Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Cancer ; 22(1): 1034, 2022 Oct 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36192725

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This French nationwide NETSARC exhaustive prospective cohort aims to explore the impact of systematic re-excision (RE) as adjuvant care on overall survival (OS), local recurrence free survival (LRFS), and local and distant control (RFS) in patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) with positive microscopic margins (R1) after initial resection performed outside of a reference center. METHODS: Eligible patients had experienced STS surgery outside a reference center from 2010 to 2017, and had R1 margins after initial surgery. Characteristics and treatment comparisons used chi-square for categorical variables and Kruskall-Wallis test for continuous data. Survival distributions were compared in patients reexcised (RE) or not (No-RE) using a log-rank test. A Cox proportional hazard model was used for subgroup analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1,284 patients had experienced initial STS surgery outside NETSARC with R1 margins, including 1,029 patients with second operation documented. Among the latter, 698 patients experienced re-excision, and 331 were not re-excised. Characteristics were significantly different regarding patient age, tumor site, tumor size, tumor depth, and histotype in the population of patients re-excised (RE) or not (No-RE). The study identified RE as an independent favorable factor for OS (HR 0.36, 95%CI 0.23-0.56, p<0.0001), for LRFS (HR 0.45, 95%CI 0.36-0.56, p<0.0001), and for RFS (HR 0.35, 95%CI 0.26-0.46, p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: This large nationwide series shows that RE improved overall survival in patients with STS of extremities and trunk wall, with prior R1 resection performed outside of a reference center. RE as part of adjuvant care should be systematically considered.


Asunto(s)
Sarcoma , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos , Estudios de Cohortes , Extremidades/patología , Extremidades/cirugía , Humanos , Márgenes de Escisión , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sarcoma/patología , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/patología , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/cirugía
2.
Bull Cancer ; 107(3): 295-307, 2020 Mar.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32115178

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of systematic radiological review by breast specialist radiologist of malignant breast lesion imaging on the therapeutic management of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data collection was performed for patients with histopathologically proved breast cancer or suspicious breast lesion on imaging realized out of our institution. Patients underwent systematic mammary and axillary ultrasound, imaging review and if necessary complementary mammographic images. We analyzed the number of additional breast biopsies and axillary lymph node fine needle aspiration (FNA) with their histopathological results. We assessed their impact by comparing the final surgical treatment to the one planned before review. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventeen patients were included, with a total of 230 BIRADS 0, 4, 5 or 6 breast lesions. Seventy-six additional breast core biopsies were realized, leading to diagnose 43 additional BIRADS 6 lesions (24 infiltrative carcinomas, 9 DCIS and 10 atypical lesions) in 30 patients (13.82%). Thirty-five additional lymph node FNA were realized with 12 metastatic nodes and 3 false negative samples. Imaging review lead to change surgical treatment in 59 patients (27.19%, P<0.01) with modification in breast surgery in 37 patients, axillary surgery in 8 patients and both sites surgery in 12 patients. CONCLUSION: This study shows an impact of systematic radiological review by breast specialist radiologist in therapeutic management of patients treated for malignant breast lesion.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Ganglios Linfáticos/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiólogos , Adulto , Anciano , Axila , Biopsia con Aguja Fina/estadística & datos numéricos , Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Calcinosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Femenino , Humanos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Mamografía , Mastectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Mastectomía Simple/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Preoperatorio , Oncología por Radiación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Ultrasonografía Mamaria/estadística & datos numéricos
3.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 26(11): 3526-3534, 2019 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31338771

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The benefits of systematic re-excision (RE) after initial unplanned excision (UE) of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) are unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of delayed RE versus systematic RE after UE on overall survival (OS), metastatic relapse-free survival (MRFS), local relapse-free survival (LRFS), and rate of amputation. METHODS: Patients who underwent complete UE, without metastasis or residual disease, for primary extremity or superficial STS between 2007 and 2013 were analyzed. The amputation rate, LRFS, MRFS, and OS were assessed in cases of systematic RE in sarcoma referral centers (Group A), systematic RE outside of community centers (Group B), or without RE (Group C). RESULTS: Groups A, B, and C included 300 (48.2%), 71 (11.4%), and 251 (40.4%) patients, respectively. Median follow-up was 61 months and 5-year OS was 88.4%, 87.3%, and 88% in Groups A, B, and C, respectively (p = 0.22), while 5-year MFRS was 85.4%, 86.2%, and 84.9%, respectively (p = 0.938); RE (p = 0.55) did not influence MRFS. The 5-year LRFS was 83%, 73.5%, and 63.8% in Groups A, B and C, respectively (p = 0.00001). Of the 123 local recurrences observed, 0/28, 1/15, and 5/80 patients in Groups A, B, and C, respectively, required amputation (p = 0.41). Factors influencing LRFS were adjuvant radiotherapy [hazard ratio (HR) 0.21; p = 0.0001], initial R0 resection (HR 0.24, p = 0.0001), and Group A (HR 0.44; p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Systematic RE in sarcoma centers offers best local control but does not impact OS. Delayed RE at the time of local relapse, if any, could be an option.


Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Extremidades/cirugía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Neoplasia Residual/mortalidad , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Sarcoma/mortalidad , Extremidades/patología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Neoplasia Residual/patología , Neoplasia Residual/cirugía , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sarcoma/patología , Sarcoma/cirugía , Tasa de Supervivencia
4.
J Plast Surg Hand Surg ; 47(4): 273-5, 2013 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23627644

RESUMEN

Autologous fat transfer (AFT) enhances the cosmetic results of breast reconstruction and corrects breast conserving operation sequelae. The question of its oncological safety remains, as in-vitro experiences have shown that adipocytes can stimulate cancer cell proliferation. This study analysed the records of patients who had AFT after breast cancer from 2004-2009. The primary end-point was cancer recurrence. The secondary end-points were AFT complications and post-AFT mammogram modifications. Sixty-four patients (100 AFT) were included. The mean follow-up for AFT was 46.44 months (SD = 21.4). Two breast cancer recurrences were recorded (3.1%). Among 55 mammograms analysed, only one patient presented radiological abnormalities. One complication of AFT (donor-site infection) was recorded. This series is in favour of the oncological safety of AFT after breast cancer. An accurate evaluation of the recurrence risk, before performing AFT, is an essential prerequisite and must lead one to postpone or avoid this procedure in high-risk patients.


Asunto(s)
Tejido Adiposo/trasplante , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Mamoplastia/métodos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/etiología , Adulto , Biopsia con Aguja , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Mamoplastia/efectos adversos , Mamografía/métodos , Mastectomía/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico por imagen , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Reoperación/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Colgajos Quirúrgicos/irrigación sanguínea , Factores de Tiempo , Trasplante Autólogo/efectos adversos , Trasplante Autólogo/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Prog Urol ; 17(4): 864-5, 2007 Jun.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17634003

RESUMEN

The authors report a case of dark purple urine in a woman with bowel obstruction and bilateral percutaneous nephrostomy urinary diversion for 30 years. This colour was due to the presence of high urinary concentrations of 3-indoxyl sulphate due to the enzymatic activity of Providencia rettgeri. A favourable course was observed in response to antibiotics.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/orina , Indicán/orina , Providencia , Anciano , Color , Femenino , Humanos , Síndrome
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...