RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Readability of patient education materials is of utmost importance to ensure understandability and dissemination of health care information in uro-oncology. We aimed to investigate the readability of the official patient education materials of the European Association of Urology (EAU) and American Urology Association (AUA). METHODS: Patient education materials for prostate, bladder, kidney, testicular, penile, and urethral cancers were retrieved from the respective organizations. Readability was assessed via the WebFX online tool for Flesch Kincaid Reading Ease Score (FRES) and for reading grade levels by Flesch Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Gunning Fog Score (GFS), Smog Index (SI), Coleman Liau Index (CLI), and Automated Readability Index (ARI). Layperson readability was defined as a FRES of ≥70 and with the other readability indexes <7 according to European Union recommendations. This study assessed only objective readability and no other metrics such as understandability. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Most patient education materials failed to meet the recommended threshold for laypersons. The mean readability for EAU patient education material was as follows: FRES 50.9 (standard error [SE]: 3.0), and FKGL, GFS, SI, CLI, and ARI all with scores ≥7. The mean readability for AUA patient material was as follows: FRES 64.0 (SE: 1.4), with all of FKGL, GFS, SI, and ARI scoring ≥7 readability. Only 13 out of 70 (18.6%) patient education materials' paragraphs met the readability requirements. The mean readability for bladder cancer patient education materials was the lowest, with a FRES of 36.7 (SE: 4.1). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Patient education materials from leading urological associations reveal readability levels beyond the recommended thresholds for laypersons and may not be understood easily by patients. There is a future need for more patient-friendly reading materials. PATIENT SUMMARY: This study checked whether health information about different cancers was easy to read. Most of it was too hard for patients to understand.
RESUMEN
Background: Female Reddit users frequently discussed potential causes of orgasm difficulties and its implications on mental health and relationships. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the experiences of women discussing orgasms on the Internet site Reddit. We sought to qualitatively analyze the topics that arose in users' discussions to better understand the potential causes of orgasm difficulties and its implications on quality of life. Methods: Posts on the subreddit r/TwoXChromosomes containing the keywords "orgasm" and "climax" were included in the dataset. Posts and their associated comments were qualitatively analyzed using the grounded theory approach. Two independent researchers coded each thread to identify dominant themes and emergent concepts. Outcomes: The most frequently coded primary topics included: (1) orgasm (32.2% [n = 337]), (2) psychological (17.8% [n = 186]), (3) relationships (15.4% [n = 161]), and (4) treatment (10.7% [n = 112]). Results: Qualitative analysis of 107 threads and approximately 6300 comments resulted in 5 major categories: psychological aspect of orgasms, difficulty orgasming with partners, partners' responses to orgasmic dysfunction, types of orgasms, and treatments for orgasmic dysfunction. Preliminary themes included (1) the presence of an emotional component or history of trauma related to orgasmic difficulty, (2) difficulty orgasming with a partner regardless of ability to orgasm during masturbation and a variety of stimulation required to orgasm, (3) mixed partner responses to orgasmic dysfunction, (4) the definition of a normal orgasm, and (5) self-motivated treatment for orgasmic dysfunction, including clitoral stimulation devices and masturbation techniques. Notably, few posters discussed their orgasmic dysfunction with healthcare providers. Clinical Translation: The study reveals insights into the possible causes, psychosocial implications, and treatment of orgasm difficulties from a patient perspective, and can guide future research on female orgasms in a more precise, patient-oriented direction. Strengths and Limitations: The anonymous nature of the forum allowed for insight into sensitive topics related to female orgasms and sexual trauma. Limitations include the demographic distribution of Reddit users, which was primarily younger women in their 20s and 30s, which restricts generalizability. Conclusion: Reddit provides a medium for individuals with orgasm difficulties to discuss their experiences. Posts addressed users' inability to orgasm, their mental health and relationships, the stimulation required for orgasm, and treatments for orgasmic dysfunction. Interestingly, very few posts discussed healthcare, potentially suggesting that women do not classify their orgasmic dysfunction as a health issue.
RESUMEN
The gender gap is an amalgam of gender disparity issues in the workplace ranging from fewer opportunities to network, decreased funding for research, microaggressions, nebulous promotional criteria and difficulty achieving the perception of professionalism because of inherent gender bias. Contributing home factors include more substantial household duties for women typically, spouses who also have a career, and the inherent delay associated with maternity leave for those who choose to have children. This article subdivides gender disparity that impedes promotion into experiences inside and outside the workplace. Disparities within the workplace are divided into directly quantified versus qualitative differences.
Asunto(s)
Sexismo , Niño , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Embarazo , Factores SexualesRESUMEN
Anticholinergics have been used in the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB), but their use is limited by poor tolerability and anticholinergic-related side effects. Increasingly, providers are discontinuing anticholinergic prescribing because of growing evidence of the association of anticholinergic use with increased risk of cognitive decline and other adverse effects. Newer medications for OAB, the ß3-adrenergic receptor agonists mirabegron and vibegron, do not have anticholinergic properties and are typically well tolerated; however, many insurance plans have limited patient access to these newer OAB medications by requiring step therapy, meaning less expensive anticholinergic medications must be trialed and/or failed before a ß3-agonist will be covered and dispensed. Thus, many patients are unable to easily access these medications. Step therapy and other drug utilization strategies (e.g., prior authorization) are often used to manage the growing costs of pharmaceuticals, but these policies do not always follow treatment guidelines and may harm patients as a result of treatment delays, discontinuations, or related increases in adverse events. Medical professionals have called for reform of drug utilization strategies through partnerships that include clinicians and policymakers. This narrative review discusses prescribing patterns for OAB treatment and the effect of switching between drugs, as well as the costs of step therapy and prior authorization on patients and prescribers.
Asunto(s)
Vejiga Urinaria Hiperactiva , Humanos , Vejiga Urinaria Hiperactiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Antagonistas Colinérgicos/efectos adversos , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 3/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Purpose of Review: In this study, we aimed to review the common social media (SoMe) apps used and how they have impacted the practice and exchange of information, as well as the challenges of using SoMe in urology. Recent Findings: SoMe has become increasingly popular in the urology community. Lay users often turn to SoMe to learn about urological health and share their own experiences, while medical professionals may use it for career development, networking, education, and research purposes. Summary: It is important to recognize the power of SoMe and to use it responsibly and ethically, particularly given the potential risks of encountering low-quality or misleading information.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Urological surgery after renal transplantation leaves patients at risk of infection and further urological complications. Our objective was to discern patient factors associated with adverse outcomes following renal transplantation to identify patients who would benefit from close urological follow-up. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was conducted for patients undergoing renal transplantation between August 1, 2016 and July 30, 2019 at a tertiary care academic center. Data on patient demographics, medical history, and surgical history were collected. Primary outcomes observed were urinary tract infection, urosepsis, urinary retention, unexpected urology visit, and urological procedures within 3 months of transplant. Variables determined significant by hypothesis testing were used in logistic regression modeling for each primary outcome. RESULTS: Of the 789 renal transplant patients, 217 (27.5%) developed postoperative urinary tract infection and 124 (15.7%) developed postoperative urosepsis. Patients with postoperative urinary tract infection were more likely to be female (OR 2.2, P < .01), have pre-existing prostate cancer (OR 3.1, P < .01), and recurrent urinary tract infections (OR 2.1, P < .01). After renal transplant, unexpected urology visits were observed in 191 (24.2%) patients, and urological procedures were performed in 65 (8.2%) patients. Postoperative urinary retention was noted in 47 (6.0%) patients and seen more often in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (OR 2.8, P = .033) and prior prostate surgery (OR 3.0, P = .072). CONCLUSIONS: Identifiable risk factors associated with urological complications after renal transplantation include benign prostatic hyperplasia, prostate cancer, urinary retention, and recurrent urinary tract infections. Female renal transplant patients are at increased risk of postoperative urinary tract infection and urosepsis. These patient subsets would benefit from establishing urological care and pre-transplant urological evaluation including urinalysis, urine cultures, urodynamic studies, and close follow-up post-transplant.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Hiperplasia Prostática , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Infecciones Urinarias , Masculino , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Hiperplasia Prostática/etiología , Infecciones Urinarias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/etiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the quality, understandability, actionability, accuracy and commercial bias of podcasts regarding stress urinary incontinence (SUI). METHODS: The first 100 Stitcher podcasts from the search, "Stress urinary incontinence" were evaluated using the validated DISCERN criteria, PEMAT tool, and a Misinformation Likert Scale. The accuracy of information was assessed by comparison to the American Urological Association (AUA) SUI Guidelines. RESULTS: Common publisher types included health/wellness channels (66%). Low-moderate quality, poor understandability and misinformation was seen in 67% (DISCERN ≤3), 69% (PEMAT understandability ≤75%) and 17% of podcasts, respectively. Treatments discussed included pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) (89%) and surgery (47%). Health and wellness channels had the most evidence of commercial bias (44%). Podcasts that discussed surgery more often emphasized shared decision-making (DISCERN15). CONCLUSION: SUI-related podcasts on Stitcher are mostly published by health/wellness channels and skewed toward discussing PFMT. Podcasts are often low-moderate quality, poorly understandable and often have commercial bias.
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica , Incontinencia Urinaria de Esfuerzo , Humanos , Diafragma Pélvico , Terapia por Ejercicio , Incontinencia Urinaria de Esfuerzo/cirugía , ComunicaciónRESUMEN
Coronavirus disease (COVID)-related misinformation is prevalent online, including on social media. The purpose of this study was to explore factors associated with user engagement with COVID-related misinformation on the social media platform, TikTok. A sample of TikTok videos associated with the hashtag #coronavirus was downloaded on September 20, 2020. Misinformation was evaluated on a scale (low, medium, and high) using a codebook developed by experts in infectious diseases. Multivariable modeling was used to evaluate factors associated with number of views and presence of user comments indicating intention to change behavior. One hundred and sixty-six TikTok videos were identified and reviewed. Moderate misinformation was present in 36 (22%) videos viewed a median of 6.8 million times (interquartile range [IQR] 3.6-16 million), and high-level misinformation was present in 11 (7%) videos viewed a median of 9.4 million times (IQR 5.1-18 million). After controlling for characteristics and content, videos containing moderate misinformation were less likely to generate a user response indicating intended behavior change. By contrast, videos containing high-level misinformation were less likely to be viewed but demonstrated a nonsignificant trend towards higher engagement among viewers. COVID-related misinformation is less frequently viewed on TikTok but more likely to engage viewers. Public health authorities can combat misinformation on social media by posting informative content of their own.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The true prevalence of low sexual desire among women is disputed among researchers due to the complex nature and presentation of women's sexual problems. AIM: To qualitatively analyze the aspects of libido/sexual desire frequently discussed by Reddit users and compare them with the current understanding of female sexual well-being and sexual desire disorders. METHODS: By using the Reddit application programming interface, the TwoXChromosomes subreddit was queried for posts with the keywords libido and sex drive. Posts that were deleted or unrelated to themes of libido/sex drive were excluded. A total of 85 threads-63 queried from the keyword libido and 22 from sex drive-and approximately 2900 comments were qualitatively analyzed per the grounded theory approach. Five independent researchers read and coded each thread to identify dominant themes and emergent concepts. OUTCOMES: Outcomes of interest included codes related to sexual dysfunction, libido, orgasm, masturbation, types of sex, psychology, relationships, intimacy, treatment, medications, and health care. RESULTS: Posters were primarily heterosexual women in their 20s and 30s. The code categories with the highest frequency were relationships (22.7%, n = 272), libido (22.2%, n = 210), psychological (20.2%, n = 191), medications (7.29%, n = 69), and intimacy (6.0%, n = 57). Users frequently described a decrease in libido secondary to medications, particularly antidepressants and hormonal birth control. Many users discussed the challenges of navigating a relationship with low sexual desire and the resulting sexual distress. Posters described feelings of sadness, anxiety, and guilt due to their low desire. Additionally, users discussed the role that sex plays in relationships, whether as a way to develop intimacy between partners or to achieve orgasm. Finally, posters expressed dissatisfaction with health care addressing their concerns surrounding sexual desire. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The study findings-namely, the impact of medications on sexual health, the interaction of sexual desire and mental health, and cited examples of inadequate sexual health care-can help guide sexual well-being research, diagnosis, and public policy. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: Using Reddit as a data source allowed for the analysis of women's experiences outside the preestablished concepts of female sexual desire. Limitations to the study include the potential for posts to be deleted by moderator guidelines, the young demographic distribution of Reddit users, and the popularity-based structure of subreddit threads. CONCLUSION: Our results emphasize the psychosocial aspects of sexual desire and the need to redefine sexual problems to encompass the complex nature of female sexual well-being.
Asunto(s)
Libido , Disfunciones Sexuales Psicológicas , Femenino , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Conducta Sexual/psicología , Parejas Sexuales/psicología , Disfunciones Sexuales Psicológicas/psicologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Up to half of postmenopausal women experience genitourinary symptoms secondary to hormone deficiency, and there is little consensus on the use of vaginal hormone therapy (VHT) for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in these patients. This is a review of the scientific literature in the last decade evaluating the use of VHT for disorders of the lower urinary tract including overactive bladder (OAB), stress urinary incontinence (SUI), recurrent urinary tract infections (UTI), and interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (ICS/BPS). RECENT FINDINGS: Vaginal estrogen therapy improves OAB symptoms in postmenopausal women, but results are mixed when VHT is used in combination with other treatments. There is inconclusive or limited data for the use of VHT to treat SUI and IC/BPS. Vaginal estrogen and prasterone (DHEA) therapies have demonstrated efficacy as treatment modalities for patients who experience recurrent UTIs. VHT preparations show efficacy for the treatment of certain LUTS and can be considered in carefully selected patients when clinically indicated.
Asunto(s)
Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior , Vejiga Urinaria Hiperactiva , Incontinencia Urinaria de Esfuerzo , Infecciones Urinarias , Sistema Urinario , Humanos , Femenino , Vejiga Urinaria Hiperactiva/diagnóstico , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/tratamiento farmacológico , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/etiología , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Estrógenos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pinterest is a visually oriented social media platform with over 250 million monthly users. Previous studies have found misinformative content on genitourinary malignancies to be broadly disseminated on YouTube; however, no study has assessed the quality of this content on Pinterest. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the quality, understandability, and actionability of genitourinary malignancy content on Pinterest. METHODS: We examined 540 Pinterest posts or pins, using the following search terms: "bladder cancer," "kidney cancer," "prostate cancer," and "testicular cancer." The pins were limited to English language and topic-specific content, resulting in the following exclusions: bladder (n=88), kidney (n=4), prostate (n=79), and testicular cancer (n=10), leaving 359 pins as the final analytic sample. Pinterest pins were classified based on publisher and perceived race or ethnicity. Content was assessed using 2 validated grading systems: DISCERN quality criteria and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool. The presence of misinformation was evaluated using a published Likert scale ranging from 1=none to 5=high. RESULTS: Overall, 359 pins with a total of 8507 repins were evaluated. The primary publisher of genitourinary malignancy pins were health and wellness groups (n=162, 45%). Across all genitourinary malignancy pins with people, only 3% (n=7) were perceived as Black. Additionally, Asian (n=2, 1%) and Latinx (n=1, 0.5%) individuals were underrepresented in all pins. Nearly 75% (n=298) of the pins had moderate- to poor-quality information. Misinformative content was apparent in 4%-26% of all genitourinary cancer pins. Understandability and actionability were poor in 55% (n=198) and 100% (n=359) of the pins, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: On Pinterest, the majority of the urological oncology patient-centric content is of low quality and lacks diversity. This widely used, yet unregulated platform has the ability to influence consumers' health knowledge and decision-making. Ultimately, this can lead to consumers making suboptimal medical decisions. Moreover, our findings demonstrate underrepresentation across many racial and ethnic groups. Efforts should be made to ensure the dissemination of diverse, high-quality, and accurate health care information to the millions of users on Pinterest and other social media platforms.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether more severe urinary symptoms and poorer quality of life among patients on diuretic therapy are associated with decreased adherence to the diuretic regimen. METHODS: Participants were recruited via ResearchMatch.org and sent a REDCap survey. The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Short Form (OAB-q SF) was used to assess urinary symptom bother and health-related quality of life (HRQL). Participants were asked if they skip diuretic doses due to urinary symptoms with a bivariate (yes or no) outcome. Subgroup analyses of loop vs non-loop diuretic and those taking the diuretic for a cardiovascular indication (hypertension or heart failure) were performed. RESULTS: A total of 4029 surveys were sent, 285 were returned (7.1% response rate), and 279 were included in the study. Fifty-three participants admitted to skipping diuretic doses due to urinary symptoms. Lower HRQL scores were significantly associated with poorer adherence scores among all participants (P < .001), among participants taking a loop diuretic (P < .001), and among participants with hypertension and heart failure (P < .039). Association between symptoms and adherence remained significant after adjustment in the multivariate model for the whole cohort and loop diuretic subgroup but lost significance in the hypertension and heart failure subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Worsening quality of life due to urinary symptoms may be associated with poorer adherence to diuretics, particularly loop diuretics.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Hipertensión , Vejiga Urinaria Hiperactiva , Diuréticos/uso terapéutico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/inducido químicamente , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Calidad de Vida , Inhibidores del Simportador de Cloruro Sódico y Cloruro Potásico/uso terapéutico , Vejiga Urinaria Hiperactiva/inducido químicamenteRESUMEN
Total pelvic exenterations (TPE) are high morbidity procedures, with up to 38% of patients experiencing a major complication after TPE surgery. We report the case of a 69-year-old woman with a sigmoid conduit-neovaginal fistula who presented with new onset continuous vaginal leakage and decreased urostomy output 3 months post-op from a TPE. We highlight the presentation, diagnosis, conservative management, and surgical management of conduit-vaginal fistulas.
Asunto(s)
Fístula , Exenteración Pélvica , Derivación Urinaria , Anciano , Femenino , Fístula/etiología , Humanos , Exenteración Pélvica/efectos adversos , Exenteración Pélvica/métodos , Vagina/cirugíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine the role that the burden of childbearing, including pregnancy and maternity leave, plays in academic promotion for women in urology, which has been shown to be delayed as compared to their male counterparts. METHODS: Female academic urologists of varying academic rank who have children were invited to participate in a semistructured interview. A representative sample from multiple subspecialties and geographic locations were targeted. Topics addressed included pregnancy, maternity leave, parenting, and promotion in academic urology. Transcripts of the interview were analyzed using grounded theory methodology. RESULTS: Eleven participants were interviewed, including 3 assistant, 5 associate, and 3 full professors. The majority of participants chose to time pregnancy with training either during less strenuous portions or avoiding residency altogether. Nearly half endorsed self-inflicted hardships during pregnancy or early postpartum to prevent inconveniencing colleagues or to "pull their weight" in accordance with surgical culture. Outsourcing of childcare and household duties, along with spousal support, were discussed as contributing to success. Lack of transparency for promotional criteria was identified as a significant obstacle to promotion. Sponsorship and self-motivated information gathering were identified as critical components to success in promotion. CONCLUSION: A culture of support created by administration and colleagues is critical for a positive experience with childbearing, and return to clinical practice or training postpartum. Explicit promotional criteria that are accessible in early career development and sponsorship from members of the academic department or subspecialty community are crucial for all urologists, but for women in particular.
Asunto(s)
Internado y Residencia , Urología , Humanos , Niño , Femenino , Masculino , Embarazo , Urología/educación , Responsabilidad Parental , Urólogos , Cuidado del NiñoRESUMEN
To improve the quality of urologic care delivered to our patients, it is imperative to address and reduce existing gender disparities. This begins by debunking myths that perpetuate these disparities and working together to create meaningful systemic change, including how we hire, retain, promote, and support women.
Asunto(s)
Equidad de Género , Femenino , HumanosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine how medical students' Twitter engagement impacted the urology residency match and overall student perception of Twitter. METHODS: We utilized a mixed methods approach with (1) Twitter metrics data, (2) online student surveys, and (3) qualitative semi-structured interviews. Interviews were evaluated with iterative thematic content analysis, while quantitative data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, and univariate analyses. RESULTS: We identified 245 Twitter accounts of Urology residency applicants from the 2021 cycle. Matched students were more likely to have a Twitter account (59% matched vs 28% unmatched, Pâ¯=â¯.002) and account creation increased following the COVID-19 pandemic announcement. Matched students' profiles were associated with more followers, bios mentioning Urology, home Urology residency programs, and no international flags and/or references. The online survey had a 16% response rate. A majority reported utilizing Twitter for residency information (95%), wanting to continue Twitter throughout residency (67%), and feeling uncomfortable tweeting about racial, political, or diversity issues (64%). Nine interviews revealed 4 themes: Twitter's opportunities for networking, Twitter's role in the application process, the burden of social media use, and professionalism. CONCLUSION: Students applying to Urology residency increasingly utilized Twitter during the COVID-19 pandemic and having a Twitter account was associated with matching. While Twitter may not be necessary to succeed in the match and can pose an additional time burden, applicants view it as an opportunity for learning, networking, and personal branding.