Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Treatment With a Levonorgestrel 52-mg Intrauterine Device.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate heavy menstrual bleeding treatment outcomes with levonorgestrel 52-mg intrauterine device (IUD) use in participants without body mass index (BMI) or parity restrictions. METHODS: Investigators included participants aged 18-50 years with no pelvic or systemic pathology causing heavy menstrual bleeding at 29 U.S. centers in a prospective trial. Participants had up to three screening cycles with menstrual product collection for alkaline hematin blood-loss measurements. Investigators enrolled those with two menses with blood loss of 80 mL or more (values averaged for baseline blood loss), placed the IUD, and followed participants for up to six 28-day cycles. Participants collected any menstrual products used during cycles 3 and 6 for blood-loss measurement. We evaluated outcomes in participants with at least one follow-up assessment for the primary outcome of median absolute blood-loss change and, secondarily, treatment success , defined as the proportion with a final measured blood loss less than 80 mL and at least 50% reduction from baseline. We evaluated exploratory outcomes of differences in blood-loss changes by BMI and parity using Wilcoxon rank sum test. RESULTS: Of 105 enrolled participants, 47 (44.8%) had obesity (BMI 30.0 or higher) and 29 (27.6%) were nulliparous. Baseline mean blood loss ranged from 73 to 520 mL (median 143 mL, interquartile range 112-196 mL). Eighty-nine (84.8%) had at least one evaluable follow-up evaluation. Participants had median (interquartile range) absolute blood-loss decreases at cycles 3 (n=86) and 6 (n=81) of 93.3% (86.1-97.7%) and 97.6% (90.4-100%), respectively. At cycle 6, participants without obesity (n=43) and with obesity (n=38) had similar median [interquartile range] decreases (97.6% [91.8-100%] and 97.5% [90.3-100%], respectively; P =.89), with comparable findings for nulliparous (n=25) and parous (n=56) participants (97.0% [91.7-99.1%] and 98.1% [89.9-100%], respectively; P =.43). Treatment success occurred in 81.8% (95% CI 74.2-89.4%) of 99 participants, excluding those with no outcomes due to lost to follow-up or consent withdrawal, and did not vary by BMI or parity. The most common adverse events leading to discontinuation were bleeding or cramping (n=6 [5.7%]) and expulsion (n=5 [4.8%]). CONCLUSION: This levonorgestrel 52-mg IUD reduces blood loss by more than 90% over 6 months compared with baseline for most users with heavy menstrual bleeding. FUNDING SOURCE: Medicines360. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03642210.

Elagolix for Heavy Menstrual Bleeding in Women with Uterine Fibroids.

BACKGROUND: Uterine fibroids are hormone-responsive neoplasms that are associated with heavy menstrual bleeding. Elagolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist resulting in rapid, reversible suppression of ovarian sex hormones, may reduce fibroid-associated bleeding. METHODS: We conducted two identical, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 6-month phase 3 trials (Elaris Uterine Fibroids 1 and 2 [UF-1 and UF-2]) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of elagolix at a dose of 300 mg twice daily with hormonal "add-back" therapy (to replace reduced levels of endogenous hormones; in this case, estradiol, 1 mg, and norethindrone acetate, 0.5 mg, once daily) in women with fibroid-associated bleeding. An elagolix-alone group was included to assess the impact of add-back therapy on the hypoestrogenic effects of elagolix. The primary end point was menstrual blood loss of less than 80 ml during the final month of treatment and at least a 50% reduction in menstrual blood loss from baseline to the final month; missing data were imputed with the use of multiple imputation. RESULTS: A total of 412 women in UF-1 and 378 women in UF-2 underwent randomization, received elagolix or placebo, and were included in the analyses. Criteria for the primary end point were met in 68.5% of 206 women in UF-1 and in 76.5% of 189 women in UF-2 who received elagolix plus add-back therapy, as compared with 8.7% of 102 women and 10% of 94 women, respectively, who received placebo (P<0.001 for both trials). Among the women who received elagolix alone, the primary end point was met in 84.1% of 104 women in UF-1 and in 77% of 95 women in UF-2. Hot flushes (in both trials) and metrorrhagia (in UF-1) occurred significantly more commonly with elagolix plus add-back therapy than with placebo. Hypoestrogenic effects of elagolix, especially decreases in bone mineral density, were attenuated with add-back therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Elagolix with add-back therapy was effective in reducing heavy menstrual bleeding in women with uterine fibroids. (Funded by AbbVie; Elaris UF-1 and Elaris UF-2 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT02654054 and NCT02691494.).

Long-term safety of ospemifene (52-week extension) in the treatment of vulvar and vaginal atrophy in hysterectomized postmenopausal women.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the long-term safety of oral ospemifene, a non-estrogen tissue-selective estrogen agonist/antagonist, for the treatment of moderate to severe dyspareunia, a symptom of vulvar and vaginal atrophy (VVA) due to menopause. STUDY DESIGN: This multicenter, long-term, open-label, safety extension study was conducted in women without a uterus aged 40-80 years (N=301) who received oral ospemifene 60 mg/day for 52 weeks. Participants either continued their 60-mg/day ospemifene dose from the initial 12-week pivotal efficacy study or switched from blinded placebo or ospemifene 30 mg/day to open-label ospemifene 60 mg/day. The 52-week open-label extension period plus initial 12-week treatment period totaled up to 64 weeks of ospemifene exposure. A 4-week posttreatment follow-up ensued (68 weeks total). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Safety assessments included adverse events, laboratory studies, physical and gynecologic examination, vital signs, breast palpation, and mammography. RESULTS: Most treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) during the extension study were mild or moderate in severity. The most common TEAE related to study drug was hot flushes (10%; leading to discontinuation for 2% of patients). One serious TEAE, a non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction in a patient with pre-existing cardiac disease, was considered possibly related to study medication. One mild breast-related TEAE, considered unrelated to study drug, was ongoing at study completion. There were no instances of pelvic organ prolapse, incontinence, venous thromboembolism, fractures, breast cancers or death. No clinically significant adverse changes were observed in other safety parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Ospemifene is clinically safe and generally well tolerated in postmenopausal patients with dyspareunia, a symptom of VVA.

Efficacy and safety of oral tranexamic acid in women with heavy menstrual bleeding and fibroids.

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral, modified-release tranexamic acid in women with heavy menstrual bleeding and fibroids. MATERIALS & METHODS: This was a pooled analysis of two pivotal Phase III studies. Fibroids were evaluated by transvaginal ultrasonography. Menstrual blood loss (MBL) was measured via a validated alkaline hematin method. RESULTS: In women with and without fibroids, mean MBL was reduced compared with placebo across all treatment cycles (p < 0.001). Within the tranexamic acid group, more statistically significant (p < 0.001) reductions in MBL compared with placebo occurred in women with fibroids than in those without fibroids. Adverse events were similar between treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Tranexamic acid was well tolerated and reduced MBL in women with and without fibroids.

Hormone withdrawal-associated symptoms: comparison of oestradiol valerate/dienogest versus ethinylestradiol/norgestimate.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of oestradiol valerate/dienogest (E2V/DNG) versus ethinylestradiol/norgestimate (EE/NGM) on hormone-withdrawal associated symptoms (HWAS) in otherwise healthy women who had experienced at least one of these symptoms when using 21/7-day combined oral contraceptives (COCs). METHODS: This phase III, parallel-group study randomised 409 women aged 18 to 50 years to E2V/DNG or EE/NGM. The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline to cycle 6 in the average of the three highest visual analogue scale values for headache and/or pelvic pain during cycle days 22 to 28. RESULTS: In total, 395 were included in the full analysis set (E2V/DNG, n = 191; EE/NGM, n = 204). E2V/DNG reduced the symptoms of headache or pelvic pain during cycle days 22 to 28 from baseline to cycle 6 to a significantly greater extent than EE/NGM (mean decrease 43.6 vs. 35.5 mm; p = 0.0024). Both treatments were well tolerated with a similar proportion of women experiencing adverse events that were considered at least possibly related to treatment (35% E2V/DNG vs. 34% EE/NGM). CONCLUSIONS: E2V/DNG reduces the frequency and intensity of headache and pelvic pain to a greater extent than EE/NGM, and may be a good option for women susceptible to HWAS with conventional 21/7-day COCs.

Tranexamic acid increases hemoglobin and ferritin levels in women with heavy menstrual bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is the most common cause of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) in women. A novel, modified-release oral formulation of tranexamic acid (TA) designed to reduce gastrointestinal side effects was approved recently for treatment of HMB. We assessed improvements in objective laboratory measures of IDA in women with self-reported HMB who received long-term TA therapy. METHODS: Women enrolled in a long-term, open-label, multicenter study self-medicated with TA 3.9 g/day administered as 1.3 g orally up to three times daily for 5 days/menstrual cycle for 27 cycles. Oral iron therapy was required if serum hemoglobin (Hgb) levels decreased to <11 g/dL. RESULTS: A total of 723 women (mean age 38.3 years) were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Significant increases in mean serum Hgb and ferritin were observed throughout the study (p<0.01). Among 191 patients with low Hgb (<12 g/dL) at baseline, mean serum Hgb increased by ≥0.71 g/dL after the third cycle and all subsequent assessments (p<0.001). After 3 and 27 cycles, 34.1% and 45.7%, respectively, of patients with low Hgb at baseline shifted to within normal range, respectively. Among 233 patients with low ferritin (<10 ng/mL) at baseline, mean serum ferritin increased by >5.38 ng/mL after cycles 15 and 27. After 6 and 27 cycles, 35.2% and 58% of patients, respectively, with low ferritin levels at baseline shifted to within normal range. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term self-medication with this novel TA formulation improved Hgb and ferritin levels in women with self-reported HMB.

Long-term evaluation of safety and health-related quality of life in women with heavy menstrual bleeding treated with oral tranexamic acid.

AIMS: A multicenter, long-term, open-label study was conducted to assess the safety and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of an oral tranexamic acid (TA) formulation in women with cyclic heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). MATERIALS & METHODS: Following a screening menstrual cycle, women with a history of cyclic HMB initiated 27 cycles of treatment with TA 1.3 g administered three-times daily for up to 5 days per menstrual cycle (maximum of 15 doses). Safety was assessed by treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) monitoring, physical examinations, laboratory results, ophthalmologic examinations and electrocardiography. HRQoL was evaluated using both generic and HMB-specific instruments. RESULTS: Most of the TEAEs were mild to moderate in severity and were largely considered unrelated to study treatment. The most commonly reported TEAEs among women in the intent-to-treat population (n = 723) were headache, menstrual discomfort and back pain. Improvements in generic and disease-specific HRQoL measures were evident during the first treatment cycle and were maintained throughout the 15 cycles of measurement for most domains. CONCLUSION: Long-term TA treatment was well tolerated and improved measures of HRQoL in women with cyclic HMB.

A dose-response study of a novel, oral tranexamic formulation for heavy menstrual bleeding.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the efficacy and safety of 2 dosing regimens of a novel, oral tranexamic acid formulation (Lysteda; Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc, Parsippany, NJ) in women with cyclic heavy menstrual bleeding. STUDY DESIGN: This was a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group trial for 3 menstrual cycles (n = 304). Women with mean menstrual blood loss (MBL) of ≥ 80 mL/cycle were randomized to receive either 1.95 g/d or 3.9 g/d of tranexamic acid or placebo for up to 5 days of menstrual bleeding. Primary efficacy endpoints were mean MBL reduction from baseline, mean MBL reductions that were considered "meaningful" by subjects, and mean MBL reductions from baseline > 50 mL/cycle. Adverse events (AEs) were also assessed. RESULTS: Only the 3.9 g/d group met all 3 primary efficacy endpoints. AEs did not significantly differ among the 3 groups. There were no serious study-related AEs. CONCLUSION: The 3.9-g/d dose met all 3 primary efficacy endpoints, whereas the 1.95 g/d dose met 2 primary efficacy endpoints. Both doses were well tolerated.