Asciminib in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) need long-term therapy with high efficacy and safety. Asciminib, a BCR::ABL1 inhibitor specifically targeting the ABL myristoyl pocket, may offer better efficacy and safety and fewer side effects than currently available frontline ATP-competitive tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). METHODS: In a phase 3 trial, patients with newly diagnosed CML were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either asciminib (80 mg once daily) or an investigator-selected TKI, with randomization stratified by European Treatment and Outcome Study long-term survival score category (low, intermediate, or high risk) and by TKI selected by investigators before randomization (including imatinib and second-generation TKIs). The primary end points were major molecular response (defined as BCR::ABL1 transcript levels ≤0.1% on the International Scale [IS]) at week 48, for comparisons between asciminib and investigator-selected TKIs and between asciminib and investigator-selected TKIs in the prerandomization-selected imatinib stratum. RESULTS: A total of 201 patients were assigned to receive asciminib and 204 to receive investigator-selected TKIs. The median follow-up was 16.3 months in the asciminib group and 15.7 months in the investigator-selected TKI group. A major molecular response at week 48 occurred in 67.7% of patients in the asciminib group, as compared with 49.0% in the investigator-selected TKI group (difference, 18.9 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.6 to 28.2; adjusted two-sided P<0.001]), and in 69.3% of patients in the asciminib group as compared with 40.2% in the imatinib group within the imatinib stratum (difference, 29.6 percentage points; 95% CI, 16.9 to 42.2; adjusted two-sided P<0.001). The percentage of patients with a major molecular response at week 48 was 66.0% with asciminib and 57.8% with TKIs in the second-generation TKI stratum (difference, 8.2 percentage points; 95% CI, -5.1 to 21.5). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher and events leading to discontinuation of the trial regimen were less frequent with asciminib (38.0% and 4.5%, respectively) than with imatinib (44.4% and 11.1%) and second-generation TKIs (54.9% and 9.8%). CONCLUSIONS: In this trial comparing asciminib with investigator-selected TKIs and imatinib, asciminib showed superior efficacy and a favorable safety profile in patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase CML. Direct comparison between asciminib and second-generation TKIs was not a primary objective. (Funded by Novartis; ASC4FIRST ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04971226).

Sabatolimab plus hypomethylating agents in previously untreated patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (STIMULUS-MDS1): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Sabatolimab is an immunotherapy targeting T-cell immunoglobulin domain and mucin domain-3 (TIM-3), an immuno-myeloid regulator expressed on immune cells and leukaemic stem cells. In this trial, we compared the efficacy and safety of sabatolimab plus hypomethylating agent with placebo plus hypomethylating agents in previously untreated patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. METHODS: STIMULUS-MDS1 was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study done at 54 investigational sites in 17 countries. Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with intermediate-risk, high-risk, and very high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (according to Revised International Prognostic Scoring System criteria) who had not received previous treatment were included. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to intravenous sabatolimab (400 mg on day 8 and 22) or placebo plus a hypomethylating agent (intravenous decitabine 20 mg/m2 on day 1-5 or intravenous or subcutaneous azacitidine 75 mg/m2 on day 1-7 or day 1-5 and day 8 and 9) every 28 days until treatment discontinuation. The two primary endpoints were complete response rate and progression-free survival, assessed in the full analysis set, which included all randomly assigned patients. Complete response was analysed, as prespecified, 7 months after the last patient was randomly assigned. All other analyses presented, including progression-free survival, were done at the final data cutoff prespecified via a protocol amendment on Sept 2, 2021. Safety was assessed in in all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03946670, and is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between July 29, 2019, and Aug 10, 2020, 127 patients were randomly assigned to sabatolimab plus a hypomethylating agent group (sabatolimab group; n=65) or placebo plus a hypomethylating agent (placebo group; n=62). The median age of participants was 73 years (IQR 69-77), of whom 86 (68%) of 127 patients were male and 77 (61%) were White. The primary endpoints were not met. Complete response (cutoff date of March 10, 2021) was achieved in 14 (22%; 95% CI 12·3-33·5) of 65 patients in the sabatolimab group vs 11 (18%; 9·2-29·5) of 62 patients in the placebo group (p=0·77). At the cutoff date of the final analysis (March 1, 2022), median follow-up for progression-free survival was 17·8 months (IQR 16·6-19·4) in the sabatolimab group and 19·2 months (17·7-22·3) in the placebo group, and the median progression-free survival was 11·1 months (95% CI 7·6-17·6) in the sabatolimab group vs 8·5 months (6·9-11·3) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·75 [95% CI 0·48-1·17]; p=0·1022). The most common adverse events of any grade were neutropenia (35 [56%] of 62 patients in the sabatolimab group vs 43 [68%] of 63 patients in the placebo group), thrombocytopenia (30 [48%] vs 32 [51%]), constipation (29 [47%] vs 24 [38%]), diarrhoea (27 [44%] vs 14 [22%]), anaemia (22 [35%] vs 34 [54%]), febrile neutropenia (22 [35%] vs 15 [24%]), and leukopenia (15 [24%] vs 20 [32%]). One patient developed a serious potential treatment-related immune-mediated adverse event in the sabatolimab group. There was one treatment-related death in the sabatolimab group due to pneumonitis. INTERPRETATION: The addition of sabatolimab to hypomethylating agents in this study did not result in a significant improvement in complete response rates or progression-free survival. Sabatolimab had a manageable safety in most patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. A randomised phase 3 trial is ongoing to assess the potential benefit of sabatolimab plus azacitidine on overall survival in this setting. FUNDING: Novartis Pharmaceuticals.

Phase II study of everolimus in patients with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma previously treated with bevacizumab-, fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-based regimens.

PURPOSE: Dysregulation of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt/mTOR pathway is seen in 40% to 60% of patients with colorectal cancer. Everolimus, an oral inhibitor of mTOR, showed efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancers in phase I studies. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In sequential phase II studies assessing two dosing schedules, patients with metastatic colorectal cancers refractory to bevacizumab-, fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-based regimens received everolimus 70 mg/wk (n = 99) or 10 mg/d (n = 100). Primary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR) and objective response rate; secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and duration of response or stable disease (SD). Tumor tissue was collected from all patients for predefined exploratory biomarker analyses. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients were included in the per-protocol set for each cohort. DCRs of 31.0% and 32.4% (all SD) were seen in the weekly and daily schedules, respectively. Median duration of SD was 3.9 months in each cohort. Median PFS and OS were 1.8 and 4.9 months and 1.8 and 5.9 months, respectively, for the weekly and daily schedules. Among patients receiving daily everolimus, those with a KRAS mutation experienced significantly shorter median OS (P = 0.008) and lower DCR (P = 0.035) compared with those with wild-type KRAS in exploratory biomarker analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Everolimus 70 mg/wk or 10 mg/d was well tolerated but did not confer meaningful efficacy in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancers. Future studies may consider evaluating everolimus in combination with other agents or in patients with dysregulation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway.