Switching from a Non-Protease inhibitor-Based Regimen To the Fixed Dose Combination of Darunavir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide in Clinical Practice.

Background: The primary objective of this study was to estimate the proportion of people living with HIV (PLWH) who switched from a non-protease inhibitor (PI)-based regimen [integrase strand transfer inhibitor (InSTI)-based or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based regimen] to darunavir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, tenofovir alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF). Methods: This was a retrospective study on PLWH treated with a non-PI regimen in January 2017, who switched to D/C/F/TAF or to another antiretroviral therapy (ART) within November 2019. Follow-up was from the start date of D/C/F/TAF until the last available visit or discontinuation for any reason of this regimen. Virological failure (VF) was defined as 2 consecutive HIV-RNA values >50 copies/mL. Characteristics were reported as median (interquartile range) or frequency (%). A univariate Poisson regression model was used to measure the incidence rate of switch to D/C/F/TAF. Changes in laboratory parameters during D/C/F/TAF were assessed by univariate mixed linear models. Results: Overall, 3076 PLWH were included; 83% were male, median age at ART switch was 50 (42-56) years and median time on ART was 5.2 (0.3-13.0) years. PLWH had a median follow-up of 4.76 (3.70-6.38) years; during 17,099 person-years of follow-up (PYFU), 423/3076 (14%) participants discontinued the non-PI-based regimen and 106/423 (25%) switched to D/C/F/TAF, with an overall incidence rate of switch to D/C/F/TAF of 6.2 per 1000-PYFU (95% CI: 5.0-7.4). Among PLWH who switched to D/C/F/TAF, the ongoing regimen was based on NNRTIs in 37 (35%) and on InSTIs in 69 (65%). Main reasons leading to switch to D/C/F/TAF included neuropsychiatric adverse events (37%), VF (26%) and Kaposi sarcoma progression (5%). Conclusion: In the last years, a non-negligible proportion of patients on an NNRTI- or an InSTI-based regimen switched to D/C/F/TAF.

Correction to: Patient-Reported Outcomes in an Observational Cohort of HIV-1-Infected Adults on Darunavir/Cobicistat-Based Regimens: Beyond Viral Suppression.

In the original version of this article, in Fig. 2b the formatting on the x-axis of the graph has been published incorrectly.

Patient-Reported Outcomes in an Observational Cohort of HIV-1-Infected Adults on Darunavir/Cobicistat-Based Regimens: Beyond Viral Suppression.

OBJECTIVE: This prospective, multicenter, non-interventional cohort study enrolling human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1-infected, virally suppressed adult outpatients in Italy aimed to describe results obtained from patient-reported outcome questionnaires regarding treatment satisfaction and symptom perceptions in HIV-1-positive patients who switched to cobicistat-boosted darunavir antiretroviral regimens, coming from ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors. METHODS: Patients entered this study between June 2016 and February 2017, once their treating physician had considered them eligible for cobicistat-boosted darunavir-based treatment as per clinical practice. Patients' satisfaction regarding regimen and current symptom burdens were assessed using two previously validated, patient-reported outcome questionnaires: HIV Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (HIV-TSQ) and HIV Symptoms Distress Module (HIV-SDM). These questionnaires were administered at prespecified time-points: enrollment (Visit 1), 4-8 weeks later (Visit 2), and 48 ± 6 weeks after study enrollment (Visit 4). Data of patient-reported outcome total scores for both questionnaires are presented as median with 25th-75th percentiles. Questionnaires scores were analyzed overall and stratified by gender when applicable. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate the role of lost to follow-up, using the "last observation carried forward" method. RESULTS: A total of 348 patients were enrolled in this study; 296 patients (208 male and 88 female) provided both evaluable HIV-TSQ and HIV-SDM at enrollment and at 4-8 weeks, while 250 patients (174 male and 76 female) provided questionnaire data at enrollment and at 48 ± 6 weeks. The total scores of HIV-TSQ showed improvements in patient satisfaction in the overall population both at Visit 2 and Visit 4 (p < 0.001, sign test) and also when stratified by gender throughout the study period. In addition, the overall burden of symptoms, as shown by the HIV-SDM scores, decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Switching to a cobicistat-boosted darunavir-based therapy led to overall increased patient satisfaction and reduced symptom burden when compared with previous regimens. The use of patient-reported outcomes in clinical daily practice could provide a useful tool towards achieving guideline goals to achieve "fourth 90", having 90% of virally suppressed patients with a good health-related quality of life.

Effectiveness of Switching to Darunavir/Cobicistat in Virologically Suppressed HIV-Positive Patients Receiving Ritonavir-Boosted Protease Inhibitor-Based Regimen: The "STORE" Study.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the effectiveness and tolerability of switching to a darunavir/cobicistat (DRV/c)-based antiretroviral regimen from a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r)-based regimen in virologically suppressed HIV-positive patients. DRV trough values were also investigated. SETTING: Prospective, multicenter, single-country, noninterventional cohort study. METHODS: This study included patients on a PI/r-based ART for at least 12 months having plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL since at least 6 months. The primary endpoint, defined as HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL, was measured at 48 ± 6 weeks from baseline. A secondary analysis was performed using the time to loss of virological response algorithm. Biochemical parameters, including DRV trough samples, were collected as per clinical practice and measured using high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Of 336 patients enrolled, 282 completed the study: 70.8% had plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at 48 weeks; using the time to loss of virological response algorithm, 82.7% maintained virological suppression. Virological failure was observed in 6 patients (1.8%). Adverse event-related discontinuations were 4.5%. After 48 weeks, we found a significant improvement in both triglycerides (median, 130 to 113.5 mg/dL, P = 0.0254) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (48 to 49 mg/dL, P < 0.0001) but no change in other biomarkers. DRV trough concentrations in 56 subjects showed a median value of 2862.5 (1469.5-4439) ng/mL, higher in women than in men (4221 vs. 2634 ng/mL, P = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: In stable HIV-1 positive virologically suppressed patients, the switch to DRV/c-based ART was beneficial in terms of low rates of virological failure and adverse events due to its high tolerability and improvement in triglycerides.

Long-term efficacy and safety of rilpivirine plus abacavir and lamivudine in HIV-1 infected patients with undetectable viral load.

INTRODUCTION: A regimen with rilpivirine (RPV), abacavir (ABC) and lamivudine (3TC) is simple and may allow the sparing of tenofovir and protease inhibitors. However, data on use of this combination as a strategy of switch are limited. Aims of the study were to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of this regimen. METHODS: Retrospective study on HIV-1 infected patients followed at the Infectious Disease Department of the San Raffaele Scientific Institute, HBsAg-negative, HLA B5701-negative, with no documented resistance to RPV, ABC and 3TC, with HIV-RNA<50 copies/mL who started RPV plus ABC/3TC from March 2013 to September 2015. The primary outcome was durability [no treatment failure (TF)]. Secondary objectives were to evaluate changes in immunological, metabolic and other safety parameters. TF was defined as the occurrence of virological failure (VF, 2 consecutive values >50 copies/mL) or discontinuation of any drug in the regimen for any reason. Patients' follow-up accrued from the date of RPV plus ABC/3TC initiation to the date of TF (VF or discontinuation of any drug in the regimen) or to the date of last available visit. Time to TF was evaluated by use of the Kaplan-Meier curves. Mixed linear models were applied to evaluate changes in immunological, metabolic and other safety parameters. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: In this analysis, 100 patients starting RPV plus ABC/3TC were included. By 12, 24 and 36 months after switching to RPV plus ABC/3TC, the proportions of individuals without TF were 88% [95% confidence interval (CI): 79%-93%], 82% (95% CI:73%-89%) and 78% (95% CI:68%-86%), respectively. Time to TF was not significantly influenced by CD4+ nadir (≤200 vs >200 cells/µl; log-rank test: p = 0.311) or pre-ART viral load (<100000 vs ≥100000 copies/mL; log-rank test: p = 0.574) or the type of previous antiretroviral regimen (PI+2NRTIs vs NNRTI+2NRTIs vs Other; log-rank test: p = 0.942). Over a median follow-up of 2.9 years (IQR: 1.9-3.5), 26 subjects discontinued the treatment [10 due to toxicity, 7 for interactions with other drugs, 3 due to cardiovascular risk concern, 2 due to single viral blip, 1 due to VF, 1 for asthma, 1 patient's decision, 1 due to enrolment in a study protocol]. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, long-term use of RPV plus ABC/3TC regimen is effective and safe. Efficacy of this regimen was not found to be affected by low CD4+ nadir or high pre-ART viral load.

Cardiovascular disease in women with HIV-1 infection.

Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death in women, nevertheless it is often underestimated in female patients without overt risk factors. The chronic infection by Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) is clearly associated, along with the use of certain antiretroviral drugs and traditional risk factors, with an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases. The aim of this manuscript is to review the epidemiology, risk factors, pathogenesis, diagnostic approach, primary and secondary prevention strategies of cardiovascular disease in HIV-negative and HIV-positive female subjects. The ultimate goal is to promote knowledge and development of specific and appropriate clinical interventions and guidelines in this group of high-risk patients, mostly in view of the expected growth of ageing females with HIV.

Effectiveness, durability, and safety of darunavir/ritonavir in HIV-1-infected patients in routine clinical practice in Italy: a postauthorization noninterventional study.

Current antiretroviral (ARV) therapy for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1)-infected patients provides long-term control of viral load (VL). Darunavir (DRV) is a nonpeptidomimetic protease inhibitor approved for use with a ritonavir booster (DRV/r). This study evaluated the effectiveness of DRV/r in combination with other ARV agents in routine clinical practice in Italy. In this descriptive observational study, data on utilization of DRV/r, under the conditions described in the marketing authorization, were collected from June 2009 to December 2012. Effectiveness (VL <50 copies/mL), tolerability, and durability in four patient groups (two DRV/r-experienced, one ARV-experienced DRV/r-naïve, and one ARV-naïve) were analyzed. Secondary objectives included immunological response, safety, and persistence/discontinuation rates. In total, 875 of 883 enrolled patients were included in the analysis: of these, 662 (75.7%) completed the follow-up until the end of 2012 and 213 (24.3%) withdrew from the study earlier. Initial DRV dose was 600 mg twice daily (67.1%) or 800 mg once daily (32.9%). Only 16 patients (1.8%) withdrew from the study due to virological failure. Virological response proportions were higher in patients virologically suppressed at study entry versus patients with baseline VL ≥50 copies/mL in each ARV-experienced group, while there was no consistent difference across study groups and baseline VL strata according to baseline CD4(+) cell count. CD4(+) cell count increased from study entry to last study visit in all the four groups. DRV/r was well tolerated, with few discontinuations due to study-emergent nonfatal adverse events (3.0% overall, including 2.1% drug-related) or deaths (3.0% overall, all non-drug-related); 35.3% of patients reported ≥1 adverse events. These observational data show that DRV/r was effective and well tolerated in the whole patient population described here. The DRV/r-containing regimen provided viral suppression in a high percentage of patients in all groups, with low rates of discontinuation due to virological failure.

T-cell phenotype and function following a first cART regimen containing either a protease inhibitor or a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor in HIV-infected late presenters: results from a retrospective, ex vivo study.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to comparatively assess darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) and efavirenz (EFV)-based first-line cART regimens in the reconstitution of T-cell phenotype and function in HIV-infected, late presenter subjects. METHODS: Retrospective, ex vivo study on stored peripheral blood mononuclear cell samples of cART-naive, HIV-infected individuals with CD4(+) T-cell counts <50>250/µl upon cART initiation with either DRV/r or EFV as third drugs of standard antiretroviral regimens. CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell maturation (CCR7/CD45RA) and proliferation (Ki67), CD8(+) T-cell activation (CD38/HLA-DR) as well as HIV- and cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific responses (CD4/CD8/IL-2/IFN-γ) were studied by flow cytometry at baseline (T0), T3, T6 and T12 months. Soluble inflammatory markers (IL-6 and sCD14) were measured in plasma at T0 and T12. Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney tests were used for statistics. RESULTS: A total of 19 patients started DRV/r and 15 EFV. Both regimens accounted for suppression of the HIV RNA load (<40 copies/ml), reconstitution of absolute CD4(+) T-cells and CD4(+)/CD8(+) T-cell ratio. All study participants displayed a significant decrease of activated HLA-DR(+)CD38(+) CD8(+) T-cells at all study time points, yet no differences were found between study groups in T-cell activation and maturation phenotype. From a functional standpoint, only individuals receiving DRV/r displayed transitory recovery of HIV-specific IL-2(+)IFN-γ(-) CD4(+) T-cells (T3: P=0.006) and IL-2(-)IFN-γ(+) CD8(+) T-cells (T3: P=0.032). CONCLUSIONS: DRV/r- and EFV-based regimens have an equal effect on T-cell phenotype and function in HIV late presenters. A temporary restoration of HIV-specific T-cell immunity early in the course of therapy with DRV/r possibly implies a more effective control over HIV in the first months following a PI/r-based regimen, even at late stage of disease.

Safety of darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) in HIV-1-infected DRV/r-experienced and -naïve patients: analysis of data in the real-world setting in Italy.

INTRODUCTION: This descriptive, non-interventional study on HIV-1-infected patients treated with DRV/r in the usual clinical setting, with a single-arm prospective observational design, collected data on utilization of darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) under the conditions described in marketing authorization in usual clinical practice in Italy to evaluate efficacy and safety of DRV/r-based antiretroviral (ARV) treatment. This analysis focussed on the safety profile of DRV/r in HIV-1 infected patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were analyzed from four cohorts of HIV-1-infected patients treated with DRV/r in the real-world setting, including an ARV-naïve-DRV/r-naïve cohort (Cohort 1), an ARV-experienced-DRV/r-naïve cohort (Cohort 2) and two ARV-DRV/r-experienced cohorts (Cohorts 3 and 4), one of which (Cohort 3) was from the DRV/r Early Access Program. The objective of this analysis was to examine the safety data obtained in these four cohorts in patients enrolled from June 2009 to November 2011 and observed until December 2012 or DRV/r discontinuation. RESULTS: Safety data from 875 patients were analyzed. DRV/r-based treatment was well tolerated, with 36.2% of patients reporting ≥1 adverse event (AE) and very few discontinuations due to study drug-related AEs (3.0% overall). The most frequent AEs were diarrhoea (2.7%), reduced bone density (2.6%) and hypercholesterolaemia (2.1%) (Table 1). Regarding metabolic parameters, levels of liver enzymes alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) remained stable from baseline to the last study visit (LSV) in DRV-experienced patients and decreased in DRV-naïve patients. Blood glucose concentrations remained stable in all cohorts. Serum triglyceride and cholesterol concentrations remained stable in DRV-experienced patients but increased in naïve patients, yet were still within normal range. CONCLUSIONS: In HIV-1-infected patients treated with DRV/r in these settings, the tolerability profile was favourable and similar to (or better than) that reported in controlled clinical trials. These data confirm DRV/r to be a safe treatment choice in DRV/r-experienced and naïve patients.

Effectiveness and durability of darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) in DRV/r-experienced HIV-1-infected patients in routine clinical practice.

INTRODUCTION: This was a descriptive non-interventional study in HIV-1-infected patients treated with DRV/r conducted in the clinical setting, with a single-arm prospective design. The primary objective was to collect data on utilization of darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) under the conditions described in the marketing authorization. Efficacy (measured as viral load [VL] <50 copies/mL and CD4+ cell count) was evaluated for DRV/r in combination with other antiretroviral (ARV) agents in routine clinical practice in Italy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Here we describe an analysis of effectiveness and durability data from two cohorts of DRV/r-experienced patients with HIV-1 infection, already receiving DRV/r according to usual clinical practice, collected prospectively from June 2009 to December 2012: Cohort 1, data from patients from the DRV/r Early Access Program (TMC114-C226 study; N=235 patients) and Cohort 2, a separate cohort of ARV-DRV/r-experienced patients (N=407 patients), treated with DRV/r in the market. Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. RESULTS: The median length of DRV/r exposure during the study was 925 days (interquartile range [IQR] 692-1006) in Cohort 1, and 581 (IQR 508-734) days in Cohort 2. Of those patients that completed the study, 94% and 87% of patients were virologically suppressed in Cohort 1 and 2, respectively, at last study visit (LSV). As expected, the virological suppression rate was higher in patients with baseline VL <50 copies/mL (Table 2). Mean CD4+ cell counts improved from baseline to LSV in both cohorts (Cohort 1: +54 cells/µL [95% CI 31, 77] and Cohort 2: +59 cells/µL [95% CI 44, 73]). High persistence rates were seen in both cohorts, with 75.3% of patients in Cohort 1 and 82.6% in Cohort 2 remaining on treatment at LSV; very few patients discontinued due to virologic failure (Table 1). Other reasons for study discontinuation are shown in Table1. Very few patients changed DRV/r dosing during the study, 15 from 1200 to 800 mg o.d. CONCLUSIONS: In patients already treated with DRV/r, DRV/r-based ARV treatment provided effective viral suppression with long-lasting durability, low virological response failure, low discontinuation rates and good tolerability. These data confirm DRV/r to be an effective treatment choice in previously treated patients.