Hospitalist perspective on pandemic related clinical and administrative changes: a cross sectional survey study.

OBJECTIVE: Hospitalists have played a leading role in caring for hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Many clinical and administrative changes occurred in hospitals to meet the varied pandemic needs. We surveyed hospitalists to understand their perspective on pandemic-related changes in technology, models of care, administration and leadership, impact on personal lives, and which of these changes should be continued versus reverting to pre-pandemic practices. METHODS: A 30-question survey was distributed to hospitalists working across the United States between 6 April 2022 to 16 May 2022. Baseline demographics were measured, and post-pandemic perspectives related to changes were analyzed. Perspectives were measured using a 5-point Likert scale and responses were categorized into 'agree' and 'did not agree' for analysis. Variation was assessed using Chi-square or Fisher exact tests. Open-ended questions were reported following qualitative content analysis organized into themes and reported as frequency. RESULTS: 177 respondents (39%) completed the survey. Nearly three-fourths favored hybrid meetings, and two-thirds preferred to continue new models of care. Nearly 90% desired more family and leisure time, continued wellness, and support services, and resumption of social gatherings. No major differences in perspectives were noted between hospitalists at teaching facilities and non-teaching facilities except for resuming protected time for non-clinical activities in those from teaching facilities (83.0% vs 62.5%). Respondents less than age 50 were more likely to prefer virtual meetings (59.0% vs 31.3%). Content analysis of open-ended questions resulted in different themes for each question. Respondents favored more work-life balance and less administrative and logistical work burden. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalists preferred to continue the use of technology and new models of care even in the post-pandemic period and express a desire for more work-life balance and less administrative and logistical work burden.

SPEAKers at the National Society of Hospital Medicine Meeting: A Follow-UP Study of Gender Equity for Conference Speakers from 2015 to 2019. The SPEAK UP Study.

Women continue to be underrepresented as speakers at national conferences, and research has shown similar trends in hospital medicine. The Society of Hospital Medicine (SHM) Annual Meeting has historically had an open call peer review process for workshop speakers and, in 2019, expanded the process for didactic speakers. We aimed to assess the overall conference trends for women speakers and whether the systematic processes in recruitment procedures (ie, open call) resulted in improved representation of women speakers. We also sought to understand how the proportion of women speakers might affect overall scores of the conference. From 2015 to 2019, the overall representation of women speakers increased, as did evaluation scores during the same time period. When selection processes included the open call peer review process, there were higher proportions of women speakers. An open call process with peer review for speakers may be a systematic process that national meetings could replicate to reduce gender inequities.