Long-term immunogenicity and safety of the hepatitis B vaccine HepB-CpG (HEPLISAV-B) compared with HepB-Eng (Engerix-B) in adults with chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a significant global burden, especially for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) receiving hemodialysis. Three doses of HepB-CpG (HEPLISAV-B® vaccine) induced a superior immune response compared with 4 double doses of HepB-Eng (Engerix-B®) in a phase 3 trial (HBV-17) in adults with CKD. Here we report the long-term immunogenicity and safety of HepB-CpG and HepB-Eng in eligible participants of HBV-17 who enrolled in this optional 34-month follow-up trial (HBV-19). METHODS: HBV-19 is a multicenter, open-label, phase 3b trial of adults with CKD who previously received a complete series of HepB-CpG or HepB-Eng in the HBV-17 trial. Participants were assigned to seroprotection categories at enrollment on the basis of their antibody response to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) in HBV-17. The objective was to evaluate the durability of seroprotection (defined as an anti-HBs concentration ≥ 10mIU/mL) induced by HepB-CpG and HepB-Eng. Participants whose anti-HBs concentration was below 10mIU/mL received additional HepB-CpG or HepB-Eng doses. RESULTS: 147 participants were enrolled; 66.7 % were men, median age was 65.0 years, and 83.7 % were white. The durability of seroprotection in participants with CKD was similar in those who received HepB-CpG and those who received HepB-Eng. Antibody concentrations ≥ 100mIU/mL persisted for longer in HepB-CpG than HepB-Eng recipients, among those with anti-HBs ≥ 100mIU/mL post vaccination. The geometric mean anti-HBs concentration in the HepB-CpG group was significantly higher than in the HepB-Eng group over time (P ≤ 0.0001). The safety profiles were similar between the vaccine groups. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the higher antibody levels induced by HepB-CpG in participants with CKD, seroprotection against HBV may be expected to persist longer than that induced by HepB-Eng. CLINICALTRIALS: gov: NCT01282762.

A Randomized Trial of Roxadustat in Anemia of Kidney Failure: SIERRAS Study.

INTRODUCTION: Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, standard of care for anemia of end-stage kidney disease, are associated with cardiovascular events. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of roxadustat, an oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor that stimulates erythropoiesis. METHODS: SIERRAS was a phase 3, randomized, open-label, active-controlled study enrolled adults on dialysis for end-stage kidney disease receiving erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for anemia. Patients were randomized (1:1) to thrice-weekly roxadustat or epoetin alfa. Doses were based on previous epoetin alfa dose and adjusted in the roxadustat arm to maintain hemoglobin at ∼11 g/dl during treatment. Epoetin alfa dosing was adjusted per US package insert. Primary efficacy endpoint was mean hemoglobin (g/dl) change from baseline averaged over weeks 28 to 52. Treatment-emergent adverse events were monitored. RESULTS: Enrolled patients (roxadustat, n = 370 and epoetin alfa, n = 371) had similar mean (SD) baseline hemoglobin levels (10.30 [0.66] g/dl). Mean (SD) hemoglobin changes for weeks 28 to 52 were 0.39 (0.93) and -0.09 (0.84) in roxadustat and epoetin alfa, respectively. Roxadustat was noninferior (least squares mean difference: 0.48 [95% confidence interval: 0.37, 0.59]; P < 0.001) to epoetin alfa. Tolerability was comparable between treatments. CONCLUSION: In end-stage kidney disease, roxadustat was noninferior to epoetin alfa in up to 52 weeks of treatment in this erythropoietin-stimulating agent conversion study. Roxadustat had an acceptable tolerability profile.