Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Anaesthesiol ; 41(3): 217-225, 2024 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38214552

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Oral as compared to intravenous tranexamic acid (TXA) is an attractive option, in terms of cost and safety, to reduce blood loss and transfusion in total hip arthroplasty. Exclusion criteria applied in the most recent randomised trials may have limited the generalisability of oral tranexamic acid in this indication. Larger and more inclusive studies are needed to definitively establish oral administration as a credible alternative to intravenous administration. OBJECTIVES: To assess the noninferiority of oral to intravenous TXA at reducing intra-operative and postoperative total blood loss (TBL) in primary posterolateral approached total hip arthroplasty (PLTHA). DESIGN: Noninferiority, single centre, randomised, double-blind controlled study. SETTING: Patients scheduled for primary PLTHA. Data acquisition occurred between May 2021 and November 2022 at the University Hospital of Liège, Belgium. PATIENTS: Two hundred and twenty-eight patients, randomised in a 1 : 1 ratio from a computer-generated list, completed the trial. INTERVENTIONS: Administration of 2 g of oral TXA 2 h before total hip arthroplasty and 4 h after incision (Group oral) was compared to the intravenous administration of 1 g of TXA 30 min before surgery and 4 h after incision (Group i.v.). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: TBL (measured intra-operative and drainage blood loss up to 48 h after surgery, primary outcome), decrease in haemoglobin concentration, D-Dimer at day 1 and day 3, transfusion rate (secondary outcomes). RESULTS: Analyses were performed on 108 out of 114 participants (Group i.v.) and 104 out of 114 participants (Group oral). Group oral was noninferior to Group i.v. with regard to TBL, with a difference between medians (95% CI) of 35 ml (-103.77 to 33.77) within the noninferiority margins. Median [IQR] of estimated TBL was 480 ml [350 to 565] and 445 ml [323 to 558], respectively. No significant interaction between group and time was observed regarding the evolution of TBL and haemoglobin over time. CONCLUSIONS: TXA as an oral premedication before PLTHA is noninferior to its intravenous administration regarding peri-operative TBL. TRIAL REGISTRATION: European Clinical Trial Register under EudraCT-number 2020-004167-29 ( https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2020-004167-29/BE ).


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Ácido Tranexámico , Humanos , Administración Intravenosa , Antifibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Hemoglobinas , Hemorragia Posoperatoria , Ácido Tranexámico/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Administración Oral
2.
Nutrients ; 14(15)2022 Jul 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35893907

RESUMEN

Retrospective studies showed a relationship between vitamin D status and COVID-19 severity and mortality, with an inverse relation between SARS-CoV-2 positivity and circulating calcifediol levels. The objective of this pilot study was to investigate the effect of vitamin D supplementation on the length of hospital stay and clinical improvement in patients with vitamin D deficiency hospitalized with COVID-19. The study was randomized, double blind and placebo controlled. A total of 50 subjects were enrolled and received, in addition to the best available COVID therapy, either vitamin D (25,000 IU per day over 4 consecutive days, followed by 25,000 IU per week up to 6 weeks) or placebo. The length of hospital stay decreased significantly in the vitamin D group compared to the placebo group (4 days vs. 8 days; p = 0.003). At Day 7, a significantly lower percentage of patients were still hospitalized in the vitamin D group compared to the placebo group (19% vs. 54%; p = 0.0161), and none of the patients treated with vitamin D were hospitalized after 21 days compared to 14% of the patients treated with placebo. Vitamin D significantly reduced the duration of supplemental oxygen among the patients who needed it (4 days vs. 7 days in the placebo group; p = 0.012) and significantly improved the clinical recovery of the patients, as assessed by the WHO scale (p = 0.0048). In conclusion, this study demonstrated that the clinical outcome of COVID-19 patients requiring hospitalization was improved by administration of vitamin D.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Colecalciferol/uso terapéutico , Suplementos Dietéticos , Método Doble Ciego , Hospitalización , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Vitamina D , Vitaminas/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...