Abnormal Liver Biopsies of Donor Grafts in Pediatric Liver Transplantation: How Do They Fare?

BACKGROUND Little is known about outcomes of pediatric patients transplanted using donor liver grafts with abnormal biopsy results. We assessed donor liver biopsy data to report characteristics and outcomes of abnormal livers transplanted in pediatric patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS We identified pediatric patients who received a liver transplant from a biopsied deceased donor between 2015 and 2022 using the national database UNOS Standard Transplant Analysis and Research files. Recipients were excluded if they received multi-organ transplants or were lost to follow-up. Livers with ≤5% macrosteatosis, no fibrosis, and no inflammation were classified as normal livers (NL). Allografts with >5% macrosteatosis, any fibrosis, or any inflammation were considered abnormal livers (AL). Donor and recipient demographic data and outcomes were examined. RESULTS Of the 3808 total pediatric liver transplants in the study period, there were 213 biopsied donor liver allografts transplanted into pediatric recipients. Of those, 114 were NL and 99 were AL. 35.4% (35/99) of the AL had >5% macrosteatosis with a mean of 7.6±11.4%, 64.6% (64/99) had any inflammation, and 18.2% (18/99) had any fibrosis. AL donors were significantly older than NL donors. AL recipients had higher PELD scores. There were no significant differences in length of stay, rejection rates and causes, or allograft survival between AL and NL. Multivariable analysis revealed that inflammation was independently associated with a significantly greater risk for graft failure. CONCLUSIONS Outcomes of abnormal livers are excellent. Inflammation was an independent risk factor for poor graft prognosis. Donor biopsies in pediatric liver transplantation can be a useful adjunct to assess outcomes.

A contemporary analysis of 20,086 deceased donor liver biopsies.

BACKGROUND: Pre-transplant deceased donor liver biopsy may impact decision making; however, interpretation of the results remains variable and depends on accepting center practice patterns. METHODS: In this cohort study, adult recipients from 04/01/2015-12/31/2020 were identified using the UNOS STARfile data. The deceased donor liver biopsies were stratified by risk based on degree of fibrosis, macrovesicular fat content, and level of portal infiltration (low-risk: no fibrosis, no portal infiltrates, and <30% macrosteatosis; moderate-risk: some fibrosis or mild infiltrates and <30% macrosteatosis; high-risk: most fibrosis, moderate/marked infiltrates, or ≥30% macrosteatosis). Graft utilization, donor risk profile, and recipient outcomes were compared across groups. RESULTS: Of the 51,094 donor livers available, 20,086 (39.3%) were biopsied, and 34,606 (67.7%) were transplanted. Of the transplanted livers, 14,908 (43.1%) were biopsied. The transplanted grafts had lower mean macrovesicular fat content (9.3% transplanted vs. 26.9% non-transplanted, P < 0.001) and less often had any degree of fibrosis (20.9% vs. 39.9%, P < 0.001) or portal infiltration (51.3% vs. 58.2%, P < 0.001) versus non-transplanted grafts. Post-transplant recipient LOS (14.2 days high-risk vs. 15.2 days low-risk, P = 0.170) and 1-year graft survival (90.5% vs. 91.7%, P = 0.137) did not differ significantly between high- versus low-risk groups. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates further revealed no differences in the 5-year graft survival across risk strata (P = 0.833). Of the 5178 grafts biopsied and turned down, PSM revealed 1338 (26.0%) were potentially useable based on biopsy results and donor characteristics. CONCLUSION: Carefully matched deceased donor livers with some fibrosis, inflammation, or steatosis ≥30% may be suitable for transplantation. Further study of this group of grafts may decrease turndowns of potentially useable organs.

Effect of donor HSD17B13 genotype on patient survival after liver transplant: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: Several genetic variants are associated with chronic liver disease. The role of these variants in outcomes after liver transplantation (LT) is uncertain. The aim of this study was to determine if donor genotype at risk-associated variants in PNPLA3 (rs738409 C>G, p.I148M) and HSD17B13 (rs72613567 T>TA; rs80182459, p.A192Lfs∗8) influences post-LT survival. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, data on 2346 adults who underwent first-time LT between January 1, 1999 and June 30, 2020 and who had donor DNA samples available at five large Transplant Immunology Laboratories in Texas, USA, were obtained from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS). Duplicates, patients with insufficient donor DNA for genotyping, those who were <18 years of age at the time of transplant, had had a previous transplant or had missing genotype data were excluded. The primary outcomes were patient and graft survival after LT. The association between donor genotype and post-LT survival was examined using Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. Findings: Median age of LT recipients was 57 [interquartile range (IQR), 50-62] years; 837 (35.7%) were women; 1362 (58.1%) White, 713 (30.4%) Hispanic, 182 (7.8%) Black/African-American. Median follow-up time was 3.95 years. Post-LT survival was not affected by donor PNPLA3 genotype but was significantly reduced among recipients of livers with two HSD17B13 loss-of-function (LoF) variants compared to those receiving livers with no HSD17B13 LoF alleles (unadjusted one-year survival: 82.6% vs 93.9%, P < 0.0001; five-year survival: 73.1% vs 82.9%, P = 0.0017; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.25; 95% CI, 1.61-3.15 after adjustment for recipient age, sex, and self-reported ethnicity). Excess mortality was restricted to those receiving steroid induction immunosuppression (crude 90-day post-LT mortality, 9.3% [95% CI, 1.9%-16.1%] vs 1.9% [95% CI, 0.9%-2.9%] in recipients of livers with two vs no HSD17B13 LoF alleles, P = 0.0012; age, sex, and ethnicity-adjusted HR, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.72-4.71, P < 0.0001). No reduction was seen among patients who did not receive steroid induction (90-day mortality 3.1% [95% CI, 0%-7.3%] vs 2% [95% CI, 0.9%-3.1%], P = 0.65; adjusted HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.66-2.08, P = 0.60). Interpretation: Donor HSD17B13 genotype adversely affects post-LT survival in patients receiving steroid induction. Additional studies are required to confirm this association. Funding: The National Institutes of Health and American Society of Transplant Surgeons Collaborative Scientist Grant.

The effect of an organ procurement organization surgeon on pediatric organ utilization.

INTRODUCTION: Organ procurement organizations (OPO) have started to employ transplant-trained surgeons dedicated to organ procurement with the aim to increase allograft utilization and enhance the use of procured organs. We investigated the effects of an OPO-employed surgeon on the procurement and utilization of organs from pediatric donors within the Southwestern Transplant Alliance OPO. METHODS: OPO data were obtained for all procurements that were performed between 2014 and 2019. The analysis was performed to see if the presence of an OPO donor surgeon impacted the utilization of pediatric livers. Donor and recipient demographic data were examined between allografts procured with the presence of an OPO surgeon (OPO-Present) and those without an OPO surgeon (OPO-Absent). A p-value of <.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Of 149 pediatric procurements, 91 included an OPO-donor surgeon. In procurements with OPO-Present, donors were younger (8.2 vs. 11.2, p < .05) and had longer distances to travel to the recipient center (334 vs. 175 miles p < .05), but had comparable cold ischemic times. In terms of organ share type, more OPO-Present livers were shared nationally and there was no difference in discard rate between OPO-Present and OPO-Absent procurements. Finally, OPO-Present livers were more likely to be transplanted to pediatric recipients compared to OPO-Absent (47.3% vs. 24.1% p < .05). CONCLUSION: The presence of an OPO surgeon has impacted organ utilization, leading to increased transplantation of pediatric livers in pediatric recipients, and has expanded the geographical share of pediatric livers.

From Patients to Providers: Assessing Impact of Normothermic Machine Perfusion on Liver Transplant Practices in the US.

BACKGROUND: Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) of livers allows for the expansion of the donor pool and minimization of posttransplant complications. Results to date have focused on both donor and recipient outcomes, but there remains potential for NMP to also impact transplant providers. STUDY DESIGN: Using United Network for Organ Sharing Standard Transplant Analysis file data, adult deceased donors who underwent transplantation between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2022, were identified. Transplanted livers were divided by preservation methods (static cold storage [SCS] and NMP) and case time (day-reperfusion 8 am to 6 pm ). Patient factors, transplant characteristics, and short-term outcomes were analyzed between Mahalanobis-metric-matched groups. RESULTS: NMP livers represented 742 (1.4%) of 52,132 transplants. NMP donors were more marginal with higher Donor Risk Index scores (1.78 ± 0.50 NMP vs 1.49 ± 0.38 SCS, p < 0.001) and donation after cardiac death frequency (36.9% vs 8.4%, p < 0.001). NMP recipients more often had model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) exception status (29.9% vs 23.4%, p < 0.001), lower laboratory MELD scores (20.7 ± 9.7 vs 24.3 ± 10.9, p < 0.001), and had been waitlisted longer (111.5 [21.0 to 307.0] vs 60.0 [9.0 to 245.0] days, p < 0.001). One-year graft survival (90.2% vs 91.6%, p = 0.505) was similar between groups, whereas length of stay was lower for NMP recipients (8.0 [6.0 to 14.0] vs 10.0 [6.0 to 16.0], p = 0.017) after adjusting for confounders. Notably, peak case volume occurred at 11 am with NMP livers (vs 9 pm with SCS). Overall, a higher proportion of transplants was performed during daytime hours with NMP (51.5% vs 43.0%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: NMP results in increased use of marginal allografts, which facilitated transplantation in lower laboratory MELD recipients who have been waitlisted longer and often have exception points. Importantly, NMP also appeared to shift peak caseloads from nighttime to daytime, which may have significant effects on the quality of life for the entire liver transplant team.

Impact of Portable Normothermic Machine Perfusion for Liver Transplantation From Adult Deceased Donors.

OBJECTIVE: To assess how liver allografts preserved using portable normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) compare against those that underwent ischemic cold storage (ICS) in the setting of donation after brain death (DBD) and donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver transplantation (LT). BACKGROUND: Compared with conventional ICS, NMP may offer more homeostatic preservation, permit physiological assessment of organ function, and provide opportunities for graft improvement/modification. We report a single-center US experience of liver NMP. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective analysis of collected data on 541 adult whole LTs from 469 DBD donors [NMP (n = 58) vs ICS (n = 411)] and 72 DCD donors [NMP (n = 52) vs ICS (n = 20)] between January 2016 and December 2022. RESULTS: In DBD LT, male sex [odds ratio (95% CI): 1.83 (1.08-3.09)] and >10% macrosteatosis of the donor liver [1.85 (1.10-3.10)] were statistically significant independent risk factors of early allograft dysfunction (EAD). Donor age >40 years and cold ischemia time >7 hours were independent risk factors of reperfusion syndrome (RPS). One-year, 3-year, and 5-year incidences of ischemic cholangiopathy (IC) did not differ significantly in DBD cases between the NMP and ICS cohorts. In DCD LT, NMP was an independent protective factor against EAD [0.11 (0.03-0.46)] and RPS [0.04 (0.01-0.25)]. The incidence of IC in the DCD cases at 1-year and 3-year time points was significantly lower in the NMP cohort (1.9% compared with 20% in the ICS group). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with conventional ICS, NMP can significantly reduce the incidence of EAD, RPS, and IC after DCD LT.

Normothermic machine perfusion for older transplant recipients.

INTRODUCTION: Elderly patients (≥65 years old) are increasingly undergoing liver transplantation and are more likely to be removed from the waitlist. Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) holds promise in expanding the number of livers available for transplant and improving outcomes for marginal donors and recipients. We aimed to determine the impact of NMP on outcomes in elderly recipients at our institution and nationally using the UNOS database. METHODS: The use of NMP on outcomes in elderly recipients was reviewed using both the UNOS/SRTR database (2016-2022) and institutional data (2018-2020). Characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared between the NMP and static cold (control) groups within both populations. RESULTS: Nationally, using the UNOS/SRTR database, we identified 165 elderly recipients from 28 centers who received a liver allograft undergoing NMP and 4270 that underwent traditional cold static storage. NMP donors were older (48.3 vs. 43.4 years, p < 0.01), had similar rates of steatosis (8.5% vs 8.5%, p = 0.58), were more likely to be from a DCD (41.8% vs 12.3%, p < 0.01), and had a higher donor risk index (DRI; 1.70 vs. 1.60, p < 0.02). NMP recipients had similar age but had a lower MELD score at transplant (17.9 vs. 20.7, p = 0.01). Despite increased marginality of the donor graft, NMP recipients had similar allograft survival and decreased length of stay, even after accounting for recipient characteristics including MELD. Institutional data showed that 10 elderly recipients underwent NMP and 68 underwent cold static storage. At our institution, NMP recipients had a similar length of stay, rates of complications, and readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: NMP may mitigate donor risk factors that are relative contraindications for transplantation in elderly liver recipients, increasing the donor pool. The application of NMP in older recipients should be considered.

American Society of Transplant Surgeons recommendations on best practices in donation after circulatory death organ procurement.

The American Society of Transplant Surgeons supports efforts to increase the number of organs that are critically needed for patients desperately awaiting transplantation. In the United States, transplantation using organs procured from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors has continued to increase in number. Despite these increases, substantial variability in the utilization and practices of DCD transplantation still exists. To improve DCD organ utilization, it is important to create a set of best practices for DCD recovery. The following recommendations aim to provide guidance on contemporary issues surrounding DCD organ procurement in the United States. A work group was composed of members of the American Society of Transplant Surgeon Scientific Studies Committee and the Thoracic Organ Transplantation Committee. The following topics were identified by the group either as controversial or lacking standardization: prewithdrawal preparation, definition of donor warm ischemia time, DCD surgical technique, combined thoracic and abdominal procurements, and normothermic regional perfusion. The proposed recommendations were classified on the basis of the grade of available evidence and the strength of the recommendation. This information should be valuable for transplant programs as well as for organ procurement organizations and donor hospitals as they develop robust DCD donor procurement protocols.

Delayed graft function in pediatric living donor kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric recipients of living donor kidneys have a low rate of delayed graft function (DGF). We examined the incidence, risk factors and outcomes of DGF in pediatric patients who received a living donor allograft. METHODS: The STARfile was queried to examine all pediatric patients transplanted with a living donor kidney between 2000 and 2020. Donor and recipient demographic data were examined, as were survival and outcomes. Recipients were stratified into DGF and no DGF groups. DGF was defined as the need for dialysis within the first week after transplant. RESULTS: 6480 pediatric patients received a living donor (LD) kidney transplant during the study period. 269 (4.2%) developed DGF post-transplant. Donors were similar in age, creatinine, and cold ischemia time. Recipients of kidneys with DGF were similar in age, sensitization status and HLA mismatch. Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) was the most common diagnosis in recipients with DGF, and allograft thrombosis was the most common cause of graft loss in this group. Small recipients (weight < 15 kg) were found to have a significantly higher rate of DGF. Length of stay doubled in recipients with DGF, and rejection rates were higher post-transplant. Recipients of LD kidneys who developed DGF had significantly worse 1 year allograft survival (67% vs. 98%, p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric living donor kidney transplant recipients who experience DGF have significantly poorer allograft survival. Optimizing the donor and recipient matching to avoid compounding risks may allow for better outcomes.

Use of DCD organs: Expanding the donor pool to increase pediatric transplantation.

The number of children being listed for transplant continues to be greater than the number of available organs. In fact, over the past decade, rates of liver and kidney transplants in pediatric transplantation are essentially unchanged (Am J Transplant. 2020;20:193 and Am J Transplant. 2020;20:20). The use of DCD donors offers a potential solution to organ scarcity; however, the use of DCD organs in pediatric transplantation remains a rare event. Pediatric transplants done using carefully chosen DCD donor organs have shown to have outcomes similar to those seen with the use of donation after brain death (DBD) donors. Herein, we review the literature to examine the utilization of DCD livers and kidneys, outcomes of these allografts, and assess if DCD organs are a viable method to increase organ availability in pediatric transplantation.

No Stone Left Unturned: Utilization of an Organ Procurement Organization Donor Surgeon at Procurement Reduces Discards of Marginal Liver Allografts.

BACKGROUND: The recent trend of organ procurement organizations (OPOs) employing independent surgeons for organ procurement has been developed with the goal of improving the supply of suitable organs for transplantation. We investigated the effects that the addition of an OPO-employed, organ-procurement specialist has on liver allograft discard rate, marginal organ utilization, and graft survival. METHODS: Organ Procurement and Transplant Network and OPO data were retrospectively studied between April 1, 2014' and July 31, 2019' within the Southwest Transplant Alliance donor service area. Liver procurements with an OPO-surgeon present (OPO-Present) were compared to those without the involvement of an OPO surgeon (OPO-Absent). Donor and recipient characteristics as well as outcomes were analyzed across groups using propensity score matching. RESULTS: In total 869 OPO-Present liver allografts had similar rates of discard (5.2%) compared to 771 OPO-Absent livers (5.8%). However, after adjusting for donor risk, OPO-Present livers had a lower propensity of discard compared to OPO-Absent (3.4% versus 7.6%, P < 0.05). OPO-Present livers were more likely to be shared nationally (11.0% versus 4.8%, P < 0.001). Outcome analysis showed allograft survival of OPO-Present livers at 5 y was comparable to OPO-Absent livers (79.5% versus 80%, P = 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of an OPO surgeon was associated with decreased liver allograft discard and increased utilization of marginal donor organs. The OPO surgeon's presence represents a potential strategy to increase organ utilization nationally.

Is there value in volume? An assessment of liver transplant practices in the United States since the inception of MELD.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation has increased in volume and provides substantial survival benefit. However, there remains a need for value-based assessment of this costly procedure. METHODS: Model for end stage liver disease era adult recipients were identified using United Network for Organ Sharing Standard Transplant Analysis file data (n = 75,988) and compared across time periods (period A: February 2002 to January 2007; B: February 2007 to January 2013; C: February 2013 to January 2019). Liver centers were divided into volume tertiles for each period (small, medium, large). Value for the index transplant episode was defined as percentage graft survival ≥1 year divided by mean posttransplant duration of stay. RESULTS: All centers increased value over time due to ubiquitous improvement in 1-year graft survival. However, large centers demonstrated the most significant value change (large +17% vs small +7.0%, P < .001) due to a -8.5% reduction in large centers duration of stay from period A to C, while small centers duration of stay remained unchanged (-0.1%). Large centers delivered higher value despite more complex care: older recipients (54.8 ± 10.3 vs 53.0 ± 11.4 years P < .001), fewer model for end stage liver disease exceptions (34.0% vs 38.2%, P < .001), higher rates of candidate portal vein thrombosis (10.1% vs 8.5%, P < .001) and prior abdominal surgery (43.4% vs 37.4%, P < .001), and more marginal donor utilization (donor risk index 1.45 ± 0.38 vs 1.36 ± 0.33, P < .001). Mahalanobis metric matching demonstrated that compared with small centers, large centers progressively shortened recipient duration of stay per transplant in each period (A: -0.36 days, P = .437; B: -2.14 days, P < .001; C: -2.49 days, P < .001). CONCLUSION: There is value in liver transplant volume. Adoption of value-based practices from large centers may allow optimization of health care delivery for this costly procedure.

Normothermic Machine Perfusion in pediatric liver transplantation: A survey of attitudes and barriers.

BACKGROUND: NMP provides a superior strategy for the assessment and preservation of marginal donor livers and has demonstrated increased utilization and enhances organ quality when used in adult liver transplantation. We aimed to evaluate the interest of incorporating the use of NMP in pediatric liver transplantation. METHODS: An anonymous online survey was distributed to pediatric transplant surgeons and hepatologists across the United States. Respondent demographic information, attitudes toward NMP in pediatric liver transplantation, and barriers to utilization were examined. RESULTS: Thirty-two providers (18 transplant surgeons and 14 hepatologists) completed the survey, yielding a response rate of 64%. Half (50%) of respondents indicated prior exposure to NMP. Overall, 96% of respondents believed there was benefit to using NMP in pediatric liver transplantation. DCD (68%) and post-cross-clamp (75%) grafts were the greatest opportunity for NMP use. A role in splitting livers ex vivo (71%) was also seen as a potential major opportunity. Cost was perceived as a barrier to implementation (36%), followed by institutional factors (32%). Cost tolerance was significantly greater in respondents residing in OPTN regions with greater than median wait times (63% vs. 11% in OPTN regions with greater vs. shorter wait times, p = .010). CONCLUSIONS: There is significant interest within the pediatric liver transplant community for NMP to expand the donor pool. Interest appears particularly strong in regions where wait times for suitable pediatric donors are prolonged.

Rescue of an asymptomatic arterial occlusion after kidney transplant.

Arterial injury leading to vascular occlusion is a rare complication of kidney transplantation that requires urgent intervention to salvage the kidney and prevent graft loss. Occasionally, the recipient iliac vessels may be injured, resulting in acute ischaemia of the lower extremity in addition to loss of blood flow to the kidney transplant. In the case presented here, a 58-year-old man with chronic kidney disease secondary to IgA nephropathy underwent pre-emptive deceased donor renal transplantation complicated by an external iliac artery (EIA) dissection proximal to the transplant anastomosis. However, as a result of retrograde blood flow from collateral vessels, perfusion of the kidney and right lower extremity was initially preserved and early diagnosis was made after post-transplant ultrasound. This report reviews the aetiology, clinical features and therapeutic options for arterial injuries post-transplant. This case also highlights the importance of post-transplant vigilance and the value of routine postoperative ultrasound imaging.

Outcomes of Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplantation Using Kidneys of Deceased Donors With Acute Kidney Injury.

Outcomes from simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLKT) when using kidneys from donors with acute kidney injury (AKI) have not been studied. We studied 5344 SLKTs between May 1, 2007, and December 31, 2019, by using Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network registry data supplemented with United Network for Organ Sharing-DonorNet data. Designating a donor as having AKI required by definition that the following criteria were met: (1) the donor's condition aligned with the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) international consensus guidelines and the terminal serum creatinine (Scr) level was ≥1.5 times the minimum Scr level for deceased donors before organ recovery and (2) the terminal Scr level was ≥1.5 mg/dL (a clinically meaningful and intuitive Scr threshold for defining AKI for transplant providers). The primary outcomes were liver transplant all-cause graft failure (ACGF; defined as graft failures and deaths) and kidney transplant death-censored graft failure (DCGF) at 1 year after transplant. The donors with AKI were young, had good organ quality, and had a short cold ischemia time. In the study cohort, 4482 donors had no AKI, whereas 862 had AKI (KDIGO AKI stages: 1, n = 521; 2, n = 202; and 3, n = 138). In the group with AKI and the group with no AKI, respectively, liver ACGF at 1 year (11.1% versus 12.9% [P = 0.13]; hazard ratio [HR], 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-1.49) and kidney DCGF at 1 year (4.6% versus 5.7% [P = 0.18]; HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.95-1.70) did not differ in the full multivariable Cox proportional hazard models. Selected kidneys from deceased donors with AKI can be considered for SLKT.