Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Neurol Sci ; 44(9): 2995-2998, 2023 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37421487

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a demyelinating disease of the central nervous system caused by a reactivation of the human polyomavirus 2 (HPyV-2, previously known as JCV) in immunosuppressed individuals. Few cases of PML have been described in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. METHODS: We described a case of PML in a patient with MM with fatal worsening that occurred during SARS-CoV-2 infection. We also performed a literature review to update the 16 cases series of MM patients with PML already collected until April 2020. RESULTS: A 79-year-old female patient with refractory IgA lambda MM in Pomalidomide- Cyclophosphamide-Dexamethasone regimen developed gradual lower limbs and left arm paresis along with a decreased consciousness 3.5 years after the MM diagnosis. Symptoms developed shortly after the recognition of hypogammaglobulinemia. After SARS-CoV-2 infection, her neurological status quickly worsened until she deceased. MRI features and JCV-positive PCR on CSF confirmed the PML diagnosis. Our literature review adds sixteen clinical cases of PML in MM published between May 2020 and March 2023 to the 16 cases already collected in the previously published review by Koutsavlis. DISCUSSION: PML has been increasingly described in MM patients. It remains questionable if the HPyV-2 reactivation is determined by the severity of MM itself, by the effect of drugs or by a combination of both. SARS-CoV-2 infection may have a role in worsening PML in affected patients.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Virus JC , Leucoencefalopatía Multifocal Progresiva , Mieloma Múltiple , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Leucoencefalopatía Multifocal Progresiva/diagnóstico , Leucoencefalopatía Multifocal Progresiva/diagnóstico por imagen , Mieloma Múltiple/complicaciones , COVID-19/complicaciones , SARS-CoV-2
2.
New Microbiol ; 46(1): 24-28, 2023 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36853814

RESUMEN

Pathogenic Escherichia coli strains can infect a variety of body sites due to the expression of virulence factors necessary to overcome the host defenses. Here, we present two cases of E. coli infection in adults and discuss the associated genomic features. Whole-genome sequencing was performed using both Illumina iSeq 100 and Oxford Nanopore MinION systems. Assembly was carried out with Unicycler using a hybrid approach. The genomes were annotated with RASTtk and scanned for genes involved in antimicrobial resistance, virulence and stress response with AMRFinderPlus. Sequence analysis was conducted using tools from the Center for Genomic Epidemiology (CGE) website. The two strains, named SO80 and SO81, carried a genome of 5,229,956 and 5,437,935 base pairs, respectively. SO80 belonged to ST70 and carried 13 virulence factors, 6 of which were located on a 170 Kb plasmid, while SO81 belonged to ST69 and carried 29 virulence factors, 5 of which were located on a 113 Kb plasmid. Our work highlights key factors which may have contributed to the complicated clinical status of these patients, and provides new in-depth data on E. coli infections with few precedents in the literature.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Escherichia coli , Escherichia coli , Humanos , Adulto , Escherichia coli/genética , Genómica , Pacientes , Factores de Virulencia/genética
3.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 9(8): ofac366, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35959206

RESUMEN

Background: Interest in shorter antimicrobial regimens and oral treatment for osteoarticular infections is growing. The aim of this study is to assess whether there is an association between the administration of an entirely oral antibiotic therapy (OT) and the clinical outcome of native vertebral osteomyelitis (NVOs). Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective, observational study on consecutive patients with pyogenic NVOs over a 10-year period (2008-2018). We performed multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify risk factors for clinical failure, both in the whole population and in subgroups. The impact of OT versus standard treatment (intravenous induction followed by oral treatment whenever possible) was assessed in patients with a non-multidrug-resistant microorganism (MDRO) etiology, and the impact of a rifampin-containing regimen was assessed in patients affected by NVOs caused by staphylococci or of unknown etiology. Results: The study population included 249 patients, and 33 (13.3%) experienced clinical failure; the OT group consisted of 54 patients (21.7%). Multivariate regression analysis of the whole population selected Charlson comorbidity index (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.291; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.114-1.497; P = .001) and MDRO etiology (aOR, 3.301; 95% CI, 1.368-7.964; P = .008) as independent factors for clinical failure. Among patients affected by a non-MDRO NVO, OT was not associated with an increased risk of clinical failure (aOR, 0.487; 95% CI, .133-1.782; P = .271), even after adjustment for the propensity score of receiving OT. In the subgroup of patients with staphylococcal or unknown etiology, NVO rifampin was independently associated with favorable outcome (aOR, 0.315; 95% CI, .105-.949; P = .040). Conclusions: An entirely oral, highly bioavailable treatment, including rifampin, may be as effective as parenteral treatment in selected patients with NVOs.

4.
JAC Antimicrob Resist ; 3(4): dlab174, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34806011

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the impact of cefiderocol use on outcome in patients admitted to the ICU for severe COVID-19 and further diagnosed with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CR-Ab) infection. METHODS: Retrospective multicentre observational study was performed at four Italian hospitals, from January 2020 to April 2021. Adult patients admitted to ICU for severe COVID-19 and further diagnosed with CR-Ab infections were enrolled. Patients treated with cefiderocol, as compassionate use, for at least 72 h were compared with those receiving alternative regimens. Primary endpoint was all-cause 28 day mortality. The impact of cefiderocol on mortality was evaluated by multivariable Cox regression model. RESULTS: In total, 107 patients were enrolled (76% male, median age 65 years). The median time from ICU admission to CR-Ab infection diagnosis was 14 (IQR 8-20) days, and the main types of CR-Ab infections were bloodstream infection (58%) and lower respiratory tract infection (41%). Cefiderocol was administered to 42 patients within a median of 2 (IQR 1-4) days after CR-Ab infection diagnosis and as monotherapy in all cases. The remaining patients received colistin, mostly (82%) administered as combination therapy. All-cause 28 day mortality rate was 57%, without differences between groups (cefiderocol 55% versus colistin 58% P = 0.70). In multivariable analysis, the independent risk factor for mortality was SOFA score (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.15-1.38, P < 0.001). Cefiderocol was associated with a non-significant lower mortality risk (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.38-1.08, P = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms the potential role of cefiderocol in the treatment of CR-Ab infection, but larger clinical studies are needed.

5.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 27(1): 105-111, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32971254

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of corticosteroids in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: A multicentre observational study was performed from 22 February through 30 June 2020. We included consecutive adult patients with severe COVID-19, defined as respiratory rate ≥30 breath per minute, oxygen saturation ≤93% on ambient air or arterial partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen ≤300 mm Hg. We excluded patients being treated with other immunomodulant drugs, receiving low-dose corticosteroids and receiving corticosteroids 72 hours after admission. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality from hospital admission. The main exposure variable was corticosteroid therapy at a dose of ≥0.5 mg/kg of prednisone equivalents. It was introduced as binomial covariate in a logistic regression model for the primary endpoint and inverse probability of treatment weighting using the propensity score. RESULTS: Of 1717 patients with COVID-19 evaluated, 513 were included in the study, and of these, 170 (33%) were treated with corticosteroids. During hospitalization, 166 patients (34%) met the criteria of the primary outcome (60/170, 35% in the corticosteroid group and 106/343, 31% in the noncorticosteroid group). At multivariable analysis corticosteroid treatment was not associated with lower 30-day mortality rate (adjusted odds ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.20-1.74; p 0.33). After inverse probability of treatment weighting, corticosteroids were not associated with lower 30-day mortality (average treatment effect, 0.05; 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.09; p 0.12). However, subgroup analysis revealed that in patients with PO2/FiO2 < 200 mm Hg at admission (135 patients, 52 (38%) treated with corticosteroids), corticosteroid treatment was associated with a lower risk of 30-day mortality (23/52, 44% vs. 45/83, 54%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.04-0.90; p 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: The effect of corticosteroid treatment on mortality might be limited to critically ill COVID-19 patients.


Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , COVID-19/mortalidad , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/mortalidad , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidad , Adulto , Anciano , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/patología , Enfermedad Crítica , Femenino , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/uso terapéutico , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitales , Humanos , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapéutico , Italia , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2/efectos de los fármacos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Sci Rep ; 10(1): 21775, 2020 12 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33311551

RESUMEN

There is the urgent need to study the effects of immunomodulating agents as therapy for Covid-19. An observational, cohort, prospective study with 30 days of observation was carried out to assess clinical outcomes in 88 patients hospitalized for Covid-19 pneumonia and treated with canakinumab (300 mg sc). Median time from diagnosis of Covid-19 by viral swab to administration of canakinumab was 7.5 days (range 0-30, IQR 4-11). Median PaO2/FiO2 increased from 160 (range 53-409, IQR 122-210) at baseline to 237 (range 72-533, IQR 158-331) at day 7 after treatment with canakinumab (p < 0.0001). Improvement of oxygen support category was observed in 61.4% of cases. Median duration of hospitalization following administration of canakinumab was 6 days (range 0-30, IQR 4-11). At 7 days, 58% of patients had been discharged and 12 (13.6%) had died. Significant differences between baseline and 7 days were observed for absolute lymphocyte counts (mean 0.60 vs 1.11 × 109/L, respectively, p < 0.0001) and C-reactive protein (mean 31.5 vs 5.8 mg/L, respectively, p < 0.0001).Overall survival at 1 month was 79.5% (95% CI 68.7-90.3). Oxygen-support requirements improved and overall mortality was 13.6%. Confirmation of the efficacy of canakinumab for Covid-19 warrants further study in randomized controlled trials.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Hospitalización , Interleucina-1beta/antagonistas & inhibidores , SARS-CoV-2 , Anciano , COVID-19/mortalidad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oxígeno/administración & dosificación , Estudios Prospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia
7.
Clin Epidemiol ; 12: 1421-1431, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33408529

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Although the decision of which ventilation strategy to adopt in COVID-19 patients is crucial, yet the most appropriate means of carrying out this undertaking is not supported by strong evidence. We therefore described the organization of a province-level healthcare system during the occurrence of the COVID-19 epidemic and the 60-day outcomes of the hospitalized COVID-19 patients according to the respiratory strategy adopted given the limited available resources. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All COVID-19 patients (26/02/2020-18/04/2020) in the Rimini Province of Italy were included in this population-based cohort study. The hospitalized patients were classified according to the maximum level of respiratory support: oxygen supplementation (Oxygen group), non-invasive ventilation (NIV-only group), invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV-only group), and IMV after an NIV trial (IMV-after-NIV group). Sixty-day mortality risk was estimated with a Cox proportional hazard analysis adjusted by age, sex, and administration of steroids, canakinumab, and tocilizumab. RESULTS: We identified a total of 1,424 symptomatic patients: 520 (36.5%) were hospitalized, while 904 (63.5%) were treated at home with no 60-day deaths. Based on the respiratory support, 408 (78.5%) were assigned to the Oxygen group, 46 (8.8%) to the NIV-only group, 25 (4.8%) to the IMV-after-NIV group, and 41 (7.9%) to the IMV-only group. There was no significant difference in the PaO2/FiO2 at IMV inception in the IMV-after-NIV and IMV-only groups (p=0.9). Overall 60-day mortality was 24.2% (Oxygen: 23.0%; NIV-only: 19.6%; IMV-after-NIV: 32.0%; IMV-only: 36.6%; p=0.165). Compared with the Oxygen group, the adjusted 60-day mortality risk significantly increased in the IMV-after-NIV (HR 2.776; p=0.024) and IMV-only groups (HR 2.966; p=0.001). CONCLUSION: This study provided a population-based estimate of the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak in a severely affected Italian province. A similar 60-day mortality risk was found for patients undergoing immediate IMV and those intubated after an NIV trial with favorable outcomes after prolonged IMV.

8.
Hepat Mon ; 14(8): e15426, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25337140

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Due to the high efficacy of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART), the number of patients living with HIV is increasing. Chronic HCV infection has become a leading cause of non-AIDS related morbidity and mortality in patients with HIV infection. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this cross-sectional study was to identify factors associated with liver fibrosis (LF) in patients with HIV monoinfection and HIV-HCV coinfection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed LF by transient elastometry ([TE], Fibroscan) in three groups of patients (HIV, HIV-HCV and HCV) followed at the Infectious Diseases Department of University of Ancona, Italy, between October 2009 and November 2012. RESULTS: In total, 354 adults including 98 HIV, 70 HIV-HCV and 186 HCV patients were studied. HIV-HCV patients had a longer duration of HIV (P < 0.006) and HCV (P < 0.001) infections. Additionally, they were receiving cART therapy for a longer period (P < 0.001); they had higher prevalence of lipodystrophy (P < 0.001) and higher HCV load (P = 0.004). LF was significantly more pronounced in HCV and HIV-HCV compared to HIV patients (P < 0.001). A total of 13.3%, 39.2% and 51.4% of HIV, HCV and HIV-HCV, respectively, showed a LF ≥ F2. Additionally, a severe LF (F = 4) was significantly more frequent among HIV-HCV compared to other groups. A longer exposure to didanosine, stavudine, lopinavir/ritonavir and fosamprenavir resulted in increased LF by univariate analysis (P ranging from < 0.001 to 0.007). By logistic regression analysis, the only variables significantly associated with increased LF were HCV coinfection, older age, and high AST values (P ranging from < 0.001 to 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: HCV coinfection, older age and AST were associated with LF in patients with HIV infection.

9.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 66(4): 859-62, 2011 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21393138

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: An experimental study was performed to evaluate both in vitro and in vivo the kind of interaction between the Laur-CKK-NH2 dimer and daptomycin using two Enterococcus faecalis strains with different patterns of susceptibilities. METHODS: We evaluated whether selection for daptomycin-resistant E. faecalis could be prevented in vitro by combining daptomycin with the Laur-CKK-NH2 dimer. The strains were serially exposed in broth to 2-fold stepwise increasing concentrations of daptomycin alone or in combination with a fixed concentration (0.25×MIC) of the Laur-CKK-NH2 dimer. We also performed an in vitro synergy study. For in vivo studies, a mouse model of enterococcal sepsis was used. RESULTS: In vitro experiments: exposure to daptomycin alone gradually selected for enterococci with increased MICs; and the Laur-CKK-NH2 dimer showed a positive interaction with daptomycin and was able to prevent the resistance. In vivo experiments: the main outcome measures were lethality and quantitative blood cultures; and the Laur-CKK-NH2 dimer combined with daptomycin exhibited the highest efficacy for all main outcome measurements. CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight the potential usefulness of combining daptomycin with the Laur-CKK-NH2 dimer. The combination provides a future therapeutic alternative for the treatment of enterococcal severe infections.


Asunto(s)
Daptomicina/administración & dosificación , Daptomicina/farmacología , Enterococcus faecalis/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/tratamiento farmacológico , Lipopéptidos/administración & dosificación , Lipopéptidos/farmacología , Animales , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Quimioterapia Combinada , Ratones , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...