Gaining influence: Developing a Healthy Public Policy Unit at Vancouver Coastal Health.

SETTING: Regional Public Health Unit (Office of the Chief MHO, Vancouver Coastal Health Authority, BC, Canada). INTERVENTION: Recognizing the need to invest resources that strategically move public health work "upstream" where policies and investments can shape the determinants of health, the Office of the Chief MHO for Vancouver Coastal Health embarked on a process in 2019 to develop a population health team designed to engage in Healthy Public Policy (HPP) and Health in All Policies (HiAP) approaches to health promotion. The mission and design of this unit was informed by internal and external research and engagement which continued even through the COVID-19 pandemic. OUTCOMES: In the fall of 2022, this new unit, the first of its kind in British Columbia, was launched. In 2023, it embarked on strategic planning, engaged in key public policy processes, and implemented priority areas of work to help advance healthy public policy in the region, including the development of processes, tools, and practices to support a more systematic and rigorous approach to this emerging area of public health practice. IMPLICATIONS: The creation of this new Healthy Public Policy Unit invites discussion within Canada's public health community on the issue of resource allocation to support upstream interventions seeking to build the capacity and effectiveness of HPP and HiAP approaches.

RéSUMé: LIEU: Bureau de santé publique régional (bureau du médecin hygiéniste en chef, Vancouver Coastal Health Authority, Colombie-Britannique, Canada). INTERVENTION: Sachant qu'il faut investir des ressources pour transférer stratégiquement le travail de santé publique « en amont ¼, là où les politiques et les investissements peuvent structurer les déterminants de la santé, le bureau du médecin hygiéniste en chef de Vancouver Coastal Health a amorcé en 2019 un processus de création d'une équipe de santé des populations pour aborder la promotion de la santé selon les approches des politiques publiques favorables à la santé (PPFS) et de la santé dans toutes les politiques (SdTP). La mission et la conception de cette unité ont été éclairées par une recherche et une mobilisation internes et externes qui se sont poursuivies même pendant la pandémie de COVID-19. RéSULTATS: À l'automne 2022, cette nouvelle unité, la première du genre en Colombie-Britannique, a vu le jour. En 2023, elle a amorcé sa planification stratégique, participé aux principaux processus de politiques publiques et mis en œuvre ses axes prioritaires d'intervention pour faire progresser les politiques publiques favorables à la santé dans la région, y compris l'élaboration de processus, d'outils et de pratiques pour aborder de façon plus systématique et rigoureuse ce domaine émergent de la pratique en santé publique. IMPLICATIONS: La création de cette nouvelle unité des politiques publiques favorables à la santé invite à une discussion, au sein de la communauté de la santé publique du Canada, de la question de l'allocation de ressources à l'appui d'interventions en amont afin de renforcer les capacités et l'efficacité des approches PPFS et SdTP.

Implementation opportunities and challenges to piloting a community-based drug-checking intervention for sexual and gender minority men in Vancouver, Canada: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: In response to the overdose crisis, a collaborative group of two community-based organizations, a health authority and a research institute in Vancouver, Canada, implemented a pilot community-based drug checking (CBDC) intervention for sexual and gender minority (SGM) men. This study identified key factors that influenced the implementation of the CBDC intervention, including opportunities and challenges. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with seven pertinent parties involved in the CBDC, including policymakers, researchers and representatives from community-based organizations. These interviews were coded and analyzed using domains and constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. RESULTS: While drug-related stigma was identified as a challenge to deliver drug checking services, participants described the context of the overdose crisis as a key facilitator to engage collaboration between relevant organizations (e.g., health authorities, medical health officers, community organizations) to design, resource and implement the CBDC intervention. The implementation of the CBDC intervention was also influenced by SGM-specific needs and resources (e.g., lack of information about the drug supply). The high level of interest of SGM organizations in providing harm reduction services combined with the need to expand drug checking into community spaces represented two key opportunities for the CBDC intervention. Here, SGM organizations were recognized as valued partners that fostered a broader culture of harm reduction. Participants' emphasis that knowing the composition of one's drugs is a "right to know", particularly in the context of a highly contaminated illicit drug market, emerged as a key implementation factor. Lastly, participants emphasized the importance of involving SGM community groups at all stages of the implementation process to ensure that the CBDC intervention is appropriately tailored to SGM men. CONCLUSIONS: The context of the overdose crisis and the involvement of SGM organizations were key facilitators to the implementation of a drug checking intervention in SGM community spaces. This study offers contextualized understandings about how SGM knowledge and experiences can contribute to implement tailored drug checking interventions.

Fentanyl Concentration in Drug Checking Samples and Risk of Overdose Death in Vancouver, Canada.

INTRODUCTION: The proliferation of fentanyl and its analogs in illegal, unregulated drug markets remains a major driver of the overdose crisis in North America. Drug checking services have been implemented as a harm reduction strategy to address the crisis. However, little is known about their potential utility as a mechanism for monitoring population-level risk of overdose stemming from changing fentanyl concentration in unregulated drugs over time. Therefore, this study assessed the relationship between median fentanyl concentration in expected opioid drug checking samples and the death rate due to illicit drug toxicity over time in Vancouver, Canada. METHODS: Monthly population-based rates of death due to illicit drug toxicity were drawn from provincial coroner records. Monthly median percent fentanyl concentration was calculated using a validated quantification model from point-of-care Fourier-transform infrared spectra among expected opioid samples that tested positive for fentanyl at community drug checking services. A time-series analysis using generalized additive modeling was conducted to examine the association between monthly median fentanyl concentration and monthly death rate due to illicit drug toxicity, controlling for calendar month. Analyses were conducted in 2021-2022. RESULTS: Between January 2019 and October 2020, 577 deaths due to illicit drug toxicity occurred in Vancouver, and the observed monthly rate ranged from 1.75 to 7.65 deaths per 100,000 population. A significant, positive association was observed between monthly median fentanyl concentration and monthly death rate due to illicit drug toxicity, adjusting for calendar month (chi-square=52.21, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest a role for point-of-care drug checking as a tool for monitoring evolving overdose risk at the population level.

Examining fentanyl and its analogues in the unregulated drug supply of British Columbia, Canada using drug checking technologies.

INTRODUCTION: The emergence of fentanyl and its analogues have contributed to a drastic rise in overdose-related mortality in recent years. The objective of this study was to determine the number of drug checking samples containing fentanyl and fentanyl analogues using both point of care and confirmatory drug checking technologies. METHODS: Point-of-care drug checking data, using a combination of fentanyl immunoassay strips and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), were collected at harm reduction sites in Vancouver and Surrey, British Columbia. Based on current recommendations from the British Columbia Centre on Substance Use Drug Checking Project, a subset of these samples was sent for confirmatory analysis using quantitative nuclear resonance spectroscopy, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and/or liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. RESULTS: A total of 22,916 samples were tested using FTIR and fentanyl immunoassay strips, of which 6125 (29%) were positive for fentanyl and/or fentanyl analogues. FTIR identified a fentanyl analogue in five samples (all carfentanil). Of the 1467 samples sent for confirmatory analysis, fentanyl was identified in 855 (58%) and fentanyl analogues in 85 (6%), including: carfentanil (n = 56), acetyl fentanyl (n = 15), furanyl fentanyl (n = 9) and cyclopropyl fentanyl (n = 5). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Our research found that FTIR does not consistently distinguish between fentanyl and its analogues at point of care and that highly sensitive confirmatory drug checking technologies are needed to identify fentanyl analogues. These findings underscore the limitations of current drug checking technologies and the importance of using both point of care and confirmatory drug checking initiatives for monitoring changes in the drug supply.

Harm reduction in the hospital: An overdose prevention site (OPS) at a Canadian hospital.

BACKGROUND: Substance use management in hospitals can be challenging. In response, a Canadian hospital opened an overdose prevention site (OPS) where community members and hospital inpatients can inject pre-obtained illicit drugs under supervision. This study aims to: (1) describe program utilization patterns; (2) characterize OPS visits; and (3) evaluate overdose events and related outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was completed at one hospital in Vancouver, Canada. All community members and hospital inpatients who visited the OPS between May 2018 and July 2019 were included. Client measures included: hospital inpatient status, use of intravenous access line for drug injection, and substances used. Program measures included: number of visits (daily/monthly), overdose (fatal/non-fatal) events and overdose-related outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 11,673 OPS visits were recorded. Monthly visits increased from 306 to 1198 between May 2018 and July 2019 respectively. On average, 26 visits occurred daily. Among all visits, 20% reported being a hospital inpatient, and 5% reported using a hospital intravenous access line for drug injection. Opioids (56%) and stimulants (24%) were the most common substances used. Overall 39 overdose events occurred - 82% required naloxone reversal, 28% required transfer to the hospital's emergency department and none were fatal. Overdose events were more common among hospital inpatients compared to community clients (6.6 vs 2.2 per 1000 visits respectively; p value = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: This unique OPS is an example of a hospital-based harm reduction initiative. Use of the site increased over time among both groups with no fatal overdose events occurring.

Take-home drug checking as a novel harm reduction strategy in British Columbia, Canada.

BACKGROUND: Drug checking is a harm reduction strategy used to identify components of illicitly obtained drugs, including adulterants, to prevent overdose. This study evaluated the distribution of take-home fentanyl test strips to people who use drugs (PWUD) in British Columbia, Canada. The primary aim was to assess if the detection of fentanyl in opioid samples was concordant between a take-home model and testing by trained drug checking staff. METHODS: Take-home fentanyl test strips were distributed at ten sites providing drug checking services from April to July 2019. The fentanyl positivity of the aggregate take-home and on-site drug checking groups were compared by class of substance tested. An administered survey assessed acceptability and behaviour change. RESULTS: 1680 take-home results were obtained from 218 unique participants; 68% of samples (n=1142) were identified as opioids and 23% (n=382) were stimulant samples. During this period, 852 samples were tested using on-site drug checking. The fentanyl positivity of opioid samples was 90.0% for take-home samples and 89.1% for on-site samples (Difference 0.8% (95% CI -2.3% to 3.9%)). These results were not affected by previous experience with test strips. Fentanyl positivity of stimulants in the take-home group was higher than on-site (24.7% vs. 3.2%), but the study was underpowered to conduct statistical analysis on this sub-group. When fentanyl was detected, 27% of individuals reported behaviour change that was considered safer/positive. Greater than 95% of participants stated they would use fentanyl test strips again. CONCLUSIONS: Take-home fentanyl test strips used by PWUD on opioid samples can provide similar results to formal drug checking services and are a viable addition to existing overdose prevention strategies. Use of this strategy for detection of fentanyl in stimulant samples requires further evaluation. This intervention was well accepted and in some participants was associated with positive behaviour change.

Changes in the unregulated opioid drug supply during income assistance payment weeks in Vancouver, Canada: An exploratory analysis.

BACKGROUND: Increased drug-related harms, including overdoses (poisonings), have been reported in the days around income assistance payments, yet little is known about changes in the unregulated drug supply during this time. In this exploratory analysis, we investigated whether changes in the unregulated opioid drug supply are associated with income assistance payment weeks. METHODS: Using data from drug checking services in Vancouver, BC, we conducted modified Poisson and linear regression models to examine the association between income assistance payment weeks and three key outcomes: (1) proportion of fentanyl positivity among expected opioid samples, (2) fentanyl concentration among fentanyl-positive expected opioid samples, and (3) proportion of benzodiazepine positivity among expected opioid samples. RESULTS: Between October 2017 and December 2019, 4306 (90.41%) of expected opioid samples tested positive for fentanyl, and the median fentanyl concentration was 7.0% (quartile [Q]1 - Q3: 5.1% - 9.8%). Income assistance payment week was associated with an increased prevalence of fentanyl positivity among expected opioid samples (prevalence ratio [PR]: 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00, 1.05); however, we failed to find a statistically significant association between income assistance payment week and fentanyl concentration (regression coefficient: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.44, 1.09). Additionally, income assistance payment week was associated with an increased prevalence of benzodiazepine positivity among expected opioid samples (PR: 1.86; 95% CI: 1.07, 3.24). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that during income assistance payment weeks, there may be more fentanyl and benzodiazepines circulating in the unregulated opioid drug supply. The rise in fentanyl and benzodiazepine-adulterated opioids during income assistance payment weeks may be contributing to the increase in illicit drug overdoses seen during this time of the month.

A new quantitative drug checking technology for harm reduction: Pilot study in Vancouver, Canada using paper spray mass spectrometry.

INTRODUCTION: Drug checking services for harm reduction and overdose prevention have been implemented in many jurisdictions as a public health intervention in response to the opioid overdose crisis. This study demonstrates the first on-site use of paper spray mass spectrometry for quantitative drug checking to address the limitations of current on-site drug testing technologies. METHODS: Paper spray mass spectrometry was used to provide on-site drug checking services at a supervised consumption site in the Downtown Eastside of Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada during a 2-day pilot test in August 2019. The method included the targeted quantitative measurement of 49 drugs and an untargeted full scan to assist in identifying unknown/unexpected components. RESULTS: During the pilot, 113 samples were submitted for analysis, with 88 (78%) containing the client expected substance. Fentanyl was detected in 45 of 59 expected fentanyl samples, and in 50 (44%) samples overall at a median concentration of 3.6% (w/w%). The synthetic precursor of fentanyl, 4-anilino-N-phenethyl-piperidine (4-ANPP), was found in 74.0% of all fentanyl samples at a median concentration of 2.2%, suggesting widespread poor manufacturing practices. Etizolam was detected in 10 submitted samples anticipated to be fentanyl at a median concentration of 2.5%. No clients submitting these samples expected etizolam or a benzodiazepine in their sample. In three instances, it was co-measured with fentanyl, and in seven cases it was detected alone. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The quantitative capabilities and low detection limits demonstrated by paper spray mass spectrometry offer distinct benefits over existing on-site drug checking methods and harm reduction services.

Time-Series Analysis of Fentanyl Concentration in the Unregulated Opioid Drug Supply in a Canadian Setting.

North America has been contending with an unregulated street drug supply in which opioids are often adulterated with illicitly manufactured fentanyl. The unpredictability of composition may result in an increased risk of overdose due to unexpected elevated concentrations of the high-potency drug. Using data from a community-based drug-checking project, we evaluated trends in fentanyl concentration of illicit opioids in the context of an overdose epidemic. Using a quantification model for fentanyl hydrochloride, historical Fourier-transform infrared spectra from opioid drug-checking samples were analyzed to determine fentanyl concentrations. Median monthly fentanyl concentrations were plotted, and polynomial and autoregressive time-series analyses were performed to examine trends over time. A total of 3,621 fentanyl-positive samples were included in the study, spanning November 2017 to December 2019. Monthly median fentanyl concentrations ranged from 4.5% to 10.4%. Time-series analyses indicated that a third-degree polynomial model fit the data well (R2 = 0.639), suggesting a cyclical pattern in median concentration over time. Notably, absolute variance in fentanyl concentration decreased by an average 0.1% per month (P < 0.001). Future research should explore the relationship between fentanyl concentration and overdose to identify potential targeted harm-reduction interventions that can respond to changes in observed fentanyl concentration.

Is expected substance type associated with timing of drug checking service utilization?: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Drug checking is a harm reduction intervention aiming to reduce substance use-related risks by improving drug user knowledge of the composition of unregulated drugs. With increasing fears of fentanyl adulteration in unregulated drugs, this study sought to examine whether the expected type of drug checked (stimulant vs. opioid) was associated with timing of drug checking service utilization (pre-consumption vs. post-consumption). METHODS: Data were derived from drug checking sites in British Columbia between October 31, 2017 and December 31, 2019. Pearson's Chi-square test was used to examine the relationship between expected sample type (stimulant vs. opioid) and timing of service utilization. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated to assess the strength of this relationship. The Mantel-Haenszel (MH) test was used to adjust for service location. RESULTS: A total of 3561 unique stimulant and opioid samples were eligible for inclusion, including 691 (19.40%) stimulant samples; and 2222 (62.40%) samples that were tested pre-consumption. Results indicated a positive association between testing stimulant samples and testing pre-consumption (OR = 1.45; 95% CI 1.21-1.73). Regions outside of the epicenter of the province's drug scene showed a stronger association with testing pre-consumption (ORMH = 2.33; 95% CI 1.51-3.56) than inside the epicenter (ORMH = 1.33; 95% CI 1.09-1.63). CONCLUSION: Stimulant samples were more likely to be checked pre-consumption as compared with opioid samples, and stimulant samples were more likely to be tested pre-consumption in regions outside the epicenter of the province's drug scene. This pattern may reflect a concern for fentanyl-adulterated stimulant drugs.

The utility of visual appearance in predicting the composition of street opioids.

Background: With the emergence of unregulated fentanyl, people who use unregulated opioids are increasingly relying on appearance in an effort to ascertain the presence of fentanyl and level of drug potency. However, the utility of visual inspection to identify drug composition in the fentanyl era has not been assessed. Methods: We assessed client expectation, appearance, and composition of street drug samples being presented for drug checking. Results of a visual screening test were compared to fentanyl immunoassay strip testing. We calculated sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios (LR) to assess the accuracy of the common assumption that samples with a "pebbles" appearance contain fentanyl. Results: In total, of the 2502 unregulated opioid samples tested, 1820 (73.5%) appeared as "pebbles", of which 1729 (95.0%) tested positive for fentanyl for a sensitivity of 75.9% (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 74.2-77.6) and specificity of 59.4% (95%CI: 57.5-61.3). Although, the odds of samples containing fentanyl was 4.60 (95%CI: 3.47-6.11) times higher among pebbles samples compared to non-pebble samples, the positive LR for pebbles to contain fentanyl was only 1.87 (CI: 1.59-2.19). The negative LR was more useful at 0.41 (95% CI: 0.36-0.46). Conclusions: A positive screening test for pebbles is not strongly enough associated to be used as a proxy for detecting fentanyl. While the absence of the appearance of pebbles does somewhat reduce the likelihood of fentanyl being present in a given sample, the high prevalence of fentanyl and fentanyl analogues in the drug supply and the risks of consumption are such that public health providers should routinely advise people who use unregulated opioids against solely relying on visual characteristics of drugs as a harm reduction strategy.

An outbreak of novel psychoactive substance benzodiazepines in the unregulated drug supply: Preliminary results from a community drug checking program using point-of-care and confirmatory methods.

BACKGROUND: From mid-2018, an increase in novel psychoactive substance (NPS) benzodiazepines was noted on surveillance of the unregulated drug market around Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. The rise was concordant with an outbreak of atypical overdoses suspicious for benzodiazepine adulteration of unregulated opioids. This study sought to describe the number and type of NPS benzodiazepines in a sample drawn from a community drug checking program during this period, and to explore accuracy of point-of-care drug checking technologies when compared to confirmatory methods in this sample. METHODS: Point-of-care drug checking data using fentanyl and benzodiazepine test strips as well as Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy were gathered at harm reduction sites in the Vancouver area from October 2018 to January 2020. A convenience subsample underwent confirmatory testing with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, or quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. RESULTS: Of 159 samples with both point-of-care and confirmatory results, 24 (15.1%) contained at least one NPS benzodiazepine, including etizolam (n = 18), flubromazolam (n = 3), flualprazolam (4), and flubromazepam (n = 1). Of 114 confirmatory samples expected by participants on self-report to contain opioids, 18 (15.8%) contained some NPS benzodiazepine, with 16 (14.0%) containing both an NPS benzodiazepine and an opioid, always fentanyl. False positive and negative rates were 15.5% and 37.5% for test strips, and 3.9% and 91.7% for FTIR, respectively. Combined together, false positive and negative rates of point-of-care methods were 17.8% and 29.2%. CONCLUSIONS: NPS benzodiazepine adulteration in an unregulated drug supply sample reveals new risks compounding ongoing harms associated with the synthetic opioid epidemic. Given substantial false positive and false negative rates noted in our sample for point-of-care detection methods, cautious use of combined point-of-care methods, routinely paired with confirmatory drug checking may aid in early detection and monitoring of unregulated drug markets and inform targeted harm reduction strategies and health policy approaches.

Evaluation of a multisectoral intervention to mitigate the risk of severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission in long-term care facilities.

OBJECTIVE: A Canadian health authority implemented a multisectoral intervention designed to control severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission during long-term care facility (LTCF) outbreaks. The primary objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention 14 days after implementation. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental, segmented regression analysis. INTERVENTION: A series of outbreak measures classified into 4 categories: case and contact management, proactive case detection, rigorous infection control practices and resource prioritization and stewardship. METHODS: A mixed-effects segmented Poisson regression model was fitted to the incidence rate of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), calculated every 2 days, within each facility and case type (staff vs residents). For each facility, the outbreak time period was segmented into an early outbreak period (within 14 days of the intervention) and postintervention period (beyond 14 days following the intervention). Model outputs quantified COVID-19 incidence trend and rate changes between these 2 periods. A secondary model was constructed to identify effect modification by case type. RESULTS: The significant upward trend in COVID-19 incidence rate during the early outbreak period (rate ratio [RR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.11; P < .001) reversed during the postintervention period (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.67-0.80; P < .001). The average trend did not differ by case type during the early outbreak period (P > .05) or the postintervention period (P > .05). However, staff had a 70% larger decrease in the average rate of COVID-19 during the postintervention period than residents (RR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.10-0.88; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides evidence for the effectiveness of this intervention to reduce the transmission of COVID-19 in LTCFs. This intervention can be adapted and utilized by other jurisdictions to protect the vulnerable individuals in LTCFs.

Serological survey following SARS-COV-2 outbreaks at long-term care facilities in metro Vancouver, British Columbia: Implications for outbreak management and infection control policies.

A cross-sectional serological survey was carried out in two long-term care facilities that experienced COVID-19 outbreaks in order to evaluate current clinical COVID-19 case definitions. Among individuals with a negative or no previous COVID-19 diagnostic test, myalgias, headache, and loss of appetite were associated with serological reactivity. The US CDC probable case definition was also associated with seropositivity. Public health and infection control practitioners should consider these findings for case exclusion in outbreak settings.

Environmental detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) from medical equipment in long-term care facilities undergoing COVID-19 outbreaks.

Environmental sampling was conducted at long-term care facilities to determine the extent of surface contamination with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 virus. Medical equipment used throughout the facility was determined to be contaminated.

Detection of synthetic cannabinoid adulteration in the unregulated drug supply in three Canadian settings.

INTRODUCTION: Novel psychoactive substances (NPS) are increasingly being consumed worldwide, with synthetic cannabinoids and synthetic opioids being the second and third most commonly used NPS, respectively. Certain synthetic cannabinoids can produce significant harms, particularly when used with opioids. The objective of this study was to characterise the presence of synthetic cannabinoids in the unregulated drug supply in three Canadian settings METHODS: In the British Columbia setting, all samples were first analysed at point-of-care using combination Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and fentanyl immunoassay strips prior to confirmatory testing using quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) and/or liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS). In the Toronto, Ontario setting, the samples were analysed directly by GC/MS, LC/MS liquid chromatography-high resolution/mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Between January 2018 and December 2019, 38 (2.8%) synthetic cannabinoid samples were detected in the unregulated drug supply (25/909 in British Columbia and 13/440 in Ontario). In British Columbia and Ontario, 76% and 85% of samples, respectively, were expected by individuals to be an opioid. Synthetic cannabinoids detected included AMB-FUBINACA, AB-FUBINACA, 5-fluoro-MDMB-PINACA, and 5-fluoro-MDMB-PICA, and largely co-occurred with fentanyl. In the British Columbia context, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy failed to detect synthetic cannabinoid compounds in almost half (48%) of the samples at point-of-care. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: As point-of-care technologies failed to detect these compounds in many occasions, our findings demonstrate the importance of laboratory confirmatory analysis to identify NPS. Given the high risk of harm associated with the consumption of synthetic cannabinoids, further research should investigate the reasons for adulteration.

Drug checking identifies counterfeit alprazolam tablets.

BACKGROUND: Non-prescribed benzodiazepine use is increasing in North America, especially among youth. Owing to increasing demand, counterfeit benzodiazepine tablets are mass-produced in clandestine, unregulated environments and sold as legitimate pharmaceuticals. This study aimed to examine the contents of counterfeit alprazolam tablets available in the unregulated drug market in British Columbia, Canada. METHODS: Data were collected from an ongoing evaluation of a community drug checking service in British Columbia between October 2017 and March 2020. The service operates point-of-care in harm reduction sites using Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometers coupled with fentanyl and benzodiazepine immunoassay strips. A subset of samples were sent for confirmatory analysis at partner laboratories and underwent one or more of gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry, and quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance analysis. RESULTS: During the study period, 10,814 total samples were submitted for drug checking, 139 of which were expected to be Xanax (alprazolam) or generic tablets and met the criteria for inclusion. Using FTIR analysis, 33 (23.7 %) samples were identified to contain alprazolam. Only 122 samples were checked using benzodiazepine immunoassay strips and 88 (72.1 %) tested positive. Qualitative results from the 20 samples submitted for confirmatory analysis included various new psychoactive substances and only 2 contained only alprazolam. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide evidence that Xanax tablets obtained from the unregulated drug market are likely to be counterfeit and may not contain alprazolam. Drug checking offers people who use drugs a valuable means to determine the contents of their substances; however, limitations of point-of-care technologies must be considered.

Factors associated with drug checking service utilization among people who use drugs in a Canadian setting.

BACKGROUND: The United States and Canada are amidst an opioid overdose crisis, with the Canadian province of British Columbia (BC) among the hardest hit. In response, drug checking services (DCS) have been introduced in this setting as a novel pilot harm reduction intervention though little is known about usage rates. Therefore, we sought to identify factors associated with drug checking uptake among people who use drugs (PWUD) in Vancouver, BC. METHODS: Data were derived from three ongoing prospective cohort studies of PWUD in Vancouver between June and November 2018. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with self-reported DCS utilization in the past 6 months among participants at high risk of fentanyl exposure (i.e., those self-reporting illicit opioid use or testing positive for fentanyl via urine drug screen). RESULTS: Among 828 eligible participants, including 451 (55%) males, 176 (21%) reported recent use of DCS. In multivariable analyses, factors significantly associated with DCS utilization included: homelessness (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] 1.47; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.01-2.13) and involvement in drug dealing (AOR 1.59; 95% CI 1.05-2.39). CONCLUSIONS: In our sample of PWUD, uptake of DCS was low, although those who were homeless, a sub-population known to be at a heightened risk of overdose, were more likely to use the services. Those involved in drug dealing were also more likely to use the services, which may imply potential for improving drug market safety. Further evaluation of drug checking is warranted.