HIF Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitors for COVID-19 Treatment: Pros and Cons.

The review analyzes the potential advantages and problems associated with using HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors as a treatment for COVID-19. HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors are known to boost endogenous erythropoietin (Epo) and activate erythropoiesis by stabilizing and activating the hypoxia inducible factor (HIF). Recombinant Epo treatment has anti-inflammatory and healing properties, and thus, very likely, will be beneficial for moderate to severe cases of COVID-19. However, HIF PHD inhibition may have a significantly broader effect, in addition to stimulating the endogenous Epo production. The analysis of HIF target genes reveals that some HIF-targets, such as furin, could play a negative role with respect to viral entry. On the other hand, HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors counteract ferroptosis, the process recently implicated in vessel damage during the later stages of COVID-19. Therefore, HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors may serve as a promising treatment of COVID-19 complications, but they are unlikely to aid in the prevention of the initial stages of infection.

Comprehensive network of miRNA-induced intergenic interactions and a biological role of its core in cancer.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a family of short noncoding RNAs that posttranscriptionally regulate gene expression and play an important role in multiple cellular processes. A significant percentage of miRNAs are intragenic, which is often functionally related to their host genes playing either antagonistic or synergistic roles. In this study, we constructed and analyzed the entire network of intergenic interactions induced by intragenic miRNAs. We further focused on the core of this network, which was defined as a union of nontrivial strongly connected components, i.e., sets of nodes (genes) mutually connected via directed paths. Both the entire network and its core possessed statistically significant non-random properties. Specifically, genes forming the core had high expression levels and low expression variance. Furthermore, the network core did not split into separate components corresponding to individual signalling or metabolic pathways, but integrated genes involved in key cellular processes, including DNA replication, transcription, protein homeostasis and cell metabolism. We suggest that the network core, consisting of genes mutually regulated by their intragenic miRNAs, could coordinate adjacent pathways or homeostatic control circuits, serving as a horizontal inter-circuit link. Notably, expression patterns of these genes had an efficient prognostic potential for breast and colorectal cancer patients.

Selectin-independent adhesion during ovarian cancer metastasis.

PURPOSE: Ovarian cancer (OvCa) progression mainly takes place by intraperitoneal spread. Adhesion of tumor cells to the mesothelial cells which form the inner surface of the peritoneum is a crucial step in this process. Cancer cells use in principle different molecules of the leukocyte adhesion cascade to facilitate adhesion. This cascade is initiated by selectin-ligand interactions followed by integrin - extracellular matrix protein interactions. Here we address the question whether all tumor cells predominantly employ selectin-dependent leukocyte-like adhesion cascade (SDAC) or whether they use integrin mediated adhesion for OvCa progression as well. METHODS: A comparative transcriptomic analysis of the human OvCa cell lines OVCAR8 and SKOV3 was performed. Intraperitoneal xenograft model of OVCAR8 cells was used to determine whether there is a correlation between SDAC gene expression and the metastatic potential of the control cells and the cells overexpressing c-Fos. Transcriptomic analysis of OVCAR8 and SKOV3 samples was performed using microarrays. RESULTS: One-third of the protein-coding genes involved in SDAC exhibited lower expression levels in OVCAR8 than in SKOV3 cells. In contrast to SKOV3 cells, c-Fos overexpression in OVCAR8 cells did not significantly influence the expression of SDAC genes. Intraperitoneal xenograft model of OVCAR8 cells unexpectedly demonstrated that the aggressiveness of OVCAR8 tumors was not depended on the c-Fos expression level and was comparable to that of SKOV3 control tumors. Gene expression analysis of tumors suggests that SKOV3-derived tumor progression was mainly depended on SDAC. Progression of OVCAR8 tumors relied on other cell adhesion molecules that do not interact with selectins. CONCLUSIONS: High expression of c-Fos in ovarian cancer cells is not always associated with reduced metastatic potential. Low expression level of SDAC genes may not ensure low OvCa metastatic potential hence alternative adhesion mechanisms involving laminin-integrin interactions exist as well.

Intracellular and extracellular microRNA: An update on localization and biological role.

MicroRNA (miRNA) is a class of small non-coding RNAs which mediate post-transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS) by sequence-specific inhibition of target mRNAs translation and/or lowering their half-lives in the cytoplasm. Together with their binding partners, Argonaute (AGO) proteins, miRNAs form cores of RNA-induced silencing complexes (RISC). Despite a substantial progress in understanding RISC structure, until recently little was known about its localization in the cell. This review is aimed to provide an overview of the emerging picture of miRNA and RISC localization and function both in the intracellular space and outside of the cell. In contrast to the common assumption that PTGS occurs in the cytoplasm, it was found to operate mainly on the membranes of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Besides ER membranes miRNAs were found in all main cellular compartments including nucleus, nucleolus and mitochondria where they regulate various processes including transcription, translation, alternative splicing and DNA repair. Moreover, a certain pool of miRNAs may not be associated with RISC and carry completely different functions. Finally, the discovery of cell-free miRNAs in all biological fluids suggests that miRNAs might also act as signaling molecules outside the cell, and may be utilized as biomarkers for a variety of diseases. In this review we discuss miRNA secretion mechanisms and possible pathways of cell-cell communication via miRNA-containing exosomes in vivo.

Exercise immunology meets MiRNAs.

A large body of evidence indicates modified expression of protein-coding genes in response to different kinds of physical activity. Recent years have exposed another level of regulation of cellular processes mediated by non-coding RNAs. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are one of the largest families of non-coding RNAs. MiRNAs mediate post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression. The amount of data supporting the key role of miRNAs in the adaptation of the immune and other body systems to exercise steadily grows. MiRNAs change their expression profiles after exercise and seem to be involved in regulation of exercise-responsive genes in immune and other cell types. Here we discuss existing data and future directions in the field.

SNOntology: Myriads of novel snoRNAs or just a mirage?

BACKGROUND: Small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) are a large group of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) that mainly guide 2'-O-methylation (C/D RNAs) and pseudouridylation (H/ACA RNAs) of ribosomal RNAs. The pattern of rRNA modifications and the set of snoRNAs that guide these modifications are conserved in vertebrates. Nearly all snoRNA genes in vertebrates are localized in introns of other genes and are processed from pre-mRNAs. Thus, the same promoter is used for the transcription of snoRNAs and host genes. RESULTS: The series of studies by Dahai Zhu and coworkers on snoRNAs and their genes were critically considered. We present evidence that dozens of species-specific snoRNAs that they described in vertebrates are experimental artifacts resulting from the improper use of Northern hybridization. The snoRNA genes with putative intrinsic promoters that were supposed to be transcribed independently proved to contain numerous substitutions and are, most likely, pseudogenes. In some cases, they are localized within introns of overlooked host genes. Finally, an increased number of snoRNA genes in mammalian genomes described by Zhu and coworkers is also an artifact resulting from two mistakes. First, numerous mammalian snoRNA pseudogenes were considered as genes, whereas most of them are localized outside of host genes and contain substitutions that question their functionality. Second, Zhu and coworkers failed to identify many snoRNA genes in non-mammalian species. As an illustration, we present 1352 C/D snoRNA genes that we have identified and annotated in vertebrates. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that conclusions based only on databases with automatically annotated ncRNAs can be erroneous. Special investigations aimed to distinguish true RNA genes from their pseudogenes should be done. Zhu and coworkers, as well as most other groups studying vertebrate snoRNAs, give new names to newly described homologs of human snoRNAs, which significantly complicates comparison between different species. It seems necessary to develop a uniform nomenclature for homologs of human snoRNAs in other vertebrates, e.g., human gene names prefixed with several-letter code denoting the vertebrate species.

Analysis of C/D box snoRNA genes in vertebrates: The number of copies decreases in placental mammals.

C/D box small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) guide site-specific 2'-O-methylation of RNAs. Nearly all C/D box snoRNAs with known targets are involved in rRNA modification. In vertebrates, snoRNAs are encoded in introns of various genes and their processing is coupled with splicing of host gene pre-mRNA. Here, the genes encoding C/D box snoRNAs that guide 2'-O-methylation of rRNA were identified and analyzed in vertebrate genomes. The number of copies of most C/D box snoRNA genes proved to be lower in placental mammals compared to other vertebrates. This can be due to smaller oocytes and accordingly lower number of ribosomes in them in eutherians. The targets of snoRNAs encoded by single-copy and multiple-copy genes proved to have different distribution in rRNAs. The causes of this difference are discussed. In some cases, the transcripts of homologous C/D box RNA genes were shown to guide the modification of neighboring nucleotides in rRNA. C/D box snoRNA pseudogenes were found in all vertebrate classes. Three novel C/D box snoRNAs were found in Xenopus tropicalis that may guide 2'-O-methylation of Xenopus-specific rRNA sites. A list of 922 annotated C/D box snoRNA genes is presented.

Noncoding RNA of U87 host gene is associated with ribosomes and is relatively resistant to nonsense-mediated decay.

Non-coding RNAs are involved in many cellular processes. In particular, most of C/D box small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) function as guide RNAs in site-specific 2'-O-methylation of rRNAs. While most snoRNA genes reside in introns of protein-coding genes, here we demonstrated an unusual snoRNA gene occupying an intron of a previously unknown non-protein-coding gene U87HG. We characterized this host gene in human, mouse, rat, and dog. It is a member of 5'TOP gene family, which includes many translation apparatus genes. U87HG RNA carried multiple stop-codons and was associated with ribosomes, suggesting that it may be a target for nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD), a process that eliminates transcripts bearing nonsense mutations. Surprisingly, we found that U87HG RNA was hardly susceptible to NMD. Possible mechanisms (translation reinitiation, ribosomal leaky scanning, and low efficiency of translation) of this phenomenon are discussed. Unlike transcripts of four other known non-protein-coding host genes, U87HG RNA shows a relatively high degree of conservation suggesting a selective pressure and a possible functional activity of U87HG apart from producing U87 snoRNA.

U87 RNA, a novel C/D box small nucleolar RNA from mammalian cells.

A novel 72 nt small nucleolar RNA (snoRNA) called U87 was found in rat liver cells. This RNA possesses the features of C/D box snoRNA family: boxes C, D', C', D, and 11 nt antisense element complementary to 28S ribosomal RNA (rRNA). The vast majority of C/D box snoRNAs direct site-specific 2'-O-ribose methylation of rRNAs. U87 RNA is suggested to be involved in 2'-O-methylation of a G(3468) residue in 28S rRNA. U87 RNA was detected in different mammalian species with slight length variability. Rat and mouse U87 RNA gene was characterized. Unlike the majority of C/D box snoRNAs U87 RNA lacks the terminal stem required for snoRNA processing. However, U87 gene is flanked by 7 bp inverted repeats potentially able to form a terminal stem in U87 RNA precursor.