Sustained efficacy and safety of bazedoxifene in preventing fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results of a 5-year, randomized, placebo-controlled study.

UNLABELLED: In this 2-year extension of a 3-year study, bazedoxifene showed sustained efficacy in preventing new vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and in preventing non-vertebral fractures in higher-risk women. Bazedoxifene significantly increased bone mineral density and reduced bone turnover versus placebo and was generally safe and well tolerated. INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of bazedoxifene for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis over 5 years. METHODS: A total of 4,216 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were enrolled in this 2-year extension of a 3-year, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. In the core study (N = 7,492), subjects received bazedoxifene 20 or 40 mg/day, raloxifene 60 mg/day, or placebo. The raloxifene arm was discontinued after 3 years; subjects receiving bazedoxifene 40 mg were transitioned to bazedoxifene 20 mg after 4 years. Five-year findings are reported for bazedoxifene 20 and 40/20 mg and placebo. Endpoints included incidence of new vertebral fractures (primary) and non-vertebral fractures, and changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers. RESULTS: At 5 years, the incidence of new vertebral fractures in the intent-to-treat population was significantly lower with bazedoxifene 20 mg (4.5%) and 40/20 mg (3.9%) versus placebo (6.8%; P < 0.05), with relative risk reductions of 35% and 40%, respectively. Non-vertebral fracture incidence was similar among groups. In a subgroup of higher-risk women (n = 1,324; femoral neck T-score ≤-3.0 and/or ≥ 1 moderate or severe or ≥ 2 mild vertebral fracture[s]), bazedoxifene 20 mg reduced non-vertebral fracture risk versus placebo (37%; P = 0.06); combined data for bazedoxifene 20 and 40/20 mg reached statistical significance (34% reduction; P < 0.05). Bazedoxifene significantly increased BMD and reduced bone turnover versus placebo (P < 0.05) and was generally safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The findings support a sustained anti-fracture effect of bazedoxifene on new vertebral fractures in postmenopausal osteoporotic women and on non-vertebral fractures in the higher-risk subgroup of women.

Efficacy and tolerability of once-monthly oral ibandronate in postmenopausal osteoporosis: 2 year results from the MOBILE study.

BACKGROUND: Reducing bisphosphonate dosing frequency may improve suboptimal adherence to treatment and therefore therapeutic outcomes in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Once-monthly oral ibandronate has been developed to overcome this problem. OBJECTIVE: To confirm the 1 year results and provide more extensive safety and tolerability information for once-monthly dosing by a 2 year analysis. METHODS: MOBILE, a randomised, phase III, non-inferiority study, compared the efficacy and safety of once-monthly ibandronate with daily ibandronate, which has previously been shown to reduce vertebral fracture risk in comparison with placebo. RESULTS: 1609 postmenopausal women were randomised. Substantial increases in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) were seen in all treatment arms: 5.0%, 5.3%, 5.6%, and 6.6% in the daily and once-monthly groups (50 + 50 mg, 100 mg, and 150 mg), respectively. It was confirmed that all once-monthly regimens were at least as effective as daily treatment, and in addition, 150 mg was found to be better (p<0.001). Substantial increases in proximal femur (total hip, femoral neck, trochanter) BMD were seen; 150 mg produced the most pronounced effect (p<0.05 versus daily treatment). Independent of the regimen, most participants (70.5-93.5%) achieved increases above baseline in lumbar spine or total hip BMD, or both. Pronounced decreases in the biochemical marker of bone resorption, sCTX, observed in all arms after 3 months, were maintained throughout. The 150 mg regimen consistently produced greater increases in BMD and sCTX suppression than the 100 mg and daily regimens. Ibandronate was well tolerated, with a similar incidence of adverse events across groups. CONCLUSIONS: Once-monthly oral ibandronate is at least as effective and well tolerated as daily treatment. Once-monthly administration may be more convenient for patients and improve therapeutic adherence, thereby optimising outcomes.

Relaxant effects and durations of action of formoterol and salmeterol on the isolated human bronchus.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the potency and efficacy (intrinsic activity) of formoterol and salmeterol and their duration of action in comparison with other beta-adrenoceptor agonists in isolated human bronchi. Human bronchi were obtained at thoracotomy from patients with lung cancer. Potency (-log of the concentration of drug inducing 50% of maximal relaxation (-log EC50)) and efficacy (maximal effect (Emax), % of response to theophylline 3 x 10(-3) mol.l-1) were determined by analysis of cumulative isometric concentration-response curves to beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists in bronchial rings at resting tone or contracted maximally with acetylcholine 10(-3) mol.l-1 to induce functional antagonism. The onset and duration of action of beta-adrenoceptor agonists were measured by assessing the relaxant activity of drugs on the basal tone of isolated bronchi. In terms of potency, the rank order of the substances studied was formoterol > fenoterol > or = salmeterol > or = isoprenaline > or = salbutamol > or = adrenaline > or = terbutaline. Formoterol was 150-200 times more potent than isoprenaline. On preparations contracted with acetylcholine 10(-3) mol.l-1 the intrinsic activity (IA) of salbutamol, terbutaline and salmeterol compared with that of isoprenaline ranged 0.62-0.66. Intrinsic activity was higher with formoterol (0.84) and fenoterol (0.75). The onset of action of formoterol (2.14 +/- 0.55 min, n = 11) was not significantly different from that of salbutamol (1.90 +/- 0.24 min, n = 8) but shorter than that of salmeterol (6.40 +/- 1.40 min, n = 10).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Quality of life after the menopause: influence of hormonal replacement therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to demonstrate the clinical efficacy and effect of hormone replacement therapy in menopause on quality of life. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized, open, 6-month comparison of hormone replacement therapy (estradiol transdermal system [Estraderm TTS] plus chlormadinone) and symptomatic treatment (verapipride) was performed. Analysis was by intention to treat. RESULTS: In 499 postmenopausal women with moderate and severe symptoms enrolled by 101 physicians, hormone replacement therapy was superior to symptomatic treatment on all assessments of quality of life and clinical efficacy. The effects were independent of the incidence of hot flushes. CONCLUSION: The effect of hormone replacement therapy on the quality of life of postmenopausal women was significantly superior to symptomatic treatment.

Biological effects of estradiol-17 beta in postmenopausal women: oral versus percutaneous administration.

To determine whether the route of administration or the type of estrogen used in estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) is more important in avoiding effects on hepatic function, 24 postmenopausal women were studied before and at the end of 2 months of oral or percutaneous administration of the same estrogen, estradiol-17 beta (E2). The treatments studied were oral micronized E2, 2 mg/day (9 women); oral E2 valerate, 2 mg/day (5 women), and percutaneous E2, 3 mg/day (10 women). Specific plasma biological and biochemical markers of estrogenic action were evaluated, namely, E2, estrone (E1), LH, FSH, sex steroid binding protein (SBP), renin substrate, antithrombin activity, and lipoproteins (high density lipoprotein cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol, very low density lipoprotein triglycerides). Both oral and percutaneous administration of E2 increased plasma E2 levels up to midfollicular values and decreased LH and FSH levels into the same range. Oral administration of E2 led to substantial increases in plasma E1, SBP, renin substrate, and VLDL levels, whereas AT decreased significantly. Percutaneous administration of E2 led to a physiological plasma E1/E2 ratio and did not induce any change in hepatic proteins. These data suggest that the route of administration of E2 determines the biochemical response to ERT in postmenopausal women. SBP is the most sensitive marker of the liver action of estrogen, and triglycerides also are simple and useful markers for this effect. Percutaneous E2 therapy is an effective method of ERT, and has no measurable effects on hepatic markers of estrogen action.