Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Anesthesiology ; 119(6): 1284-95, 2013 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24126262

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although predictors of laryngeal mask airway failure in adults have been elucidated, there remains a paucity of data regarding laryngeal mask airway failure in children. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective database review of all pediatric patients who received a laryngeal mask anesthetic at their institution from 2006 to 2010. Device brands were restricted to LMA Unique™ (Cardinal Health, Dublin, OH) and LMA Classic™ (LMA North America, San Diego, CA), and primary outcome was laryngeal mask failure, defined as any airway event requiring device removal and tracheal intubation. Potential risk factors were analyzed with both univariate and multivariate techniques and included medical history, physical examination, surgical, and anesthetic characteristics. RESULTS: Of the 11,910 anesthesia cases performed in the study, 102 cases (0.86%) experienced laryngeal mask failure. Common presenting features of laryngeal mask failures included leak (25%), obstruction (48%), and patient intolerance such as intractable coughing/bucking (11%). Failures occurred before incision in 57% of cases and after incision in 43%. Independent clinical associations included ear/nose/throat surgical procedure, nonoutpatient admission status, prolonged surgical duration, congenital/acquired airway abnormality, and patient transport. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the study support the use of the LMA Unique™ and LMA Classic™ as reliable pediatric supraglottic airway devices, demonstrating relatively low failure rates. Predictors of laryngeal mask airway failure in the pediatric surgical population do not overlap with those in the adult population and should therefore be independently considered.


Asunto(s)
Máscaras Laríngeas/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Obstrucción de las Vías Aéreas/epidemiología , Obstrucción de las Vías Aéreas/etiología , Anestesia , Niño , Preescolar , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Falla de Equipo , Femenino , Predicción , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Periodo Perioperatorio , Enfermedades Respiratorias/congénito , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Pediatrics ; 121(5): 979-87, 2008 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18450903

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The Comparison of Venipuncture and Venous Cannulation Pain After Fast-Onset Needle-Free Powder Lidocaine or Placebo Treatment trial was a randomized, single-dose, double-blind, phase 3 study investigating whether a needle-free powder lidocaine delivery system (a sterile, prefilled, disposable system that delivers lidocaine powder into the epidermis) produces effective local analgesia within 1 to 3 minutes for venipuncture and peripheral venous cannulation procedures in children. METHODS: Pediatric patients (3-18 years of age) were randomly assigned to treatment with the needle-free powder lidocaine delivery system (0.5 mg of lidocaine and 21 +/- 1 bar of pressure; n = 292) or a sham placebo system (n = 287) at the antecubital fossa or the back of the hand 1 to 3 minutes before venipuncture or cannulation. All patients rated the administration comfort of the needle-free systems and the pain of the subsequent venous access procedures with the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (from 0 to 5). Patients 8 to 18 years of age also provided self-reports with a visual analog scale, and parents provided observational visual analog scale scores for their child's venous access pain. Safety also was assessed. RESULTS: Immediately after administration, mean Wong-Baker Faces scale scores were 0.54 and 0.24 in the active system and sham placebo system groups, respectively. After venipuncture or cannulation, mean Wong-Baker Faces scale scores were 1.77 +/- 0.09 and 2.10 +/- 0.09 and mean visual analog scale scores were 22.62 +/- 1.80 mm and 31.97 +/- 1.82 mm in the active system and sham placebo system groups, respectively. Parents' assessments of their child's procedural pain were also lower in the active system group (21.35 +/- 1.43 vs 28.67 +/- 1.66). Treatment-related adverse events were generally mild and resolved without sequelae. Erythema and petechiae were more frequent in the active system group. CONCLUSIONS: The needle-free powder lidocaine delivery system was well tolerated and produced significant analgesia within 1 to 3 minutes.


Asunto(s)
Analgesia/métodos , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Cateterismo Periférico , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos , Lidocaína/administración & dosificación , Dolor/prevención & control , Flebotomía , Administración Cutánea , Adolescente , Anestésicos Locales/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Niño , Preescolar , Método Doble Ciego , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Lidocaína/efectos adversos , Masculino , Dolor/etiología , Dimensión del Dolor , Flebotomía/efectos adversos , Polvos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...