Anesthesia and postpartum pain management for placenta accreta spectrum: The healthcare provider perspective.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the management and experiences of healthcare providers around anesthetic care in placenta accreta spectrum (PAS). METHODS: This descriptive survey study was carried out over a 6-week period between January and March 2023. Healthcare providers, both anesthesiologists and those involved in operative care for women with PAS, were invited to participate. Questions invited both quantitative and qualitative responses. Qualitative responses were analyzed using content analysis. RESULTS: In all, 171 healthcare providers responded to the survey, the majority of whom were working in tertiary PAS referral centers (153; 89%) and 116 (70%) had more than 10 years of clinical experience. There was variation in the preferred primary mode of anesthesia for PAS cases; 69 (42%) used neuraxial only, but 58 (35%) used a combined approach of neuraxial and general anesthesia, with only 12 (8%) preferring general anesthesia. Ninety-nine (61%) were offering a routine antenatal anesthesia consultation. Content analysis of qualitative data identified three main themes, which were "variation in approach to primary mode of anesthesia", "perspectives of patient preferences", and "importance of multidisciplinary team care". These findings led to the development of a decision aid provided as part of this paper, which may assist clinicians in counseling women on their options for care to come to an informed decision. CONCLUSIONS: Approach to anesthesia for PAS varied between healthcare providers. The final decision for anesthesia should take into consideration the clinical care needs as well as the preferences of the patient.

Anesthesia and postpartum pain management for placenta accreta spectrum: The patient perspective and recommendations for care.

OBJECTIVE: Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) is a high-risk complication of pregnancy, which often requires complex surgical intervention. There is limited literature on the patient experience during the perioperative period and postpartum pain management for PAS. Therefore, this study aims to explore the patient perspective of anesthesia care. METHODS: Ethical approval was granted by the hospital ethics committee (EC02.2023). This was a descriptive survey study, including women with a history of pregnancy complicated by PAS who were members of two patient advocacy groups. The survey, consisting of both open and closed questions, was performed over a 6-week period between January and March 2023. Content analysis was performed on qualitative data to identify themes, and recommendations for care are suggested. RESULTS: A total of 347 participants responded to the survey; 76% (n = 252) had a cesarean hysterectomy (n = 252), and general anesthesia was the most common primary mode of anesthesia (39%, n = 130). We identified two overarching themes: experiences of anesthesia and experience of postpartum pain management. Under experiences of anesthesia, three subthemes were identified, namely "communication with the anesthesiologist", "deferring to the expertise of the team", and "consequences of decision around the mode of anesthesia." Under postpartum pain management, two subthemes emerged: "support of specialist PAS team" and "poor pain management following PAS surgery". CONCLUSIONS: Women want to be involved in decisions around their care, but do not always understand the consequences of their decision-making, such as missing the birth of their child. An antenatal anesthesiology consultation is important to provide women with information, explore preferences, and develop a plan of care for the birth.

The evolution of the midwife in the obstetric high dependency unit.

BACKGROUND: This study involves two stand-alone tertiary level maternity hospitals with a combined average of 17,000 births per year, and with approximately 300 obstetric high dependency unit (OHDU) admissions annually. Many midwives feel that working in an OHDU does not constitute normal midwifery work and they have voiced concerns regarding their training in this setting. Midwives and nurses from different departments throughout the two hospitals are often asked to care for the OHDU patients. Co-location and expansion of a new OHDU, as well as a discussion around staffing, prompted this questionnaire. AIMS: The aim of this study was to formally assess midwives' and nurses' attitudes and confidence working in an OHDU. METHODS: After obtaining ethics committee approval, we conducted a survey and collected information on previous training in critical care, level of competence with HDU-related equipment and management of common HDU conditions. RESULTS: In total, 188 staff participated in the survey (38% response rate). The majority (n = 142, 76%) did not feel competent caring for critically ill patients despite almost 40% (n = 69) saying they had experience doing so. Nurses or dual trained midwives were more likely to state they felt competent caring for critically ill patients, with only 2 midwives feeling competent (2.2%) compared to 32 nurses or dual trained staff (34.4%), p < 0.01. One hundred forty-seven (78%) and 136 (72%) respondents felt confident managing major haemorrhage and sepsis respectively. One hundred sixty-nine (89%) respondents would be interested in further training. CONCLUSIONS: A greater proportion of nurses and dual trained midwives feel confident caring for ODHU patients. This survey suggests that a mixture of specialty-trained critical care nurses and midwives is required in order to provide a full complement of HDU care to both the antenatal and postnatal women.