Parnaparin versus aspirin in the treatment of retinal vein occlusion. A randomized, double blind, controlled study.

INTRODUCTION: Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is a common cause of unilateral visual loss. Evidence based treatment recommendations for patients with RVO cannot be made because of the lack of adequate clinical trials. To compare the efficacy and safety of aspirin and of a low molecular weight heparin, parnaparin, in the treatment of RVO. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized, double blind, controlled trial eligible patients with a delay between symptoms onset and objective diagnosis of less than 15 days were randomized to aspirin 100 mg/day for 3 months or to a fixed daily dose of parnaparin, 12.800 IU for 7 days followed by 6.400 IU for a total of 3 months. Primary end-point of the study was the incidence of functional worsening of the eye with RVO at 6 months, as assessed by fluorescein angiography, visual acuity, and visual field. Study end-points were adjudicated by an independent committee. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were enrolled in the study and 58 of them (28 treated with parnaparin, 30 with aspirin) were evaluable for the analysis. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between groups. Functional worsening was adjudicated in 20.7% of patients treated with parnaparin and in 59.4% of patients treated with ASA (p=0.002). Recurrent RVO was diagnosed in 3 patients, all treated with ASA (p=n.s.). Bleeding rates were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Parnaparin appears to be more effective than aspirin in preventing functional worsening in patients with RVO. The results of this study need to be confirmed in a larger clinical trial.

Residual venous obstruction in patients with a single episode of deep vein thrombosis and in patients with recurrent deep vein thrombosis.

Residual venous obstruction (RVO) in patients with previous deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower limbs has been suggested as an independent risk factor for recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE). RVO could be a marker of a persistent prothrombotic state. We have compared the rate of RVO in patients with DVT and a personal history of at least one previous episode of VTE to the rate of RVO among patients with a first episode of DVT. All patients underwent compression ultrasonography (CUS) of the lower limbs 1 year after index DVT. RVO was arbitrarily defined as a thrombus occupying, at maximal compressibility, more than 20% of the vein area in the absence of compression. 50 consecutive patients with recurrent DVT and 50 age and sex-matched patients with a single episode of DVT were enrolled. The index event was idiopathic in 62% of patients with recurrent DVT and in 60% of patients with a single episode. In 74% of patients with recurrent DVT the index event occurred in either the contralateral leg or in a different segment of the ipsilateral leg. RVO was detected in 50% of patients with a single episode of DVT and in 88% of patients with recurrent DVT (p<0.00001). The prevalence of RVO is significantly higher in patients with recurrent DVT than in patients with a single episode. This finding supports the importance of RVO as a potential marker of a persistent prothrombotic state.

Oral vitamin K produces a normal INR within 24 hours of its administration in most patients discontinuing warfarin.

A randomized, blinded study in 30 patients was undertaken. This study found that low dose oral vitamin K was more effective than placebo when used to correct the INR in patients who are discontinuing warfarin. Larger studies will be required to determine if the use of oral vitamin K, for example in patients who are temporarily discontinuing warfarin to undergo interventional procedures, is safe and effective.