Association Between Influenza Vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

BACKGROUND: Recent data in nonpregnant individuals suggest a protective effect of influenza vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection and its severity. OBJECTIVES: Our primary objective was to evaluate whether influenza vaccination was associated with COVID-19 severity and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes among those infected with SARS-CoV-2. The secondary objective was to examine the association between influenza vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection. STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a multicenter retrospective cohort of pregnant people who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 between March and August 2020, and a cohort of random deliveries during the same time period. The associations between 2019 influenza vaccination and the primary outcome of moderate-to-critical COVID-19 as well as maternal and perinatal outcomes were examined among all people who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 between March and August 2020. The association between 2019 influenza vaccination and having a positive SARS-CoV-2 test was examined among a cohort of individuals who delivered on randomly selected dates between March and August 2020. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of 2325 people who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, 1068 (45.9%) were vaccinated against influenza in 2019. Those who received the influenza vaccine were older, leaner, more likely to have private insurance, and identify as White or Hispanic. They were less likely to smoke tobacco and identify as Black. Overall, 419 (18.0%) had moderate, 193 (8.3%) severe, and 52 (2.2%) critical COVID-19. There was no association between influenza vaccination and moderate-to-critical COVID-19 (29.2% vs. 28.0%, adjusted OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.90-1.34) or adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes among those who tested positive. Of 8152 people who delivered in 2020, 4658 (57.1%) received the influenza vaccine. Prior vaccination was not associated with a difference in the odds of SARS-CoV-2 infection (3.8% vs. 4.2%, adjusted OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.74-1.19). CONCLUSION: Prior influenza vaccination was not associated with decreased severity of COVID-19 or lower odds of SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy.

Gestational Weight Gain and Neonatal Biometry during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multicenter Observational Cohort.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to test the hypothesis that being pregnant and delivering during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic was associated with changes in gestational weight gain (GWG) or frequency of small- (SGA) or large-for-gestational-age (LGA) neonates. STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a multicenter observational cohort comparing pregnant people who delivered during the COVID-19 pandemic (June-December 2020) to people who delivered prior to the pandemic (March-December 2019). Those with multiple gestations, fetuses with major congenital anomalies, implausible GWG values, unavailable body mass index (BMI), or who were severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2-positive were excluded. The primary outcome was frequency of optimal recommended GWG based on prepregnancy BMI. Neonatal outcomes included birth weight, ponderal index, and frequency of SGA, LGA, and small head circumference for live births. Multivariable regression analysis was used to assess associations between exposure to the pandemic and outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 10,717 pregnant people were included in our analysis. A total of 4,225 pregnant people were exposed to the pandemic and 6,492 pregnant people delivered prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Pregnant people exposed to the pandemic were older and more likely to have gestational diabetes. The frequency of appropriate GWG was 28.0% during the pandemic and 27.6% before the pandemic (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.93-1.11). Excessive GWG was more likely (54.9 vs. 53.1%; aOR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.001-1.17), and inadequate GWG was less likely during the pandemic (17.0 vs. 19.3%; aOR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.77-0.95). The frequency of SGA was 5.4% during the pandemic and 6.1% before the pandemic (aOR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.76-1.06), and the frequency of LGA was 16.0% during the pandemic versus 15.0% before the pandemic (aOR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.95-1.18). Other neonatal outcomes including birth weight percentile (62.1 [35.8-83.2] vs. 60.2 [34.4-82.2]; adjusted mean difference (aMD) = 1.50, 95% CI: -0.28 to 3.29), ponderal index (2.6 g/cm3 [2.4-2.8] in both groups; aMD = 0.01, 95% CI: 0.00-0.02), and small head circumference for livebirths (<10th percentile [8.2 vs. 8.1%; aOR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.89-1.19], <3rd percentile [3.5 vs. 3.1%; aOR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.93-1.44]) were similar between groups as well. CONCLUSION: Being pregnant and delivering during the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a higher likelihood of excessive GWG and a lower likelihood of inadequate GWG. KEY POINTS: · Delivering during the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with higher likelihood of excessive GWG.. · Delivering during the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with lower likelihood of inadequate GWG.. · COVID-19 pandemic was not associated with changes in frequency of SGA or LGA..

Prediction of COVID-19 Severity at Delivery after Asymptomatic or Mild COVID-19 during Pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop a prediction model that estimates the probability that a pregnant person who has had asymptomatic or mild coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) prior to delivery admission will progress in severity to moderate, severe, or critical COVID-19. STUDY DESIGN: This was a secondary analysis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-positive patients who delivered from March through December 2020 at hospitals across the United States. Those eligible for this analysis presented for delivery with a current or previous asymptomatic or mild SARS-CoV-2 infection. The primary outcome was moderate, severe, or critical COVID-19 during the delivery admission through 42 days postpartum. The prediction model was developed and internally validated using stratified cross-validation with stepwise backward elimination, incorporating only variables that were known on the day of hospital admission. RESULTS: Of the 2,818 patients included, 26 (0.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6-1.3%) developed moderate-severe-critical COVID-19 during the study period. Variables in the prediction model were gestational age at delivery admission (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.15; 95% CI, 1.08-1.22 per 1-week decrease), a hypertensive disorder in a prior pregnancy (aOR 3.05; 95% CI, 1.25-7.46), and systolic blood pressure at admission (aOR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.05 per mm Hg increase). This model yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.72-0.91). CONCLUSION: Among individuals presenting for delivery who had asymptomatic-mild COVID-19, gestational age at delivery admission, a hypertensive disorder in a prior pregnancy, and systolic blood pressure at admission were predictive of delivering with moderate, severe, or critical COVID-19. This prediction model may be a useful tool to optimize resources for SARS-CoV-2-infected pregnant individuals admitted for delivery. KEY POINTS: · Three factors were associated with delivery with more severe COVID-19.. · The developed model yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.82 and model fit was good.. · The model may be useful tool for SARS-CoV-2 infected pregnancies admitted for delivery..

Postpartum pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis and complications in a US cohort.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism accounts for approximately 9% of pregnancy-related deaths in the United States. National guidelines recommend postpartum risk stratification and pharmacologic prophylaxis in at-risk individuals. Knowledge on modern rates of postpartum pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis and its associated risks is limited. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the rate of, and factors associated with, initiation of postpartum pharmacologic prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism, and to assess associated adverse outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This was a secondary analysis of a multicenter cohort of individuals delivering on randomly selected days at 17 US hospitals (2019-2020). Medical records were reviewed by trained and certified personnel. Those with an antepartum diagnosis of venous thromboembolism, receiving antepartum anticoagulation, or known SARS-CoV-2 infection were excluded. The primary outcome was use of postpartum pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis. Secondary outcomes included bleeding complications, surgical site infection, hospital readmission, and venous thromboembolism through 6 weeks postpartum. The rate of thromboprophylaxis administration was assessed by mode of delivery, institution, and continuance to the outpatient setting. Multivariable regression models were developed using k-fold cross-validation with stepwise backward elimination to evaluate factors associated with thromboprophylaxis administration. Univariable and multivariable logistic models with propensity score covariate adjustment were performed to assess the association between thromboprophylaxis administration and adverse outcomes. RESULTS: Of 21,114 individuals in the analytical cohort, 11.9% (95% confidence interval, 11.4%-12.3%) received postpartum pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis; the frequency of receipt was 29.8% (95% confidence interval, 28.7%-30.9%) following cesarean and 3.5% (95% confidence interval, 3.2%-3.8%) following vaginal delivery. Institutional rates of prophylaxis varied from 0.21% to 34.8%. Most individuals (83.3%) received thromboprophylaxis only as inpatients. In adjusted analysis, cesarean delivery (adjusted odds ratio, 19.17; 95% confidence interval, 16.70-22.00), hysterectomy (adjusted odds ratio, 15.70; 95% confidence interval, 4.35-56.65), and obesity (adjusted odds ratio, 3.45; 95% confidence interval, 3.02-3.95) were the strongest factors associated with thromboprophylaxis administration. Thromboprophylaxis administration was not associated with surgical site infection (0.9% vs 0.6%; odds ratio, 1.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-2.74), bleeding complications (0.2% vs 0.1%; odds ratio, 2.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-6.80), or postpartum readmission (0.9% vs 0.3%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-2.81). The overall rate of venous thromboembolism was 0.06% (95% confidence interval, 0.03%-0.10%) and was higher in those receiving prophylaxis (0.2%) compared with those not receiving prophylaxis (0.04%). CONCLUSION: Approximately 1 in 10 patients received postpartum pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in this US cohort. Rates of prophylaxis varied widely by institution. Cesarean delivery, hysterectomy, and obesity were predominant factors associated with postpartum thromboprophylaxis administration.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Pregnancy-Related End-Stage Kidney Disease.

Importance: The incidence of pregnancy-related acute kidney injury is increasing and is associated with significant maternal morbidity including progression to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Little is known about characteristics and long-term outcomes of patients who develop pregnancy-related ESKD. Objectives: To examine the characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with pregnancy-related ESKD and to investigate associations between pre-ESKD nephrology care and outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a cohort study of 183 640 reproductive-aged women with incident ESKD between January 1, 2000, and November 20, 2020, from the US Renal Data System and maternal data from births captured in the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention publicly available natality data. Data were analyzed from December 2022 to June 2023. Exposure: Pregnancy-related primary cause of ESKD, per International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) and ICD-10 codes reported at ESKD onset by the primary nephrologist on Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services form 2728. Main Outcomes Measures: Multivariable Cox proportional hazards and competing risk models were constructed to examine time to (1) mortality, (2) access to kidney transplant (joining the waiting list or receiving a live donor transplant), and (3) receipt of transplant after joining the waitlist. Results: A total of 341 patients with a pregnancy-related primary cause of ESKD were identified (mean [SD] age 30.2 [7.3]). Compared with the general US birthing population, Black patients were overrepresented among those with pregnancy-related ESKD (109 patients [31.9%] vs 585 268 patients [16.2%]). In adjusted analyses, patients with pregnancy-related ESKD had similar or lower hazards of mortality compared with those with glomerulonephritis or cystic kidney disease (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.96; 95% CI, 0.76-1.19), diabetes or hypertension (aHR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.39-0.61), or other or unknown primary causes of ESKD (aHR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.48-0.75). Despite this, patients with pregnancy-related ESKD had significantly lower access to kidney transplant compared with those with other causes of ESKD, including (1) glomerulonephritis or cystic kidney disease (adjusted subhazard ratio [aSHR], 0.51; 95% CI, 0.43-0.66), (2) diabetes or hypertension (aSHR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.67-0.98), and (3) other or unkown cause (aSHR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.67-0.99). Those with pregnancy-related ESKD were less likely to have nephrology care or have a graft or arteriovenous fistula placed before ESKD onset (nephrology care: adjusted relative risk [aRR], 0.47; 95% CI, 0.40-0.56; graft or arteriovenous fistula placed: aRR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.17-0.57). Conclusion and Relevance: In this study, those with pregnancy-related ESKD had reduced access to transplant and nephrology care, which could exacerbate existing disparities in a disproportionately Black population. Increased access to care could improve quality of life and health outcomes among these young adults with high potential for long-term survival.

Toxic metal mixtures in private well water and increased risk for preterm birth in North Carolina.

BACKGROUND: Prenatal exposure to metals in private well water may increase the risk of preterm birth (PTB) (delivery < 37 weeks' gestation). In this study, we estimated associations between arsenic, manganese, lead, cadmium, chromium, copper, and zinc concentrations in private well water and PTB incidence in North Carolina (NC). METHODS: Birth certificates from 2003-2015 (n = 1,329,071) were obtained and pregnancies were assigned exposure using the mean concentration and the percentage of tests above the maximum contaminant level (MCL) for the census tract of each individuals' residence at the time of delivery using the NCWELL database (117,960 well water tests from 1998-2019). We evaluated associations between single metals and PTB using adjusted logistic regression models. Metals mixtures were assessed using quantile-based g-computation. RESULTS: Compared with those in other census tracts, individuals residing in tracts where > 25% of tests exceeded the MCL for lead (aOR 1.10, 95%CI 1.02,1.18) or cadmium (aOR 1.11, 95% CI 1.00,1.23) had an increased odds of PTB. Conversely, those residing in areas with > 25% MCL for zinc (aOR 0.77 (95% CI: 0.56,1.02) and copper (aOR 0.53 (95% CI: 0.13,1.34)) had a reduced odds of PTB. A quartile increase in the concentrations of a mixture of lead, cadmium, and chromium was associated with a small increased odds for PTB (aOR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01, 1.03). This metal mixture effect was most pronounced among American Indian individuals (aOR per quartile increase in all metals: 1.19 (95% CI 1.06,1.34)). CONCLUSIONS: In a large study population of over one million births, lead and cadmium were found to increase the risk of PTB individually and in a mixture, with additional mixtures-related impacts estimated from co-exposure with chromium. This study highlights critical racial and ethnic health disparities in relation to private well water thereby emphasizing the urgent need for improved private well water quality to protect vulnerable populations.

Accelerated epigenetic clock aging in maternal peripheral blood and preterm birth.

BACKGROUND: Epigenetic clocks use CpG DNA methylation to estimate biological age. Acceleration is associated with cancer, heart disease, and shorter life span. Few studies evaluate DNA methylation age and pregnancy outcomes. AgeAccelGrim is a novel epigenetic clock that combines 7 DNA methylation components. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether maternal biological aging (via AgeAccelGrim) is associated with early preterm birth. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort of patients with singleton pregnancies and at high risk of spontaneous preterm birth delivering at a tertiary university hospital were included in this study. Genome-wide CpG methylation was measured using the Illumina EPIC BeadChip (Illumina, Inc, San Diego, CA) from maternal blood samples obtained at <28 weeks of gestation. AgeAccelGrim and its 7 DNA methylation components were estimated by the Horvath DNA methylation age online tool. Positive values are associated with accelerated biological aging, whereas negative values are associated with slower biological aging relative to each subject's age. The primary outcome was preterm birth at <34 weeks of gestation (any indication). The secondary outcomes were preterm birth at <37 and <28 weeks of gestation. AgeAccelGrim was analyzed as a continuous variable and in quartiles. Exploratory analyses evaluated each of the 7 DNA methylation components included in the composite AgeAccelGrim. Data were analyzed by chi-square test, t test, rank-sum test, logistic regression (controlling a priori for maternal age, cell counts, low socioeconomic status, and gestational age at the time of sample collection), and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. The log-rank test was used to test the equality of the survival functions. RESULTS: Overall, 163 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of the patients, 48%, 39%, and 21% delivered at <37, <34, and <28 weeks of gestation, respectively. The median AgeAccelGrim was -0.35 years (interquartile range, -2.24 to 1.31) for those delivering at term. Those delivering preterm had higher AgeAccelGrim values that were inversely proportional to delivery gestational age (preterm birth at <37 weeks of gestation: +0.40 years [interquartile range: -1.21 to +2.28]; preterm birth at <34 weeks of gestation: +0.51 years [interquartile range: -1.05 to +2.67]; preterm birth at <28 weeks of gestation: +1.05 years [interquartile range: -0.72 to +2.72]). Estimated DNA methylation of the 7 epigenetic clock component values was increased among those with preterm birth at <34 weeks of gestation, although the differences were only significant for DNA methylation of plasminogen activation inhibitor 1. In regression models, AgeAcccelGrim was associated with an elevated risk of preterm birth with increasing magnitude for increasing severity of preterm birth. For each 1-year increase in the AgeAccelGrim value (ie, each 1-year increase in biological age compared with chronologic age), the adjusted odds of preterm birth were 11% (adjusted odds ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.24), 13% (adjusted odds ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.26), and 18% (adjusted odds ratio, 1.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.35) higher for preterm birth at <37, <34, and <28 weeks of gestation, respectively. Similarly, individuals with accelerated biological aging (≥75th percentile AgeAccelGrim) had more than double the odds of preterm birth at <34 weeks of gestation (adjusted odds ratio, 2.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-5.08) and more than triple the odds of preterm birth at <28 weeks of gestation (adjusted odds ratio, 3.89; 95% confidence interval, 1.61-9.38). The adjusted odds ratio for preterm birth at <37 weeks of gestation was 1.73 but spanned the null (adjusted odds ratio, 1.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-3.69). In Kaplan-Meier survival analyses, those in the highest AgeAccelGrim quartile delivered the earliest (log-rank P value of <.001). CONCLUSION: Accelerated biological aging was associated with preterm birth among high-risk patients. Future research confirming these findings and elucidating factors that slow biological aging may improve birth outcomes.

What now? A critical evaluation of over 20 years of clinical and research experience with 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate for recurrent preterm birth prevention.

Spontaneous preterm birth is multifactorial, and underlying etiologies remain incompletely understood. Supplementation with progestogens, including 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate has been a mainstay of prematurity prevention strategies in the United States in the last 2 decades. Following a recent negative confirmatory trial, 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate was withdrawn from the US market and is currently available only through clinical research studies. This expert review summarized clinical and research data regarding the use of 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate in the United States from 2003 to 2023 for recurrent prematurity prevention. In 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate. The history of the use, mechanisms of action, clinical trial results, and efficacy by clinical and biologic criteria of 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate are presented. We report that disparate findings and conclusions between similarly designed rigorous studies may reflect differences in a priori risk and population incidence and extreme care should be taken in interpreting the studies and making decisions regarding efficacy of 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate for the prevention of preterm birth. The likelihood of improved obstetrical outcomes after receiving 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate may vary by clinical factors (eg, body mass index), plasma drug concentrations, and genetic factors, although the identification of individuals most likely to benefit remains imperfect. It is crucial for the medical community to recognize the importance of preserving the decades-long efforts invested in preventing recurrent preterm birth in the United States. Moreover, it is important that we thoroughly and thoughtfully evaluate 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate as a promising contender for future well-executed prematurity studies.

Cervical Pessary for Prevention of Preterm Birth in Individuals With a Short Cervix: The TOPS Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: A short cervix as assessed by transvaginal ultrasound is an established risk factor for preterm birth. Study findings for a cervical pessary to prevent preterm delivery in singleton pregnancies with transvaginal ultrasound evidence of a short cervix have been conflicting. Objective: To determine if cervical pessary placement decreases the risk of preterm birth or fetal death prior to 37 weeks among individuals with a short cervix. Design, Setting, and Participants: We performed a multicenter, randomized, unmasked trial comparing a cervical pessary vs usual care from February 2017 through November 5, 2021, at 12 centers in the US. Study participants were nonlaboring individuals with a singleton pregnancy and a transvaginal ultrasound cervical length of 20 mm or less at gestations of 16 weeks 0 days through 23 weeks 6 days. Individuals with a prior spontaneous preterm birth were excluded. Interventions: Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either a cervical pessary placed by a trained clinician (n = 280) or usual care (n = 264). Use of vaginal progesterone was at the discretion of treating clinicians. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome was delivery or fetal death prior to 37 weeks. Results: A total of 544 participants (64%) of a planned sample size of 850 were enrolled in the study (mean age, 29.5 years [SD, 6 years]). Following the third interim analysis, study recruitment was stopped due to concern for fetal or neonatal/infant death as well as for futility. Baseline characteristics were balanced between participants randomized to pessary and those randomized to usual care; 98.9% received vaginal progesterone. In an as-randomized analysis, the primary outcome occurred in 127 participants (45.5%) randomized to pessary and 127 (45.6%) randomized to usual care (relative risk, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.83-1.20). Fetal or neonatal/infant death occurred in 13.3% of those randomized to receive a pessary and in 6.8% of those randomized to receive usual care (relative risk, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.13-3.32). Conclusions and Relevance: Cervical pessary in nonlaboring individuals with a singleton gestation and with a cervical length of 20 mm or less did not decrease the risk of preterm birth and was associated with a higher rate of fetal or neonatal/infant mortality. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02901626.

Long-term maternal mortality risk following spontaneous preterm birth: A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether women with spontaneous preterm birth (PTB) have increased risks for long-term mortality. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Births in Utah between 1939 and 1977. POPULATION: We included women with a singleton live birth ≥20 weeks who survived at least 1 year following delivery. We excluded those who had never lived in Utah, had improbable birthweight/gestational age combinations, underwent induction (except for preterm membrane rupture) or had another diagnosis likely to cause PTB. METHODS: Exposed women had ≥1 spontaneous PTB between 20+0 weeks and 37+0 weeks. Women with >1 spontaneous PTB were included only once. Unexposed women had all deliveries at or beyond 38+0 weeks. Exposed women were matched to unexposed women by birth year, infant sex, maternal age group and infant birth order. Included women were followed up to 39 years after index delivery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall and cause-specific mortality risks were compared using Cox regression. RESULTS: We included 29 048 exposed and 57 992 matched unexposed women. There were 3551 deaths among exposed (12.2%) and 6013 deaths among unexposed women (10.4%). Spontaneous PTB was associated with all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21-1.31), death from neoplasms (aHR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02-1.18), circulatory disease (aHR 1.35, 95% CI 1.25-1.46), respiratory disease (aHR 1.73, 95% CI 1.46-2.06), digestive disease (aHR 1.33, 95% CI 1.12-1.58), genito-urinary disease (aHR 1.60, 95% CI 1.15-2.23) and external causes (aHR 1.39, 95% CI 1.22-1.58). CONCLUSIONS: Spontaneous PTB is associated with modestly increased risks for all-cause and some cause-specific mortality.

The Temporal Relationship Between the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic and Preterm Birth.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether preterm birth rates changed in relation to the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and whether any change depended on socioeconomic status. METHODS: This is an observational cohort study of pregnant individuals with a singleton gestation who delivered in the years 2019 and 2020 at 1 of 16 U.S. hospitals of the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. The frequency of preterm birth for those who delivered before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic (ie, in 2019) was compared with that of those who delivered after its onset (ie, in 2020). Interaction analyses were performed for people of different individual- and community-level socioeconomic characteristics (ie, race and ethnicity, insurance status, Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) of a person's residence). RESULTS: During 2019 and 2020, 18,526 individuals met inclusion criteria. The chance of preterm birth before the COVID-19 pandemic was similar to that after the onset of the pandemic (11.7% vs 12.5%, adjusted relative risk 0.94, 95% CI 0.86-1.03). In interaction analyses, race and ethnicity, insurance status, and the SVI did not modify the association between the epoch and the chance of preterm birth before 37 weeks of gestation (all interaction P >.05). CONCLUSION: There was no statistically significant difference in preterm birth rates in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic onset. This lack of association was largely independent of socioeconomic indicators such as race and ethnicity, insurance status, or SVI of the residential community in which an individual lived.

Care plan for individuals at risk for preeclampsia: shared approach to education, strategies for prevention, surveillance, and follow-up.

Preeclampsia is a multisystemic disorder of pregnancy that affects 250,000 pregnant individuals in the United States and approximately 10 million worldwide per annum. Preeclampsia is associated with substantial immediate morbidity and mortality but also long-term morbidity for both mother and offspring. It is now clearly established that a low dose of aspirin given daily, beginning early in pregnancy modestly reduces the occurrence of preeclampsia. Low-dose aspirin seems safe, but because there is a paucity of information about long-term effects on the infant, it is not recommended for all pregnant individuals. Thus, several expert groups have identified clinical factors that indicate sufficient risk to recommend low-dose aspirin preventive therapy. These risk factors may be complemented by biochemical and/or biophysical tests that either indicate increased probability of preeclampsia in individuals with clinical risk factors, or more importantly, identify increased likelihood in those without other evident risk. In addition, the opportunity exists to provide this population with additional care that may prevent or mitigate the short- and long-term effects of preeclampsia. Patient and provider education, increased surveillance, behavioral modification, and other approaches to improve outcomes in these individuals can improve the chance of a healthy outcome. We assembled a group with diverse, relevant expertise (clinicians, investigators, advocates, and public and private stakeholders) to develop a care plan in which providers and pregnant individuals at risk can work together to reduce the risk of preeclampsia and associated morbidities. The plan is for care of individuals at moderate to high risk for developing preeclampsia, sufficient to receive low-dose aspirin therapy, as identified by clinical and/or laboratory findings. The recommendations are presented using the GRADE methodology with the quality of evidence upon which each is based. In addition, printable appendices with concise summaries of the care plan's recommendations for patients and healthcare providers are provided. We believe that this shared approach to care will facilitate prevention of preeclampsia and its attendant short- and long-term morbidity in patients identified as at risk for development of this disorder.

Patient-Reported Sexual Function Among Young Adult Cancer Survivors.

Purpose: Reproductive health and sexual function are important to survivors of Adolescent and Young adult (AYA) cancers. We evaluated the prevalence of sexual dysfunction and factors associated with dysfunction using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) sexual function (SexFS) measure in AYAs (15-39 years old at diagnosis) enrolled in a cancer survivorship cohort. Materials and Methods: Using a cross-sectional survey of a tertiary medical center-based cancer survivorship cohort, we determined the mean PROMIS SexFS v1.0 T-scores and prevalence of scores that were indicative of dysfunction (>1/2 standard deviation [SD] below reference population mean). Multivariable generalized linear regression was performed to identify factors associated with lower scores. Results: We identified 284 AYA cancer survivors, most of whom were women (70%). The mean age at survey was 36.0 years (SD = 7.9). Overall, 31% of females and 19% of men had clinically significantly lower scores than the general U.S. population in the domain of interest, and 13% of women and 6% of men had abnormal scores for satisfaction. Twenty-six percent of male AYAs reported erectile dysfunction. The rate of sexual inactivity in the last 30 days was 27%. Low levels of physical activity were associated with lower PROMIS scores for interest in sexual activity in both men and women, and for global satisfaction with sex life in women only. Conclusions: Our results suggest that low interest in sexual activity is common among survivors of AYA cancers. Low levels of physical activity may be associated with lower levels of interest in and satisfaction with sexual activity in this population.

First- or second-trimester SARS-CoV-2 infection and subsequent pregnancy outcomes.

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, including fetal death and preterm birth. It is not known whether that risk occurs only during the time of acute infection or whether the risk persists later in pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate whether the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy persists after an acute maternal illness. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of pregnant patients with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection delivering at 17 hospitals in the United States between March 2020 and December 2020. Patients experiencing a SARS-CoV-2-positive test at or before 28 weeks of gestation with a subsequent delivery hospitalization were compared with those without a positive SAR-CoV-2 test at the same hospitals with randomly selected delivery days during the same period. Deliveries occurring at <20 weeks of gestation in both groups were excluded. The study outcomes included fetal or neonatal death, preterm birth at <37 weeks of gestation and <34 weeks of gestation, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), any major congenital malformation, and size for gestational age of <5th or <10th percentiles at birth based on published standards. HDP that were collected included HDP and preeclampsia with severe features, both overall and with delivery at <37 weeks of gestation. RESULTS: Of 2326 patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy and were at least 20 weeks of gestation at delivery from March 2020 to December 2020, 402 patients (delivering 414 fetuses or neonates) were SARS-CoV-2 positive before 28 weeks of gestation and before their admission for delivery; they were compared with 11,705 patients without a positive SARS-CoV-2 test. In adjusted analyses, those with SARS-CoV-2 before 28 weeks of gestation had a subsequent increased risk of fetal or neonatal death (2.9% vs 1.5%; adjusted relative risk, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-3.85), preterm birth at <37 weeks of gestation (19.6% vs 13.8%; adjusted relative risk, 1.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.63), and HDP with delivery at <37 weeks of gestation (7.2% vs 4.1%; adjusted relative risk, 1.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-2.55). There was no difference in the rates of preterm birth at <34 weeks of gestation, any major congenital malformation, and size for gestational age of <5th or <10th percentiles. In addition, there was no significant difference in the rate of gestational hypertension overall or preeclampsia with severe features. CONCLUSION: There was a modest increase in the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes after SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Association Between Giving Birth During the Early Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic and Serious Maternal Morbidity.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether delivering during the early the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic was associated with increased risk of maternal death or serious morbidity from common obstetric complications compared with a historical control period. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study with manual medical-record abstraction performed by centrally trained and certified research personnel at 17 U.S. hospitals. Individuals who gave birth on randomly selected dates in 2019 (before the pandemic) and 2020 (during the pandemic) were compared. Hospital, health care system, and community risk-mitigation strategies for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in response to the early COVID-19 pandemic are described. The primary outcome was a composite of maternal death or serious morbidity from common obstetric complications, including hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (eclampsia, end organ dysfunction, or need for acute antihypertensive therapy), postpartum hemorrhage (operative intervention or receipt of 4 or more units blood products), and infections other than SARS-CoV-2 (sepsis, pelvic abscess, prolonged intravenous antibiotics, bacteremia, deep surgical site infection). The major secondary outcome was cesarean birth. RESULTS: Overall, 12,133 patients giving birth during and 9,709 before the pandemic were included. Hospital, health care system, and community SARS-CoV-2 mitigation strategies were employed at all sites for a portion of 2020, with a peak in modifications from March to June 2020. Of patients delivering during the pandemic, 3% had a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result during pregnancy through 42 days postpartum. Giving birth during the pandemic was not associated with a change in the frequency of the primary composite outcome (9.3% vs 8.9%, adjusted relative risk [aRR] 1.02, 95% CI 0.93-1.11) or cesarean birth (32.4% vs 31.3%, aRR 1.02, 95% CI 0.97-1.07). No maternal deaths were observed. CONCLUSION: Despite substantial hospital, health care, and community modifications, giving birth during the early COVID-19 pandemic was not associated with higher rates of serious maternal morbidity from common obstetric complications. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04519502.

Physical activity and pregnancy outcomes: an expert review.

This expert review aimed to assess current literature on the effect and tracking of physical activity during pregnancy and associated outcomes. Self-reported physical activity may be inaccurate given the subjective nature of the questionnaires. The accelerometer ActiGraph is considered the "gold standard" to objectively measure physical activity. However, other more user-friendly wearable devices are now widely available and may accurately track physical activity. Conclusive data from both validated activity questionnaires and accelerometers indicate that physical activity is safe during pregnancy. In addition, studies of physical activity during pregnancy that evaluate pregnancy outcomes have found reduced risks of preterm birth, preeclampsia, and gestational diabetes mellitus and improved mental health among individuals who regularly engage in physical activity. In the United States, approximately 48% of pregnant individuals gain more than the recommended amount of weight during pregnancy; excessive gestational weight gain is associated with an increased risk of maternal and fetal complications, including preterm birth, preeclampsia, and gestational diabetes mellitus, and corresponding higher adverse short- and long-term maternal and offspring health outcomes. Although physical activity is safe during pregnancy and may reduce excessive gestational weight gain and resultant pregnancy complications, further research is needed to determine the frequency and duration of specific types of physical activity during pregnancy. Providers should encourage physical activity before and during pregnancy and educate patients regarding the benefits and safety of physical activity.

Should case management be considered a component of obstetrical interventions for pregnancies at risk of preterm birth?

Preterm birth remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality among nonanomalous neonates in the United States. Unfortunately, preterm birth rates remain high despite current medical interventions such as progestogen supplementation and cerclage placement. Case management, which encompasses coordinated care aimed at providing a more comprehensive and supportive environment, is a key component in improving health and reducing costs in other areas of medicine. However, it has not made its way into the general lexicon and practice of obstetrical care. Case management intended for decreasing prematurity or ameliorating its consequences may include specialty clinics, social services, coordination of specialty services such as nutrition counseling, home visits or frequent phone calls by specially trained personnel, and other elements described herein. It is not currently included in nor is it advocated for as a recommended prematurity prevention approach in the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists or Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine guidelines for medically indicated or spontaneous preterm birth prevention. Our review of existing evidence finds consistent reductions or trends toward reductions in preterm birth with case management, particularly among individuals with high a priori risk of preterm birth across systematic reviews, metaanalyses, and randomized controlled studies. These findings suggest that case management has substantial potential to improve the environmental, behavioral, social, and psychological factors with patients at risk of preterm birth.

Elevated midtrimester maternal plasma cytokines and preterm birth in patients with cerclage.

BACKGROUND: Cerclage is used for the prevention of spontaneous preterm birth; however, many patients at high risk of spontaneous preterm birth who have a cerclage in place eventually deliver before term. Although inflammation, measured by biomarkers (eg, cytokines), is a known risk factor for preterm delivery, evaluation of inflammation to determine pregnancy outcomes among patients with cerclage is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine levels of maternal plasma inflammatory cytokines in the midtrimester among asymptomatic patients with a cervical cerclage (placed for any indication, including history, ultrasound, and examination indications) to evaluate the association between cytokine levels and preterm birth. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective cohort study of singleton, nonanomalous pregnancies who had a cerclage placed at <24 weeks of gestation from 2015 to 2018 at a single tertiary institution. Maternal plasma was collected perioperatively whenever possible. A custom magnetic bead Luminex cytokine assay was used to measure plasma inflammatory cytokine levels from these stored samples. The primary outcome was preterm birth at <37 weeks of gestation. A statistical cut point was calculated for each cytokine level to assess its optimal sensitivity and specificity for spontaneous preterm birth prediction. Patients were classified as having a "high" or "low" result for each cytokine based on this cut point. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to estimate sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for spontaneous preterm birth prediction. Cox proportional-hazards regression modeled the association between the number of "high" inflammatory cytokines and gestational age at delivery, adjusting for confounders. Additional analyses were performed on the subgroup of patients with history-indicated cerclage and those with an ultrasound- or examination-indicated cerclage. RESULTS: A total of 43 patients participated in this study: 20 (46.5%) had spontaneous preterm birth (median, 30.9 weeks of gestation; interquartile range, 28.4-35.0). Plasma samples were collected at a median of 0 (interquartile range, -2 to 17) days concerning cerclage placement and a median of 18 (interquartile range, 13-21) weeks of gestation. Based on the statistical cut point for each cytokine level, 7% of patients had zero, 20.9% had 1, 18.6% had 2, 20.9% had 3, and 32.6% had ≥4 "high" cytokine results. Each additional "high" cytokine level was associated with earlier delivery (hazard ratio, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-1.81) even after controlling for ultrasound- or examination-indication for cerclage (hazard ratio, 1.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-3.15). The presence of ≥4 "high" cytokine levels was 70% sensitive and 74% specific for predicting spontaneous preterm birth (area under the curve, 0.846; 95% confidence interval, 0.728-0.964; positive predictive value, 70%; negative predictive value, 73.9%). CONCLUSION: Among patients with a cervical cerclage, elevated midtrimester maternal plasma cytokine profiles were associated with subsequent preterm birth and can estimate the probability of preterm birth. Confirmation and refinement of this noninvasive panel may provide insight into improved selection of individuals who may benefit from cerclage placement and investigation of therapeutic strategies to mitigate midpregnancy inflammation.

Differences in disease severity and delivery gestational age between black and white patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to quantify racial differences in disease severity and delivery gestational age among Black and White patients with a diagnosis of a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort of all Black and White pregnant patients carrying non-anomalous singleton or twin gestations at a single tertiary healthcare system who were diagnosed with a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy, 2014-2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome was delivery < 34 weeks' gestation. Secondary outcomes were delivery < 28 weeks', preeclampsia with severe features, acute renal insufficiency, HELLP syndrome, cesarean delivery, classical cesarean delivery, small for gestational age, severe maternal morbidity, and severe composite neonatal morbidity. Outcomes were compared by race. Data were analyzed using chi square, t-test, and logistic regression. RESULTS: 3,522 patients (29.8% Black) met inclusion criteria. Black patients had a higher odds of delivery < 34 weeks' [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.22, 95% CI 1.7-2.89] and < 28 weeks' (aOR 2.39, 95% CI 1.43-3.99) and developing preeclampsia with severe features (aOR 1.92, 95% CI 1.62-2.29) than White patients. Black patients also had higher aOR of classical cesarean, severe maternal morbidity, and a small for gestational age neonate. CONCLUSIONS: Black patients are more likely to experience severe hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and preterm delivery compared to White patients. These findings suggest that Black-White disparities in preterm birth may be partially attributable to disparities in onset and severity of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.