RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Few studies have systematically explored the factors influencing the difficulty of hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy. To investigate the relationship between the difficulty of hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy and postoperative complications of the donor as well as the recipient, and then build a model for predicting the difficulty of surgery. METHODS: In this study, 60 patients who underwent hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy by the same surgeon from September 2022 to March 2024 were included as the modeling group. 20 patients operated on by another surgeon served as the external validation group. The subjective score (1-3 points) of surgical difficulty was used as the quantitative index of surgical difficulty. Pearson and Spearman correlation tests were used to explore the correlation between preoperative data and surgical difficulty scores of kidney donors, and finally built a prediction model through multiple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: With the increase in the difficulty of operation, both donors and recipients' complications were increased. Linear regression analysis showed that only the number of renal arteries, visceral fat thickness and MAP score were independent risk factors for the difficulty of hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy. The prediction equation is as follows: Difficulty score = 0.584*Number of renal arteries + 0.731*MAP score + 0.110*visceral fat thickness. CONCLUSIONS: Donors with higher surgical difficulty are more likely to have serious complications after surgery as well as the recipient. We also established a reliable prediction model for the difficulty of hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscópía Mano-Asistida , Donadores Vivos , Nefrectomía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Nefrectomía/métodos , Nefrectomía/efectos adversos , Laparoscópía Mano-Asistida/métodos , Laparoscópía Mano-Asistida/efectos adversos , Femenino , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Recolección de Tejidos y Órganos/efectos adversos , Recolección de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To compare the efficiency and safety between retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy and traditional open nephrectomy to treat autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease before kidney transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 57 patients diagnosed with huge autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease between 2000 and 2020 at our center were included in this study. Patients were divided into a retroperitoneal laparoscopic (RL; n=23) group and traditional open (TO; n = 34) group. We retrospectively analyzed and compared preoperative and perioperative variables between the two groups. RESULTS: Patients in the RL group showed a longer operation time (201.09±83.76min) compared to patients in the TO group (113.38 ± 51.84min, p < 0.001). The RL group also showed significantly less intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.025) and less intraoperative blood transfusion volume (p = 0.016) compared to the TO group. Meanwhile, time of gastrointestinal function recovery, bed leave, catheter indwelling and postoperative hospitalization in the RL group were 2.13 ± 0.63, 1.30 ± 1.0, 5.22 ± 2.09, 7.35±2.48 days, respectively, which were significantly shorter than the TO group (p < 0.05). Pain degree of patients during the first 48 hours after operation was similar between the RL and TO groups, but the opioid use percentage in the RL group was 8.70% (2/23) and was lower than the 26.47% (9/34) in the TO group (p = 0.022). Meanwhile, 5 and 23 patients exhibited postoperative complications in the RL and TO groups, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Both retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy and traditional open surgery are feasible to treat huge polycystic nephrectomy. However, patients who undergo retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy experience higher levels of safety and recover more rapidly.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Laparoscopía , Enfermedades Renales Poliquísticas , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades Renales Poliquísticas/complicaciones , Enfermedades Renales Poliquísticas/cirugía , Nefrectomía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The high incidence of Gleason score upgrading (GSU) made urologists underestimate the disease, leading to the inaccurate therapeutic decision. The study aimed to explore relevant laboratory examination evidence associated with GSU. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with prostate carcinoma undergoing radical prostatectomy in our center between January 2015 and December 2019 were included in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into GSU and NGSU groups according to the occurrence of GSU. Medical records were reviewed and analyzed between groups. RESULTS: A total of 130 patients were enrolled, including 52 patients diagnosed with GS = 6 (20 NGSU and 32 GSU) and 78 patients with GS = 7 (36 NGSU and 42 GSU). No significant differences in demographic characteristics were found between groups. An increased neutrophil count (OR = 1.326, 95% CI = 1.005-1.748) and a decreased percentage of lymphocytes (OR = 0.951, 95% CI = 0.904-1) were associated with GSU in the GS = 6 group, whereas a high HDL level (OR = 7.735, 95% CI = 0.998-59.957) was associated with GSU in GS = 7 group. Preoperative high neutrophile count and low lymphocyte percentage were correlated with GSU in patients with low-grade prostate cancer. In contrast, high HDL level was associated with GSU in patients with high-grade prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS: These laboratory examination data could provide urologists with information before making a therapeutic protocol.