Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Transfusion ; 64(4): 751-754, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38491925

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Anaplasma phagocytophilum is a tick-borne bacterium and the cause of human granulocytic anaplasmosis (HGA). Here, we report a case of transfusion-transmitted (TT)-HGA involving a leukoreduced (LR) red blood cell (RBC) unit. CASE REPORT: A 64-year-old woman with gastric adenocarcinoma and multiple myeloma who received weekly blood transfusions developed persistent fevers, hypotension, and shortness of breath 1 week after receiving an RBC transfusion. Persistent fevers, new thrombocytopenia, and transaminitis suggested a tick-borne infection. RESULTS: The absence of blood parasites on thick and thin blood smears suggested that malaria and Babesia infection were not present, and the recipient tested negative for antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi. Blood testing by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for Ehrlichia and Anaplasma species identified A. phagocytophilum. Treatment with doxycycline resolved the infection; however, the recipient expired due to complications of her known malignancies. The recipient lived in a nursing home and did not have pets or spend time outdoors. The donor was a female in her 70s from Maine who was diagnosed with HGA 3 weeks after donating blood and whose LR-RBCs from the donation were transfused to the recipient 9 days following collection. CONCLUSION: This is a confirmed case of TT-HGA. Although rare, TT-HGA has been reported with LR-RBCs and platelets. In endemic areas, testing for tick-borne associated infections should be considered when investigating post-transfusion complications.


Asunto(s)
Anaplasma phagocytophilum , Anaplasmosis , Enfermedades por Picaduras de Garrapatas , Humanos , Animales , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades por Picaduras de Garrapatas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades por Picaduras de Garrapatas/epidemiología , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos , Eritrocitos
2.
Crit Care Med ; 49(7): 1015-1025, 2021 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33870923

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Four peer-reviewed publications have reported results from randomized controlled trials of convalescent plasma for coronavirus disease 2019 infection; none were conducted in the United States nor used standard plasma as a comparator. To determine if administration of convalescent plasma to patients with coronavirus disease 2019 increases antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and improves outcome. DESIGN: Double-blind randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Hospital in New York. PATIENTS: Patients with polymerase chain reaction documented coronavirus disease 2019 infection. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized (4:1) to receive 2 U of convalescent plasma versus standard plasma. Antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 were measured in plasma units and in trial recipients. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Enrollment was terminated after emergency use authorization was granted for convalescent plasma. Seventy-four patients were randomized. At baseline, mean (sd) Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (23.4 [5.6] and 22.5 [6.6]), percent of patients intubated (19% and 20%), and median (interquartile range) days from symptom onset to randomization of 9 (6-18) and 9 (6-15), were similar in the convalescent plasma versus standard plasma arms, respectively. Convalescent plasma had high neutralizing activity (median [interquartile range] titer 1:526 [1:359-1:786]) and its administration increased antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 by 14.4%, whereas standard plasma administration led to an 8.6% decrease (p = 0.005). No difference was observed for ventilator-free days through 28 days (primary study endpoint): median (interquartile range) of 28 (2-28) versus 28 (0-28; p = 0.86) for the convalescent plasma and standard plasma groups, respectively. A greater than or equal to 2 point improvement in the World Health Organization scale was achieved by 20% of subjects in both arms (p = 0.99). All-cause mortality through 90 days was numerically lower in the convalescent plasma versus standard plasma groups (27% vs 33%; p = 0.63) but did not achieve statistical significance. A key prespecified subgroup analysis of time to death in patients who were intubated at baseline was statistically significant; however, sample size numbers were small. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of convalescent plasma to hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 infection increased antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus disease 2 but was not associated with improved outcome.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/terapia , SARS-CoV-2 , Anciano , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/sangre , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunización Pasiva , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Inmunoglobulina M/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , New York/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Sueroterapia para COVID-19
3.
Transfusion ; 61(5): 1461-1470, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33559248

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Convalescent plasma is undergoing randomized trials as a potential therapeutic option for COVID-19 infection. Little empirical evidence exists regarding the determination of donor eligibility and experiences with donor selection. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This prospective study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in New York to select plasma donors for a randomized, double-blind, controlled convalescent plasma trial. Clearance for donation required successful completion of an online questionnaire and an in-person screening visit, which included (a) completion of a Donor Health Questionnaire (DHQ), (b) Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody testing using an immunochromatographic anti- severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) test, (c) Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing if <28 days from symptom resolution, and (d) routine blood bank testing. RESULTS: After receiving 3093 online questionnaires, 521 individuals presented for in-person screening visits, with 40.1% (n = 209) fully qualifying. Subjects (n = 312) failed to progress due to the following reasons: disqualifying answer from DHQ (n = 30, 9.6%), insufficient antibodies (n = 198, 63.5%), persistent positive PCR tests (n = 14, 4.5%), and blood donation testing labs (n = 70, 22.4%). Importantly, 24.6% and 11.1% of potential donors who reported having PCR-diagnosed infection had low or undetectable SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels, respectively. Surprisingly, 62.9% (56/89) of subjects had positive PCR tests 14-27 days after symptom resolution, with 13 individuals continuing to be PCR positive after 27 days. CONCLUSION: It is feasible for a single site to fully qualify a large number of convalescent plasma donors in a short period of time. Among otherwise qualified convalescent plasma donors, we found high rates of low or undetectable antibody levels and many individuals with persistently positive PCR tests.


Asunto(s)
Donantes de Sangre , Prueba de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19 , Prueba Serológica para COVID-19 , COVID-19/sangre , Convalecencia , Selección de Donante , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa
4.
Ann Diagn Pathol ; 28: 37-42, 2017 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28648938

RESUMEN

Secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is an uncommon, but life-threatening syndrome of highly stimulated and ineffective immune dysregulation. It is not a disease entity by itself and the current diagnosis of secondary (acquired) HLH is based on constellation of nonspecific clinical and laboratory parameters indicative of overactive immune response. The presenting symptoms are often nonspecific and could potentially be missed, leading to a fatal outcome. Patients with malignancy-associated HLH have a relatively unfavorable overall survival compared with non-malignancy-associated HLH. In this retrospective study, nine adult patients with secondary HLH were identified. Of these four cases were associated with a malignancy and despite a high degree of suspicion, the underlying lymphoid malignancy was not initially evident. Three out of four patients with lymphoid malignancy-associated HLH died over a very short course of time following the diagnosis. The outcome was significantly different for the control group of patients with other underlying cause(s) for HLH. These cases emphasize the importance of a thorough search for a hidden malignant source in patients with secondary HLH for prompt diagnosis and institution of malignancy specific treatment.


Asunto(s)
Médula Ósea/patología , Linfohistiocitosis Hemofagocítica/patología , Linfoma/complicaciones , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica/métodos , Linfohistiocitosis Hemofagocítica/diagnóstico , Linfohistiocitosis Hemofagocítica/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
5.
Lab Med ; 49(1): 87-91, 2017 Dec 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29309675

RESUMEN

This case study presents a patient with multiple myeloma whose serum specimen exhibits 2 distinct bands in serum protein electrophoresis but only one band in immunofixation electrophoresis. This latter, single band corresponds to the M-spike. An investigation is presented to determine the identity of this disappearing or phantom band. Furthermore, this case is used as a teaching point to explain the criteria used for staging multiple myeloma, how a cell can become a myeloma propagating cell, methods that can be used to identify unexpected bands in serum protein electrophoresis, possible explanations for bands in the beta region, the usual treatment regimens in multiple myeloma and finally specimen collecting and handling procedures for serum protein electrophoresis.


Asunto(s)
Proteínas Sanguíneas/análisis , Mieloma Múltiple/sangre , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Densitometría , Electroforesis , Citometría de Flujo , Humanos , Inmunoelectroforesis , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
6.
Urology ; 93: e3, 2016 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26993352

RESUMEN

We report a case of multiple fungal renal abscesses in a 36-year-old woman with a history of diabetes and intravenous substance use disorder. The patient presented with fever and hematuria, and was found to be bacteremic and fungemic. She was initially managed with broad-spectrum antibiotics and antifungals. She remained febrile and imaging on treatment day 14 showed no improvement of the renal abscesses. Thus, a nephrectomy was performed, after which the patient defervesced and follow-up blood cultures were negative. There is a paucity of literature regarding management of multifocal fungal renal abscesses that fail to respond to medical management.


Asunto(s)
Absceso , Enfermedades Renales , Micosis , Infecciones Urinarias , Absceso/diagnóstico por imagen , Absceso/terapia , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedades Renales/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Renales/terapia , Micosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Micosis/terapia , Infecciones Urinarias/diagnóstico por imagen , Infecciones Urinarias/terapia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...