Characterization of Patients with EGFR Mutation-Positive NSCLC Following Emergence of the Osimertinib Resistance Mutations, L718Q or G724S: A Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study in France.

Purpose: The third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), osimertinib, is an effective first-line therapy for patients with common EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, almost all patients become resistant to treatment. In some patients, emergence of tertiary EGFR mutations is implicated as a resistance mechanism. This study describes patients with NSCLC who acquired the rare EGFR mutations, L718Q or G724S, following EGFR TKI treatment. Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective, observational study undertaken in France from Feb-Nov 2021, in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC with an acquired L718Q or G724S mutation. Primary objectives were description of tumor characteristics, progression, and progression under treatment. Results: Nine eligible patients were identified. Acquired resistance to initial EGFR TKI treatment was associated with T790M emergence in six patients, who then received osimertinib monotherapy. Overall, eight patients received osimertinib monotherapy treatment at some point (average treatment duration: 18.3 months). Following the emergence of L718Q or G724S, patients received chemotherapy (n = 4; two of whom subsequently received afatinib), nivolumab (n = 2), afatinib (n = 2), or immunochemotherapy (n = 1). In the four patients who received afatinib after identification of L718Q or G724S, 2 achieved a partial response, one had stable disease and one had progressive disease. Treatment duration was 1.6-31.7 months. In patients with controlled disease (n = 3), progression-free survival was 6.1-31.7 months. Two of these patients had previously received osimertinib. Conclusion: Currently, there is no consensus regarding the treatment of EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC following emergence of the osimertinib resistance mutations, L718Q or G724S. Afatinib appears to be a promising treatment option in this setting.

Phase II INTERACT-ION study: ezabenlimab (BI 754091) and mDCF (docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil) followed by chemoradiotherapy in patients with Stage III squamous cell anal carcinoma.

Background: Chemoradiotherapy alone is the standard treatment for locally advanced squamous cell anal carcinoma (SCAC). However, up to 50% of patients will experience recurrence; thus, there is a need for new treatments to improve outcomes. Modified docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (mDCF) is a treatment option for first-line metastatic SCAC, having shown efficacy in the Epitopes-HPV01 and -02 trials (NCT01845779 and NCT02402842). mDCF treatment also plays a role in the modulation of anti-tumor immunity, suggesting it may be a good combination partner for immunotherapy in patients with SCAC. Anti-programmed death protein-1 (PD-1) immunotherapy has been shown to be effective in metastatic SCAC. We therefore designed the INTERACT-ION study to assess the combination of mDCF with ezabenlimab (BI 754091), an anti-PD-1 antibody, followed by chemoradiotherapy, in patients with Stage III SCAC. Methods: INTERACT-ION is a pivotal, open-label, single-arm phase II study in patients with treatment-naïve Stage III SCAC. Patients will receive induction treatment with mDCF (docetaxel 40 mg/m2 and cisplatin 40 mg/m2 on Day 1, 5-fluorouracil 1200 mg/m2/day for 2 days) every 2 weeks for 4 cycles and ezabenlimab (240 mg given intravenously) every 3 weeks for 3 cycles. In the absence of disease progression at 2 months, two additional cycles of mDCF and one additional cycle of ezabenlimab will be administered. Patients with radiological objective response, pathological complete/near-complete response and biological complete response will then receive an involved-node radiotherapy with intensity-modulated radiation therapy and concurrent chemotherapy, followed by ezabenlimab alone for seven cycles. All other patients will receive standard chemoradiotherapy. The primary endpoint is the clinical complete response rate 10 months after the first cycle of mDCF plus ezabenlimab. Major secondary endpoints are major pathological response and biological complete response after induction treatment. An extensive ancillary biomarker study in tumor tissue and peripheral blood will also be conducted. Discussion: The addition of immunotherapy to chemotherapy is an area of active interest in metastatic anal cancer. This pivotal study will evaluate this combination in the locally advanced setting. Ancillary biomarker studies will contribute to the understanding of predictors of response or resistance to treatment. Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04719988, identifier NCT04719988.

Immune checkpoint-targeted antibodies: a room for dose and schedule optimization?

Anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors are therapeutic monoclonal antibodies that do not target cancer cells but are designed to reactivate or promote antitumor immunity. Dosing and scheduling of these biologics were established according to conventional drug development models, even though the determination of a maximum tolerated dose in the clinic could only be defined for anti-CTLA-4. Given the pharmacology of these monoclonal antibodies, their high interpatient pharmacokinetic variability, the actual clinical benefit as monotherapy that is observed only in a specific subset of patients, and the substantial cost of these treatments, a number of questions arise regarding the selected dose and the dosing interval. This review aims to outline the development of these immunotherapies and considers optimization options that could be used in clinical practice.

[Patients on oral anticancer drugs and coordinated pathway: CHIMORAL, feedback from care providers]. / Patients sous anticancéreux oraux et parcours coordonné : CHIMORAL, retour des acteurs de soins.

INTRODUCTION: Oral anticancer drugs have raised the question of how to follow-up these patients and how to coordinate this follow-up. The CHIMORAL study evaluated the involvement of primary care providers and a coordination by territorial health networks. Training/information tools were provided, as well as weekly nursing follow-up at home. METHODS: The operational feasibility of this model was assessed through a qualitative/quantitative analysis of territorial health network intervention and feedback from primary care providers. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty four patients received coordinated care, with nursing follow-up for 89% of them (average 6.3 weeks). One in three nurses, one in five pharmacists and one in ten doctors used the tools provided, 41% of which were used for training and 16% for the management of an adverse event. The main reasons for using the networks concerned adverse effects (34%) and came mainly from nurses (45%) and patients and their relatives (47%). Patients felt safe, with more responsive management. DISCUSSION: This intervention has strengthened the networks' links with primary care providers. The use of the community-based care system for adverse events was more frequent, with improved detection and patient awareness, with no observed impact on compliance. A proposed evolution is to maintain an in-home assessment for all patients and to define a frequency and duration of follow-up according to the patient's profile.

Treatment sequence of first and second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor followed by osimertinib in EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer: a real life study.

Background: We aimed to assess the effectiveness and cost of patients with first line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) sequence of first (1G) and second generation (2G) followed by osimertinib. Materials & methods: Using the French nationwide claims and hospitalization database, we analyzed non-small-cell lung cancer patients who had been treated with osimertinib between April 2015 and December 2017, after a first line treatment with a TKI-1G/2G. Results: The median time on treatment for sequential TKI-1G/2G followed by osimertinib was 34 months (95% CI: 31-46); 13 and 12months, respectively for TKI 1G or 2G and TKI 3G, respectively. The median overall survival for sequential TKI 1G or 2G followed by osimertinib was 37 months (95% CI: 34-42). The mean monthly costs per patient was €5162. Conclusion: These results, in line with those observed during clinical trials, confirm the effectiveness of the sequence TKI-1G/2G followed by osimertinib in EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies used in oncology: Part 1, monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates and bispecific T-cell engagers.

More than 25 therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) used in oncology have been approved since 1997. Their nature has been largely modified through the last 20 years, from the chimeric IgG1 rituximab with pharmacokinetic parameters specific of murin or chimeric mAbs to humanized or human mAbs. Doses and administration frequency have been chosen based on this nature. More recently, the developed and registered mAbs are mostly IgG1, IgG2, IgG3 or IgG4 humanized or 100% human. Therefore, their behavior is different from the first mAbs authorized leading to lower systemic clearance and shorter half-life due to higher cellular uptake balanced by FcRn recognition with recirculation. The complexity of the pharmacokinetics and the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics relation are increased for antibody-drug conjugates or bispecific T-cell engagers. However, significant number of studies reported pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics relations, with positive exposure-response link justifying the exploration of the pharmacokinetics in routine clinical practice of these therapeutic mAbs to prevent treatment failures and to limit their toxicities.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies used in oncology: Part 2, immune checkpoint inhibitor antibodies.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) directed against negative immunologic regulators that are used to restore the immune response against cancer. Approved drugs include anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and anti-programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibodies exhibiting pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics typical of mAbs. Most factors such as age, sex, ethnicity, tumour burden, performance status and immunogenicity, but not body weight, do not seem to affect drug clearance clinically. However, an exposure-response relation has been described for both the efficacy and toxicity of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 agents. The change in clearance over time is associated with overall response at least for nivolumab and pembrolizumab. Few PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) data are available for anti-PD-L1 mAbs, but time-varying clearance has been described for these drugs, and the high immunogenicity rate observed with atezolizumab may affect PK parameters and should be further studied. These data suggest the need for additional PK/PD studies. In this review, we summarise studies of the PKs of immune checkpoint inhibitors, exploring possible interactions with PD considerations.

[Impact of a coordinated regional organization to secure the management of patients on oral anticancer drugs: CHIMORAL, a comparative trial]. / Impact d'une organisation régionale coordonnée pour sécuriser la prise en charge des patients sous anticancéreux oraux : CHIMORAL, une étude comparative.

INTRODUCTION: Oral anticancer drugs have disrupted hospital and community practices. A better coordination and patient support for medication and adverse events management by primary care providers (general practitioner, community pharmacist and liberal nurse) could improve the situation. The CHIMORAL study evaluated a model of coordination by territorial health networks. METHODS: A here and elsewhere, prospective and multicentric study, comparing coordinated care with standard care. Primary outcome was the use of the hospital structure for adverse events within 6 months of initiating treatment. RESULTS: In all, 283 patients were included. 92% had at least one adverse event, with a higher median number in the coordinated group (12.5 vs. 9.0, P=0.02). No difference in hospital use by arm (P=0.502). Increase in the use of community care for adverse events in the coordinated group (27% vs. 16%, P=0.009). No observed impact on progression rates, quality of life and treatment adherence. The overall survival rate at 6 months is numerically higher in the coordinated group (87% vs. 76%, P=0.064). DISCUSSION: This model does not show any difference on the primary endpoint. The lack of randomization, patient selection, power loss, and local initiatives to monitor these patients may have biased the analysis. A large number of uses of the healthcare system were observed. These results confirm the need for a dedicated care pathway for the patient with oral anticancer drugs.

High-dose thiotepa-related neurotoxicity and the role of tramadol in children.

BACKGROUND: Serious neurological adverse events (NAE) have occurred during treatment with high-dose thiotepa regimens of children with high-risk solid tumours. The objective was to assess the incidence of NAE related to high-dose thiotepa and to identify potential contributing factors that could exacerbate the occurrence of this neurotoxicity. METHODS: From May 1987 to March 2011, children with solid tumours treated with high-dose thiotepa were retrospectively identified. Each NAE detected led to an independent case analysis. Potential contributing factors were pre-specified and univariate/multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS: Three hundred seven courses of thiotepa (251 patients) were identified. The total dose per treatment ranged from 600 to 900 mg/m2. 81 NAE (26%) were identified. 46 NAE were related to high-dose thiotepa during the first course (18.3%) and 11 during the second course (19.6%). The symptoms appeared in a median time of 2 days after the introduction of thiotepa. Central and peripheral symptoms were headaches, tremors, confusion, seizures, cerebellar syndrome, and coma. High-dose thiotepa was reintroduced in 18 cases and symptoms reappeared in 5 children. For 3 patients who had seizures during the first course, premedication with clonazepam for the second course has prevented recurrence of NAE. As contributing factors, brain tumour and tramadol treatment increased the risk of thiotepa-related neurotoxicity by 2 to 6 times respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of neurotoxicity was 18.3%. Brain tumours and tramadol treatment are risk factors to consider when using high-dose thiotepa. The outcome of patients was favourable without sequelae in all cases and rechallenge with thiotepa was possible.

Cetuximab-induced aseptic meningitis: case report and review of a rare adverse event.

BACKGROUND: Cetuximab is a commonly used antibody agent in the treatment of colorectal or head and neck cancer. Although it is generally well tolerated in most patients, cetuximab has been associated with some rare but serious adverse events. Aseptic meningitis is one such distinctly uncommon adverse drug reaction. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a middle-aged Caucasian patient, who presented with fever and headache within a few hours of starting cetuximab therapy and was diagnosed with cetuximab-induced aseptic meningitis after a complete workup. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the ninth case of cetuximab-induced aseptic meningitis reported in literature. Because of a nonspecific clinical presentation, this adverse drug reaction can be easily misdiagnosed. It is important to increase awareness of this potentially severe reaction among oncologists.

[Care pathways of cancer patients: Modeling and risks analysis induced by oral anticancer drugs]. / Parcours de soins : modélisation et analyse des risques induits par les anticancéreux oraux.

The care pathway of cancer patients is complex and therefore difficult to define. The oral anticancers (AKPO) have shown their benefits to patients and health professionals, however, the risks induced on the care pathway remain unknown. The objective of the study is to define, quantify the risks from AKPO and their effects on the care pathway (breakdown [Ds], rupture [Rt]). From the proposed care pathway model, FMEA method is used to analyze risks. For the 3 identified processes (1 monotherapy, 2 bitherapies: 2 AKPO or 1 AKPO/1 AKIV), analysis revealed an average of 91 risks, 173 Ds, 147 Rt, increased for 1 AKPO/1 AKIV therapy. The administration and delivery are the most risky steps. The lack of training and information of patients and healthcare professionals generates 80% of Ds and Rt. This model confirms the complexity, variability of the care pathway. The development of actions to improve town-hospital coordination and exchange of information is required to optimize and secure the route, confirming the objectives of "Plan Cancer 3".