RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pancreaticobiliary (PB) cancers are a diverse group of cancers with poor prognoses and high rates of recurrence after resection. Patient-derived xenografts (PDX), created from surgical specimens, provide a reliable preclinical research platform and high-fidelity cancer model from which to study these malignancies with consistent recapitulation of their original patient tumors in vivo. However, the relationship between PDX engraftment success (growth or no growth) and patient oncologic outcomes has not been well studied. We sought to evaluate the correlation between successful PDX engraftment and survival in several PB exocrine carcinomas, including the pancreatic and biliary tract. STUDY DESIGN: In accordance with IRB and Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee protocols and with appropriate consent and approval, excess tumor tissue obtained from surgical patients was implanted into immunocompromised mice. Mice were monitored for tumor growth to determine engraftment success. PDX tumors were verified to recapitulate their tumors of origin by a hepatobiliary pathologist. Xenograft growth was correlated with clinical recurrence and overall survival data. RESULTS: A total of 384 PB xenografts were implanted. The successful engraftment rate was 41% (158/384). We found that successful PDX engraftment was highly associated with both recurrence-free survival (p < 0.001) and overall survival (p < 0.001) outcomes. Successful PDX tumor generation occurs significantly in advance of clinical recurrences in their corresponding patients (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Successful PB cancer PDX models predict recurrence and survival across tumor types and may provide critical lead time to alter patients' surveillance or treatment plans before cancer recurrence.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales , Humanos , Animales , Ratones , Xenoinjertos , Avatar , Ensayos Antitumor por Modelo de Xenoinjerto , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Modelos Animales de EnfermedadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Improving the reliability of handoffs and care transitions is an important goal for many health care organizations. Increasing evidence shows that human-centered design and improved teamwork can lead to sustainable care transition improvements and better patient outcomes. This study was conducted within a cardiovascular service line at an academic medical center that performs more than 600 surgical procedures annually. A handoff process previously implemented at the center was poorly adopted. This work aimed to improve cardiovascular handoffs by applying human factors and the science of teamwork. METHODS: The study's quality improvement method used Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles and participatory design and ergonomics to develop, implement, and assess a new handoff process and bundle. Trained observers analyzed video-recorded and live handoffs to assess teamwork, leadership, communication, coordination, cooperation, and sustainability of unit-defined handoff best practices. The intervention included a teamwork-focused redesign process and handoff bundle with supporting cognitive aids and assessment metrics. RESULTS: The study assessed 153 handoffs in multiple phases over 3 years (2016-2019). Quantitative and qualitative assessments of clinician (teamwork) and implementation outcomes were performed. Compared with the baseline, the observed handoffs demonstrated improved team leadership (p < 0.0001), communication (p < 0.0001), coordination (p = 0.0018), and cooperation (p = 0.007) following the deployment of the handoff bundle. Sustained improvements in fidelity to unit-defined handoff best practices continued 2.3 years post-deployment of the handoff bundle. CONCLUSION: Participatory design and ergonomics, combined with implementation and safety science principles, can provide an evidence-based approach for sustaining complex sociotechnical change and making handoffs more reliable.
Asunto(s)
Pase de Guardia , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Transferencia de Pacientes/métodos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , ComunicaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Portal or superior mesenteric vein (PV-SMV) resection and reconstruction is sometimes required during pancreatic tumor resection. In patients requiring segmental venous resection with interposition grafting, the left renal vein (LRV) is an accessible autologous solution. However, long-term patency outcomes of the LRV as an interposition conduit in this setting have not been analyzed. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing pancreatic resection with PV-SMV reconstruction using LRV between 2002 and 2022. The primary outcome was PV-SMV patency at last follow-up, assessed with postoperative CT scans and analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival methods that account for variation in follow-up duration. Development of any postoperative acute kidney injury within 7 days of surgery and morbidity were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: The study cohort includes 65 patients who underwent LRV harvest; 60 (92%) ultimately underwent successful reconstruction with harvested LRV graft. Kaplan-Meier 2-year estimated patency rate of the LRV graft was 88%, with no cases of complete occlusion. Six (10%) patients experienced graft stenosis. Nine of 61 (15%) patients experienced grade II or III acute kidney injury, 6 of 9 returning to normal renal function before discharge. No difference in median serum creatinine was observed at baseline, 6 and 12 months from surgery. LRV remnant thrombosis was seen in 7 of 65 (11%) patients. Only 3 of 61 (5%) patients had persistent acute kidney injury caused by complications unrelated to LRV harvesting. CONCLUSIONS: Autologous LRV graft was a reliable conduit for segmental PV-SMV reconstruction, resulting in a high patency rate and marginal impact on renal function. LRV harvest is a safe and potentially ideal surgical option for PV-SMV reconstruction in pancreatic surgery.
Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Venas Renales/cirugía , Venas Renales/patología , Venas Mesentéricas/cirugía , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vena Porta/cirugía , Riñón/cirugía , Riñón/fisiología , Riñón/patologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) displays a remarkable propensity towards therapy resistance. However, molecular epigenetic and transcriptional mechanisms enabling this are poorly understood. In this study, we aimed to identify novel mechanistic approaches to overcome or prevent resistance in PDAC. DESIGN: We used in vitro and in vivo models of resistant PDAC and integrated epigenomic, transcriptomic, nascent RNA and chromatin topology data. We identified a JunD-driven subgroup of enhancers, called interactive hubs (iHUBs), which mediate transcriptional reprogramming and chemoresistance in PDAC. RESULTS: iHUBs display characteristics typical for active enhancers (H3K27ac enrichment) in both therapy sensitive and resistant states but exhibit increased interactions and production of enhancer RNA (eRNA) in the resistant state. Notably, deletion of individual iHUBs was sufficient to decrease transcription of target genes and sensitise resistant cells to chemotherapy. Overlapping motif analysis and transcriptional profiling identified the activator protein 1 (AP1) transcription factor JunD as a master transcription factor of these enhancers. JunD depletion decreased iHUB interaction frequency and transcription of target genes. Moreover, targeting either eRNA production or signaling pathways upstream of iHUB activation using clinically tested small molecule inhibitors decreased eRNA production and interaction frequency, and restored chemotherapy responsiveness in vitro and in vivo. Representative iHUB target genes were found to be more expressed in patients with poor response to chemotherapy compared with responsive patients. CONCLUSION: Our findings identify an important role for a subgroup of highly connected enhancers (iHUBs) in regulating chemotherapy response and demonstrate targetability in sensitisation to chemotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/genética , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/metabolismo , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/genética , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/metabolismo , Factores de Transcripción/genética , ARN , Elementos de Facilitación Genéticos/genética , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Línea Celular Tumoral , Neoplasias PancreáticasRESUMEN
Mixed acinar neuroendocrine carcinoma of the pancreas (MANEC-P) is an extremely rare malignancy with a poor prognosis. However, epidemiological estimates of MANEC-P remain unknown. This study aimed to estimate and compare the incidence, prevalence, and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of MANEC-P in the United States (US). Patients with MANEC-P were identified through the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) and National Program of Cancer Registries databases between 2000-2017. The primary outcomes included age-adjusted incidence rate, limited-duration prevalence, and CSS. A total of 630 patients were identified for the incidence analysis and 149 for the prevalence and CSS analyses. The MANEC-P incidence rate was 0.011 per 100,000 individuals, which was the lowest among pancreatic cancer histologic subtypes. The incidence rate was significantly higher in men and Black races and peaked at 75-79 years of age. The incidence rate was the lowest in the midwestern region (0.009) and the highest in the northeastern US (0.013). The 17-year prevalence was 0.00005%, indicating that 189 patients were alive in the United States at the beginning of 2018. The median CSS of MANEC-P was estimated to be 41 (23, 69) months. In conclusion, MANEC-P is very rare, and its incidence rate has been steady in the US over the last two decades. MANEC-P has a poor prognosis and is the 5th leading cause of pancreatic cancer-related death in the US.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Biliary tract tumors are uncommon but highly aggressive malignancies with poor survival outcomes. Due to their low incidence, research into effective therapeutics has been limited. Novel research platforms for pre-clinical studies are desperately needed. We sought to develop a patient-derived biliary tract cancer xenograft catalog. METHODS: With appropriate consent and approval, surplus malignant tissues were obtained from surgical resection or radiographic biopsy and implanted into immunocompromised mice. Mice were monitored for xenograft growth. Established xenografts were verified by a hepatobiliary pathologist. Xenograft characteristics were correlated with original patient/tumor characteristics and oncologic outcomes. A subset of xenografts were then genomically characterized using Mate Pair sequencing (MPseq). RESULTS: Between October 2013 and January 2018, 87 patients with histologically confirmed biliary tract carcinomas were enrolled. Of the 87 patients, 47 validated PDX models were successfully generated. The majority of the PDX models were created from surgical resection specimens (n = 44, 94%), which were more likely to successfully engraft when compared to radiologic biopsies (p = 0.03). Histologic recapitulation of original patient tumor morphology was observed in all xenografts. Successful engraftment was an independent predictor for worse recurrence-free survival. MPseq showed genetically diverse tumors with frequent alterations of CDKN2A, SMAD4, NRG1, TP53. Sequencing also identified worse survival in patients with tumors containing tetraploid genomes. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest series of biliary tract cancer xenografts reported to date. Histologic and genomic analysis of patient-derived xenografts demonstrates accurate recapitulation of original tumor morphology with direct correlations to patient outcomes. Successful development of biliary cancer tumografts is feasible and may be used to direct subsequent therapy in high recurrence risk patients. LAY SUMMARY: Patient biliary tract tumors grown in immunocompromised mice are an invaluable resource in the treatment of biliary tract cancers. They can be used to guide individualized cancer treatment in high-risk patients.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The ability of handoff redesign to improve short-term outcomes is well established, yet an effective approach for achieving widespread adoption is unknown. An implementation science-based approach capable of influencing the leading indicators of widespread adoption was used to redesign handoffs from the cardiac operating room to the intensive care unit. METHODS: A transdisciplinary, unit-based team used a 12-step implementation process. The steps were divided into 4 phases: planning, engaging, executing, and evaluating. Based on unit-determined best practices, a "handoff bundle" was designed. This included team training, structured education with video illustration, and cognitive aids. Fidelity and acceptability were measured before, during, and after the handoff bundle was deployed. RESULTS: Redesign and implementation of the handoff process occurred over 12 months. Multiple rapid-cycle process improvements led to reductions in the handoff duration from 12.6 minutes to 10.7 minutes (P < .014). Fidelity to unit-determined handoff best practices was assessed based on a sample of the cardiac surgery population preimplantation and postimplementation. Twenty-three handoff best practices (information and tasks) demonstrated improvements compared with the preimplementation period. Provider satisfaction scores 2.5 years after implementation remained high compared with the redesign phase (87 vs. 84; P = .133). CONCLUSIONS: The use of an implementation-based approach for handoff redesign can be effective for improving the leading indicators of successful adoption of a structured handoff process. Future quality improvement studies addressing sustainability and widespread adoption of this approach appear to be warranted, and should include the relationships to improved care coordination and reduced preventable medical errors.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Unidades de Cuidados Coronarios/organización & administración , Ciencia de la Implementación , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/normas , Pase de Guardia/organización & administración , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Quirófanos/normas , Transferencia de Pacientes/métodos , Estudios RetrospectivosAsunto(s)
Anestesia/normas , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/normas , Pase de Guardia/normas , Seguridad del Paciente , Periodo Perioperatorio , Algoritmos , Anestesia/métodos , Congresos como Asunto , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Humanos , Modelos Organizacionales , Readmisión del Paciente , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Estados UnidosAsunto(s)
Bronquios/diagnóstico por imagen , Intubación Intratraqueal/instrumentación , Mucormicosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Ventilación Unipulmonar/instrumentación , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/diagnóstico por imagen , Bronquios/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Intubación Intratraqueal/métodos , Mucormicosis/cirugía , Ventilación Unipulmonar/métodos , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/cirugía , Adulto JovenAsunto(s)
Hipertensión Pulmonar/terapia , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/prevención & control , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio/métodos , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Disfunción Ventricular Derecha/terapia , Humanos , Hipertensión Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Hipertensión Pulmonar/mortalidad , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/mortalidad , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio/mortalidad , Mortalidad/tendencias , Atención Perioperativa/mortalidad , Disfunción Ventricular Derecha/diagnóstico , Disfunción Ventricular Derecha/mortalidadRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is associated with significant mortality and morbidity in survivors. Treatment is only supportive, therefore elucidating modifiable factors that could prevent ARDS could have a profound impact on outcome. The impact that sepsis-associated cardiac dysfunction has on ARDS is not known. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective observational cohort study of mechanically ventilated patients with severe sepsis and septic shock, 122 patients were assessed for the impact of sepsis-associated cardiac dysfunction on incidence of ARDS (primary outcome) and mortality. RESULTS: Sepsis-associated cardiac dysfunction occurred in 44 patients (36.1%). There was no association of sepsis-associated cardiac dysfunction with ARDS incidence (p= 0.59) or mortality, and no association with outcomes in patients that did progress to ARDS after admission. Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that higher BMI was associated with progression to ARDS (adjusted OR 11.84, 95% CI 1.24 to 113.0, p= 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac dysfunction in mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis did not impact ARDS incidence, clinical outcome in ARDS patients, or mortality. This contrasts against previous investigations demonstrating an influence of nonpulmonary organ dysfunction on outcome in ARDS. Given the frequency of ARDS as a sequela of sepsis, the impact of cardiac dysfunction on outcome should be further studied.