Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Abdom Radiol (NY) ; 48(1): 411-417, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36210369

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The majority of newly diagnosed renal tumors are masses < 4 cm in size with treatment options, including active surveillance, partial nephrectomy, and ablative therapies. The cost-effectiveness literature on the management of small renal masses (SRMs) does not account for recent advances in technology and improvements in technical expertise. We aim to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis for percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RA-PN) for the treatment of SRMs. METHODS: We created a decision analytic Markov model depicting management of the SRM incorporating costs, health utilities, and probabilities of complications and recurrence as model inputs using TreeAge. A willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of $100,000 and a lifetime horizon were used. Probabilistic and one-way sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Percutaneous MWA was the preferred treatment modality. MWA dominated RA-PN, meaning it resulted in more quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at a lower cost. Cost-effectiveness analysis revealed a negative Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER), indicating dominance of MWA. The model revealed MWA had a mean cost of $8,507 and 12.51 QALYs. RA-PN had a mean cost of $21,521 and 12.43 QALYs. Relative preference of MWA was robust to sensitivity analysis of all other variables. Patient starting age and cost of RA-PN had the most dramatic impact on ICER. CONCLUSION: MWA is more cost-effective for the treatment of SRM when compared with RA-PN and accounting for complication and recurrence risk.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Renales , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Microondas/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Renales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Nefrectomía/métodos
2.
HIV Med ; 23(11): 1214-1218, 2022 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36377075

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: HIV remains a key public health issue. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence and British HIV Association guidance recommends that patients should be offered HIV testing when admitted to hospital or attending emergency departments (EDs) in areas with a prevalence ≥ 2 per 1000. We report a novel method of testing and the first 3-year results from our HIV ED testing programme utilizing biochemistry samples for HIV testing, with the aim of improving uptake while ensuring no changes to clinical practice in EDs. METHODS: Routine ED HIV testing was implemented on 1 October 2018; it was initially opt-in and was subsequently changed to opt-out on 1 February 2019. HIV testing was added to all ED blood test order sets and was performed on the biochemistry samples of those aged 18-59 years. The age range was extended to include those aged 16+ years on 1 March 2021 along with a move to notional consent. RESULTS: A total of 78 333 HIV tests were performed from an estimated 110 683 attendees who had bloods taken in the same age range, demonstrating an overall 69.5% testing coverage. On implementation of opt-out testing after the first 4 months, the proportion of tests increased (from 57.9% to 69%). After increase in age range to 16+ years and a move to notional consent, the overall testing coverage improved to 74.2%. Of 1054 reactive results, 728 (69%) were known people living with HIV, eight (0.8%) were not contactable, two (0.2%) re-tested elsewhere and three (0.3%) declined a re-test. A total of 259 false-positives were determined by follow-up testing and 50 (4.8%) were newly diagnosed with HIV. An HIV diagnosis was suspected in only 22%, and 48% had never previously tested for HIV. CONCLUSIONS: An opt-out HIV testing programme with notional consent and using biochemistry samples within the ED is feasible, acceptable and provides an excellent opportunity to diagnose patients who do not perceive themselves to be at risk or have never tested before.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Tamizaje Masivo , Humanos , Adolescente , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Prueba de VIH , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Hospitales de Enseñanza , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud
3.
HIV Med ; 23(2): 121-133, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34555242

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The contribution of HIV to COVID-19 outcomes in hospitalized inpatients remains unclear. We conducted a multi-centre, retrospective matched cohort study of SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive hospital inpatients analysed by HIV status. METHODS: HIV-negative patients were matched to people living with HIV (PLWH) admitted from 1 February 2020 to 31 May 2020 up to a 3:1 ratio by the following: hospital site, SARS-CoV-2 test date ± 7 days, age ± 5 years, gender, and index of multiple deprivation decile ± 1. The primary objective was clinical improvement (two-point improvement or better on a seven-point ordinal scale) or hospital discharge by day 28, whichever was earlier. RESULTS: A total of 68 PLWH and 181 HIV-negative comparators were included. In unadjusted analyses, PLWH had a reduced hazard of achieving clinical improvement or discharge [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.39-0.85, p = 0.005], but this association was ameliorated (aHR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.43-1.17, p = 0.18) after additional adjustment for ethnicity, frailty, baseline hypoxaemia, duration of symptoms prior to baseline, body mass index (BMI) categories and comorbidities. Baseline frailty (aHR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.65-0.95, p = 0.011), malignancy (aHR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.17, 0.82, p = 0.014) remained associated with poorer outcomes. The PLWH were more likely to be of black, Asian and minority ethnic background (75.0% vs 48.6%, p = 0.0002), higher median clinical frailty score [3 × interquartile range (IQR): 2-5 vs, 2 × IQR: 1-4, p = 0.0069), and to have a non-significantly higher proportion of active malignancy (14.4% vs 9.9%, p = 0.29). CONCLUSIONS: Adjusting for confounding comorbidities and demographics in a matched cohort ameliorated differences in outcomes of PLWH hospitalized with COVID-19, highlighting the importance of an appropriate comparison group when assessing outcomes of PLWH hospitalized with COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infecciones por VIH , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Urol Pract ; 8(6): 630-635, 2021 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37145502

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: We sought to determine and compare the perioperative cost associated with percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RA-PN) for treatment of localized renal masses (LRMs). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of a prospectively maintained IRB-approved LRM database. The database was queried for patients treated with microwave ablation or partial nephrectomy from 2015 to 2020. Allocated costs related to the procedural encounter and related to complications were collected. Allocated cost was calculated using ratio of cost-to-charges cost accounting methodology. Total cost was the sum of medical center cost and physician related cost. Statistical analysis was performed in SAS using Student's t-test and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. RESULTS: A total of 279 patients were identified, of whom 165 underwent percutaneous MWA and 114 underwent RA-PN. All partial nephrectomies were robot-assisted. The mean total cost was $20,536 for RA-PN and $6,470 for percutaneous MWA (p <0.0001). Five patients (3%) who underwent MWA and 7 (6%) who underwent RA-PN experienced complications. Patients who underwent MWA and did not have a major complication had an average medical center cost of $5,174, compared to $8,990 for those with a major complication (p=0.36). Among patients who underwent RA-PN, those who did not have a major complication had an average medical center cost of $15,138, compared to $28,940 for those who did have a major complication (p=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: MWA demonstrates lower perioperative cost and lower cost of complications than RA-PN for treatment of LRM. Further cost-effectiveness studies for LRM treatment should be performed with this updated cost information.

5.
Int J STD AIDS ; 28(4): 404-407, 2017 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28198339

RESUMEN

Sexual health policy remains focussed on younger adults. However, rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in older people continue to increase. We explored the sexual healthcare needs of women aged 40 and over attending an integrated sexual health clinic in South London. We conducted a retrospective case note review and found that almost 20% of these women had STIs. These included genital herpes, trichomoniasis, genital warts, chlamydia and gonorrhoea. Less than a quarter of women reported use of condoms during most recent sexual contact, indicating sexual risk-taking behaviour. 38% of women attended for contraception. The sexual health needs of older people can only continue to increase, given our rapidly ageing population. Age-specific health promotion strategies are needed.


Asunto(s)
Salud Sexual , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/epidemiología , Adulto , Condones/estadística & datos numéricos , Anticoncepción , Femenino , Promoción de la Salud , Humanos , Londres/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Asunción de Riesgos , Conducta Sexual , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/prevención & control
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...