Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Peritoneal Metastasis-Only Colorectal Cancer Treated with First-Line Bevacizumab and FOLFIRI Through Irinotecan Dose Escalation According to UGT1A1 Polymorphism: Compared to Liver Metastasis-Only, and Lung Metastasis-Only.

Background: The prognosis of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) depends on the metastatic site and systemic therapy regimen. Peritoneal metastases are associated with a relatively unfavorable prognosis among patients with mCRC. In this article, we present the treatment outcomes of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC)-only, liver metastasis (LiM)-only, and lung metastasis (LuM)-only CRC. Methods: Overall, 206 mCRC patients with single-site metastasis and who had received treatment from January 2014 to December 2018 were recruited. Among 206 patients with mCRC, 15 had PC-only mCRC, 145 had LiM-only mCRC, and 46 had LuM-only mCRC. They attended regular follow-ups until November 2020, and the median follow-up period was 24.7 months (5.1-41.3 months). Patients' characteristics, including clinical data, gene mutation profiles, and clinical outcomes, were evaluated. All patients with PC-only CRC were treated with first-line bevacizumab and FOLFIRI, and the irinotecan dose escalation depended on UGT1A1 polymorphism. Results: Of the 206 patients, no statistical difference was observed between the PC-only, LiM-only, and LuM-only groups in terms of age, primary tumor location, RAS mutation status, BRAF mutation status, and epidermal growth factor receptor overexpression (all P > 0.05). Patients with PC-only CRC had a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 18.0 months and a median overall survival (mOS) of 24.6 months. Patients with LiM-only or LuM-only CRC had mPFS of 18.2 and 26.6 months and mOS of 25.0 and 44.5 months, respectively. No significant differences regarding PFS and OS (both P > 0.05) between the three groups of patients with mCRC were observed. Conclusion: Our study revealed that in patients with PC-only mCRC treatment of first-line bevacizumab and FOLFIRI through irinotecan dose escalation according to UGT1A1 polymorphism could confer such patients with comparable outcomes to that of patients with LiM-only and LuM-only mCRC.

Surgical Efficacy and Safety of Patients with Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer following Neoadjuvant Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy and Chemotherapy.

Background: The safety and efficacy of gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) following neoadjuvant therapy have gained increasing attention. In this article, we present our preliminary treatment results and compare the surgical safety and outcomes of neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with those of chemotherapy in patients with LAGC. Patients and Methods. Sixty-three patients with a diagnosis of LAGC (clinical staging cT3N2+, cT4aN+, or cT4b) who had received neoadjuvant therapy at any period from January 2014 to December 2020 were enrolled. Among 63 patients who received neoadjuvant therapy, 38 were treated with CCRT and 25 were treated with chemotherapy. They regularly received follow-up until July 2021. The patients' characteristics, including their clinical data, perioperative results, and pathologic outcomes, were analyzed. Results: The CCRT and chemotherapy groups did not significantly differ with respect to age, sex, or clinical stage (all p > 0.05). Finally, radical gastrectomy was performed in 15 (39.5%) patients with neoadjuvant CCRT and 10 (40.0%) patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Both groups did not significantly differ with respect to operation time, blood loss, operative morbidities, or postoperative length of stay (both p > 0.05). The patients in the CCRT group exhibited favorable pathologic responses after treatment: three patients exhibited a pathologic complete response (pCR) and four, seven, and one patients exhibited a response at pathologic stages I, II, and III, respectively. By contrast, among the patients in the chemotherapy group after treatment, one patient exhibited a pCR and one, four, and four patients exhibited a response at pathologic stages I, II, and III, respectively. Conclusions: Radical resection in patients with LAGC is challenging. This study reports that neoadjuvant CCRT is associated with better pathologic response with no increase in serious postoperative complications. However, further prospective randomized trials involving patients with LAGC receiving neoadjuvant CCRT should be conducted to verify the findings of this retrospective study.

Low-Molecular-Weight Fucoidan as Complementary Therapy of Fluoropyrimidine-Based Chemotherapy in Colorectal Cancer.

This study investigated the roles of low-molecular-weight fucoidan (LMWF) in enhancing the anti-cancer effects of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. HCT116 and Caco-2 cells were treated with LMWF and 5-FU. Cell viability, cell cycle, apoptosis, and migration were analyzed in both cell types. Potential mechanisms underlying how LMWF enhances the anti-cancer effects of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy were also explored. The cell viability of HCT116 and Caco-2 cells was significantly reduced after treatment with a LMWF--5FU combination. In HCT116 cells, LMWF enhanced the suppressive effects of 5-FU on cell viability through the (1) induction of cell cycle arrest in the S phase and (2) late apoptosis mediated by the Jun-N-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling pathway. In Caco-2 cells, LMWF enhanced the suppressive effects of 5-FU on cell viability through both the c-mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET)/Kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS)/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and the c-MET/phosphatidyl-inositol 3-kinases (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT) signaling pathways. Moreover, LMWF enhanced the suppressive effects of 5-FU on tumor cell migration through the c-MET/matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 signaling pathway in both HCT116 and Caco-2 cells. Our results demonstrated that LMWF is a potential complementary therapy for enhancing the efficacies of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in colorectal cancers (CRCs) with the wild-type or mutated KRAS gene through different mechanisms. However, in vivo studies and in clinical trials are required in order to validate the results of the present study.

A Pilot Study of Silymarin as Supplementation to Reduce Toxicities in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated With First-Line FOLFIRI Plus Bevacizumab.

Irinotecan, a topoisomerase inhibitor, is a common cytotoxic agent prescribed for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Diarrhea is the most common adverse event (AE). The underlying mechanism of irinotecan-induced diarrhea is intestinal mucosal damage caused by SN-38 (active metabolite of irinotecan) hydrolyzed from SN-38G (inactive metabolite) by bacterial -glucuronidase (G). According to an animal study, silymarin reduces the activity of bacterial G without impairing antitumor efficacy. We conducted a prospective open-label pilot study to evaluate the effect of silymarin as supplementation in reducing toxicities of mCRC patients undergoing irinotecan-based chemotherapy. We enrolled and randomized 70 mCRC patients receiving first-line FOLFIRI (5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/irinotecan) plus bevacizumab. In each treatment cycle, the study group was administered silymarin capsules (150 mg) three times daily for 7 days. The study group experienced less AEs in diarrhea (5.7% vs. 14.6%, p=0.002) and nausea (27.0% vs. 40.2%, p=0.005) in comparison with the control group, but no significant differences in hepatic toxicities were observed. In conclusion, simultaneous administration of silymarin is a potential effective supplementation for reducing toxicities in mCRC patients undergoing first-line FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab, especially in diarrhea and nausea.

UGT1A1 Polymorphism for Irinotecan Dose Escalation in Patients with BRAF-Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with First-Line Bevacizumab and FOLFIRI.

BACKGROUND: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and BRAF V600E mutation have a poor prognosis, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of only 5-7 months after initial therapy. The current standard first-line chemotherapy for these patients includes FOLFOX or FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab. In this study, we explored the effects and oncological outcomes of UGT1A1 polymorphism for irinotecan escalation in patients with BRAF-mutated mCRC. Patients and Methods. This retrospective study included 17 patients with BRAF-mutated mCRC between April 2016 and December 2019. UGT1A1 genotyping was performed on all patients prior to initiating bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was PFS, and the secondary endpoints were toxicity, response rate, disease control rate, and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Fifteen and two patients had UGT1A1 1∗/1∗ and 1∗/28∗, respectively. Eight underwent irinotecan dose escalation with tolerable adverse effects (AEs), and nine maintained an irinotecan dose of 180 mg/m2 or required deescalation to 150 mg/m2 due to intolerable AEs. After a median follow-up period of 15.7 (range, 3-54) months, the median PFS and OS were 9.4 and 15.7 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 AEs were observed in three (6%) patients. The disease control and partial response rates were 64.7% and 11.8%, respectively, indicating that most patients (14, 82.3%) could maintain this as a first-line line therapy with stable disease or proceed to second-line therapy if disease progression occurred, thereby maintaining acceptable performance status. CONCLUSIONS: The oncological outcomes of patients with BRAF-mutated mCRC treated using FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab with irinotecan dose escalation as a first-line therapy are acceptable with tolerable AEs; this may be a feasible treatment option in such patients. Pretherapeutic UGT1A1 genotyping-guided dose adjustment can achieve favorable outcomes.

Feasibility of robot-assisted surgery in elderly patients with rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although surgical resection is the main treatment for rectal cancer, the optimal surgical protocol for elderly patients with rectal cancer remains controversial. This study evaluated the feasibility of robot-assisted surgery in elderly patients with rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 156 patients aged 28-93 years diagnosed with Stage I-III rectal cancer, who underwent robot-assisted surgery between May 2013 and December 2018 at a single institution. RESULTS: In total, 156 patients with rectal cancer, including 126 non-elderly (aged < 70 years) and 30 elderly (aged ≥70 years) patients, who underwent robot-assisted surgery were recruited. Between the patient groups, the post-operative length of hospital stay did not differ statistically significantly (P = 0.084). The incidence of overall post-operative complications was statistically significantly lower in the elderly group (P = 0.002). The disease-free and overall survival did not differ statistically significantly between the two groups (P = 0.719 and 0.390, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted surgery for rectal cancer was well tolerated by elderly patients, with similar results to the non-elderly patients. Oncological outcomes and survival did not depend on patient age, suggesting that robot-assisted surgery is a feasible surgical modality for treating operable rectal cancer and leads to age-independent post-operative outcomes in elderly patients.

Oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision after neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer.

AIMS: This study analyzed the oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision (TME) in patients with rectal cancer after neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). METHODS: We enrolled 109 consecutive patients with stage II-III rectal cancer who underwent robotic-assisted TME after neoadjuvant CCRT at one hospital between July 2013 and June 2018. RESULTS: All 109 patients underwent preoperative CCRT. Of them, 37 (33.9%) achieved a pathologic complete response, and 29 (26.6%) experienced relapse, with local recurrence in 9 (8.3%) and distant metastasis in 20 (18.3%). R0 resection was performed in 104 (95.7%) patients; however, 7 (6.7%) of them developed local recurrence and 17 (16.3%) developed distant metastasis. Over a median follow-up of 42 months, the 3-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 73.4% and 87.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic-assisted TME after neoadjuvant CCRT is safe and effective for treating patients with stage II-III rectal cancer in one institution with acceptable short-term oncological outcomes. It may be a therapeutic alternative to salvage surgery for T4 tumors invading adjacent organs, such as the bladder, prostate, and uterus.

Prognostic Value of EGFR Expression for Patients With Stage III Colorectal Cancer Receiving Fluoropyrimidine Metronomic Maintenance Therapy After Radical Resection and Adjuvant Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy.

This study evaluated the survival effects of metronomic maintenance therapy with oral fluoropyrimidine in patients with stage III colorectal cancer (CRC) according to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression. We enrolled 197 patients with stage III CRC who had undergone radical resection and FOLFOX regimen adjuvant chemotherapy. The clinicopathological features and effects of metronomic maintenance therapy with oral capecitabine (daily dose of 850 mg/m², twice daily, on days 114 every 3 weeks for 6 months) on survival according to treatment group and EGFR expression were analyzed. By conducting an in vitro cell line study and in vivo study through knockout of the EGFR gene, we analyzed the capacities of cell proliferation and migration. Relapse and survival were significantly more common in the FOLFOX group. Metronomic maintenance therapy was a significantly independent associated factor of relapse and survival as well as a prognostic factor of disease-free survival and overall survival. Significant intergroup differences in survival were only observed in patients with positive EGFR expression. Thus, our findings suggest EGFR expression is a prognostic factor in patients with stage III CRC receiving metronomic maintenance therapy. Analysis of EGFR expression in these patients helps identify potential candidates who may receive the optimal survival benefit from metronomic maintenance therapy.

Supplemental home parenteral nutrition improved nutrition status with comparable quality of life in malnourished unresectable/metastatic gastric cancer receiving salvage chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Even with significant advances in surgical techniques and treatment, salvage chemotherapy remains the major treatment strategy for patients with unresectable or metastatic gastric cancer (GC). Practical and technical advances have simplified safe and convenient use of supplemental home parenteral nutrition (HPN). We aimed to clarify the role of HPN in patients with incurable GC undergoing salvage chemotherapy. METHODS: We enrolled 25 patients with GC with a nutritional risk index (NRI) of ≦ 97.5 undergoing HPN. Their nutritional status, laboratory data, and quality of life (QoL) were analyzed using the Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire-C30 before and after HPN administration at 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 months. We enrolled 25 patients with an NRI of > 97.5 not undergoing HPN as the control group. RESULTS: Total protein (P = 0.008), prealbumin (P < 0.001), and total cholesterol (P = 0.023) levels improved significantly after 0.5 months of HPN administration. The study group also demonstrated a marked improvement in nitrogen balance (P = 0.004) and prealbumin levels (P < 0.012) after 1 month. Gains in body weight after 1 month and body mass index after 2 months of HPN administration remained comparable with those of the control group. Global QoL scores were maintained and comparable with those of the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Supplemental HPN therapy for malnourished patients with unresectable or metastatic GC undergoing salvage chemotherapy is feasible and revealed marked improvement in nutritional status. Early HPN intervention should be considered an important part of palliative treatment for advanced GC.

Taiwan Society of Colon and Rectum Surgeons (TSCRS) Consensus for Anti-Inflammatory Nutritional Intervention in Colorectal Cancer.

Malnutrition and systemic inflammatory response (SIR) frequently occur in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and are associated with poor prognosis. Anti-inflammatory nutritional intervention is not only a way to restore the malnourished status but also modulate SIR. Nine experts, including colorectal surgeons, physicians and dieticians from 5 hospitals geographically distributed in Taiwan, attended the consensus meeting in Taiwan Society of Colon and Rectum Surgeons for a 3-round discussion and achieved the consensus based on a systematic literature review of clinical studies and published guidelines. The consensus recommends that assessment of nutritional risk and SIR should be performed before and after CRC treatment and appropriate nutritional and/or anti-inflammatory intervention should be adapted and provided accordingly.

Outcomes of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by radical resection for T4 colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with clinical T4 colorectal cancer (CRC) have a poor prognosis because of compromised surgical margins. Neoadjuvant therapy may be effective in downstaging tumors, thereby rendering possible radical resection with clear margins. AIM: To evaluate tumor downsizing and resection with clear margins in T4 CRC patients undergoing neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. METHODS: This study retrospectively included 86 eligible patients with clinical T4 CRC who underwent neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by radical resection. Neoadjuvant therapy consisted of radiation therapy at a dose of 45-50.4 Gy and chemotherapy agents, either FOLFOX or capecitabine. A circumferential resection margin (CRM) of < 1 mm was considered to be a positive margin. We defined pathological complete response (pCR) as the absence of any malignant cells in a specimen, including the primary tumor and lymph nodes. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify independent predictive factors for pCR. RESULTS: For 86 patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery, the rate of pCR was 14%, and the R0 resection rate was 91.9%. Of the 61 patients with rectal cancer, 7 (11.5%) achieved pCR and 5 (8.2%) had positive CRMs. Of the 25 patients with colon cancer, 5 (20%) achieved pCR and 2 (8%) had positive CRMs. We observed that the FOLFOX regimen was an independent predictor of pCR (P = 0.046). After a median follow-up of 47 mo, the estimated 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 70.8% and 61.4%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that a tumor with a negative resection margin was associated with improved DFS (P = 0.014) and OS (P = 0.001). Patients who achieved pCR exhibited longer DFS (P = 0.042) and OS (P = 0.003) than those who did not. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy engenders favorable pCR and R0 resection rates among patients with T4 CRC. The R0 resection rate and pCR are independent prognostic factors for patients with T4 CRC.

Impact of previous abdominal surgery on robotic-assisted rectal surgery in patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score matching study.

BACKGROUND: The application of minimally invasive surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and a history of previous abdominal surgery (PAS) remains controversial. This retrospective study with propensity score matching (PSM) investigated the impact of PAS on robotic-assisted rectal surgery outcomes in patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). METHODS: In total, 203 patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent preoperative CCRT and robotic-assisted rectal surgery between May 2013 and December 2019 were enrolled. Patients were categorized into PAS and non-PAS groups based on the PAS history. The PSM caliper matching method with 1-to-3 matches was used to match PAS patients with non-PAS. RESULTS: Of the 203 enrolled patients, 35 were PAS patients and 168 were non-PAS patients. After PSM, 32 PAS patients and 96 non-PAS patients were included for analysis. No significant between-group differences were noted in the perioperative outcomes, including median console time (165 min (PAS) vs. 175 min (non-PAS), P = 0.4542) and median operation time (275 min (PAS) vs. 290 min (non-PAS), P = 0.5943) after PSM. Postoperative recovery and overall complication rates were also similar (all P > 0.05). Moreover, the between-group differences in pathological or short-term oncological outcomes were also nonsignificant (all P > 0.05). No 30-day postoperative deaths were observed in either group. CONCLUSION: The current results indicate that robotic-assisted surgery is safe and feasible for PAS patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing preoperative CCRT. However, future prospective randomized clinical trials are required to verify these findings.

Extended-Release Dinalbuphine Sebacate Versus Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia with Fentanyl for Postoperative Moderate-to-Severe Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Post-operative pain control remains unsatisfactory in patients after laparotomy. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and quality of life with a single dose of extended-release dinalbuphine sebacate (ERDS) pre-operatively to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with fentanyl in patients undergoing laparotomy. METHODS: This was a prospective, open-label, randomized controlled study. Of 110 randomized patients, 107 completed all assessments. The area under the curve (AUC) of visual analogue scale (VAS) from baseline to 48 h after surgery, VAS throughout 7 days after surgery, post-operative analgesics use, quality of life, satisfaction, and safety were evaluated. RESULTS: The AUC of VAS from baseline to 48 h after surgery were 118.6 [97.5% confidence interval (CI) 95.6-141.6] in ERDS group and 176.13 (97.5% CI 150.8-201.4) in PCA group, which showed the non-inferiority because the upper limit of the 97.5% CIs of ERDS group was lower than the lower limit of PCA group (P < 0.001), but also had superiority in favor of ERDS group (P < 0.001). ERDS group reported a significant reduction in VAS pain intensity at 4, 24, 32, 72, 120, and 144 h after surgery, and better quality of life (P < 0.05). The safety profile was comparable between ERDS and PCA groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing laparotomy, a single dose of dinalbuphine sebacate was superior to intravenous PCA with fentanyl on lower pain intensity and better quality of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03296488.

Observational Study Comparing Efficacy and Safety between Neoadjuvant Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy and Chemotherapy for Patients with Unresectable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Dismal outcomes in patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer (GC) highlight the need for effective systemic neoadjuvant treatment strategies to improve clinical results. Neoadjuvant multimodality strategies vary widely. This study compared the efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes of neoadjuvant CCRT and chemotherapy for such patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-five patients with histologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic GC following neoadjuvant CCRT or computed tomography (CT) were retrospectively enrolled between January 2010 and April 2019. Clinical outcomes included response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), and toxicity was compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Of the 65 patients, 18 (27.7%) were in the response group (2 patients with a complete response and 16 with a partial response) and 47 (72.3%) in the nonresponse group (29 patients with a stable disease and 18 with a progressive disease). Multivariate analysis revealed no independent response predictor between CCRT and chemotherapy groups (all P > 0.05). Furthermore, results revealed no statistical differences in toxicity between the two groups (all P > 0.05). With a follow-up median of 12 months (ranging 6-48 months), 12-month OS and PFS were 39.7% and 20.4% in the CCRT group and 30.3% and 13.2% in the chemotherapy group, respectively. The median OS and PFS were 14.0 months (95% CI 9.661-18.339) and 9.0 months (95% CI 6.805-11.195) in the CCRT group and 10.0 months (95% CI 6.523-13.477) and 8.0 months (95% CI 6.927-9.073) in the chemotherapy group, respectively. Both OS (P=0.011) and PFS (P=0.008) in patients with CCRT were significantly better than those in patients with chemotherapy alone. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant CCRT achieved more favorable OS and PFS than did neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, without significant increases of toxicity in patients. However, prospective randomized trials comparing treatment modalities are necessary to confirm the potential advantages of neoadjuvant CCRT.

ERCC overexpression associated with a poor response of cT4b colorectal cancer with FOLFOX-based neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) of the clinical tumor stage T4b (cT4b) refers to advanced tumors with direct invasion of adjacent structures and the tumors are considered unresectable. Despite advancements in aggressive surgery and combination chemotherapy, the prognosis of cT4b CRC remains poor. Optimizing the therapeutic sequence administered to patients with cT4b CRC to improve clinical outcomes is crucial. In the present study, patients with unresectable cT4b and nodal stage N1-2 CRC were investigated at a single institution. A total of 20 consecutive patients were treated with pre-operative concurrent chemoradiation by using 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) since February 2015 and were regularly followed up until March 2020. Due to their poor response to concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) with FOLFOX, the chemotherapy regimen was changed to irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFIRI) as the second-line neoadjuvant treatment. Genetic alterations, such as microsatellite instability (MSI), were documented, and the expression levels of excision repair cross-complementing group 1 (ERCC1) and ERCC2 were examined. Of the 20 patients, the tumors of 14 patients (70%) became resectable after FOLFIRI administration. The median duration between the last date of radiotherapy and surgery was 32.7 weeks (range, 10.1-59.3 weeks). Of note, 4 of the 14 patients with resectable tumors (28.6%) achieved a pathologic complete response. The median overall survival and progression-free survival were 27.5 months (range, 12-39 months) and 27.5 months (range, 8-39 months), respectively. The cancerous specimens of all of the patients (100%) exhibited ERCC2 overexpression and 18 specimens (90%) had ERCC1 overexpression. Only one tumor (5%) exhibited high MSI. The present study indicated that ERCC overexpression associated with the poor response of FOLFOX-based CCRT and FOLFIRI after FOLFOX-based CCRT failure may have a potential role in conversion to resectable tumors by neoadjuvant treatment in cT4b CRC. However, a further prospective study with more patients is required to improve the precision of the conclusions.

Effect of KRAS and NRAS mutations on the prognosis of patients with synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer presenting with liver-only and lung-only metastases.

It has been reported that 20-25% of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) have metastases at the time of diagnosis. Liver and lung are the most common metastatic sites. The aim of the present study was to investigate the association of KRAS and NRAS mutations with clinicopathological features and prognosis of patients with initial liver-metastasis only (LiM-only) or lung-metastasis only (LuM-only) metastatic CRC (mCRC). Overall, 166 patients with CRC with initial LiM-only (n=124) and LuM-only (n=42) were retrospectively analyzed from January 2014 to December 2017. The median follow-up time was 19.2 months (1.0-57.1 months). Patient characteristics at diagnosis were collected. Genomic DNA was isolated from frozen primary CRC tissues for targeting KRAS and NRAS. Patients with LuM-only were significantly older compared with those with LiM-only (65.5 vs. 61.5 years; P=0.05). There was no significant differences between the LiM-only and LuM-only groups in terms of sex, location of the primary tumor, serum carcinoembryonic antigen level, histological grade and RAS mutation status. KRAS mutations were detected in 43 (41.0%) patients with LiM-only and 13 (35.1%) patients with LuM-only. The overall survival time (OS) of LuM-only was more favorable compared with that of patients with LiM-only (44.5 vs. 24.7 months); however, there was no significant difference (P=0.095). The progression-free survival (PFS) and OS in the RAS wild-type group were significantly improved compared with the RAS mutant cohorts (P=0.004 and P=0.031, respectively) in the LiM-only group. In patients with stage IV CRC, those with synchronous LiM-only mCRC had a higher incidence of metastasis but a less favorable PFS and OS compared with patients with LuM-only. RAS mutation status exhibited a significant association with the survival outcome in patients with LiM-only mCRC.

Predictive Value of FOLFOX-Based Regimen, Long Interval, Hemoglobin Levels and Clinical Negative Nodal Status, and Postchemoradiotherapy CEA Levels for Pathological Complete Response in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy.

We aimed to identify predictors of a pathological complete response (pCR) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) following a multimodality therapy. We retrospectively reviewed 236 patients with LARC treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by radical resection from January 2011 to December 2017. Patients were administered CRT, which comprised radiotherapy and chemotherapy with an oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil- or fluoropyrimidine-based regimen. Clinical factors were correlated with treatment response. The multivariate logistic regression revealed that a negative nodal stage (odds ratio (OR) = 3.2, P=0.0135), a high hemoglobin level (>10 g/dL) during neoadjuvant CRT (OR = 3.067, P=0.0125), an oxaliplatin-containing neoadjuvant CRT (OR = 5.385, P=0.0044), a long interval (>8 weeks) between radiotherapy and surgery (OR = 1.135, P=0.0469), and a post-CRT CEA ≤2 ng/mL (OR = 2.891, P=0.0233) were the independent predictors of increased pCR rates. The prediction nomogram was developed according to the above independent variables. The concordance index was 0.74, and the calibration curve showed good agreement. In summary, negative nodal stages, high hemoglobin levels during treatment, oxaliplatin-containing neoadjuvant therapy, a long radiotherapy-surgery interval (>8 weeks), and post-CRT CEA levels ≤2 ng/mL were favorable predictors of a pCR. This prediction nomogram might be crucial for patients with LARC undergoing a multimodality therapy.

An observational study of patho-oncological outcomes of various surgical methods in total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a single center analysis.

BACKGROUND: Total mesorectal excision (TME) with or without neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the treatment for rectal cancer (RC). Recently, the use of conventional laparoscopic surgery (LS) or robotic-assisted surgery (RS) has been on a steady increase cases. However, various oncological outcomes from different surgical approaches are still under investigation. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study comprising 300 consecutive RC patients who underwent various techniques of TME (RS, n = 88; LS, n = 37; Open surgery, n = 175) at a single center of real world data to compare the pathological and oncological outcomes, with a median follow-up of 48 months. RESULTS: Upon multivariate analysis, histologic grade (P = 0.016), and stage (P < 0.001) were the independent factors of circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis determined RS, early pathologic stage, negative CRM involvement, and pathologic complete response to be significantly associated with better overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) (all P < 0.05). Multivariable analyses observed the surgical method (P = 0.037), histologic grade (P = 0.006), and CRM involvement (P = 0.043) were the independent factors of DFS, whereas histologic grade (P = 0.011) and pathologic stage (P = 0.022) were the independent prognostic variables of OS. CONCLUSIONS: This study determined that RS TME is feasible because it has less CRM involvement and better oncological outcomes than the alternatives have. The significant factors influencing CRM and prognosis depended on the histologic grade, tumor depth, and pre-operative CCRT. RS might be an acceptable option owing to the favorable oncological outcomes for patients with RC undergoing TME.

Smartband Use During Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Facilitates Inpatient Recuperation Following Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery.

Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is valuable in perioperative care for its ability to improve short-term surgical outcomes and facilitate patient recuperation after major surgery. Early postoperative mobilization is a vital component of the integrated care pathway and is a factor strongly associated with successful outcomes. However, early mobilization still has various definitions and lacks specific strategies. Methods: Patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer followed our perioperative ERAS program, including mobilization from the first postoperative day. After perioperative care skills were improved in our well-established program, compliance, inpatient surgical outcomes, and complications associated with adding smartband use were evaluated and compared with the outcomes for standard protocol. Quality of recovery was evaluated using patient-rated QoR-40 questionnaires the day before surgery, on postoperative days 1 and 3, and on the day of discharge. Results: Smartband use after minimally invasive colorectal surgery failed to increase compliance with early mobilization or reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications significantly compared with standard ERAS protocol. However, when smartbands were utilized, quality of recovery was optimized and patients returned to their preoperative status earlier, at postoperative day 3. The length of hospital stay, as defined by discharge criteria, and hospital stay of patients without complications was reduced by 1.1 and 0.9 days, respectively (P = 0.009 and 0.049, respectively). Conclusions: Smartbands enable enhanced communication between patients and surgical teams and strengthen self-management in patients undergoing minimally invasive colorectal resection surgery. Accelerated recovery to preoperative functional status can be facilitated by integrating smartbands into the process of early mobilization during ERAS.

Predictive Value of ERCC1, ERCC2, and XRCC Expression for Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant mFOLFOX-4 Chemotherapy.

The dismal outcome in patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer (GC) highlights the need for effective systemic neoadjuvant chemotherapy to improve clinical results. This study evaluated the correlation between the expression of three DNA repair genes, namely the excision repair cross-complementing group 1 (ERCC1), excision repair cross-complementing group 2 (ERCC2), and X-ray repair cross-complementing protein 1 (XRCC1) and the clinical outcome of patients with locally advanced or metastatic GC treated with mFOLFOX-4 neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Fifty-eight patients with histologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic GC following neoadjuvant mFOLFOX-4 chemotherapy were enrolled between January 2009 and January 2018. We analyzed clinicopathological features and ERCC1, ERCC2, and XRCC1 expression to identify potential predictors of clinical response. Among the 58 patients, 16 (27.6%) were categorized into the response group (partial response) and 42 into the nonresponse group (stable disease in 24 patients and progressive disease in 18 patients). A multivariate analysis showed that ERCC1 overexpression (P = 0.003), ERCC2 overexpression (P = 0.049), and either ERCC1 or ERCC2 overexpression (P = 0.002) were independent predictors of response following mFOLFOX-4 neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Additionally, ERCC1 and ERCC2 overexpression did not only predict the response but also progression-free survival (both P < 0.05) and overall survival (both P < 0.05). ERCC1 and ERCC2 overexpression are promising predictive biomarkers for patients with locally advanced or metastatic GC receiving neoadjuvant mFOLFOX-4 chemotherapy and the potential clinical implication is mandatory for further investigation.