VOGT-KOYANAGI-HARADA DISEASE-LIKE UVEITIS IN A PATIENT WITH ADVANCED MELANOMA TREATED BY SEQUENTIAL ADMINISTRATION OF NIVOLUMAB AND DABRAFENIB/TRAMETINIB THERAPY.

PURPOSE: To describe a case of bilateral Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH)-like uveitis during treatment with dabrafenib and trametinib and three months after discontinuation of nivolumab for malignant melanoma, and discuss the possible (synergistic) role(s) of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors in its pathophysiology. METHODS: Retrospective case report with fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography. RESULTS: A 55-year old patient with metastatic melanoma presented with a complaint of gradually worsening blurry vision in the right eye during treatment with dabrafenib and trametinib, three months after discontinuation of nivolumab. Based on the clinical examination, optical coherence tomography and fluorescein angiography findings, and a thorough laboratory work-up, he was diagnosed with a bilateral VKH-like uveitis without extraocular manifestations. The uveitis responded well to oral corticosteroids. CONCLUSION: Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada-like uveitis is a rare adverse effect of MAPK inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Similar pathogenetic mechanisms including a drug-induced autoimmunity targeted against benign and malignant melanocytes may underlie MAPK inhibitor-induced and immune checkpoint inhibitors-induced VKH-like uveitis. In our report, the patient developed a VKH-like uveitis during MAPK inhibition therapy, four months after discontinuation of nivolumab. It is difficult to delineate whether MAPK inhibition alone was responsible for this adverse effect, or whether, on the contrary, potentiation occurred as a result of immune modulation by previous treatment with an immune checkpoint inhibitor. Further cases are needed to further clarify this latter hypothesis.

Genetic Modulation of Neurocognitive Development in Cancer Patients throughout the Lifespan: a Systematic Review.

The rise in cancer survival rates has raised concerns about the long-term adverse effects of cancer treatment, including neurocognitive impairment. Neurocognitive deficits such as attention and processing speed are frequently observed and can have a profound, lifelong impact in daily life of cancer patients. Interestingly, large interpatient variability exists in cognitive outcomes. Emerging evidence indicates that such differences may be related to genetic variation. The aim of our review was to systematically summarize the current literature on the modulatory effects of germline genetic polymorphisms on cancer treatment-induced cognitive changes and the potential age-dependent impact in cancer survivors. The PubMed/Medline database was screened using an extensive search string focusing on four components: "cancer", "cancer treatment", "neurocognitive outcome" and "germline genetic variation". Seventeen studies meeting predefined eligibility criteria were analyzed, including sixteen candidate gene studies and one genome-wide association study. 38 polymorphisms in 15 genes across proposed pathophysiological pathways, including (1) neural plasticity and repair, (2) neuroinflammation and defenses against oxidative stress, (3) neurotransmission, and (4) folate metabolism pathway, were reported to be significantly associated with treatment-related neurocognitive dysfunction or neuroimaging abnormalities. Still, some study results remained discordant, partly due to the methodological heterogeneity (i.e. in test assessments, age, cancer-type populations). Future large-scale, (epi-)genome studies integrating neurocognitive assessments and advanced neuroimaging techniques, are recommended in order to investigate neurotoxicity throughout the lifespan. Hence, adverse neurodevelopmental problems during childhood and neurodegenerative processes later in life could be minimized based on genetic risk classifications.