Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) genotypes distribution in South-Eastern Tuscany: a ten-year retrospective study.

Italy is recognized as having the highest Hepatitis C virus (HCV) prevalence in Europe. The Tuscany region, where the prevalence of HCV infection is approximately 0.8%, implemented two programs for the control of chronic hepatitis C in Tuscany from 2018 to 2022. This retrospective study aims to investigate the incidence of HCV in a population screened in Southeastern Tuscany from 2013 to 2022. The study population included 246,137 patients from the provincial area of Arezzo and Grosseto, Tuscany, spanning from January 2013 to October 2022. Among the subjects included in the study, 3,190 (1.29%) tested positive for anti-HCV antibodies. Of this population, 2,119 patients (66.43%) also tested positive for HCV-RNA quantification, leading to their enrolment for subsequent viral genotyping. 1,106 patients had genotype (GT) 1 (52.2%), 484 had GT 3 (22.8%), 371 had GT 2 (17.5%), and 158 had GT 4 (7.5%). Our study underscores the prevalence of HCV GTs 1 and 3 as the most predominant GTs in the Southeast Tuscany region. We also observe a correlation between age, sex and HCV genotypic distribution.

Comparison of serologic and molecular SARS-CoV 2 results in a large cohort in Southern Tuscany demonstrates a role for serologic testing to increase diagnostic sensitivity.

BACKGROUND: Since February 2020, Italian hospitals registered COVID-19 (COronaVIrus Disease 19) cases more often than the rest of the Europe. During this epidemic, health authorities requested swab tests, while seeking new patient paths. METHODS: A dual laboratory approach was evaluated, consisting of patient care reports for viral RNA detection on swabs and rapid serological tests in 516 patients (192 symptomatic or paucisymptomatic and 324 asymptomatic). RESULTS: We found the molecular positive fraction equal to 12% (23/192) among symptomatic/paucisymptomatic (S/P) and 15.4% (50/324) in asymptomatic (As) sets. Among subsets, we observed serologically positive results, corresponding to 35% (8/23) for S/P and 38% (19/50) for As. Among molecular negative cases, we detected specific Immunoglobulin G or M (Ig G or Ig M) positivity in the S/P cohort equal to 6.6% (11/167) and 6% (15/246) in As cases. For indeterminate molecular results, we found S/P serological positivity equal to 100% (1/1) and 54% (13/24) in As patients. We found higher (p < 0.05) seropositivity in older patients (n = 8) among symptomatic and positives for viral RNA (n.23). CONCLUSIONS: It has been observed that a dual approach of serological and molecular tests detects a higher absolute number of disease cases in a pandemic context,which could improve monitoring and health surveillance efficacy. The age-related seropositivity frequency in this study, if confirmed, could enhance the validity of serological tests, especially in older patients.In these subjects, molecular positivity accompanied by serological positivity (distinct for M and G immunoglobulins) should help determine disease status and support decisions related to patient management.