Quantifying the Survival Loss Linked to Late Therapeutic Indication in High-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Background: International guidelines recommend aortic valve replacement (AVR) as Class I triggers in high-gradient severe aortic stenosis (HGSAS) patients with symptoms and/or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%. The association between waiting for these triggers and postoperative survival penalty is poorly studied. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of guideline-based Class I triggers on long-term postoperative survival in HGSAS patients. Methods: 2,030 patients operated for HGSAS were included and classified as follows: no Class I triggers (no symptoms and LVEF >50%, n = 853), symptoms with LVEF >50% (n = 965), or LVEF <50% regardless of symptoms (n = 212). Survival was compared after matching (inverse probability weighting) for clinical differences. Restricted mean survival time was analyzed to quantify lifetime loss. Results: Ten-year survival was better without any Class I trigger than with symptoms or LVEF <50% (67.1% ± 3% vs 56.4% ± 3% vs 53.1% ± 7%, respectively, P < 0.001). Adjusted death risks increased significantly in operated patients with symptoms (HR: 1.45 [95% CI: 1.15-1.82]) or LVEF <50% (HR: 1.47 [95% CI: 1.05-2.06]) than in those without Class I triggers. Performing AVR with LVEF >60% produced similar outcomes to that of the general population, whereas operated patients with LVEF <60% was associated with a 10-year postoperative survival penalty. Furthermore, according to restricted mean survival time analyses, operating on symptomatic patients or with LVEF <60% led to 8.3- and 11.4-month survival losses, respectively, after 10 years, compared with operated asymptomatic patients with a LVEF >60%. Conclusions: Guideline-based Class I triggers for AVR in HGSAS have profound consequences on long-term postoperative survival, suggesting that HGSAS patients should undergo AVR before trigger onset. Operating on patients with LVEF <60% is already associated with a 10-year postoperative survival penalty questioning the need for an EF threshold recommending AVR in HGSAS patients.

Evaluation of new predictive scores for sudden cardiac death in childhood hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in a French cohort.

BACKGROUND: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is rare in children, and sudden cardiac death (SCD) is difficult to predict. Two prognostic scores - HCM Risk-Kids and Precision Medicine for Cardiomyopathy (PRIMaCY) - were developed to assess the risk of SCD in the next 5 years in children with HCM. AIMS: To test the ability of these scores to predict SCD in children with HCM. Also, to identify factors associated with a severe cardiac rhythmic event (SCRE) (ventricular fibrillation, sustained ventricular tachycardia, heart transplant for rhythmic reasons or SCD). METHODS: Retrospective, multicentre, observational study at 10 medical centres in the Nord-Pas-de-Calais region, France. RESULTS: This study included 72 paediatric patients with HCM during 2009-2019 who were followed for a median (interquartile range [IQR]) of 8.5 (5.0-16.2) years. Eleven patients (15.3%) presented with SCRE. HCM Risk-Kids was high, with a median (IQR) score of 6.2% (2.1-12.8%; significant threshold≥6.0%) and the PRIMaCY median (IQR) score was 7.1% (2.6-15.0%; significant threshold≥8.3%). The positive predictive value was only 27.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 21.5-32.5%) for HCM Risk-Kids (with a threshold of≥6.0%) and 33.2% (95% CI 27.1-38.9%) for the PRIMaCY score (with a threshold of≥8.3%). The negative predictive values were 95.4% (95% CI 92.3-97.7%) and 93.0% (95% CI 89.8-96.2%), respectively. Three of 28 patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) experienced complications (including inappropriate shocks). CONCLUSION: HCM Risk-Kids and the PRIMaCY score have low positive predictive values to predict SCD in paediatric patients. If used alone, they could increase the rate of ICD implantation and thus ICD complications. Therefore, the scores should be used in combination with other data (genetic and magnetic resonance imaging results).

Additive Prognostic Value of Left Ventricular Dispersion and Deformation in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Speckle tracking strain echocardiography allows one to visualize the timing of maximum regional strain and quantifies left ventricular-mechanical dispersion (LV-MD). Whether LV-MD and LV-global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) provide similar or complementary information in mortality risk stratification in patients with severe aortic stenosis (SAS) remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: The authors hypothesized that LV mechanical dyssynchrony assessed by LV-MD is associated with an increased risk of mortality and provides additional prognostic information on top of LV-GLS in patients with SAS. METHODS: A total of 364 patients with SAS (aortic valve area indexed ≤0.6 cm2/m2 and/or aortic valve area ≤1 cm2), LV ejection fraction ≥50% and no or mild symptoms were enrolled. The endpoint was overall mortality. RESULTS: During a median follow-up period of 41 months, 149 patients died. After adjustment, LV-MD ≥68 ms was significantly associated with an increased risk of mortality (adjusted HR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.01-1.96; P = 0.044). Adding LV-MD ≥68 ms to a multivariable Cox regression model including LV-GLS ≥-15% improved predictive performance in terms of overall mortality, with improved global model fit, reclassification, and better discrimination. Patients with both criteria had an important increase in mortality compared to patients with none or one criterion (adjusted HR: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.34-3.03; P = 0.001). Interobserver reproducibility of LV-MD was good with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.72-0.97). CONCLUSIONS: LV-MD is a reproducible parameter independently associated with an increased risk of mortality in SAS. Increased LV-MD associated with depressed LV-GLS identifies a subgroup of patients with an increased mortality risk. Whether early aortic valve replacement improves the outcome of these patients deserves further studies.

Is there a role for cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of biological aortic valves?

Patients with biological aortic valves (following either surgical aortic valve replacement [SAVR] or trans catheter aortic valve implantation [TAVI]) require lifelong follow-up with an imaging modality to assess prosthetic valve function and dysfunction. Echocardiography is currently the first-line imaging modality to assess biological aortic valves. In this review, we discuss the potential role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) as an additional imaging modality in situations of inconclusive or equivocal echocardiography. Planimetry of the prosthetic orifice can theoretically be measured, as well as the effective orifice area, with potential limitations, such as CMR valve-related artefacts and calcifications in degenerated prostheses. The true benefit of CMR is its ability to accurately quantify aortic regurgitation (paravalvular and intra-valvular) with a direct and reproducible method independent of regurgitant jet morphology to accurately assess reverse remodelling and non-invasively detect focal and interstitial diffuse myocardial fibrosis. Following SAVR or TAVI for aortic stenosis, interstitial diffuse fibrosis can regress, accompanied by structural and functional improvement that CMR can accurately assess.

Is "moderate" aortic stenosis still the right name? A review of the literature.

Current guidelines recommend aortic valve replacement for symptomatic or selected asymptomatic high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. Conversely, a watchful waiting attitude applies to patients with moderate aortic stenosis, regardless of their risk profile and symptoms, until the echocardiographic thresholds of severe aortic stenosis are reached. This strategy is based on data reporting high mortality in untreated severe symptomatic aortic stenosis, whereas moderate aortic stenosis has always been perceived as a non-threatening condition, with a benefit-risk balance against surgery. Meanwhile, numerous studies have reported a worrying event rate in these patients, surgical techniques and outcomes have improved significantly and the use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement has become more widespread and extended to lower-risk patients, leaving this strategy open to question, especially for patients with moderate aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction. In this review, we summarize the current state of knowledge about moderate aortic stenosis progression and prognosis. We also discuss the particular case of moderate aortic stenosis associated with left ventricular dysfunction, and the ongoing trials that that might change our paradigm for the management of this "moderate" valvular heart disease.

Integrating Echocardiography Parameters With Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Data-Driven Clustering of Primary Mitral Regurgitation Phenotypes.

BACKGROUND: Primary mitral regurgitation (MR) is a heterogeneous clinical disease requiring integration of echocardiographic parameters using guideline-driven recommendations to identify severe disease. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this preliminary study was to explore novel data-driven approaches to delineate phenotypes of MR severity that benefit from surgery. METHODS: The authors used unsupervised and supervised machine learning and explainable artificial intelligence (AI) to integrate 24 echocardiographic parameters in 400 primary MR subjects from France (n = 243; development cohort) and Canada (n = 157; validation cohort) followed up during a median time of 3.2 years (IQR: 1.3-5.3 years) and 6.8 (IQR: 4.0-8.5 years), respectively. The authors compared the phenogroups' incremental prognostic value over conventional MR profiles and for the primary endpoint of all-cause mortality incorporating time-to-mitral valve repair/replacement surgery as a covariate for survival analysis (time-dependent exposure). RESULTS: High-severity (HS) phenogroups from the French cohort (HS: n = 117; low-severity [LS]: n = 126) and the Canadian cohort (HS: n = 87; LS: n = 70) showed improved event-free survival in surgical HS subjects over nonsurgical subjects (P = 0.047 and P = 0.020, respectively). A similar benefit of surgery was not seen in the LS phenogroup in both cohorts (P = 0.70 and P = 0.50, respectively). Phenogrouping showed incremental prognostic value in conventionally severe or moderate-severe MR subjects (Harrell C statistic improvement; P = 0.480; and categorical net reclassification improvement; P = 0.002). Explainable AI specified how each echocardiographic parameter contributed to phenogroup distribution. CONCLUSIONS: Novel data-driven phenogrouping and explainable AI aided in improved integration of echocardiographic data to identify patients with primary MR and improved event-free survival after mitral valve repair/replacement surgery.

Dyssynchrony and Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Heart Failure Patients With Unfavorable Electrical Characteristics.

BACKGROUND: Among heart failure (HF) patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), those with unfavorable electrical characteristics (UEC) are less frequently CRT responders. OBJECTIVES: In this study, the authors sought to evaluate the relationship between preprocedural echocardiographic parameters of electromechanical dyssynchrony (EMD) and outcome following CRT. METHODS: Among 551 patients receiving CRT, 121 with UEC, defined as atypical left bundle branch, presence of right bundle branch block, or unspecified intraventricular conduction disturbance, were enrolled. Indices of EMD were presence of septal flash, apical rocking, septal deformation patterns, and global wasted work (GWW), determined with the use of speckle-tracking strain echocardiography. Endpoints were response to CRT, defined as a relative decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volume ≥15% at 9-month postoperative follow-up, and all-cause death or HF hospitalization during follow-up. RESULTS: Among the 121 patients, 68 (56%) were CRT responders. In multivariate analysis, GWW ≥200 mm Hg% (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 4.17 [95% CI: 1.33-14.56]; P = 0.0182) and longitudinal strain septal contraction patterns 1 and 2 (aOR: 10.05 [95% CI: 2.82-43.97]; P < 0.001) were associated with CRT response. During a 46-month follow-up (IQR: 42-55 months), survival free from death or HF hospitalization increased with the number of positive criteria (87% for 2, 59% for 1, and 27% for 0). After adjustment for established predictors of outcome in patients receiving CRT, absence of either of the 2 criteria remained associated with a considerable increased risk of death and/or HF hospitalization (adjusted HR: 4.83 [95% CI: 1.84-12.68]; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with UEC, echocardiographic assessment of EMD may help to select patients who will derive benefit from CRT. (Echocardiography in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy [Echo-CRT]; NCT02986633).

The evolving role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the assessment of mitral valve prolapse.

Mitral valve prolapse (MVP), characterized by a displacement > 2 mm above the mitral annulus of one or both bileaflets, with or without leaflet thickening, is a common valvular heart disease, with a prevalence of approximately 2% in western countries. Although this population has a generally good overall prognosis, MVP can be associated with mitral regurgitation (MR), left ventricular (LV) remodeling leading to heart failure, ventricular arrhythmia, and, the most devastating complication, sudden cardiac death, especially in myxomatous bileaflet prolapse (Barlow's disease). Among several prognostic factors reported in the literature, LV fibrosis and mitral annular disjunction may act as an arrhythmogenic substrate in this population. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has emerged as a reliable tool for assessing MVP, MR severity, LV remodeling, and fibrosis. Indeed, CMR is the gold standard imaging modality to assess ventricular volume, function, and wall motion abnormalities; it allows accurate calculation of the regurgitant volume and regurgitant fraction in MR using a combination of LV volumetric measurement and aortic flow quantification, independent of regurgitant jet morphology and valid in cases of multiple valvulopathies. Moreover, CMR is a unique imaging modality that can assess non-invasively focal and diffuse fibrosis using late gadolinium enhancement sequences and, more recently, T1 mapping. This review describes the use of CMR in patients with MVP and its role in identifying patients at high risk of ventricular arrhythmia.

Quantification of primary mitral regurgitation by echocardiography: A practical appraisal.

The accurate quantification of primary mitral regurgitation (MR) and its consequences on cardiac remodeling is of paramount importance to determine the best timing for surgery in these patients. The recommended echocardiographic grading of primary MR severity relies on an integrated multiparametric approach. It is expected that the large number of echocardiographic parameters collected would offer the possibility to check the measured values regarding their congruence in order to conclude reliably on MR severity. However, the use of multiple parameters to grade MR can result in potential discrepancies between one or more of them. Importantly, many factors beyond MR severity impact the values obtained for these parameters including technical settings, anatomic and hemodynamic considerations, patient's characteristics and echocardiographer' skills. Hence, clinicians involved in valvular diseases should be well aware of the respective strengths and pitfalls of each of MR grading methods by echocardiography. Recent literature highlighted the need for a reappraisal of the severity of primary MR from a hemodynamic perspective. The estimation of MR regurgitation fraction by indirect quantitative methods, whenever possible, should be central when grading the severity of these patients. The assessment of the MR effective regurgitant orifice area by the proximal flow convergence method should be used in a semi-quantitative manner. Furthermore, it is crucial to acknowledge specific clinical situations in MR at risk of misevaluation when grading severity such as late-systolic MR, bi-leaflet prolapse with multiple jets or extensive leak, wall-constrained eccentric jet or in older patients with complex MR mechanism. Finally, it is debatable whether the 4-grades classification of MR severity would be still relevant nowadays, since the indication for mitral valve (MV) surgery is discussed in clinical practice for patients with 3+ and 4+ primary MR based on symptoms, specific markers of adverse outcome and MV repair probability. Primary MR grading should be seen as a continuum integrating both quantification of MR and its consequences, even for patients with presumed "moderate" MR.

Impact of left atrial and diastolic ventricular dysfunction on mortality in patients with aortic stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Diastolic dysfunction (DD) is common in severe aortic stenosis (AS) and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF≥50%). AIM: To determine the impact of American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging-recommended DD grading and left atrial strain on mortality in a cohort of patients with severe AS and preserved LVEF. METHODS: We studied patients with severe AS (aortic valve area indexed<0.6 cm2/m2 and/or aortic valve area<1cm2), LVEF≥50% and no or mild AS-related symptoms. The endpoint was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: A total of 387 patients (median age 76years; 53% women) were studied. During a median follow-up of 57 (interquartile range 37; 83) months, 158 patients died. After adjustment for prognostic factors, patients with grade II or III DD had an increased mortality risk versus patients with grade I DD (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-2.38; P=0.013; aHR 4.73, 95% CI 2.49-8.99; P<0.001; respectively). Adding peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS)≤14% to a multivariable model including DD grade improved predictive performance, with better global model fit, reclassification and discrimination. Patients with grade III DD or grade II DD+PALS≤14% displayed an increased mortality risk versus patients with grade I DD+PALS>14% (aHR 4.17, 95% CI 2.46-7.06; P<0.0001). Those with grade I DD+PALS≤14% or grade II DD+PALS>14% were at intermediate risk (aHR 1.63, 95% CI 1.07-2.49; P=0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate the strong relationship between DD and mortality in patients with severe AS and preserved LVEF. Patients with grade III or grade II DD and impaired PALS are at very high risk. These data demonstrate the importance of a comprehensive assessment of diastolic function in patients with severe AS.

Clinical significance of myocardial contraction fraction in significant primary mitral regurgitation.

BACKGROUND: The optimal timing for mitral valve (MV) surgery in asymptomatic patients with primary mitral regurgitation (MR) remains a matter of debate. Myocardial contraction fraction (MCF) - the ratio of the left ventricular (LV) stroke volume to that of the myocardial volume - is a volumetric measure of LV myocardial shortening independent of size or geometry. AIM: To assess the relationship between MCF and outcome in patients with significant chronic primary MR due to prolapse managed in contemporary practice. METHODS: Clinical, Doppler-echocardiographic and outcome data prospectively collected in 174 patients (mean age 62 years, 27% women) with significant primary MR and no or mild symptoms were analysed. The impact of MCF< or ≥30% on cardiac events (cardiovascular death, acute heart failure or MV surgery) was studied. RESULTS: During an estimated median follow-up of 49 (22-77) months, cardiac events occurred in 115 (66%) patients. The 4-year estimates of survival free from cardiac events were 21±5% for patients with MCF <30% and 40±6% for those with ≥30% (P<0.001). MCF <30% was associated with a considerable increased risk of cardiac events after adjustment for established clinical risk factors, MR severity and current recommended class I triggers for MV surgery (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.33, 95% confidence interval: 1.51-3.58; P<0.001). Moreover, MCF<30% improved the predictive performance of models, with better global fit, reclassification and discrimination. CONCLUSIONS: MCF<30% is strongly associated with occurrence of cardiac events in patients with significant primary MR due to prolapse. Further studies are needed to assess the direct impact of MCF on patient management and outcomes.

Atrial fibrillation in severe aortic stenosis: Prognostic value and results of aortic valve replacement.

OBJECTIVES: Although atrial fibrillation (AF) is common, its impact on long-term mortality has not been reliably determined in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). We aimed to assess whether AF is associated with survival in patients with severe AS and to determine the impact of AF on the results of aortic valve replacement (AVR). METHODS: The study included 1838 consecutive patients with severe AS (77 ± 11 years, male 47%). Upon AS diagnosis, patients were screened for AF using a 12-lead electrocardiogram. The treatment strategy (conservative management or AVR) was selected by the heart team in accordance with current guidelines. The effect of AVR on survival was analyzed as a time-dependent covariate using the entire follow-up period. RESULTS: AF, diagnosed in 593 (32%) patients was associated with poor survival at 5 years (55 ± 2% vs 74 ± 1% for patients in sinus rhythm, P < .001), even after adjustment for established outcome predictors (hazard ratio [HR], 1.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-1.84; P < .001). In patients with AF, AVR was associated with lower mortality (HR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.12-0.22; P < .001) even in those with no or minimal symptoms (HR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.08-0.20; P < .001). However, among patients who underwent AVR, those in AF had an excess mortality (HR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.22-2.08; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In severe AS, AF is a strong predictor of mortality even in asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients. After AVR, AF remains associated with poorer survival than sinus rhythm. In patients in AF, AVR is associated with lower mortality compared with conservative treatment. Further studies are needed to confirm the benefits of AVR in asymptomatic patients in AF with severe AS.

David Procedure: A 21-year Experience With 300 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Valve-sparing aortic root replacement with the David procedure is an alternative to the Bentall procedure in patients with aortic root aneurysm. The aim of this study was to describe our long-term experience with this technique and the predictive factors of late failure. METHODS: Between January 1998 and August 2019, 300 consecutive patients underwent a David procedure. Clinical and echocardiographic early- and long-term outcomes were analyzed. Median follow-up was 7.0 years (range, 4.1-11.5), with 98.3% complete. RESULTS: Early mortality was 1%. No early valve-related reoperations occurred. There were 9 cardiac-related deaths and 22 reinterventions (19 valve-related). All patients survived reoperation. In 3 patients reintervention consisted of transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Overall survival rates were 95.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 92.0-97.2), 91.1% (95% CI, 86.5-94.2), and 82.9% (95% CI, 75.3-88.4) at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. Freedom from postoperative aortic insufficiency (AI) grade ≥ 2 was 84.8% (95% CI, 79.9-88.6) and 74.3% (95% CI, 67.4-79.9) at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Freedom from reintervention for aortic valve disease was 97.1% (95% CI, 94.2-98.5), 92.9% (95% CI, 88.2-95.7), and 92.5% (95% CI, 87.1-95.7) at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. Preoperative AI ≥ 2 (hazard ratio, 1.782; 95% CI, 1.352-2.350) and a ventriculoaortic junction ≥ 29 mm (hazard ratio, 3.379; 95% CI, 1.726-6.616) were predictive factors for postoperative AI ≥ 2 in a multivariate analysis (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative AI ≥ 2 and a ventriculoaortic junction ≥ 29 mm were identified as risk factors for late postoperative AI ≥ 2.

Extent of Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Reduction and All-cause and Cardiovascular Mortality Benefit: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT: Lipid-modifying agents steadily lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels with the aim of reducing mortality. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to determine whether all-cause or cardiovascular (CV) mortality effect size for lipid-lowering therapy varied according to the magnitude of LDL-C reduction. Electronic databases were searched, including PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov , from inception to December 31, 2019. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials that compared lipid-modifying agents (statins, ezetimibe, and PCSK-9 inhibitors) versus placebo, standard or usual care or intensive versus less-intensive LDL-C-lowering therapy in adults, with or without known history of CV disease with a follow-up of at least 52 weeks. All-cause and CV mortality as primary end points, myocardial infarction, stroke, and non-CV death as secondary end points. Absolute risk differences [ARD (ARDs) expressed as incident events per 1000 person-years], number needed to treat (NNT), and rate ratios (RR) were assessed. Sixty randomized controlled trials totaling 323,950 participants were included. Compared with placebo, usual care or less-intensive therapy, active or more potent lipid-lowering therapy reduced the risk of all-cause death [ARD -1.33 (-1.89 to -0.76); NNT 754 (529-1309); RR 0.92 (0.89-0.96)]. Intensive LDL-C percent lowering was not associated with further reductions in all-cause mortality [ARD -0.27 (-1.24 to 0.71); RR 1.00 (0.94-1.06)]. Intensive LDL-C percent lowering did not further reduce CV mortality [ARD -0.28 (-0.83 to 0.38); RR 1.02 (0.94-1.09)]. Our findings indicate that risk reduction varies across subgroups and that overall NNTs are high. Identifying patient subgroups who benefit the most from LDL-C levels reduction is clinically relevant and necessary.

Prognostic Implications of Discordant Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis: Comprehensive Analysis of a Large Multicenter Registry.

Background: Up to 30% of patients with severe aortic stenosis (SAS) (indexed aortic valve area [AVAi] <0.6 cm2/m2) exhibit low-transvalvular gradient despite normal ejection fraction. There is intense debate regarding the prognostic significance of this entity. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of patients with discordant low-gradient SAS (DLG-SAS) vs moderate aortic stenosis (MAS) and high-gradient SAS (HG-SAS). Methods: We used the BEL-F-ASt (Belgium-France-Aortic Stenosis) registry including consecutive patients with AS. Survival was compared overall and after matching (inverse probability weighting and propensity-score matching) for clinical and imaging variables. The analysis was first performed in the overall population (n = 2,582) and then in the population of unoperated patients (n = 1,812). Results: After-inverse probability weighting-matching, the 3 groups were balanced. Five-year survival was better in MAS than in DLG-SAS and HG-SAS-patients (58.9% vs 47% vs 41.2%, P < 0.001). Similar results were obtained in unoperated patients (54.1% vs 37.9% vs 28.1%, P < 0.001). To explore the impact of MG (≤40 vs >40 mmHg) and AVAi (<0.6 vs ≥0.6 cm2/m2) on outcomes, survival of propensity score-matched cohorts of HG-vs DLG-SAS and MAS vs DLG-SAS were compared. After matching for MG, survival was better in MAS than in DLG-SAS (52% vs 40%, P < 0.001). After matching for AVAi, survival was better in DLG-SAS than in HG-SAS patients (45% vs 33%, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Survival of DLG-SAS is better than that of HG-SAS and worse than that of MAS patients. At comparable MG, the lower the AVAi, the worse the prognosis, whereas at comparable AVAi, the higher the MG, the worse the prognosis. These data argue that DLG-SAS is an intermediate form in the disease continuum.

Evaluating the safety and short-term equivalence of colchicine versus prednisone in older patients with acute calcium pyrophosphate crystal arthritis (COLCHICORT): an open-label, multicentre, randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Acute calcium pyrophosphate crystal arthritis causes intense joint pain mainly affecting older people. Because guidance and evidence remain scarce, management of this disease relies on expert opinion. We therefore aimed to compare the safety and short-term equivalence of low-dose colchicine with oral prednisone in older patients with acute calcium pyrophosphate crystal arthritis. METHODS: We did an open-label, multicentre, randomised, trial (COLCHICORT) at six hospitals in Paris and northern France. We enrolled patients who were admitted to hospital who were 65 years or older and who presented with acute calcium pyrophosphate crystal arthritis with a symptom duration of less than 36 h. Diagnosis of calcium pyrophosphate crystal arthritis was made by the identification of calcium pyrophosphate crystals on synovial fluid analysis or typical clinical presentation (onset of joint pain and swelling). Key exclusion criteria included absence of calcium pyrophosphate crystals on synovial fluid analysis or a history of gout. Participants were randomly allocated (1:1), using a centralised electronic treatment group allocation module, to receive either colchicine 1·5 mg on day 1 and 1 mg on day 2 (ie, the colchicine group) or oral prednisone 30 mg on days 1 and 2 (ie, the prednisone group). The primary outcome was change in joint pain (measured by visual analogue scale [VAS] from 0 mm to 100 mm) at 24 h. Equivalence was determined whether the 95% CI of the between-group difference at 24 h was within the -13 mm to +13 mm margin in the per-protocol analysis. Adverse events were recorded using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0). This trial is completed and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03128905. FINDINGS: Between Feb 5, 2018, and May 7, 2022, 111 patients who were admitted to hospital were randomly assigned (57 [51%] to the colchicine group and 54 [49%] to the prednisone group). 95 (86%) of 111 patients were included in the per-protocol analysis (49 [52%] in the colchicine group and 46 [48%] in the prednisone group). The median age was 88·0 years (IQR 82·0-91·0) and 69 (73%) of 95 participants were women and 26 (27%) were men. Acute calcium pyrophosphate crystal arthritis affected mainly the knee in 46 (48%) of 95 participants, the wrist in 19 (20%), and the ankle in 12 (13%). Pain VAS at baseline was 68 mm (SD 17). At 24 h, change in pain VAS was -36 mm (SD 32) in the colchicine group and -38 mm (SD 23) in the prednisone group. The between-group difference in change in pain VAS at 24 h was -1 mm (95% CI -12 to 10), showing equivalence between the two drugs. In the colchicine group, 12 (22%) of 55 patients had diarrhoea, one (2%) had hypertension, and none had hyperglycaemia. In the prednisone group, three (6%) of 54 had diarrhoea, six (11%) had hypertension, and three (6%) had hyperglycaemia. No deaths occurred in the colchicine group; two deaths occurred in the prednisone group, which were deemed unrelated to prednisone (one due to infectious valvular endocarditis leading to heart failure, and one due to a stroke). INTERPRETATION: Colchicine and prednisone exhibit equivalent short-term efficacy for the treatment of acute calcium pyrophosphate crystal arthritis, with different safety profiles in the older population. FUNDING: French Inter-regional Hospital Program of Clinical Research.

Unsupervised clustering of patients with severe aortic stenosis: A myocardial continuum.

BACKGROUND: Traditional statistics, based on prediction models with a limited number of prespecified variables, are probably not adequate to provide an appropriate classification of a condition that is as heterogeneous as aortic stenosis (AS). AIMS: To investigate a new classification system for severe AS using phenomapping. METHODS: Consecutive patients from a referral centre (training cohort) who met the echocardiographic definition of an aortic valve area (AVA) ≤ 1 cm2 were included. Clinical, laboratory and imaging continuous variables were entered into an agglomerative hierarchical clustering model to separate patients into phenogroups. Individuals from an external validation cohort were then assigned to these original clusters using the K nearest neighbour (KNN) function and their 5-year survival was compared after adjustment for aortic valve replacement (AVR) as a time-dependent covariable. RESULTS: In total, 613 patients were initially recruited, with a mean±standard deviation AVA of 0.72±0.17 cm2. Twenty-six variables were entered into the model to generate a specific heatmap. Penalized model-based clustering identified four phenogroups (A, B, C and D), of which phenogroups B and D tended to include smaller, older women and larger, older men, respectively. The application of supervised algorithms to the validation cohort (n=1303) yielded the same clusters, showing incremental cardiac remodelling from phenogroup A to phenogroup D. According to this myocardial continuum, there was a stepwise increase in overall mortality (adjusted hazard ratio for phenogroup D vs A 2.18, 95% confidence interval 1.46-3.26; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Artificial intelligence re-emphasizes the significance of cardiac remodelling in the prognosis of patients with severe AS and highlights AS not only as an isolated valvular condition, but also a global disease.

Role of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Native Valvular Regurgitation: A Comprehensive Review of Protocols, Grading of Severity, and Prediction of Valve Surgery.

Valvular regurgitation is common in developed countries with an increasing prevalence due to the aging of the population and more accurate diagnostic imaging methods. Echocardiography is the gold standard method for the assessment of the severity of valvular heart regurgitation. Nonetheless, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has emerged as an additional tool for assessing mainly the severity of aortic and mitral valve regurgitation in the setting of indeterminate findings by echocardiography. Moreover, CMR is a valuable imaging modality to assess ventricular volume and flow, which are useful in the calculation of regurgitant volume and regurgitant fraction of mitral valve regurgitation, aortic valve regurgitation, tricuspid valve regurgitation, and pulmonary valve regurgitation. Notwithstanding this, reference values and optimal thresholds to determine the severity and prognosis of valvular heart regurgitation have been studied lesser by CMR than by echocardiography. Hence, further larger studies are warranted to validate the potential prognostic relevance of the severity of valvular heart regurgitation determined by CMR. The present review describes, analyzes, and discusses the use of CMR to determine the severity of valvular heart regurgitation in clinical practice.

Significance of Left Ventricular Ejection Time in Primary Mitral Regurgitation.

The optimal timing for mitral valve (MV) surgery in asymptomatic patients with primary mitral regurgitation (MR) remains controversial. We aimed at evaluating the relation between left ventricular ejection time (LVET) and outcome in patients with moderate or severe chronic primary MR because of prolapse. Clinical, Doppler echocardiographic, and outcome data prospectively collected from 302 patients (median age 61 [54 to 74] years, 34% women) with moderate or severe primary MR were analyzed. Patients were retrospectively stratified by quartiles of LVET. The primary end point of the study was the composite of need for MV surgery or all-cause mortality. During a median follow-up time of 66 (25th to 75th percentile, 33 to 95) months, 178 patients reached the primary end point. Patients in the lowest quartile of LVET (<260 ms) were at high risk for adverse events compared with those in the other quartiles of LVET (global p = 0.005), whereas the rate of events was similar for the other quartiles (p = NS for all). After adjustment for clinical predictors of outcome, including age, gender, history of atrial fibrillation, MR severity, and current recommended triggers for MV surgery in asymptomatic primary MR, LVET <260 ms was associated with an increased risk of events (adjusted hazard ratio 1.49, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 2.16, p = 0.033). In conclusion, we observed that shorter LVET is associated with increased risk of adverse events in patients with moderate or severe primary MR because of prolapse. Further studies are required to investigate whether shorter LVET has a direct effect on outcomes or is solely a risk marker in primary MR.