and higher incidences of complications, such as shortness of breath, groaning, irregular breathing and neonatal jaundice, than newborns born to pregnant women not infected with COVID-19.
RESUMEN
Purpose: Pelvic floor disorder (PFD) seriously affects the everyday life of women. This cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and risk factors for postpartum PFD in women living in the Tibet Autonomous Region (TAR). Methods: Parous women who attended the outpatient gynaecology clinic at our hospital between June 2022 and August 2022 were screened in this study. The demographic and clinical data of these women were collected. Their pelvic floor functions were evaluated via a pelvic organ prolapse (POP) quantification examination, the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory Questionnaire-20 (PFDI-20) and the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS). Results: A total of 201 women were included in this study, of whom 81.09% (163/201) were Tibetan. Twenty-seven women (13.43%) were diagnosed with POP stage ≥2 and 27 women (13.43%) with an OABSS score ≥3. The median PFDI-20 total score was 4.17 (range 0-43.75). Han women (n = 38) in the TAR had much lower PFDI-20 total scores, compared with Tibetan women (n = 163) (p < 0.05). The results of the multiple linear regression models showed that the PFDI-20 scores obtained from women living in the TAR were closely related to parity, history of heavy weight lifting, age, history of instrumental deliveries, ethnicity and number of caesarean sections. Conclusion: Pelvic floor disorder is common among parous women living in the TAR. Ethnicity, parity, history of heavy weight lifting, age, history of instrumental deliveries and number of caesarean sections are the factors closely related to the PFDI-20 scores.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study is aimed at assessing the effect of postoperative electrical stimulation (ES) plus biofeedback therapy on patient rehabilitation after pelvic floor reconstructive surgery. METHODS: Patients with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) who had received pelvic floor reconstructive surgery were randomly allocated to the intervention group and the control group at a 1:1 ratio. Patients in the control group received routine postoperative nursing care. Patients in the intervention group underwent ES plus biofeedback therapy. The outcomes included the recovery of urination function, the improvement of pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength, and the change of Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory Questionnaire-20 (PFDI-20) scores. The study outcomes were evaluated at pre-intervention (T0, 2 months after surgery), 3 months after surgery (T1), and 6 months after surgery (T2). RESULTS: A total of 60 patients with POP were included in this study. For the urination function evaluation, the intervention group had a higher recovered rate than the control group at the time point of T2 (p = 0.038). For the EMG results, the changes of flick-max and tonic-mean values from T0 to T2 were much higher in the intervention group comparing to the control group. Corresponding to the EMG results, digital palpation showed that intervention group had a much higher proportion of patients who had elevated PFM strength. Furthermore, the intervention group also had more significant PFDI-20 score improvements compared with control group. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative ES plus biofeedback therapy could significantly improve urination function, PFM strength, and patient's reported QoL. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical registration number: hiCTR2000032432.
Asunto(s)
Diafragma Pélvico , Cirugía Plástica , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Micción , Biorretroalimentación Psicológica , Estimulación EléctricaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to determine whether the use of labor analgesia had a higher risk of pelvic floor functional problems after delivery. STUDY DESIGN: All primiparas who delivered at our hospital between June 2019 and May 2020 were enrolled in the study. They were divided into two groups according to their choices: delivery with labor analgesia (analgesia group, n = 76), and delivery without labor analgesia (nonanalgesia group, n = 78). The primary outcome of the study was to test the pelvic floor function by electromyography (EMG) at postpartum 6 to 8 weeks. Participants also completed questionnaires including Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20), International Consultation on Incontinent Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF), and Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) at postpartum 6 to 8 weeks. RESULTS: Primiparas in the analgesia group experienced longer first and second stages of labor (p< 0.05), and had significantly higher PFDI-20 scores at postpartum 6 to 8 weeks (p< 0.05). But the differences in ICIQ-SF, OABSS scores, and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system between the two groups were not significant (p > 0.05). No statistically significant difference was found in class II and class I muscles, scores of pretest resting baseline, and posttest resting baseline between primiparas with or without labor analgesia (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our results strongly confirmed that labor analgesia did not increase the risk of pelvic floor dysfunction up to 6 to 8 weeks after delivery, although symptom burden might be increased after labor analgesia. KEY POINTS: · Labor analgesia did not increase risk of pelvic floor muscle dysfunction after delivery.. · There are longer first and second stages of labor in primiparas with labor analgesia.. · Primiparas with labor analgesia had more obvious subjective symptoms of PFD..
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: There have been a number of controversies about which treatment of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is more beneficial for overactive bladder (OAB). An attempt to investigate the therapeutic effect of NMES with different pulse widths for OAB in elderly women has been made in this study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The postmenopausal elderly women without pelvic organ prolapse (POP) who received transvaginal NMES in Beijing Hospital from November 2020 to December 2020 were randomly divided into two groups (Group A and Group B). Patients from Group A accepted the treatment with NMES by pulse width of 300 µs and patients from Group B accepted the treatment with NMES by pulse width of 200 µs. Myoelectric potential of Type I and Type II muscle fibers at pelvic floor and overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS) were valued. RESULTS: There were 46 patients eligible for the study and randomly divided into Group A and Group B, 23 patients for each group. OABSS were significantly reduced in both groups after the treatment of NEMS. And OABSS in Group A (after treated by pulse width of 300 µs) were significantly decreased greater than those in Group B (after treated with pulse width of 200 µs). Both Group A and Group B had no significant difference in the mean myoelectric potential at pre-resting state when compared before and after the treatment of NEMS. Myoelectric potential of Type I muscle fiber and the maximum myoelectric potential of Type II muscle fibers were significantly increased after the treatment of NEMS than before the treatment in the two groups, respectively. And myoelectric potential of Type I muscle fiber and the maximum myoelectric potential of Type II muscle fibers in group A (after treated with pulse width of 300 µs) were increased significantly much higher than those in Group B (after treated with pulse width of 200 µs). CONCLUSIONS: Comparing the indicators before and after the treatments of NMES, our study has preliminarily confirmed that NMES has its advantages in treating with OAB. And NMES by pulse width of 300 µs were more effective in improving pelvic floor muscle strength than NMES by pulse width of 200 µs.
Asunto(s)
Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico , Vejiga Urinaria Hiperactiva , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Vejiga Urinaria Hiperactiva/terapia , Diafragma Pélvico , Estimulación Eléctrica , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare intraoperative and short-term postoperative outcomes and recurrence of laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LARVH) to abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) in the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer. METHODS: A search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library search trial (central) databases was conducted from database inception through December 2015. We included studies comparing surgical approaches with radical hysterectomy (LARVH vs ARH) in women with stages IA1 to IIB cervical cancer. Outcomes included blood loss, operative time, number of lymph nodes retrieved, intraoperative complications, hospital stay, and prognosis. RESULT: Seven studies were included (4 prospective cohort studies and 3 case control studies) enrolling 794 women; 349 women were treated by LARVH, and 445 were treated by ARH. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy was associated with less blood loss (weight mean difference [WMD], -237.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], -453.42 to -21.47), wound-related complications (odds ratio, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.05-0.61), shorter hospital stay (WMD, -2.01; 95% CI, -2.52 to -1.51), and longer operative time (WMD, 48.95; 95% CI, 42.08 to 55.82) versus ARH. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy was comparable with ARH in number of lymph nodes retrieved, urinary-related complications, rectal injury, lymphedema, and all prognosis indicators. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence suggests that LARVH is superior to ARH with lower blood loss, less wound-related complications, and shorter hospital stay. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and ARH seem equivalent in number of lymph nodes retrieved, urinary-related complications, rectal injury, lymphedema, and prognosis.