Characterization of patients with extensive left atrial myopathy referred for atrial fibrillation ablation: incidence, predictors, and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Although atrial fibrosis has a relevant impact on ablation success rate, experimental studies have reported that extensive fibrosis may be accompanied by a reduced burden secondary to a prominent depression of atrial excitability. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to identify clinical and echocardiographic factors associated with extensive left atrial myopathy (ELAM), to analyze the predictive ability of established scores (AF score, APPLE, and DR-FLASH) and assess outcomes in terms of AF recurrence, left atrial flutter, and post-procedural heart failure admissions. METHODS: A total of 950 consecutive patients undergoing the first AF ablation were included. A 3D electroanatomical mapping system (CARTO3, Biosense Webster) was created using a multipolar mapping catheter (PentaRay, Biosense Webster). ELAM was defined as ≥ 50% low voltage area. A subanalysis with four groups was also created (< 10%; 10-20%; 10-20%; and > 30%). Logistic regressions, Cox proportional hazards models, and log-rank test were used to test the predictors independently associated with the presence of ELAM and AF recurrence. The model was prospectively validated in a cohort of 150 patients obtaining an excellent ability for prediction AUC 0.90 (CI 95% 0.84-0.96). RESULTS: Overall, 78 (8.42%) presented ELAM. Age, female sex, persistent AF, first-degree AV block, and E/e' were significant predictors. The model incorporating these factors outperformed the existing scores (AUC = 0.87). During a mean follow-up of 20 months (IQR 9 to 36), patients with ELAM presented a higher rate of AF recurrence (42.02% vs 26.01%, p = 0.030), left atrial flutter (26.03% vs 8.02%, p < 0.001), and post-procedural heart failure admissions (12.01% vs 0.61%, p < 0.001) than non-ELAM patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals the incidence and clinical factors associated with ELAM in AF, highlighting age, female, persistent AF, first-degree AV block, and E/e'. Importantly, the presence of ELAM is associated with poorer outcomes in terms of recurrence and HF admission.

Catheter ablation as an adjunctive therapy to ICD implantation in Brugada syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Brugada Syndrome (BrS) is a life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia disorder associated with an increased risk ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) and sudden cardiac death (SCD). Current management primarily relies on implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), but patients may experience ICD shocks. Catheter ablation (CA) has emerged as a potential intervention to target the arrhythmogenic substrate. This systematic review aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of catheter ablation in BrS patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Studies with BrS patients undergoing catheter ablation for VAs were included. 14 studies that involved a total population of 709 BrS patients, with catheter ablation performed in 528 of them, were included. Catheter ablation resulted in non-inducibility of VAs in 91% (95% CI: 83-99, I2 = 76%) and resolution of Type 1 ECG Brugada pattern in 88% (95% CI: 81-96.2, I2 = 91%) of the patients. After a mean follow-up of 30.7 months, 87% (95% CI: 80-94, I2 = 82%) of patients remained free from VAs. The incidence of VAs during follow-up was significantly lower in the ablation cohort in comparison to the group receiving only ICD therapy (OR = 0.03, 95% CI: 0.01-0.12, I2 = 0%). CONCLUSION: Catheter ablation shows potential as a therapeutic approach to reduce VAs and improve outcomes in BrS patients. While further research with long follow-up period is required to confirm these findings, it represents a valuable tool as an add-on intervention to ICD implantation in BrS patients with high burden of VAs.Protocol registration: CRD42024506439.

Implantable loop recorders in patients with Brugada syndrome: the BruLoop study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Available data on continuous rhythm monitoring by implantable loop recorders (ILRs) in patients with Brugada syndrome (BrS) are scarce. The aim of this multi-centre study was to evaluate the diagnostic yield and clinical implication of a continuous rhythm monitoring strategy by ILRs in a large cohort of BrS patients and to assess the precise arrhythmic cause of syncopal episodes. METHODS: A total of 370 patients with BrS and ILRs (mean age 43.5 ± 15.9, 33.8% female, 74.1% symptomatic) from 18 international centers were included. Patients were followed with continuous rhythm monitoring for a median follow-up of 3 years. RESULTS: During follow-up, an arrhythmic event was recorded in 30.7% of symptomatic patients [18.6% atrial arrhythmias (AAs), 10.2% bradyarrhythmias (BAs), and 7.3% ventricular arrhythmias (VAs)]. In patients with recurrent syncope, the aetiology was arrhythmic in 22.4% (59.3% BAs, 25.0% VAs, and 15.6% AAs). The ILR led to drug therapy initiation in 11.4%, ablation procedure in 10.9%, implantation of a pacemaker in 2.5%, and a cardioverter-defibrillator in 8%. At multivariate analysis, the presence of symptoms [hazard ratio (HR) 2.5, P = .001] and age >50 years (HR 1.7, P = .016) were independent predictors of arrhythmic events, while inducibility of ventricular fibrillation at the electrophysiological study (HR 9.0, P < .001) was a predictor of VAs. CONCLUSIONS: ILR detects arrhythmic events in nearly 30% of symptomatic BrS patients, leading to appropriate therapy in 70% of them. The most commonly detected arrhythmias are AAs and BAs, while VAs are detected only in 7% of cases. Symptom status can be used to guide ILR implantation.

Pericarditis prophylactic therapy after sinus node-sparing hybrid ablation for inappropriate sinus tachycardia/postural orthostatic sinus tachycardia.

Background: Pericarditis is the most common complication following hybrid sinus node-sparing ablation for inappropriate sinus tachycardia (IST)/postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS). Objective: The study sought to evaluate the association of prophylaxis therapy on the risk of symptomatic pericarditis following hybrid IST/POTS ablation. Methods: All consecutive patients undergoing to hybrid ablation of symptomatic IST/POTS refractory or intolerant to drugs were retrospectively analyzed. Pharmacological prophylaxis therapy was based on acetylsalicylic acid and colchicine started on the day of the ablation and continued for at least 3 months. The primary endpoint was occurrence of symptomatic pericarditis. The secondary endpoint was occurrence of pericarditis-related complications, including the following: duration of pericarditis >3 months, hospitalization for pericarditis, postpericardiectomy pleuro-pericarditis, and pericardiectomy. Results: A total of 220 patients undergone to hybrid IST/POTS ablation were included and 44 (20%) underwent prophylaxis therapy. Pericarditis occurred in 101 (45.9%) patients, with 97 (96%) in the first 5 days. At survival analysis, prophylaxis was associated with higher rate of freedom from pericarditis (81.9% vs 47.2%, log-rank P < .001). Pericarditis-related complications were low, occurring in 7 (3.2%) patients. There was no difference in pericarditis-related complications between the patients who underwent prophylaxis therapy and patients who did not. At Cox multivariate analysis, predictors of pericarditis were IST (vs POTS) (hazard ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval0.39-0.99, P = .04) and prophylaxis therapy (hazard ratio 0.27, 95% confidence interval 0.13-0.55, P < .001). Conclusion: In a large cohort of patients undergoing hybrid ablation for IST/POTS, a prophylaxis therapy with acetylsalicylic acid and colchicine was associated with a lower rate of symptomatic pericarditis.

Pulsed field ablation of the right superior pulmonary vein prevents vagal responses via anterior right ganglionated plexus modulation.

BACKGROUND: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is selective for the myocardium. However, vagal responses and reversible effects on ganglionated plexi (GP) are observed during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Anterior-right GP ablation has been proven to effectively prevent vagal responses during radiofrequency-based PVI. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that PFA-induced transient anterior-right GP modulation when targeting the right superior pulmonary vein (RSPV) before any other pulmonary veins (PVs) may effectively prevent intraprocedural vagal responses. METHODS: Eighty consecutive paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients undergoing PVI with PFA were prospectively included. In the first 40 patients, PVI was performed first targeting the left superior pulmonary vein (LSPV-first group). In the last 40 patients, RSPV was targeted first, followed by left PVs and right inferior PV (RSPV-first group). Heart rate (HR) and extracardiac vagal stimulation (ECVS) were evaluated at baseline, during PVI, and postablation to assess GP modulation. RESULTS: Vagal responses occurred in 31 patients (78%) in the LSPV-first group and 5 (13%) in the RSPV-first group (P <.001). Temporary pacing was needed in 14 patients (35%) in the LSPV-first group and 3 (8%) in the RSPV-first group (P = .003). RSPV isolation was associated with similar acute HR increase in the 2 groups (13 ± 11 bpm vs 15 ± 12 bpm; P = .3). No significant residual changes in HR or ECVS response were documented in both groups at the end of the procedure compared to baseline (all P >.05). CONCLUSION: PVI with PFA frequently induced vagal responses when initiated from the LSPV. Nevertheless, an RSPV-first approach promoted transient HR increase and reduced vagal response occurrence.

TriGuard Embolic Protection Device in percutaneous cardiac interventions with intracavitary cardiac thrombosis: A case series.

Embolic cerebral protection devices are not routinely used in clinical practice during electrophysiological interventions. We report a case series of patients with intracardiac thrombosis undergoing a percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure and a ventricular tachycardia (VT) catheter ablation supported by TriGuard 3 Cerebral Embolic Protection Device.

Redo procedures after sinus node sparing hybrid ablation for inappropriate sinus tachycardia/postural orthostatic sinus tachycardia.

AIMS: A novel sinus node (SN) sparing hybrid ablation for inappropriate sinus node tachycardia (IST)/postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) has been demonstrated to be an effective and safe therapeutic option in patients with symptomatic drug-resistant IST/POTS. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term rate of redo procedures after hybrid IST ablation and procedural strategy, outcomes and safety of redo procedures. METHODS AND RESULTS: All consecutive patients from 2015 to 2023 were prospectively enrolled in the UZ Brussel monocentric IST/POTS registry. They were analysed if the following inclusion criteria were fulfilled: 1) diagnosis of IST or POTS, 2) symptomatic IST/POTS refractory or intolerant to drugs, and 3) hybrid SN sparing ablation performed. The primary endpoint was redo procedure. The primary safety endpoint was pacemaker (PM) implantation. A total of 220 patients undergone to hybrid IST ablation were included, 185 patients (84.1%) were treated for IST and 61 patients (27.7%) for POTS.After a follow-up of 73.3 ± 16.2 months, 34 patients (15.4%) underwent a redo. A total of 23 patients (67.6%) had a redo for IST recurrence and 11 patients (32.4%) for other arrhythmias. Pacemaker implantation was performed in 21 patients (9.5%). Nine patients (4.1%) had no redo procedure and experienced sick sinus syndrome requiring a PM. Twelve patients (5.4%) received a PM as a shared therapeutic choice combined with SN ablation procedure. CONCLUSION: In a large cohort of patients the long-term free survival from redo procedure after hybrid IST ablation was 84.6% with a low PM implantation rate.

Atrial fibrillation cycle-length (AF-CL) inside the pulmonary veins predicts paroxysmal AF ablation success- the INDUCE-AF study.

BACKGROUND: A novel method to measure atrial fibrillation cycle length (AF-CL) was recently described, based on the average of 10 consecutive signals (FARS10). FARS10 accurately identified pulmonary vein isolation (PVI)-responders among patients with persistent AF. Whether this method is applicable to patients with paroxysmal AF is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic value of FARS10 measurements in patients with paroxysmal AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled paroxysmal AF patients undergoing PVI in a prospective multicenter study. After AF induction with a standardized protocol, the AF-CL was measured using FARS-10 method. The primary endpoint was AF/AT-recurrence. One-hundred and four patients were included (61 ± 14 years, 25% females). After a mean follow-up of 12 ± 4 months, AF/AT recurrence rate was 20%. The fastest PV CL (fPV-CL) was independently associated with the primary endpoint at multivariate analysis (HR 1.02, p < 0.001). Every 10 ms increase in fPV-CL, AF recurrences increased by 20%. The value of 160 ms was found to be the optimal cut-off (specificity 81%, sensitivity 76%). Patients with fPV-CL < 160 ms experienced lower AF recurrences as compared to patients with fPV-CL > 160 ms (8% vs. 32% at 1 year; HR = 0.17, p < 0.001). Progression to persistent AF was observed in 13% of patients with fPV-CL > 160 ms. CONCLUSION: fPV-CL measured with the FARS-10 method accurately predicts PVI success in paroxysmal AF patients undergoing PVI. Patients with slow PV activity (fPV-CL > 160 ms) experience higher AF recurrence rate after PVI and more frequent progression to persistent AF. In 104 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing AF ablation, AF was induced at the beginning of the procedure. Pulmonary vein activity was measured using FARS10 measurement (10 consecutive fastest atrial repetitive similar morphology signals). The value of 160 ms was found to be the best cut-off to discriminate outcomes. At 1-year follow-up, patients with fast veins (< 160 ms) experienced significantly fewer AF recurrences as compared to patients with slow veins (> 160 ms). PV activity measured with FARS10 method accurately discriminates pulmonary vein isolation responders, in patients with paroxysmal AF. ABBREVIATIONS: AF atrial fibrillation, AT atrial tachycardia, CL cycle length, FARS10: 10 consecutive fastest atrial repetitive similar morphology signal, fPV fastest pulmonary vein, HR hazard ratio, ms milliseconds.

Dynamic changes of left atrial substrate over time following pulmonary vein isolation: the Progress-AF study.

AIMS: Little is known about dynamic changes of the left atrial (LA) substrate over time in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aims to evaluate substrate changes following pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). METHODS AND RESULTS: In our prospective observational study, consecutive patients undergoing first PVI-only and redo ablation were included. High-density maps of the two procedures were compared. Progression or regression was diagnosed if a significant concordant decrease or increase in bipolar voltages in ≥2 segments was observed, respectively. In 28 patients (61.2 ± 9.5 years, 39% female, 53.5% persistent AF), 111.013 voltage points from 56 high-density LA maps (1.982 points/patient) were analysed. Comparing the high-density maps of the first and second procedures, in the progression group (17 patients, 61%), there was a decrease in global (-35%, P < 0.001) and all regional voltages. In the regression group (11 patients, 39%), there was an increase in global (+43%, P < 0.001) and regional voltages. Comparing the progression with the regression group, the area of low-voltage zone (LVZ) increased (+3.5 vs. -4.5 cm2, P < 0.001) and LA activation time prolonged (+8.0 vs. -9.1 ms, P = 0.005). Baseline clinical parameters did not predict progression or regression. In patients with substrate progression, pulmonary veins (PVs) were more frequently isolated (P = 0.02) and the AF pattern at recurrence was more frequently persistent (P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Our study describes bidirectional dynamic properties of the LA substrate with concordant either progressive or regressive changes. Regression occurs with reduced AF burden after the first procedure, while progression is associated with persistent AF recurrence despite durable PV isolation. The dynamic nature of LA substrate poses questions about LVZ-based ablation strategies.

Left ventricular functional recovery after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation in heart failure: a prediction model.

AIMS: Management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and concomitant heart failure (HF) remains complex. The Antwerp score, based on four parameters [QRS >120 ms (2 points), known aetiology (2 points), paroxysmal AF (1 point), severe atrial dilation (1 point)] adequately estimated the probability of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) recovery after AF ablation in a single-centre cohort. The present study aims to externally validate this prediction model in a large European multi-centre cohort. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 605 patients (61.1 ± 9.4 years, 23.8% females, 79.8% with persistent AF) with HF and impaired LVEF (<50%) undergoing AF ablation in 8 European centres were retrospectively identified. According to the LVEF changes at 12-month echocardiography, 427 (70%) patients fulfilled the '2021 Universal Definition of HF' criteria for LVEF recovery and were defined as 'responders'. External validation of the score yielded good discrimination and calibration {area under the curve 0.86 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82-0.89], P < .001; Hosmer-Lemeshow P = .29}. Patients with a score < 2 had a 93% probability of LVEF recovery as opposed to only 24% in patients with a score > 3. Responders experienced more often positive ventricular remodelling [odds ratio (OR) 8.91, 95% CI 4.45-17.84, P < .001], fewer HF hospitalizations (OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.05-0.18, P < .001) and lower mortality (OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.04-0.31, P < .001). CONCLUSION: In this multi-centre study, a simple four-parameter score predicted LVEF recovery after AF ablation in patients with HF and discriminated clinical outcomes. These findings support the use of the Antwerp score to standardize shared decision-making regarding AF ablation referral in future clinical studies.

Axillary vein puncture versus cephalic vein cutdown for cardiac implantable electronic device implantation: A meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Cephalic vein cutdown (CVC) and axillary vein puncture (AVP) are both recommended for transvenous implantation of leads for cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Nonetheless, it is still debated which of the two techniques has a better safety and efficacy profile. METHODS: We systematically searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane electronic databases up to September 5, 2022, for studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of AVP and CVC reporting at least one clinical outcome of interest. The primary endpoints were acute procedural success and overall complications. The effect size was estimated using a random-effect model as risk ratio (RR) and relative 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Overall, seven studies were included, which enrolled 1771 and 3067 transvenous leads (65.6% [n = 1162] males, average age 73.4 ± 14.3 years). Compared to CVC, AVP showed a significant increase in the primary endpoint (95.7 % vs. 76.1 %; RR: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.09-1.40; p = .001) (Figure 1). Total procedural time (mean difference [MD]: -8.25 min; 95% CI: -10.23 to -6.27; p < .0001; I2  = 0%) and venous access time (MD: -6.24 min; 95% CI: -7.01 to -5.47; p < .0001; I2  = 0%) were significantly shorter with AVP compared to CVC. No differences were found between AVP and CVC for incidence overall complications (RR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.28-1.10; p = .09), pneumothorax (RR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.13-4.0; p = .71), lead failure (RR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.23-1.48; p = .26), pocket hematoma/bleeding (RR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.15-2.23; p = .43), device infection (RR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.14-6.60; p = .96) and fluoroscopy time (MD: -0.24 min; 95% CI: -0.75 to 0.28; p = .36). CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis suggests that AVP may improve procedural success and reduce total procedural time and venous access time compared to CVC.

Incidence of ventricular arrhythmias related to COVID infection and vaccination in patients with Brugada syndrome: Insights from a large Italian multicenter registry based on continuous rhythm monitoring.

INTRODUCTION: Brugada syndrome (BrS) has a dynamic ECG pattern that might be revealed by certain conditions such as fever. We evaluated the incidence and management of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) related to COVID-19 infection and vaccination among BrS patients carriers of an implantable loop recorder (ILR) or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and followed by remote monitoring. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective study. Patients were carriers of devices with remote monitoring follow-up. We recorded VAs 6 months before COVID-19 infection or vaccination, during infection, at each vaccination, and up to 6-month post-COVID-19 or 1 month after the last vaccination. In ICD carriers, we documented any device intervention. RESULTS: We included 326 patients, 202 with an ICD and 124 with an ILR. One hundred and nine patients (33.4%) had COVID-19, 55% of whom developed fever. Hospitalization rate due to COVID-19 infection was 2.76%. After infection, we recorded only two ventricular tachycardias (VTs). After the first, second, and third vaccines, the incidence of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) was 1.5%, 2%, and 1%, respectively. The incidence of VT was 1% after the second dose. Six-month post-COVID-19 healing or 1 month after the last vaccine, we documented NSVT in 3.4%, VT in 0.5%, and ventricular fibrillation in 0.5% of patients. Overall, one patient received anti-tachycardia pacing and one a shock. ILR carriers had no VAs. No differences were found in VT before and after infection and before and after each vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: From this large multicenter study conducted in BrS patients, followed by remote monitoring, the overall incidence of sustained VAs after COVID-19 infection and vaccination is relatively low.

Pulsed electric field, cryoballoon, and radiofrequency for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation: a propensity score-matched comparison.

AIMS: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a novel, non-thermal energy source to selectively ablate cardiac tissue. We describe a multicentre experience on pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) via the pentaspline Farapulse™ PFA system vs. thermal-based technologies in a propensity score-matched population of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Propensity score matching was adopted to compare PVI-only ablation outcomes via the Farawave™ system (Group PFA), cryoballoon (Group CRYO), or focal radiofrequency (Group RF) (PFA:CRYO:RF ratio = 1:2:2). Among 1572 (mean age: 62.4 ± 11.3 years; 42.5% females) PAF patients undergoing first time PVI with either PFA (n = 174), CRYO (n = 655), or RF (n = 743), propensity score matching yielded 174 PFA, 348 CRYO, and 348 RF patients. First-pass isolation was achieved in 98.8% of pulmonary veins (PVs) with PFA, 81.5% with CRYO, and 73.1% with RF (P < 0.001). Procedural and dwell times were significantly shorter with PFA, whereas the availability of a 3D mapping system led to a significant reduction in X-ray exposure with RF. Overall complication rates were 3.4% (n = 6) with PFA, 8.6% (n = 30) with CRYO, and 5.5% (n = 19) with RF (P = 0.052). The 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimated freedom from any atrial tachyarrhythmia was 79.3% with PFA, 74.7% with CRYO, and 72.4% with RF (log-rank P-value: 0.24). Among 145 repeat ablation procedures, PV reconnection rate was 19.1% after PFA, 27.5% after CRYO, and 34.8% after RF (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Pulsed field ablation contributed to significantly shorter procedural times. Follow-up data showed a similar arrhythmia freedom, although a higher rate of PV reconnection was documented in post-CRYO and post-RF redo procedures.