A window into the mind-brain-body interplay: Development of diagnostic, prognostic biomarkers, and rehabilitation strategies in functional motor disorders.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Functional motor disorders (FMD) present a prevalent, yet misunderstood spectrum of neurological conditions characterized by abnormal movements (i.e., functional limb weakness, tremor, dystonia, gait impairments), leading to substantial disability and diminished quality of life. Despite their high prevalence, FMD often face delayed diagnosis and inadequate treatment, resulting in significant social and economic burdens. The old concept of psychological factors as the primary cause (conversion disorder) has been abandoned due to the need for more evidence about their causal role. According to a predictive coding account, the emerging idea is that symptoms and disability may depend on dysfunctions of a specific neural system integrating interoception, exteroception, and motor control. Consequently, symptoms are construed as perceptions of the body's state. Besides the main pathophysiological features (abnormal attentional focus, beliefs/expectations, and sense of agency), the lived experience of symptoms and their resulting disability may depend on an altered integration at the neural level of interoception, exteroception, and motor control. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Our proposal aims to elucidate the pathophysiological mechanisms of FMD through a three-stage research approach. Initially, a large cohort study will collect behavioral, neurophysiological, and MRI biomarkers from patients with FMD and healthy controls, employing eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) to develop a diagnostic algorithm. Subsequently, validation will occur using patients with organic motor disorders. Finally, the algorithm's prognostic value will be explored post-rehabilitation in one subgroup of patients with FMD. RESULTS: Data collection for the present study started in May 2023, and by May 2025, data collection will conclude. DISCUSSION: Our approach seeks to enhance early diagnosis and prognostication, improve FMD management, and reduce associated disability and socio-economic costs by identifying disease-specific biomarkers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered in clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06328790).

Clinical Course of Neurologic Adverse Events Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Focus on Chronic Toxicities.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The clinical course and the risk of chronicity of neurologic immune-related adverse events (n-irAEs) associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are not well documented. This study aimed to characterize the clinical course of n-irAEs and assess the prevalence of chronic events. METHODS: This nationwide, multicenter, retrospective study included patients with n-irAEs identified at 7 Italian hospitals. The clinical course of n-irAEs was categorized into fulminant (if resulted in death within 12 weeks), monophasic (if resolved within 12 weeks), and chronic (if persisted beyond 12 weeks). Chronic n-irAEs were further subdivided into active (if there was indirect evidence of ongoing inflammation [i.e., required ongoing immunosuppression, relapsed on steroid tapering, or exhibited neurologic progression]) and inactive (if patients had neurologic sequelae without ongoing inflammation). Comparisons between groups and time-to-death analyses were performed. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were included (median age: 69 years [IQR 62-75]; 53 [80%] men). n-irAEs involved the peripheral nervous system in 48 patients (73%), the central nervous system in 14 (21%), and both in 4 (6%). Twelve patients (18%) had a fulminant course, with the risk being significantly higher in those with concurrent myocarditis (OR 5.4; 95% CI [1.02-28.31]). Among 54 patients with a nonfulminant course, 23 (43%) had a monophasic n-irAE and 31 (57%) had a chronic n-irAE, of which 16 of 31 (52%) were chronic active (due to ongoing immunosuppression [69%], relapses at corticosteroid tapering [19%], or neurologic disease progression [12%]) and 15 of 31 (48%) were chronic inactive. In patients with chronic inactive n-irAEs, neurologic sequelae included cerebellar ataxia (33%), neuromuscular weakness (27%), visual loss (13%), sensory disturbances (13%), focal neurologic signs (7%), and cognitive impairment (7%). Compared with patients with monophasic events, those with chronic n-irAEs had a higher rate of severe neurologic disability at the last evaluation (p < 0.01), shorter survival (p < 0.01), and higher overall mortality (p < 0.01), primarily due to cancer progression. DISCUSSION: More than half of the patients with n-irAEs who survived the acute phase developed a chronic condition. Patients with chronic n-irAEs were at higher risk of death, mainly due to cancer progression. Future studies are needed to further characterize chronic n-irAEs and identify optimal long-term management strategies.

Application of the international criteria for optic neuritis in the Acute Optic Neuritis Network.

OBJECTIVE: The first international consensus criteria for optic neuritis (ICON) were published in 2022. We applied these criteria to a prospective, global observational study of acute optic neuritis (ON). METHODS: We included 160 patients with a first-ever acute ON suggestive of a demyelinating CNS disease from the Acute Optic Neuritis Network (ACON). We applied the 2022 ICON to all participants and subsequently adjusted the ICON by replacing a missing relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) or dyschromatopsia if magnetic resonance imaging pathology of the optical nerve plus optical coherence tomography abnormalities or certain biomarkers are present. RESULTS: According to the 2022 ICON, 80 (50%) patients were classified as definite ON, 12 (7%) patients were classified as possible ON, and 68 (43%) as not ON (NON). The main reasons for classification as NON were absent RAPD (52 patients, 76%) or dyschromatopsia (49 patients, 72%). Distribution of underlying ON etiologies was as follows: 78 (49%) patients had a single isolated ON, 41 (26%) patients were diagnosed with multiple sclerosis, 25 (16%) patients with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease, and 15 (9%) with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. The application of the adjusted ON criteria yielded a higher proportion of patients classified as ON (126 patients, 79%). INTERPRETATION: According to the 2022 ICON, almost half of the included patients in ACON did not fulfill the requirements for classification of definite or possible ON, particularly due to missing RAPD and dyschromatopsia. Thorough RAPD examination and formal color vision testing are critical to the application of the 2022 ICON.

Protocol of a prospective multicenter study on comorbidity impact on multiple sclerosis and antibody-mediated diseases of the central nervous system (COMMIT).

Comorbidities in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and antibody-mediated diseases of the central nervous system (CNS) including neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) are common and may influence the course of their neurological disease. Comorbidity may contribute to neuronal injury and therefore limit recovery from attacks, accelerate disease progression, and increase disability. This study aims to explore the impact of comorbidity, particularly vascular comorbidity, and related risk factors on clinical and paraclinical parameters of MS, NMOSD and MOGAD. We propose COMMIT, a prospective multicenter study with longitudinal follow-up of patients with MS, NMOSD, and MOGAD, with or without comorbidities, as well as healthy subjects as controls. Subjects will be stratified by age, sex and ethnicity. In consecutive samples we will analyze levels of inflammation and neurodegeneration markers in both fluid and cellular compartments of the peripheral blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) using multiple state-of-the-art technologies, including untargeted proteomics and targeted ultrasensitive ELISA assays and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) as well as high-dimensional single-cell technologies i.e., mass cytometry and single-cell RNA sequencing. Algorithm-based data analyses will be used to unravel the relationship between these markers, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and clinical outcomes including frequency and severity of relapses, long-term disability, and quality of life. The goal is to evaluate the impact of comorbidities on MS, NMOSD, and MOGAD which may lead to development of treatment approaches to improve outcomes of inflammatory demyelinating diseases of the CNS.

Kappa index in the diagnostic work-up of autoimmune encephalitis.

BACKGROUND: The presence of inflammatory changes in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), including immunoglobulin intrathecal synthesis (IS), can support the diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis (AE) and allow prompt treatment. The main aim of our study was to calculate the Kappa index as a marker of IS, in patients with AE. METHODS: Charts of patients undergoing a diagnostic work-up for suspected AE between 2009 and 2023 were reviewed and the Graus criteria applied. CSF and serum kappa free light chains were determined using the Freelite assay (The Binding Site Group) and the turbidimetric Optilite analyzer. RESULTS: We identified 34 patients with "definite" AE (9 anti-NMDAR AE and 25 limbic AE) and nine patients with "possible" AE. Five patients (15%) with definite AE had pleocytosis and twelve (34%) showed CSF-restricted oligoclonal bands (OCB) at isoelectric focusing. The Kappa index was >6 in 29.4% and > 3 in 50% of the definite AE patients. It was elevated (>3) in 36.4% of patients with definite AE who resulted negative to OCB testing and was the only altered parameter suggestive of an ongoing inflammatory process in the CNS in three definite AE patients with otherwise normal CSF findings (i.e. normal cell count and protein levels, no OCBs). In the possible AE group, one patient had a Kappa index >3 in the absence of OCB. CONCLUSIONS: The Kappa index could be useful, as a more sensitive marker of IS and as a supportive marker of neuroinflammation, in the diagnostic work-up of suspected AE.

Is there an immunological cross-reactivity of antibodies to the myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein and coronaviruses?

Recent reports indicated that myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease might be a rare complication after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection or vaccination. It is unclear whether this is an unspecific sequel of infection or vaccination or caused by possible immunological cross-reactivity of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 proteins and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein. The aim of this study was therefore to elucidate whether there is an immunological cross-reactivity between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 spike or nucleocapsid proteins and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein and to explore the relation of antibody responses against myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and other coronaviruses. We analysed serum samples from patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection and neurological symptoms with (myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease, n = 12) or without myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-antibodies (n = 10); severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection without neurological symptoms (n = 32); vaccinated patients with no history of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection and neurological symptoms with (myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease, n = 10) or without myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-antibodies (n = 9); and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 negative/naïve unvaccinated patients with neurological symptoms with (myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease, n = 47) or without myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-antibodies (n = 20). All samples were analysed for serum antibody responses to myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, and other common coronaviruses (CoV-229E, CoV-HKU1, CoV-NL63 and CoV-OC43). Based on sample amount and antibody titres, 21 samples were selected for analysis of antibody cross-reactivity between myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 spike and nucleocapsid proteins using affinity purification and pre-absorption. Whereas we found no association of immunoglobulin G and A myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies with coronavirus antibodies, infections with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 correlated with an increased immunoglobulin M myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody response. Purified antibodies showed no cross-reactivity between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 spike protein and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein. However, one sample of a patient with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection showed a clear immunoglobulin G antibody cross-reactivity to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 nucleocapsid protein and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein. This patient was also seropositive for other coronaviruses and showed immunological cross-reactivity of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and CoV-229E nucleocapsid proteins. Overall, our results indicate that an immunoglobulin G antibody cross-reactivity between myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 proteins is rare. The presence of increased myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-immunoglobulin M antibodies after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection may either be a consequence of a previous infection with other coronaviruses or arise as an unspecific sequel after viral infection. Furthermore, our data indicate that myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-immunoglobulin A and particularly myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-immunoglobulin M antibodies are a rather unspecific sequel of viral infections. Finally, our findings do not support a causative role of coronavirus infections for the presence of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-immunoglobulin G antibodies.

HLA-DQB1*05 subtypes and not DRB1*10:01 mediates risk in anti-IgLON5 disease.

Anti-IgLON5 disease is a rare and likely underdiagnosed subtype of autoimmune encephalitis. The disease displays a heterogeneous phenotype that includes sleep, movement and bulbar-associated dysfunction. The presence of IgLON5-antibodies in CSF/serum, together with a strong association with HLA-DRB1*10:01∼DQB1*05:01, supports an autoimmune basis. In this study, a multicentric human leukocyte antigen (HLA) study of 87 anti-IgLON5 patients revealed a stronger association with HLA-DQ than HLA-DR. Specifically, we identified a predisposing rank-wise association with HLA-DQA1*01:05∼DQB1*05:01, HLA-DQA1*01:01∼DQB1*05:01 and HLA-DQA1*01:04∼DQB1*05:03 in 85% of patients. HLA sequences and binding cores for these three DQ heterodimers were similar, unlike those of linked DRB1 alleles, supporting a causal link to HLA-DQ. This association was further reflected in an increasingly later age of onset across each genotype group, with a delay of up to 11 years, while HLA-DQ-dosage dependent effects were also suggested by reduced risk in the presence of non-predisposing DQ1 alleles. The functional relevance of the observed HLA-DQ molecules was studied with competition binding assays. These proof-of-concept experiments revealed preferential binding of IgLON5 in a post-translationally modified, but not native, state to all three risk-associated HLA-DQ receptors. Further, a deamidated peptide from the Ig2-domain of IgLON5 activated T cells in two patients, compared with one control carrying HLA-DQA1*01:05∼DQB1*05:01. Taken together, these data support a HLA-DQ-mediated T-cell response to IgLON5 as a potentially key step in the initiation of autoimmunity in this disease.

Autoimmune Movement Disorders Complicating Treatment with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) may trigger autoimmune neurological conditions, including movement disorders (MD). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to characterize MDs occurring as immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of ICIs. METHODS: A systematic literature review of case reports/series of MDs as irAEs of ICIs was performed. RESULTS: Of 5682 eligible papers, 26 articles with 28 patients were included. MDs occur as a rare complication of cancer immunotherapy with heterogeneous clinical presentations and in most cases in association with other irAEs. Inflammatory basal ganglia T2/fluid attenuated inversion recovery abnormalities are rarely observed, but brain imaging is frequently unrevealing. Cerebrospinal fluid findings are frequently suggestive of inflammation. Half of cases are associated with a wide range of autoantibodies. Steroids and ICI withdrawal usually lead to improvement, even though some patients experienced relapses or a severe clinical course. CONCLUSION: MDs are a rare complication of ICIs that should be promptly recognized to offer patients a correct diagnosis and treatment.

Serum Biomarker Profiles Discriminate AQP4 Seropositive and Double Seronegative Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and neurofilament light chain (NfL) serum levels are useful to define disease activity in different neurologic conditions. These biomarkers are increased in patients with aquaporin-4 antibody-positive NMOSD (AQP4+NMOSD) during clinical attacks suggesting a concomitant axonal and glial damage. However, there are contradictory results in double seronegative NMOSD (DS-NMOSD). The aim of this study was to characterize the neuronal, axonal, and glial damage of DS-NMOSD in comparison with AQP4+NMOSD. METHODS: Patients with DS-NMOSD (i.e., for AQP4 and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies-MOG-Abs) and age-matched AQP4+NMOSD diagnosed according to the latest diagnostic criteria and with available serum samples obtained within 3 months from onset/relapse were retrospectively enrolled from 14 international centers. Clinical and radiologic data were collected. Serum NfL, GFAP, tau, and UCH-L1 levels were determined using an ultrasensitive paramagnetic bead-based ELISA (SIMOA). Statistical analysis was performed using nonparametric tests and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: We included 25 patients with AQP4+NMOSD and 26 with DS-NMOSD. The median age at disease onset (p = 0.611) and female sex predominance (p = 0.072) were similar in the 2 groups. The most common syndromes at sampling in both AQP4+NMOSD and DS-NMOSD were myelitis (56% vs 38.5%) and optic neuritis (34.6% vs 32%), with no statistical differences (p = 0.716). Median EDSS at sampling was 3.2 (interquartile range [IQR] 2-7.7) in the AQP4+NMOSD group and 4 (IQR [3-6]) in the DS-NMOSD group (p = 0.974). Serum GFAP, tau, and UCH-L1 levels were higher in patients with AQP4+NMOSD compared with those with DS-NMOSD (median 308.3 vs 103.4 pg/mL p = 0.001; median 1.2 vs 0.5 pg/mL, p = 0.001; and median 61.4 vs 35 pg/mL, p = 0.006, respectively). The ROC curve analysis showed that GFAP, tau, and UCH-L1, but not NfL, values were able to discriminate between AQP4+ and DS-NMOSD (area under the curve (AUC) tau: 0.782, p = 0.001, AUC GFAP: 0.762, p = 0.001, AUC UCH-L1: 0.723, p = 0.006). NfL levels were associated with EDSS at nadir only in patients with AQP4+NMOSD. DISCUSSION: Serum GFAP, tau, and UCH-L1 levels discriminate between AQP4+NMOSD and DS-NMOSD. The different biomarker profile of AQP4+NMOSD vs DS-NMOSD suggests heterogeneity of diseases within the latter category and provides useful data to improve our understanding of this disease.

Microfibrillar-associated protein 4 as a potential marker of acute relapse in inflammatory demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system: Pathological and clinical aspects.

BACKGROUND: Microfibrillar-associated protein 4 (MFAP4) is an extracellular matrix protein not previously described in the human central nervous system (CNS). OBJECTIVES: We determined MFAP4 CNS expression and measured cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum levels. METHODS: Tissue was sampled at autopsy from patients with acute multiple sclerosis (MS) (n = 3), progressive MS (n = 3), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) (n = 2), and controls (n = 9), including 6 healthy controls (HC). MFAP4 levels were measured in 152 patients: 49 MS, 62 NMOSD, 22 myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-associated disease (MOGAD), and 19 isolated optic neuritis (ION). RESULTS: MFAP4 localized to meninges and vascular/perivascular spaces, intense in the optic nerve. At sites of active inflammation, MFAP4 reactivity was reduced in NMOSD and acute MS and less in progressive MS. CSF MFAP4 levels were reduced during relapse and at the onset of diseases (mean U/mL: MS 14.3, MOGAD 9.7, and ION 14.6 relative to HC 17.9. (p = 0.013, p = 0.000, and p = 0.019, respectively). Patients with acute ON (n = 68) had reduced CSF MFAP4 (mean U/mL: 14.5, p = 0.006). CSF MFAP4 levels correlated negatively with relapse severity (rho = -0.41, p = 0.017). CONCLUSION: MFAP4 immunoreactivity was reduced at sites of active inflammation. CSF levels of MFAP4 were reduced following relapse and may reflect disease activity.

Analysis of inflammatory markers and tau deposits in an autopsy series of nine patients with anti-IgLON5 disease.

Anti-IgLON5 disease is a rare neurological, probably autoimmune, disorder associated in many cases with a specific tauopathy. Only a few post-mortem neuropathological studies have been reported so far. Little is known about the pathogenic mechanisms that result in neurodegeneration. We investigated the neuropathology of anti-IgLON5 disease and characterized cellular and humoral inflammation. We included nine cases (six of them previously published). Median age of patients was 71 years (53-82 years), the median disease duration was 6 years (0.5-13 years), and the female to male ratio was 5:4. Six cases with a median disease duration of 9 years presented a prominent tauopathy. Five of them had a classical anti-IgLON5-related brainstem tauopathy and another presented a prominent neuronal and glial 4-repeat tauopathy, consistent with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). Three cases with short disease duration (median 1.25 years) only showed a primary age-related neurofibrillary pathology. Inflammatory infiltrates of T and B cells were mild to moderate and did not significantly differ between anti-IgLON5 disease cases with or without tauopathy. In contrast, we found an extensive neuropil deposition of IgG4 in the tegmentum of the brainstem, olivary nucleus, and cerebellar cortex that was most prominent in two patients with short disease duration without the typical IgLON5-related tauopathy. The IgG4 deposits were particularly prominent in the cerebellar cortex and in these regions accompanied by mild IgG1 deposits. Activated complement deposition (C9neo) was absent. Our study indicates that IgLON5-related tau pathology occurs in later disease stages and may also present a PSP-phenotype with exclusively 4-repeat neuronal and glial tau pathology. The prominent deposition of anti-IgLON5 IgG4 at predilection sites for tau pathology suggests that anti-IgLON5 antibodies precede the tau pathology. Early start of immunotherapy might prevent irreversible neuronal damage and progression of the disease, at least in a subgroup of patients.

Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment for acute attacks in myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease.

BACKGROUND: The potential therapeutic benefit of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIGs) for acute attacks of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease (MOGAD) is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to describe the outcomes of IVIG treatment for acute MOGAD attacks. METHODS: A retrospective observational study involving seven tertiary neuroimmunology centers. Data collection included patients' demographics, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), and visual acuity (VA) before the attack, at the nadir of the attack before IVIG treatment, and at follow-up visits ⩾3 months after treatment. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were included, of which 21 (53.8%) were female. The median age was 23 years (range 5-74 years), and the median disease duration was 4 months (range 0-93 months). The most common type of attack treated with IVIG was isolated optic neuritis (ON) (unilateral n = 14, bilateral n = 5, associated with transverse myelitis (TM), n = 1), followed by acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) (n = 8), multifocal (n = 7), TM (n = 3), brainstem (n = 1), and other encephalitis (n = 1). A significant improvement in both the EDSS and VA measures was observed at follow-up compared to the time of IVIG treatment initiation (p < 0.0001 for both outcome measures). CONCLUSION: IVIG may be an effective treatment option for acute MOGAD attacks. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate our results.

Non-demyelinating disorders mimicking and misdiagnosed as NMOSD: a literature review.

BACKGROUND: Differentiating neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) from its mimics is crucial to avoid misdiagnosis, especially in the absence of aquaporin-4-IgG. While multiple sclerosis (MS) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-IgG associated disease (MOGAD) represent major and well-defined differential diagnoses, non-demyelinating NMOSD mimics remain poorly characterized. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review on PubMed/MEDLINE to identify reports of patients with non-demyelinating disorders that mimicked or were misdiagnosed as NMOSD. Three novel cases seen at the authors' institutions were also included. The characteristics of NMOSD mimics were analyzed and red flags associated with misdiagnosis identified. RESULTS: A total of 68 patients were included; 35 (52%) were female. Median age at symptoms onset was 44 (range, 1-78) years. Fifty-six (82%) patients did not fulfil the 2015 NMOSD diagnostic criteria. The clinical syndromes misinterpreted for NMOSD were myelopathy (41%), myelopathy + optic neuropathy (41%), optic neuropathy (6%), or other (12%). Alternative etiologies included genetic/metabolic disorders, neoplasms, infections, vascular disorders, spondylosis, and other immune-mediated disorders. Common red flags associated with misdiagnosis were lack of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pleocytosis (57%), lack of response to immunotherapy (55%), progressive disease course (54%), and lack of magnetic resonance imaging gadolinium enhancement (31%). Aquaporin-4-IgG positivity was detected in five patients by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (n = 2), cell-based assay (n = 2: serum, 1; CSF, 1), and non-specified assay (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: The spectrum of NMOSD mimics is broad. Misdiagnosis frequently results from incorrect application of diagnostic criteria, in patients with multiple identifiable red flags. False aquaporin-4-IgG positivity, generally from nonspecific testing assays, may rarely contribute to misdiagnosis.

Investigating the association between neoplasms and MOG antibody-associated disease.

Introduction: The association of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody associated disease (MOGAD) and tumors has seldom been reported. We aim to investigate the occurrence of tumors in a cohort of patients with MOGAD and to describe their clinical features, in addition to previously reported cases. Methods: We retrospectively identified patients with MOGAD (i.e., compatible clinical phenotype and positive MOG antibodies analysed with a live cell-based assay) from 1/1/2015 to 1/1/2023 who had a neoplasm diagnosed within 2 years from MOGAD onset. Furthermore, we performed systematic review of literature to identify previously reported cases. Clinical, paraclinical and oncological findings were collected and reported as median (range) or number (percentage). Results: Two of 150 MOGAD patients (1%) had a concomitant neoplasm in our cohort. Fifteen additional cases were retrieved from literature. Median age was 39 (16-73) years-old, 12 patients were female. ADEM (n = 4;23.5%), encephalomyelitis (n = 3;17.6%), and monolateral optic neuritis (n = 2;11.8%) were the most frequent phenotypes. Median number of treatments was 1 (range 1-4), improvement was reported in 14/17 cases (82.4%). Oncological accompaniments were teratoma (n = 4), CNS (n = 3), melanoma (n = 2), lung (n = 2), hematological (n = 2), ovary (n = 1), breast (n = 1), gastrointestinal (n = 1), and thymic (n = 1) neoplasms. Median time from tumor diagnosis to MOGAD onset was 0 (range - 60 to 20) months. MOG expression in neoplastic tissue was reported in 2/4 patients. Median PNS-CARE score was 3 (range 0-7): 11 patients were classified as "non-PNS," 5 as "possible PNS," and 1 as "probable PNS." Discussion: Our study confirms that MOG is a low-risk antibody for paraneoplastic neurological syndromes and that the clinical presentation and oncological accompaniments are extremely variable. Most of these patients were classified as non-PNS, whereas only a minority was diagnosed with possible/probable PNS, frequently in association with ovarian teratoma. These findings support the notion that MOGAD is not a paraneoplastic disease.

Neurologic sequelae of COVID-19 are determined by immunologic imprinting from previous coronaviruses.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), remains a global public health emergency. Although SARS-CoV-2 is primarily a respiratory pathogen, extra-respiratory organs, including the CNS, can also be affected. Neurologic symptoms have been observed not only during acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, but also at distance from respiratory disease, also known as long-COVID or neurological post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (neuroPASC). The pathogenesis of neuroPASC is not well understood, but hypotheses include SARS-CoV-2-induced immune dysfunctions, hormonal dysregulations and persistence of SARS-CoV-2 reservoirs. In this prospective cohort study, we used a high throughput systems serology approach to dissect the humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 (and other common coronaviruses: 229E, HKU1, NL63 and OC43) in the serum and CSF from 112 infected individuals who developed (n = 18) or did not develop (n = 94) neuroPASC. Unique SARS-CoV-2 humoral profiles were observed in the CSF of neuroPASC compared with serum responses. All antibody isotypes (IgG, IgM, IgA) and subclasses (IgA1-2, IgG1-4) were detected in serum, whereas CSF was characterized by focused IgG1 (and absence of IgM). These data argue in favour of compartmentalized brain-specific responses against SARS-CoV-2 through selective transfer of antibodies from the serum to the CSF across the blood-brain barrier, rather than intrathecal synthesis, where more diversity in antibody classes/subclasses would be expected. Compared to individuals who did not develop post-acute complications following infection, individuals with neuroPASC had similar demographic features (median age 65 versus 66.5 years, respectively, P = 0.55; females 33% versus 44%, P = 0.52) but exhibited attenuated systemic antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2, characterized by decreased capacity to activate antibody-dependent complement deposition (ADCD), NK cell activation (ADNKA) and to bind Fcγ receptors. However, surprisingly, neuroPASC individuals showed significantly expanded antibody responses to other common coronaviruses, including 229E, HKU1, NL63 and OC43. This biased humoral activation across coronaviruses was particularly enriched in neuroPASC individuals with poor outcome, suggesting an 'original antigenic sin' (or immunologic imprinting), where pre-existing immune responses against related viruses shape the response to the current infection, as a key prognostic marker of neuroPASC disease. Overall, these findings point to a pathogenic role for compromised anti-SARS-CoV-2 responses in the CSF, likely resulting in incomplete virus clearance from the brain and persistent neuroinflammation, in the development of post-acute neurologic complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in inflammatory neurological conditions: a multicentre retrospective comparative study.

It is well established that neurological and non-neurological autoimmune disorders can be triggered by viral infections. It remains unclear whether SARS-CoV-2 infection induces similar conditions and whether they show a distinctive phenotype. We retrospectively identified patients with acute inflammatory CNS conditions referred to our laboratory for antibody testing during the pandemic (March 1 to August 31, 2020). We screened SARS-COV-2 IgA/IgG in all sera by ELISA and confirmed the positivity with additional assays. Clinical and paraclinical data of SARS-COV-2-IgG seropositive patients were compared to those of seronegative cases matched for clinical phenotype, geographical zone, and timeframe. SARS-CoV-2-IgG positivity was detected in 16/339 (4%) sera, with paired CSF positivity in 3/16. 5 of these patients had atypical demyelinating disorders and 11 autoimmune encephalitis syndromes. 9/16 patients had a previous history of SARS-CoV-2 infection and 6 of them were symptomatic. In comparison with 32 consecutive seronegative controls, SARS-CoV-2-IgG-positive patients were older, frequently presented with encephalopathy, had lower rates of CSF pleocytosis and other neurological autoantibodies, and were less likely to receive immunotherapy. When SARS-CoV-2 seropositive versus seronegative cases with demyelinating disorders were compared no differences were seen. Whereas seropositive encephalitis patients less commonly showed increased CSF cells and protein, our data suggest that an antecedent symptomatic or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection can be detected in patients with autoimmune neurological conditions. These cases are rare, usually do not have specific neuroglial antibodies.

A score that predicts aquaporin-4 IgG positivity in patients with longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM) associated with aquaporin-4 autoantibodies (AQP4-IgG) can cause severe disability. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment are critical to prevent relapses. A novel score is described based on clinical and neuroimaging characteristics that predicts AQP4-IgG positivity in patients with LETM. METHODS: Patients were enrolled both retrospectively and prospectively from multiple Italian centers. Clinical and neuroimaging characteristics of AQP4-IgG positive and negative patients were compared through univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were included. Twenty-seven (41%) were AQP4-IgG positive and median age at onset was 45.5 years (range 19-81, interquartile range 24). Female sex (odds ratio [OR] 17.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6-381.9; p = 0.014), tonic spasms (OR 45.6, 95% CI 3.1-2197; p = 0.017) and lesion hypointensity on T1-weighted images (OR 52.9, 95% CI 6.8-1375; p = 0.002) were independently associated with AQP4-IgG positivity. The AQP4-IgG positivity in myelitis (AIM) score predicted AQP4-IgG positivity with 85% sensitivity and 95% specificity. Positive and negative likelihood ratios were 16.6 and 0.2 respectively. The inter-rater and intra-rater agreement in the score application were both excellent. CONCLUSIONS: The AIM score predicts AQP4-IgG positivity with good sensitivity and specificity in patients with a first episode of LETM. The score may assist clinicians in early diagnosis and treatment of AQP4-IgG positive LETM.

Predictive Value of Serum Neurofilament Light Chain Levels in Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Determinants of disease activity and prognosis are limited in anti-NMDA receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis. Neurofilament light chains (NfL) are markers of axonal damage and have been identified as valuable biomarkers for neurodegenerative and other neuroinflammatory disorders. We aimed to investigate serum NfL levels in patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis as a biomarker for disease severity and outcome. METHODS: In this retrospective study, NfL values were measured in all available pretreatment serum and paired CSF samples of the nationwide anti-NMDAR encephalitis cohort. The values were analyzed in duplicate using single-molecule array and compared with measurements in healthy references. Follow-up sera were tested to analyze longitudinal responsiveness, if at least available from 2 time points after diagnosis. Serum NfL levels were compared with data on disease activity (seizures, MRI, and CSF findings), severity (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score, admission days, and intensive care unit admission), and outcome (mRS score and relapses), using regression analysis. RESULTS: We have included 71 patients (75% female; mean age 31.4 years, range 0-85 years) of whom pretreatment serum samples were analyzed. Paired CSF samples were available of 33 patients, follow-up serum samples of 20 patients. Serum NfL levels at diagnosis were higher in patients (mean 19.5 pg/mL, 95% CI 13.7-27.7) than in references (mean 6.4 pg/mL, 95% CI 5.8-7.2, p < 0.0001). We observed a good correlation between serum and CSF NfL values (R = 0.84, p < 0.0001). Serum NfL levels and age correlated in patients (Pearson R = 0.57, p < 0.0001) and references (R = 0.62, p < 0.0001). Increased NfL values were detected in patients post-herpes simplex virus 1 encephalitis (mean 248.8 vs 14.1 pg/mL, p < 0.0001) and in patients with brain MRI lesions (mean 27.3 vs 11.1 pg/mL, p = 0.019). NfL levels did relate to the long-term follow-up (mRS score at 12 months; ßNfL = 0.55, p = 0.013), although largely explained by the effect of age on NfL levels and prognosis. In serial samples, NfL values did roughly follow clinical disease activity, albeit with delay. DISCUSSION: Increased serum NfL levels reflect neuroaxonal damage in anti-NMDAR encephalitis. No relationship was identified with disease severity, whereas the association with outcome was confounded by age. The implied role of sampling timing on NfL levels also limits the applicability of NfL as a prognostic marker.

The Acute Optic Neuritis Network (ACON): Study protocol of a non-interventional prospective multicenter study on diagnosis and treatment of acute optic neuritis.

Optic neuritis (ON) often occurs at the presentation of multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD), and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody-associated disease (MOGAD). The recommended treatment of high-dose corticosteroids for ON is based on a North American study population, which did not address treatment timing or antibody serostatus. The Acute Optic Neuritis Network (ACON) presents a global, prospective, observational study protocol primarily designed to investigate the effect of time to high-dose corticosteroid treatment on 6-month visual outcomes in ON. Patients presenting within 30 days of the inaugural ON will be enrolled. For the primary analysis, patients will subsequently be assigned into the MS-ON group, the aquapotin-4-IgG positive ON (AQP4-IgG+ON) group or the MOG-IgG positive ON (MOG-IgG+ON) group and then further sub-stratified according to the number of days from the onset of visual loss to high-dose corticosteroids (days-to-Rx). The primary outcome measure will be high-contrast best-corrected visual acuity (HC-BCVA) at 6 months. In addition, multimodal data will be collected in subjects with any ON (CIS-ON, MS-ON, AQP4-IgG+ON or MOG-IgG+ON, and seronegative non-MS-ON), excluding infectious and granulomatous ON. Secondary outcomes include low-contrast best-corrected visual acuity (LC-BCVA), optical coherence tomography (OCT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements, serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers (AQP4-IgG and MOG-IgG levels, neurofilament, and glial fibrillary protein), and patient reported outcome measures (headache, visual function in daily routine, depression, and quality of life questionnaires) at presentation at 6-month and 12-month follow-up visits. Data will be collected from 28 academic hospitals from Africa, Asia, the Middle East, Europe, North America, South America, and Australia. Planned recruitment consists of 100 MS-ON, 50 AQP4-IgG+ON, and 50 MOG-IgG+ON. This prospective, multimodal data collection will assess the potential value of early high-dose corticosteroid treatment, investigate the interrelations between functional impairments and structural changes, and evaluate the diagnostic yield of laboratory biomarkers. This analysis has the ability to substantially improve treatment strategies and the accuracy of diagnostic stratification in acute demyelinating ON. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT05605951.