Atezolizumab Plus Chemotherapy With or Without Bevacizumab in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: Clinical and Biomarker Data From the Randomized Phase II IMbrave151 Trial.

PURPOSE: Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) harbor an immunosuppressed tumor microenvironment and respond poorly to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Bevacizumab (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor) plus chemotherapy can promote anticancer immunity, augmenting response to PD-L1 inhibition. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, proof-of-concept phase II study enrolled patients (n = 162) with previously untreated advanced BTC (IMbrave151; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04677504). Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive cycles of atezolizumab (1,200 mg) plus bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) or atezolizumab plus placebo once every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. All patients received cisplatin (25 mg/m2) plus gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2; cisplatin plus gemcitabine [CisGem]) on days 1 and 8 once every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles. Stratification of patients was by disease status, geographic region, and primary tumor location. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). No formal hypothesis testing was performed. Exploratory correlative biomarker analysis was undertaken using transcriptome analysis (n = 95) and mutation profiling (n = 102) on baseline tumor samples. RESULTS: Between February and September 2021, 162 patients were enrolled. Median PFS was 8.3 months in the bevacizumab arm and 7.9 months in the placebo arm (stratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.67 [95% CI, 0.46 to 0.95]). Median overall survival (OS) was 14.9 and 14.6 months in the bevacizumab and placebo arms, respectively (stratified HR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.64 to 1.47]). The incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse events was 74% in both arms. High VEGFA gene expression was associated with improved PFS (HR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.23 to 0.83]) in the bevacizumab arm versus placebo. CONCLUSION: In unselected patients with advanced BTC, adding bevacizumab to atezolizumab plus CisGem modestly improves PFS but not OS. High VEGFA gene expression may represent a predictive biomarker of benefit from atezolizumab/bevacizumab, warranting further investigation.

A Phase Ib/II Randomized Clinical Trial of Oleclumab with or without Durvalumab plus Chemotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma upregulates CD73, potentially contributing to immune surveillance evasion. Combining oleclumab (CD73 inhibitor) and durvalumab with chemotherapy may identify an effective treatment option. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We describe a multicenter phase Ib/II randomized clinical trial in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, untreated (cohort A) or previously received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy (cohort B; NCT03611556). During escalation, patients received oleclumab 1,500 or 3,000 mg, durvalumab 1,500 mg, and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP; cohort A; n = 14) or modified FOLFOX (cohort B; n = 11). During expansion, cohort A patients (n = 170) were randomized to GnP (arm A1), oleclumab [recommended phase II dose (RP2D)] with GnP (arm A2), or oleclumab (RP2D) with durvalumab plus GnP (arm A3). Primary objectives were safety (escalation) and objective response rate (expansion). Secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: During escalation, 1/11 patients from cohort B (oleclumab 3,000 mg) experienced two dose-limiting toxicities. Oleclumab's RP2D was 3,000 mg. During expansion, grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 67.7% (42/62) of patients in A1, 73.7% (28/38) in A2, and 77.1% (54/70) in A3. The objective response rate was 29.0%, 21.1%, and 32.9% in A1, A2, and A3, respectively (A1 vs. A3; P = 0.650). PFS [HR = 0.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.47, 1.11] and OS (HR = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.50-1.13) were similar for A3 versus A1. Patients with high CD73 expression had improved PFS and OS in A3 versus A1, although this should be interpreted with caution. CONCLUSIONS: Although the safety profile was acceptable, this study did not meet its primary efficacy endpoint.

A plain language summary of the results from the phase 2b HERIZON-BTC-01 study of zanidatamab in participants with HER2-amplified biliary tract cancer.

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: Researchers wanted to study whether the research drug zanidatamab could help people with a type of cancer called biliary tract cancer. In some people, biliary tract cancer cells make extra copies of a gene called HER2 (also called ERBB2). This is known as being HER2-amplified. Zanidatamab is an antibody designed to destroy cancer cells that have higher-than-normal HER2 protein or gene levels. Zanidatamab is currently under research and is not yet approved for any diseases. Participants in this phase 2b clinical study had tumors that were HER2-amplified and at the advanced or metastatic stage. Participants also had cancer which had become worse after previous chemotherapy or had side effects that were too bad to continue chemotherapy. They also had to meet other requirements to be enrolled. Researchers measured the amount of HER2 protein in the tumor samples of the participants who were enrolled. There were 80 participants with tumors that were both HER2 amplified and had higher-than-normal HER2 protein amounts (considered to be 'HER2-positive'). There were 7 participants with tumors that were HER2-amplified, but had little-to-no levels of the HER2 protein (considered to be 'HER2-low'). All participants in the study were treated with zanidatamab and no other cancer treatments once every 2 weeks. WHAT ARE THE KEY TAKEAWAYS?: In the HER2-positive group, 33 of 80 (41%) participants had their tumors shrink by 30% or more of their original size. In half of these participants, their tumors did not grow for 13 months or longer. No participant in the HER2-low group had their tumors shrink by 30% or more. In total, 63 of 87 participants (72%) had at least one side effect believed to be related to zanidatamab treatment. Most side effects were mild or moderate in severity. No participant died from complications related to zanidatamab. Diarrhea was one of the more common side effects and was experienced by 32 of 87 participants (37%). Side effects related to receiving zanidatamab through the vein, such as chills, fever, or high blood pressure, were experienced by 29 of 87 participants (33%). WHAT ARE THE CONCLUSIONS REPORTED BY THE RESEARCHERS?: The results of this study support the potential for zanidatamab as a new therapy for people with HER2-positive biliary tract cancer after they had already received chemotherapy. More research is occurring to support these results.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04466891 (HERIZON-BTC-01 study).

The HERIZON-BTC-01 study revealed zanidatamab as a potentially effective treatment for HER2-positive biliary tract cancer after standard chemotherapy fails. Read more in the lay summary by @hardingjjmd, @DrShubhamPant, and coauthors. #BiliaryTractCancer #HER2 #zanidatamab.

The PARP1 selective inhibitor saruparib (AZD5305) elicits potent and durable antitumor activity in patient-derived BRCA1/2-associated cancer models.

BACKGROUND: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 and 2 (PARP1/2) inhibitors (PARPi) are targeted therapies approved for homologous recombination repair (HRR)-deficient breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancers. Since inhibition of PARP1 is sufficient to cause synthetic lethality in tumors with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), PARP1 selective inhibitors such as saruparib (AZD5305) are being developed. It is expected that selective PARP1 inhibition leads to a safer profile that facilitates its combination with other DNA damage repair inhibitors. Here, we aimed to characterize the antitumor activity of AZD5305 in patient-derived preclinical models compared to the first-generation PARP1/2 inhibitor olaparib and to identify mechanisms of resistance. METHODS: Thirteen previously characterized patient-derived tumor xenograft (PDX) models from breast, ovarian, and pancreatic cancer patients harboring germline pathogenic alterations in BRCA1, BRCA2, or PALB2 were used to evaluate the efficacy of AZD5305 alone or in combination with carboplatin or an ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 related (ATR) inhibitor (ceralasertib) and compared it to the first-generation PARPi olaparib. We performed DNA and RNA sequencing as well as protein-based assays to identify mechanisms of acquired resistance to either PARPi. RESULTS: AZD5305 showed superior antitumor activity than the first-generation PARPi in terms of preclinical complete response rate (75% vs. 37%). The median preclinical progression-free survival was significantly longer in the AZD5305-treated group compared to the olaparib-treated group (> 386 days vs. 90 days). Mechanistically, AZD5305 induced more replication stress and genomic instability than the PARP1/2 inhibitor olaparib in PARPi-sensitive tumors. All tumors at progression with either PARPi (39/39) showed increase of HRR functionality by RAD51 foci formation. The most prevalent resistance mechanisms identified were the acquisition of reversion mutations in BRCA1/BRCA2 and the accumulation of hypomorphic BRCA1. AZD5305 did not sensitize PDXs with acquired resistance to olaparib but elicited profound and durable responses when combined with carboplatin or ceralasertib in 3/6 and 5/5 models, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, these results show that the novel PARP1 selective inhibitor AZD5305 yields a potent antitumor response in PDX models with HRD and delays PARPi resistance alone or in combination with carboplatin or ceralasertib, which supports its use in the clinic as a new therapeutic option.

Clinical Value of Liquid Biopsy in Patients with FGFR2 Fusion-Positive Cholangiocarcinoma During Targeted Therapy.

PURPOSE: FGFR2 fusions occur in 10% to 15% of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), potentially benefiting from FGFR inhibitors (FGFRi). We aimed to assess the feasibility of detecting FGFR2 fusions in plasma and explore plasma biomarkers for managing FGFRi treatment. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective study in 18 patients with iCCA and known FGFR2 fusions previously identified in tissue samples from prior FGFRi treatment. Both tissue and synchronous plasma samples were analyzed using a custom hybrid capture gene panel with next-generation sequencing (VHIO-iCCA panel) and validated against commercial vendor results. Longitudinal plasma analysis during FGFRi was performed. Subsequently, we explored the correlation between plasma biomarkers, liver enzymes, tumor volume, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (88.9%) were positive for FGFR2 fusion events in plasma. Remarkably, the analysis of plasma suggests that lower levels of ctDNA are linked to clinical benefits from targeted therapy and result in improved progression-free survival and overall survival. Higher concentrations of cell-free DNA before FGFRi treatment were linked to worse overall survival, correlating with impaired liver function and indicating compromised cell-free DNA removal by the liver. Additionally, increased ctDNA or the emergence of resistance mutations allowed earlier detection of disease progression compared with standard radiologic imaging methods. CONCLUSIONS: VHIO-iCCA demonstrated accurate detection of FGFR2 fusions in plasma. The integration of information from various plasma biomarkers holds the potential to predict clinical outcomes and identify treatment failure prior to radiologic progression, offering valuable guidance for the clinical management of patients with iCCA.

Facts and Hopes in the Systemic Therapy of Biliary Tract Carcinomas.

Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are a heterogeneous group of cancers that continue to present a particularly poor prognosis. BTC treatment is rapidly evolving yet facing many challenges to improve patient outcomes and maximize benefit from treatment. Only a minority of patients are diagnosed with early-stage disease and are suitable for curative resection. Current surgical strategies are limited by a high relapse rate, and despite extensive efforts focused on adjuvant strategies, the development of more effective adjuvant strategies remains a challenge. In addition, the role of locoregional strategies, liver transplant, and neoadjuvant treatment remains unclear. Systemic treatment in the advanced setting is based on three main pillars: first, cytotoxic chemotherapy options; second, the addition of immunotherapy to chemotherapy; and third, targeted therapies. The role of targeted therapies is oriented by many promising targets, including IDH1 mutations, FGFR2 fusions, BRAF-V600E mutations, and HER2 amplifications. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of current facts and future hopes in the management of BTC, including an overview of the unmet need, and particularly focus on systemic therapies.

Combining CD40 agonist mitazalimab with mFOLFIRINOX in previously untreated metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (OPTIMIZE-1): a single-arm, multicentre phase 1b/2 study.

BACKGROUND: Current systemic therapies for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma are associated with poor outcomes with a 5-year overall survival rate under 5%. We aimed to assess the safety and antitumour activity of mitazalimab, a human CD40 agonistic IgG1 antibody, with modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX; fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan), in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: OPTIMIZE-1 was a single-arm, multicentre, phase 1b/2 study which enrolled adults with histologically-confirmed metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and European Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1 in 14 university hospitals in Belgium, France, and Spain. The primary endpoint of phase 1b was to determine the recommended phase 2 dose of intravenous mitazalimab (450 µg/kg or 900 µg/kg) when combined with intravenous mFOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, irinotecan 150 mg/m2, fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2). In the first 21-day treatment cycle, mitazalimab was administered on days 1 and 10, and mFOLFIRINOX on day 8. In subsequent 14-day cycles mitazalimab was administered 2 days after mFOLFIRINOX. The phase 2 primary endpoint was objective response rate. Activity and safety analyses were conducted on the full analysis set (all patients who received the combination of mitazalimab at the recommended phase 2 dose and mFOLFIRINOX for at least two treatment cycles) and safety set (all patients who received any study treatment), respectively. Enrolment is complete, and data represents a primary analysis of the ongoing trial. The trial is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04888312). FINDINGS: Between Sept 29, 2021, and March 28, 2023, 88 patients were screened and 70 patients were enrolled (40 [57%] were female and 30 [43%] were male). In phase 1b, 900 µg/kg mitazalimab was determined as the recommended phase 2 dose. Overall, five patients received 450 µg/kg mitazalimab; 65 received 900 µg/kg mitazalimab. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed at 450 µg/kg, and one dose-limiting toxicity was observed at 900 µg/kg. 57 patients were evaluated for activity, and all 70 patients were included in the safety set. At data cutoff on Nov 14, 2023, median follow-up was 12·7 months (95% CI 11·1-15·7). Of the 57 patients, 29 (51%) remained on study and 18 (32%) remained on treatment. The primary endpoint (objective response rate >30%) was met (objective response rates in 23 [40%]; one-sided 90% CI ≥32 of 57 patients). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were neutropenia (18 [26%] of 70 patients), hypokalaemia (11 patients [16%]), and anaemia and thrombocytopenia (eight patients [11%]). Serious adverse events were reported in 29 (41%) of 70 patients, the most common being vomiting (five [7%] of 70 patients), decreased appetite (four [6%]), and diarrhoea and cholangitis (three [4%] of 70 patients for each), none considered related to mitazalimab. No treatment-related deaths were reported. INTERPRETATION: Mitazalimab with mFOLFIRINOX demonstrated manageable safety and encouraging activity, warranting continued development in a phase 3, randomised, controlled trial. The results from OPTIMIZE-1 pave the way for further exploration and confirmation of a novel immunotherapy treatment regimen for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, which is a complex and aggressive cancer with very low survival rates and restricted treatment options. FUNDING: Alligator Bioscience.

SRC inhibition enables formation of a growth suppressive MAGI1-PP2A complex in isocitrate dehydrogenase-mutant cholangiocarcinoma.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is an aggressive bile duct malignancy that frequently exhibits isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH1/IDH2) mutations. Mutant IDH (IDHm) ICC is dependent on SRC kinase for growth and survival and is hypersensitive to inhibition by dasatinib, but the molecular mechanism underlying this sensitivity is unclear. We found that dasatinib reduced p70 S6 kinase (S6K) and ribosomal protein S6 (S6), leading to substantial reductions in cell size and de novo protein synthesis. Using an unbiased phosphoproteomic screen, we identified membrane-associated guanylate kinase, WW, and PDZ domain containing 1 (MAGI1) as an SRC substrate in IDHm ICC. Biochemical and functional assays further showed that SRC inhibits a latent tumor-suppressing function of the MAGI1-protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) complex to activate S6K/S6 signaling in IDHm ICC. Inhibiting SRC led to activation and increased access of PP2A to dephosphorylate S6K, resulting in cell death. Evidence from patient tissue and cell line models revealed that both intrinsic and extrinsic resistance to dasatinib is due to increased phospho-S6 (pS6). To block pS6, we paired dasatinib with the S6K/AKT inhibitor M2698, which led to a marked reduction in pS6 in IDHm ICC cell lines and patient-derived organoids in vitro and substantial growth inhibition in ICC patient-derived xenografts in vivo. Together, these results elucidated the mechanism of action of dasatinib in IDHm ICC, revealed a signaling complex regulating S6K phosphorylation independent of mTOR, suggested markers for dasatinib sensitivity, and described a combination therapy for IDHm ICC that may be actionable in the clinic.

Generation of Metastatic Cholangiocarcinoma Patient-Derived Xenograft Models.

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) poses a substantial clinical hurdle as it is often detected at advanced metastatic stages with limited therapeutic options. To enhance our understanding of advanced CCA, it is imperative to establish preclinical models that faithfully recapitulate the disease's characteristics. Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models have emerged as a valuable approach in cancer research, offering an avenue to reproduce and study the genomic, histologic, and molecular features of the original human tumors. By faithfully preserving the heterogeneity, microenvironmental interactions, and drug responses observed in human tumors, PDX models serve as highly relevant and predictive preclinical tools. Here, we present a comprehensive protocol that outlines the step-by-step process of generating and maintaining PDX models using biopsy samples from patients with advanced metastatic CCA. The protocol encompasses crucial aspects such as tissue processing, xenograft transplantation, and subsequent monitoring of the PDX models. By employing this protocol, we aim to establish a robust collection of PDX models that accurately reflect the genomic landscape, histologic diversity, and therapeutic responses observed in advanced CCA, thereby enabling improved translational research, drug development, and personalized treatment strategies for patients facing this challenging disease.

Management of biliary tract cancers in early-onset patients: A nested multicenter retrospective study of the ACABI GERCOR PRONOBIL cohort.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Accumulating data has shown the rising incidence and poor prognosis of early-onset gastrointestinal cancers, but few data exist on biliary tract cancers (BTC). We aimed to analyse the clinico-pathological, molecular, therapeutic characteristics and prognosis of patients with early onset BTC (EOBTC, age ≤50 years at diagnosis), versus olders. METHODS: We analysed patients diagnosed with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and gallbladder adenocarcinoma between 1 January 2003 and 30 June 2021. Baseline characteristics and treatment were described in each group and compared. Progression-free survival, overall survival and disease-free survival were estimated in each group using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Overall, 1256 patients were included, 188 (15%) with EOBTC. Patients with EOBTC demonstrated fewer comorbidities (63.5% vs. 84.5%, p < .0001), higher tumour stage (cT3-4: 50.0% vs. 32.3%, p = .0162), bilobar liver involvement (47.8% vs. 32.1%, p = .0002), and metastatic disease (67.6% vs. 57.5%, p = .0097) compared to older. Patients with EOBTC received second-line therapy more frequently (89.5% vs. 81.0% non-EOBTC, p = .0224). For unresectable patients with BTC, median overall survival was 17.0 vs. 16.2 months (p = .0876), and median progression-free survival was 5.8 vs. 6.0 months (p = .8293), in EOBTC vs. older. In advanced stages, fewer actionable alterations were found in EOBTC (e.g., IDH1 mutations [7.8% vs. 16.6%]; FGFR2-fusion [11.7% vs. 8.9%]; p = .029). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with EOBTC have a more advanced disease at diagnosis, are treated more heavily at an advanced stage but show similar survival. A distinctive molecular profile enriched for FGRF2 fusions was found.

Efficacy and Safety of the MDM2-p53 Antagonist Brigimadlin (BI 907828) in Patients with Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Case Series.

Background: In patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC), first-line chemotherapy plus immunotherapy has improved outcomes; however, second-line options that reflect the disease's molecular heterogeneity are still needed. One emerging target is MDM2, amplified in ~5-8% of BTC cases. Methods: This is a subset analysis of two ongoing Phase Ia/Ib trials assessing patients treated with brigimadlin (BI 907828; a highly potent, oral MDM2-p53 antagonist) ± ezabenlimab (PD-1 inhibitor) ± BI 754111 (anti-LAG-3; n = 1). Results: Results from 12 patients with BTC are shown (monotherapy: n = 6/combination: n = 6). Six patients achieved partial response (monotherapy: n = 2/combination: n = 4), four had stable disease; responses were durable. Brigimadlin had a manageable safety profile. Seven patients had dose reductions due to adverse events, but no treatment-related adverse events led to treatment discontinuation. Conclusion: Brigimadlin demonstrated anti-tumor activity in patients with advanced MDM2-amplified BTC, and warrants further investigation.

Biliary tract carcinoma (BTC) is a cancer that affects the bile ducts which are part of the digestive system. Usually, the first treatment for advanced BTC (ie cannot be removed surgically and/or has spread) is chemotherapy in combination with immunotherapy. However, if chemotherapy does not work, or stops working, there are few treatment options available in second-line. Accordingly, intensive research is ongoing to try and find effective drugs. One potential medicine, called brigimadlin (or BI 907828), is a tablet that activates a molecule in tumor cells called p53. The normal function of p53 is to kill cells when they first start to become cancerous. However, if p53 is turned off by genetic mutations, or other mechanisms, then cancer can develop. Although p53 is rarely mutated in BTC tumors, it is inactivated by another molecule called MDM2 which is usually present at abnormally high levels in BTC. Brigimadlin prevents interaction between MDM2 and p53. This activates p53 and causes the cancer to die. Two clinical trials are currently assessing brigimadlin in a range of cancers, including BTC, with the aim of identifying a safe dose that can be examined in more detail in larger trials. So far, 12 patients with BTC have been treated. The patients' tumors significantly shrank in six of these patients and remained stable in a further four patients. Side effects were as expected and could be tolerated by pausing treatment or lowering the dose. These results show that brigimadlin should be tested further in patients with advanced BTC.

Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 1b/2 Trial of Nabpaclitaxel + Gemcitabine ± Olaratumab in Treatment-Naïve Participants with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer.

The efficacy and safety of olaratumab plus nabpaclitaxel and gemcitabine in treatment-naïve participants with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma was evaluated. An initial phase 1b dose-escalation trial was conducted to determine the olaratumab dose for the phase 2 trial, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to compare overall survival (OS) in the olaratumab arm vs. placebo arms. In phase 1b, 22 participants received olaratumab at doses of 15 and 20 mg/kg with a fixed dose of nabpaclitaxel and gemcitabine. In phase 2, 159 participants were randomized to receive olaratumab 20 mg/kg in cycle 1 followed by 15 mg/kg in the subsequent cycles (n = 81) or the placebo (n = 78) on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle, plus nabpaclitaxel and gemcitabine. The primary objective of the trial was not met, with a median OS of 9.1 vs. 10.8 months (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.728, 1.527; p = 0.79) and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.5 vs. 6.4 months (HR = 1.19; 95% CI: 0.806, 1.764; p = 0.38), in the olaratumab vs. placebo arms, respectively. The most common treatment-emergent adverse event of any grade across both arms was fatigue. Olaratumab plus chemotherapy failed to improve the OS or PFS in participants with metastatic PDAC. There were no new safety signals.

Update on the management of older patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a perspective from medical oncology.

In the context of pancreatic cancer, surgical intervention is typically recommended for localized tumours, whereas chemotherapy is the preferred approach in the advanced and/or metastatic setting. However, pancreatic cancer is closely linked to ageing, with an average diagnosis at 72 years. Paradoxically, despite its increased occurrence among older individuals, this population is often underrepresented in clinical studies, complicating the decision-making process. Age alone should not determine the therapeutic strategy but, given the high comorbidity and mortality of this disease, a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is necessary to define the best treatment, prevent toxicity, and optimize older patient care. In this review, a group of experts from the Oncogeriatrics Section of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica, SEOM), the Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumours (Grupo Español de Tratamiento de los Tumores Digestivos, TTD), and the Multidisciplinary Spanish Group of Digestive Cancer (Grupo Español Multidisciplinar en Cáncer Digestivo, GEMCAD) have assessed the available scientific evidence and propose a series of recommendations on the management and treatment of the older population with pancreatic cancer.

The phase I/II eNRGy trial: Zenocutuzumab in patients with cancers harboring NRG1 gene fusions.

Neuregulin 1 (NRG1) fusions are oncogenic drivers that have been detected in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and other solid tumors. NRG1 fusions are rare, occurring in less than 1% of solid tumors. Patients with NRG1 fusion positive (NRG1+) cancer have limited therapeutic options. Zenocutuzumab is a novel, bispecific IgG1 antibody that targets both HER2 and HER3 proteins and inhibits NRG1 binding through a 'Dock & Block®' mechanism of action. Here, we describe the rationale and design of the phase II component of the eNRGy trial, part of the overall, open-label phase I/II, multicenter trial exploring the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity and antitumor activity of zenocutuzumab in patients with NRG1+ NSCLC, PDAC or other solid tumors.

eNRGy: a clinical trial of zenocutuzumab for cancer caused by NRG1 gene fusionsNRG1 gene fusions are rare mutations that cause cancer cells to grow. These fusions are found in many different types of cancer. Tumors with NRG1 gene fusions do not respond well to standard treatment options. Zenocutuzumab, or Zeno, is a treatment that is being tested to see if it can stop cancer that is growing because of NRG1 gene fusions. Here, we describe the reasoning for and design of an ongoing clinical trial (eNRGy) designed to study the efficacy (how well it works) and safety of Zeno in patients with cancer that has NRG1 gene fusions. The eNRGy trial is recruiting patients with cancer that has NRG1 gene fusions, including non-small-cell lung cancer, pancreatic cancer and others. Patients who join this trial will receive Zeno once every 2 weeks until their cancer grows. The main goal (primary end point) of this trial is to determine the percentage of patients whose tumors decrease in size by 30% or more. The eNRGy trial is currently enrolling patients. For more information, refer to ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02912949), visit https://nrg1.com/, or call 1-833-NRG-1234.

Nab-Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine and FOLFOX in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Sequential nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine followed by modified FOLFOX-6 (oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil) (nab-P/Gem-mFOLFOX) showed a good safety and clinical profile in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) in the phase I SEQUENCE trial. METHODS: The safety and efficacy of sequential nab-P/Gem-mFOLFOX was compared with standard nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (nab-P/Gem) as first-line treatment in a multi-institutional, randomized, open-label, phase II trial in patients with untreated mPDAC. We randomly assigned patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive nab-P/Gem on days 1, 8, and 15 followed by mFOLFOX on day 29 of a 6-week cycle (experimental group) or nab-P/Gem on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 4-week cycle (control group). The primary end point was the 12-month overall survival rate. RESULTS: A total of 157 patients were randomly assigned: 78 to nab-P/Gem-mFOLFOX and 79 to nab-P/Gem. Patients receiving nab-P/Gem-mFOLFOX had a 12-month overall survival of 55.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 44.2 to 66.5) versus 35.4% (95% CI, 24.9 to 46) in the control group (P=0.02). Similarly, the 24-month survival was 22.4% (95% CI, 13 to 31.8) with nab-P/Gem-mFOLFOX versus 7.6% (95% CI, 1.8 to 13.4) with control treatment. The median overall survival was 13.2 months (95% CI, 10.1 to 16.2) with nab-P/Gem-mFOLFOX and 9.7 months (95% CI, 7.5 to 12) with nab-P/Gem (hazard ratio for death, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.95). The safety profile showed a higher incidence of grade 3 or higher neutropenia (35 of 76 vs. 19 of 79 patients, P=0.004), grade 3 or higher thrombocytopenia (18 of 78 vs. 6 of 79 patients, P=0.007), and two treatment-related deaths (2.6%) with nab-P/Gem-mFOLFOX compared with none with control treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Sequential nab-P/Gem-mFOLFOX showed a significantly higher 12-month survival when compared with the standard nab-P/Gem treatment; this came with greater treatment toxicity. (Funded by Celgene; EuCT number, 2014-005350-19; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02504333.)

Timing of Initiation of Palliative Chemotherapy in Asymptomatic Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: An International Expert Survey and Case-Vignette Study.

Background: The use of imaging, in general, and during follow-up after resection of pancreatic cancer, is increasing. Consequently, the number of asymptomatic patients diagnosed with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPDAC) is increasing. In these patients, palliative systemic therapy is the only tumor-directed treatment option; hence, it is often immediately initiated. However, delaying therapy in asymptomatic palliative patients may preserve quality of life and avoid therapy-related toxicity, but the impact on survival is unknown. This study aimed to gain insight into the current perspectives and clinical decision=making of experts regarding the timing of treatment initiation of patients with asymptomatic mPDAC. Methods: An online survey (13 questions, 9 case-vignettes) was sent to all first and last authors of published clinical trials on mPDAC over the past 10 years and medical oncologists of the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group. Inter-rater variability was determined using the Kappa Light test. Differences in the preferred timing of treatment initiation among countries, continents, and years of experience were analyzed using Fisher's exact test. Results: Overall, 78 of 291 (27%) medical oncologists from 15 countries responded (62% from Europe, 23% from North America, and 15% from Asia-Pacific). The majority of respondents (63%) preferred the immediate initiation of chemotherapy following diagnosis. In 3/9 case-vignettes, delayed treatment was favored in specific clinical contexts (i.e., patient with only one small lung metastasis, significant comorbidities, and higher age). A significant degree of inter-rater variability was present within 7/9 case-vignettes. The recommended timing of treatment initiation differed between continents for 2/9 case-vignettes (22%), in 7/9 (77.9%) comparing the Netherlands with other countries, and based on years of experience for 5/9 (56%). Conclusions: Although the response rate was limited, in asymptomatic patients with mPDAC, immediate treatment is most often preferred. Delaying treatment until symptoms occur is considered in patients with limited metastatic disease, more comorbidities, and higher age.

The potential of patient-derived organoids in precision medicine of biliary tract cancer.

Chemotherapy resistance in biliary tract cancer (BTC) presents a major clinical hurdle. Ren et al.1 developed and characterized an extensive collection of BTC patient-derived organoid (PDO) models, enabling advanced investigation of chemotherapy response prediction.

Clinical and genomic characterisation of early-onset pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of early-onset pancreatic cancer (EOPC) has risen dramatically in recent years. We aimed to characterise the clinical and genomic features of EOPC and evaluate their therapeutic implications. METHODS: We performed a comparative, single-centre, retrospective analysis of clinical, germline, and genomic features in EOPC (≤50 years) patients and compared them with a control group of average-onset pancreatic cancer patients (AOPC, ≥70 years). Key molecular findings were compared with an external, publicly available cohort. RESULTS: We reviewed 336 patients who met all inclusion criteria (EOPC N = 139, AOPC N = 197). EOPC was associated with smoking status, lower prevalence of diabetes, better performance status, higher CA19.9 levels, and higher albumin levels at diagnosis. After adjustment for baseline covariates, we observed no differences in overall survival (OS). Age was associated with an increase in the incidence of KRASMUT both in our cohort and the validation cohort. EOPC were enriched in potentially actionable alterations according to ESCAT tiers I-IIIA when compared with AOPC in discovery and validation cohorts (19% versus 14% and 14% versus 8%, respectively). In the first-line metastatic setting, EOPC had a longer progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43-0.87) and OS (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.45-0.95), although there were no differences in response rate. After adjusting for the number of treatment lines, EOPC patients who did receive targeted therapies exhibited longer OS compared with EOPC who did not (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.12-0.93). CONCLUSIONS: EOPC patients have improved outcomes in the metastatic setting when compared to AOPC and are enriched for targetable alterations that open opportunities for precision oncology-based approaches.

NALIRIFOX versus nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in treatment-naive patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (NAPOLI 3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma remains one of the most lethal malignancies, with few treatment options. NAPOLI 3 aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of NALIRIFOX versus nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine as first-line therapy for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC). METHODS: NAPOLI 3 was a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study conducted at 187 community and academic sites in 18 countries worldwide across Europe, North America, South America, Asia, and Australia. Patients with mPDAC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score 0 or 1 were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive NALIRIFOX (liposomal irinotecan 50 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 60 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, and fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2, administered sequentially as a continuous intravenous infusion over 46 h) on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle or nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, administered intravenously, on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Balanced block randomisation was stratified by geographical region, performance status, and liver metastases, managed through an interactive web response system. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population, evaluated when at least 543 events were observed across the two treatment groups. Safety was evaluated in all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This completed trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04083235. FINDINGS: Between Feb 19, 2020 and Aug 17, 2021, 770 patients were randomly assigned (NALIRIFOX, 383; nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine, 387; median follow-up 16·1 months [IQR 13·4-19·1]). Median overall survival was 11·1 months (95% CI 10·0-12·1) with NALIRIFOX versus 9·2 months (8·3-10·6) with nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine (hazard ratio 0·83; 95% CI 0·70-0·99; p=0·036). Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 322 (87%) of 370 patients receiving NALIRIFOX and 326 (86%) of 379 patients receiving nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine; treatment-related deaths occurred in six (2%) patients in the NALIRIFOX group and eight (2%) patients in the nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine group. INTERPRETATION: Our findings support use of the NALIRIFOX regimen as a possible reference regimen for first-line treatment of mPDAC. FUNDING: Ipsen. TRANSLATION: For the plain language summary see Supplementary Materials section.

Assessment of the level III of Inoue by preoperative endoscopic ultrasound and elastography: a novel approach to predict a periarterial divestment technique in borderline resectable (BR) or locally advanced (LA) pancreatic adenocarcinoma-How I do it.

BACKGROUND: Periarterial divestment is a surgical technique to approach borderline resectable (BR) or locally advanced (LA) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with arterial involvement. There are no reports in the literature regarding the role of endoscopic ultrasound and elastography (EUS-EG) in exploring the integrity of Inoue's level III and its correlation with the periarterial divestment technique feasibility. Our research is aimed at exploring the role of EUS-EG in this scenario. METHODS: We describe our approach to Inoue's level II by EUS-EG in patients with BR and LA pancreatic cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: Between June 2019 and December 2020, four patients out of 25 were eligible to perform a preoperative EUS-EG. In all cases, Inoue's level III integrity was corroborated by EUS-EG and confirmed posteriorly in the surgical scenario where a periarterial divestment technique was feasible. Vein resections were necessary in all cases, with no need for arterial resection. An R0 (> 1 mm) margin was achieved in all patients, and the histopathological assessment showed the presence of neurovascular tissue at the peripheral arterial margin. CONCLUSION: Preoperatively, EUS-EG is a novel approach to explore the integrity of Inoue's level III and could be helpful to preclude a periarterial divestment technique in borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma with arterial involvement.