Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 38
Filtrar
1.
Farm Hosp ; 48(1): 16-22, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37612186

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to analyze and describe the concentrations of eculizumab and the complement blockade in patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) and C3 glomerulopathy, and to define a therapeutic margin where there is a high probability of achieving therapeutic efficacy. METHODS: Observational, ambispective and multicenter study that included adult and pediatric patients diagnosed with aHUS and C3 glomerulopathy from September 2020 to October 2022 in five hospitals in Spain. Eculizumab was administered at the doses recommended by the data sheet according to the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Pre-dose and post-dose concentrations of eculizumab were determined, as well as blockade of the classical complement pathway (CH50). Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected, and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated. To establish the cut-off point for eculizumab concentrations that predicted complement blockade, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed. Lastly, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to contrast the differences in different parameters according to eculizumab concentrations. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were included, 19 adults (76.0%) and 6 pediatrics (24.0%), with median ages of 43.4 (IQR 35.7-48.8) and 10.1 (IQR 9.6-11.3) years, respectively. Of these, 22 (88.0%) patients were diagnosed with aHUS and 3 (12.0%) with C3 glomerulopathy. A total of 111 eculizumab concentrations were determined. Mean pre-dose and post-dose concentration values detected during the maintenance phase were 243.8 (SD 240.6) µg/mL and 747.4 (SD 444.3) µg/mL, respectively. Increased complement blockade was observed at higher pre-dose concentrations (p=0.002) and decreased serum creatinine at both higher pre- and post-dose concentrations (p=0.001 and p=0.017, respectively). Using ROC curves, it was determined that a pre-dose concentration >149.0 µg/mL was optimal to achieve complement blockade, with an AUC of 0.87 (0.78-0.95). Finally, high inter-individual (48.9% CV) with low intra-individual variabilities (11.9% CV) in eculizumab clearance were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The present study reports supratherapeutic concentrations of eculizumab in patients with aHUS, and defines higher concentrations than those described in the data sheet to achieve blockade, thus encouraging the personalization of treatment with eculizumab.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Hemolítico Urémico Atípico , Adulto , Humanos , Niño , Persona de Mediana Edad , Síndrome Hemolítico Urémico Atípico/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , España
2.
Farm Hosp ; 48(1): T16-T22, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38057242

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to analyze and describe the concentrations of eculizumab and the complement blockade in patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) and C3 glomerulopathy, and to define a therapeutic margin where there is a high probability of achieving therapeutic efficacy. METHODS: Observational, ambispective, and multicenter study that included adult and pediatric patients diagnosed with aHUS and C3 glomerulopathy from September 2020 to October 2022 in 5 hospitals in Spain. Eculizumab was administered at the doses recommended by the data sheet according to the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Pre- and post-dose concentrations of eculizumab were determined, as well as blockade of the classical complement pathway (CH50). Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected, and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated. To establish the cut-off point for eculizumab concentrations that predicted complement blockade, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed. Lastly, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to contrast the differences in different parameters according to eculizumab concentrations. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were included, 19 adults (76.0%) and 6 pediatrics (24.0%), with median ages of 43.4 (interquartile range (IQR) 35.7-48.8) and 10.1 (IQR 9.6-11.3) years, respectively. Of these, 22 (88.0%) patients were diagnosed with aHUS and 3 (12.0%) with C3 glomerulopathy. A total of 111 eculizumab concentrations were determined. Mean pre- and post-dose concentration values detected during the maintenance phase were 243.8 (SD 240.6) µg/mL and 747.4 (standard deviation (SD) 444.3) µg/mL, respectively. Increased complement blockade was observed at higher pre-dose concentrations (P = .002) and decreased serum creatinine at both higher pre- and post-dose concentrations (P = .001 and P = .017, respectively). Using ROC curves, it was determined that a pre-dose concentration >149.0 µg/mL was optimal to achieve complement blockade, with an AUC of 0.87 (0.78-0.95). Finally, high inter-individual (48.9% variation coefficient (CV)) with low intra-individual variabilities (11.9% CV) in eculizumab clearance were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The present study reports supratherapeutic concentrations of eculizumab in patients with aHUS, and defines higher concentrations than those described in the data sheet to achieve blockade, thus encouraging the personalization of treatment with eculizumab.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Hemolítico Urémico Atípico , Adulto , Humanos , Niño , Persona de Mediana Edad , Síndrome Hemolítico Urémico Atípico/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , España
3.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 42(8): e290-e292, 2023 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37079569

RESUMEN

We describe the use of monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection in a pediatric patient with severe combined immunodeficiency who required urgent stem cell transplantation to cure his disease.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Inmunodeficiencia Combinada Grave , Humanos , Niño , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , SARS-CoV-2 , Inmunodeficiencia Combinada Grave/complicaciones , Anticuerpos Antivirales
4.
Antibiotics (Basel) ; 12(3)2023 Mar 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36978469

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no validated method for estimating antimicrobial consumption in the neonatal population, as it exists for adults using Defined Daily Doses (DDD). In neonatology, although there are different methods, each one with advantages and disadvantages, there is no unified criterion for use. The aim of this study is to validate the neonatal DDD designed as a new standardised form of antimicrobial consumption over this population. METHODS: The validation of the neonatal DDD, Phase II of the research project, was carried out through a descriptive observational study. Periodic cut-offs were performed to collect antimicrobial prescriptions of neonates admitted to the neonatology and intensive care units of nine Spanish hospitals. The data collected included demographic variables (gestational age, postnatal age, weight and sex), antimicrobial dose, frequency and route of administration. The selection of the optimal DDD value takes into account power value, magnitude obtained from the differences in the DDD, statistical significance obtained by the Wilcoxon test and degree of agreement in the stipulated doses. RESULTS: Set of 904 prescriptions were collected and finally 860 were analysed based on the established criteria. The antimicrobials were mostly prescribed in the intensive care unit (63.1%). 32 different antimicrobials were collected, and intravenous administration was the most commonly used route. Neonatal DDD were defined for 11 different antimicrobials. A potency > 80% was obtained in 7 antibiotics. The 57.1% of the selected DDD correspond to phase I and 21.4% from phase II. CONCLUSION: DDD validation has been achieved for the majority of intravenously administered antimicrobials used in clinical practice in the neonatal population. This will make it possible to have an indicator that will be used globally to estimate the consumption of antimicrobials in this population, thus confirming its usefulness and applicability.

5.
Eur J Hosp Pharm ; 2022 Dec 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36535690

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Worldwide organisations advocate standardising the management of intravenous drugs as an essential strategy to increase safety in paediatric healthcare settings. Intravenous administration is a route associated with some potential complications. Many adverse events are related to the use of intravenous medications, and the great variability in their handling and preparation represents an added risk that jeopardises the safety of children. PURPOSE: To standardise the dilutions of intravenous drugs most commonly administered to Spanish hospitalised paediatric and neonatal patients. METHODS: The process leading to the standardisation of concentrations was undertaken following a two-round modified Delphi procedure. The consensus included the most common drugs administered by continuous or intermittent intravenous infusion to hospitalised and/or critically ill paediatric patients. RESULTS: For paediatric patients, the proposal included a total of 102 drugs (45 continuous infusion and 59 intermittent infusion), with 192 concentrations to be standardised. The final consensus included 101 drugs (99%), of which 44 were continuous infusion and 59 intermittent infusion; 160 concentrations were standardised (72.7%). For neonates, the initial proposal included 80 drugs (38 continuous infusion and 43 intermittent infusion), with 189 concentrations to be standardised. The final consensus included 80 drugs (100%), of which 38 were continuous infusion and 43 were intermittent infusion; 120 concentrations were standardised (49.2%). CONCLUSIONS: This proposal showed that standardisation is a feasible approach that can be reached by other healthcare institutions. It can be used in other centres and contribute in the future to unifying paediatric clinical practice.

6.
An Pediatr (Engl Ed) ; 96(3): 179-189, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35241404

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: In January 2019, the Community of Madrid's Health Department published a guide about the use of antimicrobials in outpatient children. Taking this regional Guide as reference, this study was aimed at estimating the adequacy of the antimicrobial stewardship at discharge from a pediatric Emergency Department (ED). Secondarily, the differences in adequacy according to the diagnosis and the prescriber were studied, and the agreement between this Guide and the protocols of the ED was assessed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An observational, descriptive, retrospective study was conducted on patients under 16 years old, with a diagnosis included in the regional Guide who were discharged from a pediatric ED between March of 2018 and February of 2019. Prescription was considered adequate when the indication, the antibiotic and the posology (dosage, dosing interval, length of treatment and route of administration) were correct. RESULTS: 165 out of 648 (25,5%) infectious diseases processes analyzed received antimicrobial treatment. In 23 processes treated with antimicrobial, the adequacy could not be evaluated due to the absence of data necessary to assess any aspect of posology. Therapy was considered appropriate in 550/625 processes (88.0%). When antimicrobial treatment was prescribed, 70/142 (49.3%) were appropriate and no statistically significant differences in adequacy were found between prescribers. Posology was the worst handled point of the prescription (26.3%). Tract urinary infection, conjunctivitis and otitis media were the pathologies with the lowest adecuacy (44.4%; 50.0% and 52.2%) and presented the highest discrepancy between the Guide and the center protocols (κ = 0.308; κ = 0.000; κ = 0.586). CONCLUSIONS: The adequacy of the management of infectious processes to the reference Guide in our pediatric ED was high, but it was below 50% when antimicrobial treatment was required. The degree of adequacy to the local protocols of the center was greater than to the regional Guide. This reveals a discrepancy between the 2 documents that should be analyzed and corrected according to the available scientific evidence.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos , Alta del Paciente , Adolescente , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos
7.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 4336, 2022 03 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35288599

RESUMEN

To analyze the effectiveness of dexamethasone in preventing upper airway obstruction (UAO) symptoms after extubation and the need of reintubation in critically ill children. Multicenter, prospective, double-blind, randomized, phase IV clinical trial involving five pediatric intensive care units. Children between 1 month and 16 years-of-age intubated for more than 48 h were included. Patients were randomized to receive placebo or dexamethasone 0.25 mg/kg every 6 h, 6-to-12 h prior to extubation (four doses). 48 h follow-up was carried out after extubation. Severity of UAO symptoms (Taussig score, stridor) and reintubation requirement were compared. 147 patients were randomized (10 were excluded), 70 patients received dexamethasone and 67 placebo. No global differences were found in the presence of stridor or moderate-to-severe UAO symptoms (Taussig ≥ 5), but Taussig ≥ 5 was less frequent in patients less than 2 years-of-age treated with steroids (p = 0.014). Median Taussig score was lower in the dexamethasone group 1 h after extubation, p < 0.001. 27 patients required reintubation, 9 due to UAO: 3 (4.3%) in the dexamethasone group and 6 (8.9%) in the placebo group, p = 0.319. In those intubated > 5 days, reintubation due to UAO was higher in the placebo group (2.4% vs. 14.3, p = 0.052). Nebulized epinephrine and budesonide were required more frequently in the placebo group in the first 2 h (p = 0.041) and 1 h (p = 0.02) after extubation, respectively. No relevant side effects were observed. Dexamethasone prior to extubation did not significantly reduce moderate-severe UAO symptoms, except for patients under 2-years of age. Dexamethasone could decrease Taussig score and the need of rescue therapies, as well as reintubation rates in those intubated for more than 5 days.


Asunto(s)
Obstrucción de las Vías Aéreas , Trastornos Respiratorios , Extubación Traqueal/efectos adversos , Obstrucción de las Vías Aéreas/tratamiento farmacológico , Obstrucción de las Vías Aéreas/etiología , Obstrucción de las Vías Aéreas/prevención & control , Niño , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Trastornos Respiratorios/tratamiento farmacológico , Respiración Artificial/efectos adversos , Ruidos Respiratorios/etiología
8.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35120651

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial defined daily dose (DDD), a standardized metric to assess antimicrobial consumption in adult population, has limitations hampering its use in neonatal patients. This study proposes an alternative DDD design applicable for neonates. METHODS: Neonates (<1 month-old) from 6 Spanish hospitals during a 12-months period were included. Weight and weeks gestational age of each neonate were the variables collected. DDD (g) for each antimicrobial was calculated by multiplying the obtained weight times the recommended dose (mg/kg) of the antimicrobial for the most common infectious indication selected by the Delphi method. RESULTS: A total of 4820 neonates were included. Mean age was 36.72 weeks of gestational age and Mean weight was 2.687kg. Standardized DDD (intravenous; oral route) for representative antimicrobials were: Amoxicillin (0.08; 0.08), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (0.27; 0.08), ampicillin (0.27; x), cloxacillin (0.13; 0.13), penicillin G sodium (0.12), cefazolin (0.13), cefuroxime (0.27; x), cefotaxime (0.27), ceftazidime (0.27), ceftriaxone (0.13), cefepime (0.27) piperacillin-tazobactam (0.54), aztreonam (0.24), azithromycin (0.03; 0.03), clindamycin (0.04; 0.04), amikacin (0.04), gentamicin (0.01), metronidazole (0.04; 0.08), ciprofloxacin (0.04; 0.05), levofloxacin (x;x), fluconazole (0.02; 0.02), itraconazole (0.01; 0.01), fosfomycin (0.27). Restricted antimicrobials: meropenem (0.11), teicoplanin (0.02), vancomycin (0.08; 0.11), linezolid (0.08; 0.08), daptomycin (x), amphotericin B liposomal (0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A useful method for antimicrobial DDD measurement in neonatology has been designed to monitor antimicrobial consumption in hospital settings. It should be validated in further studies and thereby included in the design for neonatal antimicrobial stewardship programs in the future.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Ceftriaxona , Ciprofloxacina , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido
10.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34183175

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial defined daily dose (DDD), a standardized metric to assess antimicrobial consumption in adult population, has limitations hampering its use in neonatal patients. This study proposes an alternative DDD design applicable for neonates. METHODS: Neonates (<1 month-old) from 6 Spanish hospitals during a 12-months period were included. Weight and weeks gestational age of each neonate were the variables collected. DDD (g) for each antimicrobial was calculated by multiplying the obtained weight times the recommended dose (mg/kg) of the antimicrobial for the most common infectious indication selected by the Delphi method. RESULTS: A total of 4820 neonates were included. Mean age was 36.72 weeks of gestational age and Mean weight was 2.687kg. Standardized DDD (intravenous; oral route) for representative antimicrobials were: Amoxicillin (0.08; 0.08), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (0.27; 0.08), ampicillin (0.27; x), cloxacillin (0.13; 0.13), penicillin G sodium (0.12), cefazolin (0.13), cefuroxime (0.27; x), cefotaxime (0.27), ceftazidime (0.27), ceftriaxone (0.13), cefepime (0.27) piperacillin-tazobactam (0.54), aztreonam (0.24), azithromycin (0.03; 0.03), clindamycin (0.04; 0.04), amikacin (0.04), gentamicin (0.01), metronidazole (0.04; 0.08), ciprofloxacin (0.04; 0.05), levofloxacin (x;x), fluconazole (0.02; 0.02), itraconazole (0.01; 0.01), fosfomycin (0.27). Restricted antimicrobials: meropenem (0.11), teicoplanin (0.02), vancomycin (0.08; 0.11), linezolid (0.08; 0.08), daptomycin (x), amphotericin B liposomal (0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A useful method for antimicrobial DDD measurement in neonatology has been designed to monitor antimicrobial consumption in hospital settings. It should be validated in further studies and thereby included in the design for neonatal antimicrobial stewardship programs in the future.

11.
An Pediatr (Engl Ed) ; 2021 Feb 11.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33583763

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: In January 2019, Community of Madrid's Health Department published a guide about the use of antimicrobials in outpatient children. Taking this regional Guide as reference, this study was aimed at estimating the adequacy of the antimicrobial stewardship at discharge from a pediatric Emergency Department (ED). Secondarily, the differences in adequacy according to the diagnosis and the prescriber were studied, and the agreement between this Guide and the protocols of the ED was assessed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An observational, descriptive, retrospective study was conducted on patients under 16 years old, with a diagnosis included in the regional Guide who were discharged from a pediatric ED between March of 2018 and February of 2019. Prescription was considered adequate when the indication, the antibiotic and the posology (dosage, dosing interval, length of treatment and route of administration) were correct. RESULTS: 165 out of 648 (25,5%) infectious diseases processes analyzed received antimicrobial treatment. In 23 processes treated with antimicrobial, the adequacy could not be evaluated due to the absence of data necessary to assess any aspect of posology. Therapy was considered appropriate in 550/625 processes (88.0%). When antimicrobial treatment was prescribed, 70/142 (49.3%) were appropriate and no statistically significant differences in adequacy were found between prescribers. Posology was the worst handled point of the prescription (26.3%). Tract urinary infection, conjunctivitis and otitis media were the pathologies with the lowest adecuacy (44.4%; 50.0% and 52.2%) and presented the highest discrepancy between the Guide and the center protocols (k=0.308; k=0.000; k=0.586). CONCLUSIONS: The adequacy of the management of infectious processes to the reference Guide in our pediatric ED was high, but it was below 50% when antimicrobial treatment was required. The degree of adequacy to the local protocols of the center was greater than to the regional Guide. This reveals a discrepancy between the 2documents that should be analyzed and corrected according to the available scientific evidence.

12.
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol ; 14(2): 249-260, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33499687

RESUMEN

Background: We report the long-term outcomes, changes in laboratory parameters, the incidence of secondary nosocomial infections and treatment cost of a Spanish cohort of patients with severe COVID-19 that received tocilizumab (TCZ).Methods: Retrospective cohort of PCR confirmed adult patients who received TCZ from March 1 to 24, 2020 in a tertiary hospital was analyzed. Patients were followed up until 10 May 2020.Results: We included 162 patients (median age 64 years; 70.4% male). At time of TCZ administration, 48.1% of patients were on invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Over a median follow-up of 53 days, 46.9% of patients were discharge in good conditions and 19.8% were still hospitalized. The overall mortality was 33.3%, being higher in patients on IMV than those who did not (46.2% vs 26.7%, P < 0.001). A significant improvement in the lymphocyte count, C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase, and D-dimer was observed. Overall, 43.2% patients presented nosocomial infections, causing death in 8%. Infections were more prevalent in ICU units (63.0% vs 17.1%, P < 0.001). The total cost of TCZ was €371,784.Conclusions: Among the patients who used TCZ, one third died, regardless the improvement in some inflammatory biomarkers. The incidence of secondary nosocomial infections was high.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , España/epidemiología
13.
Drugs R D ; 21(1): 39-64, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33346878

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Intravenous drug administration is associated with potential complications, such as phlebitis. The physiochemical characteristics of the infusate play a very important role in some of these problems. AIM: The aim of this study was to standardize the dilutions of intravenous drugs most commonly used in hospitalized adult patients and to characterize their pH, osmolarity and cytotoxic nature to better guide the selection of the most appropriate vascular access. METHODS: The project was conducted in three phases: (i) standardization of intravenous therapy, which was conducted using a modified double-round Delphi method; (ii) characterization of the dilutions agreed on in the previous phase by means of determining the osmolarity and pH of each of the agreed concentrations, and recording the vesicant nature based on the information in literature; and (iii) algorithm proposal for selecting the most appropriate vascular access, taking into account the information gathered in the previous phases. RESULTS: In total, 112 drugs were standardized and 307 different admixtures were assessed for pH, osmolarity and vesicant nature. Of these, 123 admixtures (40%), had osmolarity values >600 mOsm/L, pH < 4 or > 9, or were classified as vesicants. In these cases, selection of the most suitable route of infusion and vascular access device is crucial to minimize the risk of phlebitis-type complications. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing safety of intravenous therapy should be a priority in the healthcare settings. Knowing the characteristics of drugs to assess the risk involved in their administration related to their physicochemical nature may be useful to guide decision making regarding the most appropriate vascular access and devices.


Asunto(s)
Infusiones Intravenosas/efectos adversos , Infusiones Intravenosas/normas , Adulto , Algoritmos , Técnica Delphi , Humanos , Concentración de Iones de Hidrógeno , Pacientes Internos , Irritantes , Concentración Osmolar , Flebitis/etiología , España , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/efectos adversos , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/normas
14.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 27(7): 1753-1757, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33356885

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Cerebellar mutism syndrome (CMS) is a common complication after posterior fossa tumor resection. It is characterized by a significant lack or loss of speech. Its biological origin remains unclear and there are no standardized treatments. However, bromocriptine seems to be a possible treatment for this condition. CASE REPORT: In this paper, we present three cases of pediatric patients (4, 5, and 17-year old) who developed CMS after posterior fossa tumor surgery. They were treated with bromocriptine to improve neurological symptoms.Management and outcome: Bromocriptine was started at a low dose and was progressively increased to reach the minimum effective dose. After four months of treatment, a normal and fluid speech was observed in the three patients. No discontinuation due to adverse events were reported. DISCUSSION: Bromocriptine has shown to be an effective and safe treatment for CMS in pediatric patients after posterior fossa tumor resection.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Cerebelosas , Neoplasias Infratentoriales , Meduloblastoma , Mutismo , Bromocriptina/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Cerebelosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cerebelosas/cirugía , Niño , Humanos , Mutismo/tratamiento farmacológico , Mutismo/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/tratamiento farmacológico
15.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 57(2): 106249, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33259918

RESUMEN

Few large series describe the clinical characteristics, outcomes and costs of COVID-19 in Western countries. This cohort reports the first 1255 adult cases receiving anti-COVID-19 treatment at a Spanish hospital (1-24 March 2020). Treatment costs were calculated. A logistic regression model was used to explore risk factors on admission associated with ARDS. A bivariate Cox proportional hazard ratio (HR) model was employed to determine the HR between individual factors and death. We included 1255 patients (median age 65 years; 57.8% male), of which 92.3% required hospitalisation. The prevalence of hypertension, cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus (DM) was 45.1%, 31.4% and 19.9%, respectively. Lymphocytopenia (54.8%), elevated alanine aminotransferase (33.0%) and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (58.5%) were frequent. Overall, 36.7% of patients developed ARDS, 10.0% were admitted to an ICU and 21.3% died. The most frequent antiviral combinations were lopinavir/ritonavir plus hydroxychloroquine (44.2%), followed by triple therapy with interferon beta-1b (32.7%). Corticosteroids and tocilizumab were used in 25.3% and 12.9% of patients, respectively. Total cost of anti-COVID-19 agents was €511 825 (€408/patient). By multivariate analysis, risk factors associated with ARDS included older age, obesity, DM, severe hypoxaemia, lymphocytopenia, increased creatine kinase and increased C-reactive protein. In multivariate Cox model, older age (HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.06-1.09), cardiovascular disease (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.01-1.79), DM (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.09-1.92), severe hypoxaemia (HR 2.01, 95% CI 1.49-2.72), lymphocytopenia (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.20-2.20) and increased C-reactive protein (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.06) were risk factors for mortality.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Antivirales/economía , COVID-19/economía , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/mortalidad , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitalización , Humanos , Hidroxicloroquina , Inmunosupresores/economía , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Lopinavir/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/virología , Ritonavir/uso terapéutico , España/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
Farm Hosp ; 42(6): 234-238, 2018 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30381043

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the environmental contamination generated during the preparation of cytostatic  agents using three different methods through simulations using fluorescein, and  the time required for preparation of each method. METHOD: A comparative study of the processing of fluorescein mixtures using three types of closed systems was conducted at the centralized unit for  hazardous drugs of the Pharmacy Department of a General Teaching Hospital. Environmental contamination was detected in critical points of  connection, and in splashes produced at any other points. The main variable was  qualitative detection of contamination through ultraviolet light when three  methods were compared (method A: ChemoClave®, method B: SmartSite®  valve and Texium® connector, method C: PhaSealTM with BD luer extension). A  final number of 60 mixtures were prepared to detect differences of at least 5%. RESULTS: Qualitative contamination at the critical points during preparation, was  seen in groups A and B for every mixture that was processed. No contamination  at all in critical points was seen in any of the mixtures prepared using  PhaSealTM. Statistically significant differences were found between arms A and  C (p < 0.001) and arms B and C (p < 0.001); no differences were found  between arms A and B. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of PhaSealTM system in conjunction with the BD  luer extension for administering hazardous drugs from a tree modality system  has been shown to be the system with the lowest level of contamination during  processing without increasing the time required for preparation of the mixture.


Objetivo: El objetivo de este estudio fue comparar la contaminación ambiental  generada durante la preparación de fluoresceína y el tiempo de preparación  usando tres sistemas cerrados de transferencia diferentes.Método: Estudio comparativo de elaboración de mezclas de fluoresceína con  tres tipos de sistemas cerrados en una unidad de mezclas peligrosas de un  Servicio de Farmacia de un Hospital General Universitario. Se consideró  contaminación ambiental la detectada en los puntos críticos de conexión y las  salpicaduras generadas en cualquier otro punto distinto. La variable principal fue  la detección cualitativa mediante luz ultravioleta de la contaminación  generada cuando se comparan tres sistemas (sistema A: ChemoClave®, sistema  B: válvula SmartSite® y conector Texium®, sistema C: PhaSealTM con  alargadera luer BD). Se prepararon 60 mezclas para poder detectar  diferencias de al menos el 5%.Resultados: Se detectó contaminación en los puntos críticos durante la  preparación en todas las mezclas de los grupos A y B. No se detectó contaminación en ninguna de las mezclas en las que se usó el sistema  cerrado PhaSealTM. Se encontraron diferencias estadísticas entre los grupos A y  C (p < 0,001) y entre los grupos B y C (p < 0,001); no se encontraron diferencias entre los grupos A y B.Conclusiones: La combinación del sistema PhaSealTM y la alargadera luer BD  para administrar fármacos peligrosos en la modalidad de árbol ha mostrado ser  el sistema con el menor nivel de contaminación durante la preparación, sin que  esto se traduzca en aumento en el tiempo de elaboración.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/química , Composición de Medicamentos/métodos , Fluoresceína/análisis , Sustancias Peligrosas , Humanos , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Servicio de Farmacia en Hospital
18.
Eur J Paediatr Neurol ; 21(4): 682-684, 2017 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28284887

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ranitidine has not been considered as a potential cause of ocular movement conditions. However, it is known that the vestibular nucleus complex, that has a key role in gaze control and vestibule-ocular reflexes, receives hypothalamic histaminergic innervations. Some studies reported the effect of ranitidine blocking the excitatory responses of vestibular nuclei neurons to histamine. CASE REPORT: We report the first case of a downbeat nystagmus secondary to ranitidine in an infant. A 3-month-old female developed a downbeat gaze after starting treatment with ranitidine for a pediatric gastroesophageal reflux disease. Microbiological test were negative and neuroblastoma evaluation was normal. CONCLUSION: As ranitidine is widely prescribed in the pediatric population, clinicians should be aware of its potential to cause ocular movements disorders.


Asunto(s)
Antiulcerosos/efectos adversos , Nistagmo Patológico/inducido químicamente , Ranitidina/efectos adversos , Femenino , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Lactante
19.
An Pediatr (Barc) ; 86(1): 28-36, 2017 Jan.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27151379

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To analyze the prevalence of use of off-label and unlicensed drugs in a pediatric intensive care unit of a University Hospital. METHOD: An observational, descriptive, prospective six week pilot study in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. Hospitalized patients aged between 0 and 18 years were included. Each prescribed drug was evaluated taking into account indication and condition of use, according to the information available on the Summary of Product Characteristics established by the European Medicines Agency. A sequential algorithm was defined allowing drug classification in unlicensed, off-label or approved. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were included. A total of 696 prescriptions, involving 102 different drugs, were analyzed. All patients had at least one off-label prescription, and a median of 8.9 off-label prescriptions was obtained. Of the total prescriptions, 8.6% were unlicensed and 53.9% corresponded to off-label use. The main reason for off-label use was by indication, followed by age and dose. A lineal tendency between off-label drug use and patient age was observed, where off-label use increased as patient age decreased. The drugs most commonly used off-label were: atropine, etomidate, dipyrone and ranitidine, and unlicensed drugs: spironolactone, sildenafil, acetazolamide and hydrochlorothiazide. CONCLUSION: Pediatric Intensive Care Units are characterized by a high ratio of off-label and unlicensed prescriptions. The scarce number of studies performed in this specific and complex sub-population added inconveniency to the current lack of data on safety and efficacy for drugs in paediatrics. Performing studies with these characteristics allows us to document practice on paediatric drug utilisation are required.


Asunto(s)
Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico , Uso Fuera de lo Indicado/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Algoritmos , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos
20.
Farm Hosp ; 40(n06): 496-503, 2016 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27894224

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The level of environmental contamination generated during preparation and administration of hazardous drugs using different valve closed-systems and their combinations was compared. The actual impact on the overall time of preparation of cytostatics and the economic cost of the different modalities were also compared. METHODS: Comparative study of the preparation of fluorescein mixtures with different modalities of valve closed-system combinations. Environmental contamination was detected in critical points of connection, and in splashes produced at any other points. The main variable was qualitative detection of contamination by splashes through ultraviolet light when modalities with or without a connector were compared. A final number of 160 mixtures were prepared to detect differences of at least 5%. RESULTS: Splashes were produced in 7 preparations without a connector (p = 0.015). No significant differences (p = 0.445) were detected either in the use of a supporting vial spike vs an anchoring spike, or in the ChemoCLAVE® system vs valve systems with Fleboflex® solutions. Contamination at any critical point was produced in all preparations. The use of a supporting vial spike, syringe connector and bag solution with Luer connection was the most efficient modality. CONCLUSIONS: A syringe connector is needed to guarantee a closed system. Anchoring spikes do not show higher advantages as compared with supporting vial spikes. Fleboflex® solutions with Luer bags are more efficient than ChemoCLAVE® and show similar safety. However, connections of these closed systems are not leak-tight, and it is therefore important to continue studies of contamination of the different closed system transfer devices.


Objetivo: Comparar la contaminación generada durante la elaboración y administración de fármacos peligrosos con diferentes componentes de sistemas cerrados y de manera secundaria, seleccionar el sistema más eficiente. Material y métodos: Estudio comparativo de elaboración de mezclas de fluoresceína con diferentes combinaciones de sistemas cerrados de tipo valvular. Se consideró contaminación ambiental la detectada en los puntos críticos de conexión y las salpicaduras generadas en cualquier otro punto distinto. La variable principal fue la detección cualitativa mediante luz ultravioleta de contaminación por salpicaduras al comparar las modalidades con y sin conector. Se calculó un tamaño muestral de 160 preparaciones por modalidad, para detectar diferencias de al menos un 5%. Resultados: Se produjeron salpicaduras en 7 preparaciones, todas sin conector (p = 0,015). No se encontraron diferencias entre utilizar punzón de apoyo o de anclaje (p = 0,445), ni entre el sistema ChemoCLAVE® vs sistema valvular con sueros Fleboflex®. En todas las preparaciones se produjo contaminación en algún punto crítico. La utilización de punzones de apoyo, conectores y sueros luer se ha identificado como la modalidad más eficiente. Conclusiones: Es importante utilizar el conector de jeringa para que el sistema sea completamente cerrado. El uso de punzones de anclaje no parece presentar ventajas frente a los de apoyo y la combinación con los sueros Fleboflex® presenta una seguridad similar al sistema ChemoCLAVE®. Sin embargo, las conexiones de estos sistemas no son secas y, por tanto, es importante continuar con estudios de contaminación que comparen diferentes sistemas.


Asunto(s)
Composición de Medicamentos/instrumentación , Fluoresceína/química , Sustancias Peligrosas , Ambiente , Humanos , Rayos Ultravioleta
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...