RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have attempted to explain age-related changes to the orbit in isolation, often producing conflicting results. The authors used highly accurate imaging software to analyze computed tomographic scans to characterize changes related to age objectively. METHODS: In this case-control study, patients seen in an ear, nose, and throat clinic were screened for study entry. Male and female participants were divided into two age groups (20 to 30 years and 60 to 75 years). Primary outcomes included measurement of bony orbital dimensions, volume of soft tissues (muscle and fat volume), and anterior globe position. Three-dimensional reconstructions were created of each orbit allowing these measurements. The generalized estimating equation was used so that both orbits from each patient could be included without any bias. RESULTS: The final sample included 240 orbits from 120 patients. There were 30 patients in each age group. Among female participants, the bony orbital volume ( p < 0.05), fat volume ( p < 0.01), and central width ( p < 0.001) of the bony orbit increased with age. The anterior globe position was significantly greater in older female participants ( p < 0.01). For male participants, the fat volume ( p < 0.0001) and central height ( p < 0.03) increased with age; the lateral rim moved posteriorly with age ( p < 0.007). The anterior globe position was not different between the age groups in male participants ( p = 0.56). CONCLUSION: The female bony orbit expands with age and is associated with a more anterior position of the globe; the male bony orbital volume remains the same and the lateral rim moves posteriorly.
Asunto(s)
Órbita , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Adulto , Anciano , Envejecimiento/fisiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Órbita/diagnóstico por imagen , Órbita/cirugía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To determine if crowdsourced ratings of oculoplastic surgical outcomes provide reliable information compared to professional graders and oculoplastic experts. METHODS: In this prospective psychometric evaluation, a scale for the rating of postoperative eyelid swelling was constructed using randomly selected images and topic experts. This scale was presented adjacent to 205 test images, including 10% duplicates. Graders were instructed to match the test image to the reference image it most closely resembles. Three sets of graders were solicited: crowdsourced lay people from Amazon Mechanical Turk marketplace, professional graders from the Doheny Image Reading Center (DIRC), and American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery surgeons. Performance was assessed by classical correlational analysis and generalizability theory. RESULTS: The correlation between scores on the first rating and the second rating for the 19 repeated occurrences was 0.60 for lay observers, 0.80 for DIRC graders and 0.84 for oculoplastic experts. In terms of inter-group rating reliability for all photos, the scores provided by lay observers were correlated with DIRC graders at a level of r = 0.88 and to experts at r = 0.79. The pictures themselves accounted for the greatest amount of variation among all groups. The amount of variation in the scores due to the rater was highest in the lay group at 25%, and was 20% and 21% for DIRC graders and experts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Crowdsourced observers are insufficiently precise to replicate the results of experts in grading postoperative eyelid swelling. DIRC graders performed similarly to experts and present a less resource-intensive option.
Asunto(s)
Colaboración de las Masas , Oftalmología , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
This study was to determine the degree of posttraumatic enophthalmos that is detectable by lay observers. In this case-control study, 60 photographs (frontal and oblique angles) of patients from an oculoplastics registry at the authors' institution were reviewed by lay observers. Patients were included if they had between 1 and 5 mm of unilateral enophthalmos, at least 6 months following trauma. They were divided into five groups of 10 and each group was separated by increments of 1 mm. Controls were selected from the same database and had 0 mm difference between each eye. Patients were excluded if they had any medical condition that might cause enophthalmos (including use of prostaglandin analogues). Participants were also excluded if they had any medical or surgical condition affecting the contralateral side. Lay observers were randomly selected from a pool of volunteers in nonmedical programs at our affiliated university. The primary outcome measure was the asymmetry cut-off (in millimeters) in which more than 50% of the cases (chance) were identified correctly. The generalized mixed model predicts that 66% of lay observers would correctly identify a difference between both eyes at a rate greater than would be predicted by chance, if at least a 5 mm difference existed between them (95% confidence interval [CI] 55.5-75%). This study shows that lay observers only reliably detect unilateral enophthalmos when there is at least a 5 mm difference between the eyes. This study used two-dimensional (2D) photographs and, therefore, results with three-dimensional (3D) observation may be different. In this study of 2D photographs, unilateral posttraumatic enophthalmos is only reliably detected by lay observers when a 5 mm difference exists between the eyes.