The Dynamic Interplay Between Ribosomal DNA and Transposable Elements: A Perspective From Genomics and Cytogenetics.

Although both are salient features of genomes, at first glance ribosomal DNAs and transposable elements are genetic elements with not much in common: whereas ribosomal DNAs are mainly viewed as housekeeping genes that uphold all prime genome functions, transposable elements are generally portrayed as selfish and disruptive. These opposing characteristics are also mirrored in other attributes: organization in tandem (ribosomal DNAs) versus organization in a dispersed manner (transposable elements); evolution in a concerted manner (ribosomal DNAs) versus evolution by diversification (transposable elements); and activity that prolongs genomic stability (ribosomal DNAs) versus activity that shortens it (transposable elements). Re-visiting relevant instances in which ribosomal DNA-transposable element interactions have been reported, we note that both repeat types share at least four structural and functional hallmarks: (1) they are repetitive DNAs that shape genomes in evolutionary timescales, (2) they exchange structural motifs and can enter co-evolution processes, (3) they are tightly controlled genomic stress sensors playing key roles in senescence/aging, and (4) they share common epigenetic marks such as DNA methylation and histone modification. Here, we give an overview of the structural, functional, and evolutionary characteristics of both ribosomal DNAs and transposable elements, discuss their roles and interactions, and highlight trends and future directions as we move forward in understanding ribosomal DNA-transposable element associations.

Evolving Together: Cassandra Retrotransposons Gradually Mirror Promoter Mutations of the 5S rRNA Genes.

The 5S rRNA genes are among the most conserved nucleotide sequences across all species. Similar to the 5S preservation we observe the occurrence of 5S-related nonautonomous retrotransposons, so-called Cassandras. Cassandras harbor highly conserved 5S rDNA-related sequences within their long terminal repeats, advantageously providing them with the 5S internal promoter. However, the dynamics of Cassandra retrotransposon evolution in the context of 5S rRNA gene sequence information and structural arrangement are still unclear, especially: (1) do we observe repeated or gradual domestication of the highly conserved 5S promoter by Cassandras and (2) do changes in 5S organization such as in the linked 35S-5S rDNA arrangements impact Cassandra evolution? Here, we show evidence for gradual co-evolution of Cassandra sequences with their corresponding 5S rDNAs. To follow the impact of 5S rDNA variability on Cassandra TEs, we investigate the Asteraceae family where highly variable 5S rDNAs, including 5S promoter shifts and both linked and separated 35S-5S rDNA arrangements have been reported. Cassandras within the Asteraceae mirror 5S rDNA promoter mutations of their host genome, likely as an adaptation to the host's specific 5S transcription factors and hence compensating for evolutionary changes in the 5S rDNA sequence. Changes in the 5S rDNA sequence and in Cassandras seem uncorrelated with linked/separated rDNA arrangements. We place all these observations into the context of angiosperm 5S rDNA-Cassandra evolution, discuss Cassandra's origin hypotheses (single or multiple) and Cassandra's possible impact on rDNA and plant genome organization, giving new insights into the interplay of ribosomal genes and transposable elements.

Visualization of Oligonucleotide-Based Probes Along Pseudochromosomes Using RIdeogram, KaryoploteR, and Circlize (Circos).

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using oligonucleotide-based probes is an innovative modification of classic FISH techniques, enabling karyotypic identifications. Here, we exemplarily describe the design and in silico visualization of oligonucleotide-based probes derived from the Cucumis sativus genome. Additionally, the probes are also plotted comparatively to the closely related Cucumis melo genome. The visualization process is realized in R using various libraries for linear or circular plots including RIdeogram, KaryoploteR, and Circlize.

The Cassandra retrotransposon landscape in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) and related Amaranthaceae: recombination and re-shuffling lead to a high structural variability.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Plant genomes contain many retrotransposons and their derivatives, which are subject to rapid sequence turnover. As non-autonomous retrotransposons do not encode any proteins, they experience reduced selective constraints leading to their diversification into multiple families, usually limited to a few closely related species. In contrast, the non-coding Cassandra terminal repeat retrotransposons in miniature (TRIMs) are widespread in many plants. Their hallmark is a conserved 5S rDNA-derived promoter in their long terminal repeats (LTRs). As sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) has a well-described LTR retrotransposon landscape, we aim to characterize TRIMs in beet and related genomes. METHODS: We identified Cassandra retrotransposons in the sugar beet reference genome and characterized their structural relationships. Genomic organization, chromosomal localization, and distribution of Cassandra-TRIMs across the Amaranthaceae were verified by Southern and fluorescent in situ hybridization. KEY RESULTS: All 638 Cassandra sequences in the sugar beet genome contain conserved LTRs and thus constitute a single family. Nevertheless, variable internal regions required a subdivision into two Cassandra subfamilies within B. vulgaris. The related Chenopodium quinoa harbours a third subfamily. These subfamilies vary in their distribution within Amaranthaceae genomes, their insertion times and the degree of silencing by small RNAs. Cassandra retrotransposons gave rise to many structural variants, such as solo LTRs or tandemly arranged Cassandra retrotransposons. These Cassandra derivatives point to an interplay of template switch and recombination processes - mechanisms that likely caused Cassandra's subfamily formation and diversification. CONCLUSIONS: We traced the evolution of Cassandra in the Amaranthaceae and detected a considerable variability within the short internal regions, whereas the LTRs are strongly conserved in sequence and length. Presumably these hallmarks make Cassandra a prime target for unequal recombination, resulting in the observed structural diversity, an example of the impact of LTR-mediated evolutionary mechanisms on the host genome.