The prevalence of chronic pain in children and adolescents: a systematic review update and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT: Chronic pain, defined as persistent or recurring pain or pain lasting longer than 3 months, is a common childhood problem. The objective of this study was to conduct an updated systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of chronic pain (ie, overall, headache, abdominal pain, back pain, musculoskeletal pain, multisite/general pain, and other) in children and adolescents. EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched for publications between January 1, 2009, and June 30, 2023. Studies reporting population-based estimates of chronic nondisease related pain prevalence in children or adolescents (age ≤ 19 years) were included. Two independent reviewers screened articles based on a priori protocol. One hundred nineteen studies with a total of 1,043,878 children (52.0% female, mean age 13.4 years [SD 2.4]) were included. Seventy different countries were represented, with the highest number of data points of prevalence estimates coming from Finland and Germany (n = 19 each, 4.3%). The overall prevalence of chronic pain in children and adolescents was 20.8%, with the highest prevalence for headache and musculoskeletal pain (25.7%). Overall, and for all types of pain except for back pain and musculoskeletal pain, there were significant differences in the prevalence between boys and girls, with girls having a higher prevalence of pain. There was high heterogeneity (I 2 99.9%). Overall risk of bias was low to moderate. In summary, approximately 1 in 5 children and adolescents experience chronic pain and prevalence varies by pain type; for most types, there is higher pain prevalence among girls than among boys. Findings echo and expand upon the systematic review conducted in 2011.

Pain, mental health and healthcare utilization: Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on youth with chronic pain, parents and siblings.

BACKGROUND: Paediatric chronic pain was a public health emergency before the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, and this problem is predicted to escalate. Pain tends to occur intergenerationally in families, and youth with chronic pain and their parents have high rates of mental health issues, which can further exacerbate pain. Siblings of youth with chronic pain have been largely overlooked in research, as well as the impact of the pandemic on posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms and healthcare utilization. METHODS: This cross-sectional study examined pain, mental health and healthcare utilization in three groups: youth with chronic pain (n = 357), parents of youth with chronic pain (n = 233) and siblings of youth with chronic pain (n = 156) during the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada. RESULTS: More so than with pain symptoms, the results revealed high levels of mental health symptoms (i.e. anxiety, depressive, and PTSD), particularly in individuals more personally impacted by the pandemic. The largest effect was seen on PTSD symptoms for all groups. For parents with chronic pain, greater personal COVID-19 impact was related to worse pain interference. Reported rates of healthcare utilization were strikingly high, with youth with chronic pain, parents (reporting on behalf of their children with chronic pain), and siblings of youth with chronic pain reporting that most consultations were due to pain. CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal research assessing these outcomes across continued waves of the pandemic is needed to ensure timely, tailored and equitable access to pain and mental health assessment and treatment. SIGNIFICANCE: This study examined pain, mental health, substance use and healthcare utilization in youth with chronic pain, siblings and parents during the COVID-19 pandemic. Greater personal impact of the pandemic was not largely associated with poorer pain outcomes; however, it was associated with mental health, with the largest effect on PTSD symptoms. The high rates and significant association of COVID-19 impact with PTSD symptoms underscore the importance of including PTSD assessment as part of routine screening practices in pain clinics.

Urgent air transfers for acute respiratory infections among children from Northern Canada, 2005-2014.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of hospitalizations for acute respiratory infections (ARI) among young Indigenous children from Northern Canada is consistently high. ARIs requiring urgent air transfer can be life-threatening and costly. We aimed to describe their epidemiology, estimate age-specific incidences, and explore factors associated with level of care required. METHODS: We undertook a retrospective cohort study of children <5 years old from Northern Canada transferred by urgent air transport for ARI from 2005 through 2014 to 5 pediatric tertiary care centers in Vancouver, Edmonton, Winnipeg, Ottawa and Montreal. Admissions were identified via ARI-related ICD-9/10 coding and forward sortation area. Descriptive statistics and univariable analyses were performed. RESULTS: Among 650 urgent air transfers, the majority were from Nunavut (n = 349, 53.7%) or Nunavik (n = 166, 25.5%), <6 months old (n = 372, 57.2%), and without underlying comorbidity (n = 458; 70.5%). Estimated annual tertiary care ARI admission rates in infants <1 year old from Nunavut (40.7/1000) and Nunavik (44.5/1000) were tenfold higher than in children aged 1 to 4 years. Bronchiolitis (n = 333, 51.2%) and pneumonia (n = 208, 32.0%) were the most common primary discharge diagnoses. Nearly half required critical care (n = 316, 48.6%); mechanical ventilation rates ranged from 7.2% to 55.9% across centres. The most common primary pathogen was respiratory syncytial virus (n = 196, 30.1%). Influenza A or B was identified in 35 cases (5.4%) and vaccine-preventable bacterial infections in 27 (4.1%) cases. INTERPRETATION: Urgent air transfers for ARI from Northern Canada are associated with high acuity. Variations in levels of care were seen across referral centers, age groups and pathogens.

Mapping the current state of pediatric surgical pain care across Canada and assessing readiness for change.

Background: Preventing pediatric chronic postsurgical pain is a patient, parent/caregiver, health care professional, and policymaker priority. Poorly managed presurgical and acute postsurgical pain are established risk factors for pediatric chronic postsurgical pain. Effective perioperative pain management is essential to prevent the transition from acute to chronic pain after surgery. Aims: The aim of this study was to identify current pediatric surgical pain management practices and assess health system readiness for change at health care institutions conducting pediatric surgery in Canada. Methods: An online survey was completed by 85 multidisciplinary health care professionals (nurses, surgeons, anesthesiologists, allied health) from 20 health institutions in Canada regarding institutional pre- and postsurgical pediatric pain care, specialty pain services, and Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC). Results: Of all specialty pain services, acute and chronic/complex pain services were most common, primarily with physician and nursing involvement. Alignment to recommended practices for pediatric pre- and postsurgical pain care varied (38.1%-79.8% reported "yes, for every child"), with tertiary/quaternary children's hospitals reporting less alignment than other institutions (community/regional or rehabilitation hospitals, community treatment centers). No significant differences were reported between health care institutions serving pediatric populations only versus those also serving adults. Health care professional experience/practice was the most reported strength in pediatric surgical pain care, with inconsistent standard of care the most common gap. Participants "somewhat agreed" that their institutions were committed and capable of change in pediatric surgical pain care. Conclusions: There is a continued need to improve pediatric pain care during the perioperative period at Canadian health care institutions to effectively prevent the development of pediatric postsurgical pain.

Contexte: La prévention de la douleur post-chirurgicale chronique pédiatrique est une priorité des patients, des parents/prestataires de soins, des professionnels de la santé et des décideurs. La douleur pré-chirurgicale et post-chirurgicale aiguë mal prises en charge constituent des facteurs de risque connus de la douleur post-chirurgicale chronique pédiatrique. La prise en charge efficace de la douleur périopératoire est essentielle pour prévenir la transition de la douleur aiguë à la douleur chronique aprés une chirurgie.Buts: Le but de cette étude était de recenser les pratiques actuelles en matiére de prise en charge de la douleur chirurgicale pédiatrique et d'évaluer l'état de préparation au changement du systéme de santé dans les établissements de soins de santé menant des chirurgies pédiatriques au Canada.Méthodes: 85 professionnels de la santé multidisciplinaires (infirmiéres, chirurgiens, anesthésistes, auxiliaires médicaux) ont répondu à un sondage en ligne de 20 établissements de santé au Canada concernant les soins pédiatriques pré et post-chirurgicaux en établissement, les services spécialisés de traitement de la douleur, les services de la douleur spécialisés et la préparation organisationnelle à la mise en œuvre du changement.Résultats: De tous les services de la douleur spécialisés, les services de la douleur aiguë et chronique/complexe étaient les plus fréquents, principalement avec la participation d'un médecin et d'une infirmiére. L'adéquation avec les pratiques recommandées pour les soins pédiatriques pré et post-chirurgicaux était variable (38,1 %-79,8 % ont déclaré « oui, pour chaque enfant ¼), alors que les hôpitaux pour enfants tertiaires/quaternaires ont déclaré moins d'adéquation que les autres institutions (hôpitaux communautaires/régionaux ou de réadaptation, centres de traitement communautaires). Aucune différence significative n'a été rapportée entre les établissements de soins de santé desservant uniquement les populations pédiatriques et ceux desservant aussi les adultes. L'expérience professionnelle/la pratique en matière de soins de santé a été la force la plus rapportée dans les soins de la douleur chirurgicale pédiatrique, tandis que les normes de soins incoh'rentes constituaient la lacune la plus courante. Les participants ont « quelque peu convenu ¼ que leurs institutions étaient engagées et capables de changer les soins chirurgicaux pédiatriques.Conclusions: ll y a un besoin continu déaméliorer les soins de la douleur pédiatrique pendant la période périopératoire dans les établissements de soins de santé canadiens afin de prévenir efficacement le développement de la douleur postopératoire.

Partnering with Youth and Parents for the Greatest Impact of Top Patient-Oriented Priorities in Pediatric Chronic Pain Research, Care and Policy.

Our original patient-oriented research project identified the top 10 priorities for pediatric chronic pain research and care in Canada from the perspective of people with lived experience (patients), their family members and healthcare professionals through a modified James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership. We undertook subsequent knowledge translation activities with youth, families, healthcare professionals, decision makers and researchers to (1) generate awareness and interest in the top 10 priorities and our partnership process, (2) facilitate collaborative dialogue and open innovation and (3) integrate and adopt the top 10 priorities into stakeholder activities. This paper describes our knowledge translation activities, outcomes and impact.

Ensuring Equity and Inclusion in Virtual Care Best Practices for Diverse Populations of Youth with Chronic Pain.

Poor access to care is a top patient-oriented research priority for youth with chronic pain in Canada, and the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated these concerns. Our patient-oriented project team engaged with marginalized and racialized youth with chronic pain (Black youth with sickle cell disease, Indigenous youth and youth with complex medical needs) and their families to ensure that best practice recommendations for virtual care are inclusive and equitable. Input provided through virtual round-table discussions improved recommendations for leveraging, implementing and selecting best platforms for virtual care for youth with chronic pain and identified new gaps for future research, practice and policy change.

COVID-19 Pandemic Impact and Response in Canadian Pediatric Chronic Pain Care: A National Survey of Medical Directors and Pain Professionals.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic presents one of the greatest threats to pediatric pain care seen in generations. Due to public health restrictions, many pediatric pain clinics halted in-person appointments, delaying and disrupting access to care. There is no existing research on the impacts of COVID-19 on pediatric chronic pain care in Canada or the challenges experienced by health care professionals and pain clinics. Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on Canadian pediatric chronic pain care by documenting how health care professionals provided care during the first six months of the pandemic. Methods: Two Canadian online cross-sectional surveys were conducted: one among Canadian pediatric pain clinic directors (Study 1) and another among multidisciplinary pediatric pain health care professionals (Study 2). Results: Responses from 13/13 Canadian pediatric pain clinics/rehabilitation programs indicated that all clinics provided virtual care during the pandemic. No significant changes were reported on the frequency of appointment requests. Most clinics reported no perceived change in patient pain levels (n = 9/13, 69%) or occurrence of pain flares (n = 10/13, 77%). Results from 151 individual health care professionals indicated that the majority (90%) of non-emergency department respondents were providing virtual care. The main challenges of virtual care included technological barriers, financial concerns, infrastructure and logistics, privacy, and clinical challenges. Conclusions: This study documented the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pediatric chronic pain care in Canada and highlighted the rapid shift to using virtual solutions. Simultaneously, respondents outlined current challenges and potential solutions to consider in the development of virtual care guidelines and policy in Canada.

Contexte: La pandémie de COVID-19 représente l'une des plus grandes menaces pour les soins de la douleur pédiatrique jamais connue depuis des générations. En raison de restrictions de santé publique, de nombreuses cliniques pédiatriques de la douleur ont interrompu les rendez-vous en personne, occasionnant ainsi des retards et des perturbations dans l'accès aux soins. Il n'existe pas de recherche sur les répercussions de la COVID-19 sur les soins pédiatriques de la douleur chronique au Canada ou sur les défis rencontrés par les professionnels des soins de santé et les cliniques de la douleur.Objectifs: L'objectif de cette étude était d'évaluer les répercussions de la COVID-19 sur les soins pédiatriques de la douleur chronique au Canada en documentant la façon dont les professionnels de la santé ont prodigué les soins au cours des six premiers mois de la pandémie.Méthodes: Deux enquêtes transversales canadiennes en ligne ont été menées : l'une auprès des directeurs de cliniques pédiatriques de la douleur canadiennes (Étude 1) et l'autre auprès de professionnels des soins de santé de la douleur pédiatriques multidisciplinaires (étude 2).Résultats: Les réponses obtenues de la part de 13 / 13 cliniques pédiatriques de la douleur / programmes de réadaptation ont indiqué que toutes les cliniques avaient fourni des soins virtuels pendant la pandémie. Aucun changement significatif n'a été rapporté sur la fréquence des demandes de rendez-vous. La plupart des cliniques n'ont signalé aucun changement perçu dans les niveaux de douleur des patients (n = 9/13, 69 %) ou la survenue de poussées douloureuses (n = 10/13, 77 %). Les résultats obtenus de 151 professionnels de la santé ont indiqué que la majorité (90 %) des répondants de département autres que les urgences fournissaient des soins virtuels. Les principaux défis des soins virtuels comprenaient les barrières technologiques, les préoccupations financières, l'infrastructure et la logistique, la confidentialité et les défis cliniques.Conclusions: Cette étude a documenté les répercussions de la pandémie de COVID-19 sur les soins pédiatriques de la douleur chronique au Canada et a mis en lumière le passage rapide à l'utilisation de solutions virtuelles. Simultanément, les répondants ont décrit les défis actuels et les solutions potentielles devant être tenues en compte dans l'élaboration de lignes directrices et de politiques sur les soins virtuels au Canada.

Best practices for virtual care to support youth with chronic pain and their families: a rapid systematic review to inform health care and policy during COVID-19 and beyond.

The COVID-19 pandemic has acutely challenged health systems and catalyzed the need for widescale virtual care and digital solutions across all areas of health, including pediatric chronic pain. The objective of this rapid systematic review was to identify recommendations, guidelines, and/or best practices for using virtual care to support youth with chronic pain and their families (CRD42020184498). MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, APA PsychINFO, and Web of Science were searched the week of May 25, 2020, for English language peer-reviewed articles published since 2010 that (1) discussed children and adolescents aged <18 years reporting any type of chronic pain (ie, pain lasting >3 months); (2) focused on any type of virtual care (eg, telephone, telehealth, telemedicine, mHealth, eHealth, online, or digital); and (3) reported on guidelines, best practices, considerations, or recommendations for virtual care. Abstract and full text screening and data extraction were performed in duplicate. Meta-ethnography was used to synthesize concepts across articles. Of 4161 unique records screened, 16 were included addressing diverse virtual care and pediatric chronic pain conditions. Four key themes were identified: (1) opportunities to better leverage virtual care, (2) direct effective implementation of virtual care, (3) selection of virtual care platforms, and (4) gaps in need of further consideration when using virtual care to support youth with chronic pain and their families. No existing guidelines for virtual care for pediatric chronic pain were identified; however, best practices for virtual care were identified and should be used by health professionals, decision makers, and policymakers in implementing virtual care.

Rapid Evidence and Gap Map of virtual care solutions across a stepped care continuum for youth with chronic pain and their families in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

ABSTRACT: Poor access to pediatric chronic pain care is a longstanding concern. The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated virtual care delivery at an unprecedented pace and scale. We conducted a scoping review to create an interactive Evidence and Gap Map of virtual care solutions across a stepped care continuum (ie, from self-directed to specialist care) for youth with chronic pain and their families. Review methodology was codesigned with 8 youth with chronic pain and 7 parents/caregivers. Data sources included peer-reviewed scientific literature, gray literature (app stores and web sites), and a call for innovations. Records were independently coded and assessed for quality. Overall, 185 records were included (105 scientific records, 56 apps, 16 web sites, and 8 innovations). Most virtual care solutions were applicable across pediatric chronic pain diagnoses, with the greatest proportion at lower levels of stepped care (ie, >100 self-guided apps and web sites). Virtual delivery of psychological strategies was common. Evidence gaps were noted at higher levels of stepped care (ie, requiring more resource and health professional involvement), integration with health records, communication with health professionals, web accessibility, and content addressing social/family support, medications, school, substance use, sleep, diet, and acute pain flares or crises. Evidence and Gap Maps are a novel visual knowledge synthesis tool, which enable rapid evidence-informed decision-making by patients and families, health professionals, and policymakers. This evidence and gap map identified high-quality virtual care solutions for immediate scale and spread and areas with no evidence in need of prioritization. Virtual care should address priorities identified by youth with chronic pain and their families.

Epidemiology of chronic pain in children and adolescents: a protocol for a systematic review update.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic pain, defined as persistent or recurring pain or pain lasting longer than 3 months, is a common childhood problem and can profoundly impact children's physical, psychological and social functioning. The last comprehensive systematic review estimating the prevalence of chronic pain in children and adolescents was published in 2011. Since then, the literature on paediatric chronic pain has grown substantially. This manuscript outlines a protocol for an updated systematic review to provide updated estimates of the prevalence of various forms of chronic pain in children and adolescence. The review will also examine the relationship between sociodemographic and psychosocial factors related to chronic pain prevalence. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This review will follow Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We will search EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL and PsycINFO for observational studies published in English between 2009 and 2020 reporting population-based estimates of chronic non-disease-related pain prevalence in children or adolescents (age ≤19 years). Two independent reviewers will screen the titles and abstracts retrieved from the search based on predefined eligibility criteria. The full texts of relevant studies will then be assessed by two reviewers. Studies meeting inclusion criteria will be categorised according to the type of pain investigated: headache only, abdominal pain only, back pain only, musculoskeletal pain, combined pain, general pain and other pain. Data will be extracted using customised forms and studies will be assessed for risk of bias using a 10-item tool developed by Hoy et al (2012). A narrative synthesis will summarise the prevalence estimates of paediatric chronic pain and associated sociodemographic and psychosocial correlates. Meta-analyses and meta-regressions will be performed if the data permit. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through publication in an academic journal, presentations at conferences and in various media. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020198690.

Improving access to Indigenous medicine for patients in hospital-based settings: a challenge for health systems in northern Canada.

In this commentary, we argue that Indigenous patients in the Northwest Territories (NWT) have a right to access traditional medicine and related practitioners as a part of the continuum of medical care. Indigenous people make up over half of the NWT population, spread over vast geographic areas with representation from First Nations, Inuit and Métis (FNIM) people. Ensuring barrier-free access to traditional medicine and providers in a culturally respectful environment is a challenge that requires structural transformation in the territorial health system. The ongoing transmission of knowledge about Indigenous traditional medicine in Northern Canada and the collective survival of Northern peoples is a testament to the applicability of traditional medicines in a self-determined wellness system. Through a discussion of the barriers to policy development and implementation, this commentary aims to elevate Indigenous perspectives and offer recommendations for integrating traditional medicines into Northern health systems.

Improving access to Indigenous medicine for patients in hospital-based settings: a challenge for health systems in northern Canada.

In this commentary, we argue that Indigenous patients in the Northwest Territories (NWT) have a right to access traditional medicine and related practitioners as a part of the continuum of medical care. Indigenous people make up over half of the NWT population, spread over vast geographic areas with representation from First Nations, Inuit and Métis (FNIM) people. Ensuring barrier-free access to traditional medicine and providers in a culturally respectful environment is a challenge that requires structural transformation in the territorial health system. The ongoing transmission of knowledge about Indigenous traditional medicine in Northern Canada and the collective survival of Northern peoples is a testament to the applicability of traditional medicines in a self-determined wellness system. Through a discussion of the barriers to policy development and implementation, this commentary aims to elevate Indigenous perspectives and offer recommendations for integrating traditional medicines into Northern health systems.