Effectiveness of biosimilar infliximab CT-P13 compared to originator infliximab in biological-naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis: data from the Portuguese Register.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of the infliximab biosimilar CT-P13 with originator infliximab over 24 months of follow-up in biological-naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). METHODS: Biological-naïve patients from the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Register (Reuma.pt), with a clinical diagnosis of RA or axSpA, who were starting either the infliximab biosimilar CT-P13 or the originator infliximab after 2014 (date of market entry of CT-P13 in Portugal), were included. Patients on biosimilar and originator were compared regarding different response outcomes at 3 and 6 months, adjusting for age, sex and baseline C-reactive protein (CRP). The main outcome was the change in DAS28-erytrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for RA and the ASDAS-CRP for axSpA. Additionally, the effect of infliximab biosimilar vs originator on different response outcomes over 24 months of follow-up was tested with longitudinal generalized estimating equations (GEE) models. RESULTS: In total, 140 patients were included, 66 (47%) of which with RA. The distribution of patients starting the infliximab biosimilar and the originator was the same between the two diseases (approximately 60% and 40%, respectively). From the 66 patients with RA, 82% were females, mean age was 56 years (SD 11) and mean DAS28-ESR 4.9 (1.3) at baseline. As for the patients with axSpA, 53% were males, mean age was 46 years (13) and mean ASDAS-CRP 3.7 (0.9) at baseline. There were no differences in efficacy between RA patients treated with the infliximab biosimilar and the originator, either at 3 months (∆DAS28-ESR: -0.6 (95% CI -1.3; 0.1) vs -1.2 (-2.0; -0.4)), or at 6 months (∆DAS28-ESR: -0.7 (-1.5; 0.0) vs -1.5 (-2.4; -0.7)). This was also true for patients with axSpA (∆ASDAS-CRP at 3 months: -1.6 (-2.0; -1.1) vs -1.4 (-1.8; -0.9) and at 6 months: -1.5 (-2.0; -1.1) vs -1.1 (-1.5; -0.7)). Results were similar with the longitudinal models over 24 months. CONCLUSION: There are no differences in effectiveness between the infliximab biosimilar CT-P13 and the infliximab originator in the treatment of biological-naïve patients with active RA and axSpA in clinical practice.

The Role of Lung Ultrasound in Systemic Sclerosis: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: In systemic sclerosis (SSc), high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of the chest is the standard criterion for the diagnosis of interstitial lung disease (ILD). However, recent evidence suggests that lung ultrasound (LUS) can also detect ILD, without radiation exposure. Thus, our goal was to perform a systematic review, aiming to clarify the role of LUS in the detection of ILD in SSc. METHODS: A systematic review was carried out in PubMed and EMBASE (PROSPERO register number CRD42022293132), to identify studies that compared LUS with HRCT in the detection of ILD in patients with SSc. Risk of bias was assessed with the QUADAS-2 () tool. RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-five publications were identified. After screening, 13 were included in the final analysis. No study presented high risk of bias. Lung ultrasound protocol was highly heterogeneous between authors, specifically concerning transducer, intercostal spaces evaluated, exclusion criteria, and definition of positive LUS. Most authors evaluated the presence of B-lines as a surrogate of ILD, with only 4 focusing on pleural changes. A positive correlation between LUS findings and ILD detected by HRCT was reported. Results also revealed high sensitivity (74.3%-100%) but variable specificity (16%-99%). Positive predictive value varied between 16% and 95.1%, and negative predictive value between 51.7% and 100%. CONCLUSION: Lung ultrasound is sensitive in the detection of ILD, but specificity must be optimized. The value of pleural evaluation also requires further investigation. Moreover, a consensus is needed to define a uniform LUS protocol to implement in future investigations.

Osteolysis in Systemic Sclerosis: A Scoping Review.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a scoping review focusing on osteolysis in systemic sclerosis (SSc). METHODS: This review was performed in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) recommendations. RESULTS: From a total of 351 results, 29 articles were included for the final analysis. The publications included proved to be heterogeneous regarding the population and inclusion criteria. The lack of a standardized method of detection of osteolysis further enhanced these inequalities. Most studies reported location/prevalence of osteolysis and associations with other manifestations, with only a minority focusing on topics like predictors of osteolysis and its prognostic value. None of the authors addressed treatment approach. The most frequently analyzed and prevalent location was acro-osteolysis (AO). Diffuse cutaneous subtype and anti-topoisomerase I antibody correlated positively with AO. Disease duration, calcinosis, and digital ischemia were the features more frequently associated with AO, but only the last 2 predicted AO. Ultrasound showed high sensitivity for detection of AO. CONCLUSION: Despite the effect that osteolysis has on patients with SSc, there is a significant lack of studies on this area. Notably, there are no studies that we know of focused on treatment. Also, there is a lack of longitudinal studies that would allow a reliable assessment of its prognostic value and predictors.

Can numerical rating scales of disease impact be used as targets for patient-centred management in rheumatoid arthritis?

OBJECTIVES: Patient centred care is an increasingly important paradigm. Applying a treat-to-target strategy to the impact of the disease in patients' lives seems a very promising tool to serve this purpose. We aimed to evaluate if maximum acceptable impact scores (target-values) defined at the population level provide an appropriate representation for most individual patients. To determine if the individually established target values of impact are consistent enough to be used in a treat-to-target strategy. METHODS: Consecutive patients with rheumatoid arthritis were asked to indicate, in two consecutive visits, the maximum severity of impact they considered acceptable to live with for the rest of their lives, in the seven domains of Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease score. The individual adequacy of population-based reference values was assessed by measures of dispersion. Stability of individual target-values were evaluated through intraclass correlation coefficient. Socio-demographic, clinical and psychological features were tested as co-factors of stability. RESULTS: 299 patients were included. The dispersion of targets was wide (CV>0.68), thus limiting the use of any population-based single values as targets for the individual patients. Although the mean target values were very similar in both visits for all domains, reliability was poor in all cases (ICCs: 0.37-0.47). Only 25-30% of the patients selected the same target value in the 2 visits. No explanatory factors for (non-)stability were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Quantified impact targets defined at population level are not appropriate for individual patient care. Research on alternative tools to support patient-centred, target-oriented management strategies is warranted.

Direct tissue-sensing reprograms TLR4+ Tfh-like cells inflammatory profile in the joints of rheumatoid arthritis patients.

CD4+ T cells mediate rheumatoid arthritis (RA) pathogenesis through both antibody-dependent and independent mechanisms. It remains unclear how synovial microenvironment impinges on CD4+ T cells pathogenic functions. Here, we identified a TLR4+ follicular helper T (Tfh) cell-like population present in the blood and expanded in synovial fluid. TLR4+ T cells possess a two-pronged pathogenic activity whereby direct TLR4+ engagement by endogenous ligands in the arthritic joint reprograms them from an IL-21 response, known to sponsor antibody production towards an IL-17 inflammatory program recognized to fuel tissue damage. Ex vivo, synovial fluid TLR4+ T cells produced IL-17, but not IL-21. Blocking TLR4 signaling with a specific inhibitor impaired IL-17 production in response to synovial fluid recognition. Mechanistically, we unveiled that T-cell HLA-DR regulates their TLR4 expression. TLR4+ T cells appear to uniquely reconcile an ability to promote systemic antibody production with a local synovial driven tissue damage program.

Eligibility criteria for biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in axial spondyloarthritis: going beyond BASDAI.

OBJECTIVES: To compare definitions of high disease activity of the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) in selecting patients for treatment with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs). METHODS: Patients from Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Register (Reuma.pt) with a clinical diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) were included. Four subgroups (cross-tabulation between ASDAS (≥2.1) and BASDAI (≥4) definitions of high disease activity) were compared regarding baseline characteristics and response to bDMARDs at 3 and 6 months estimated in multivariable regression models. RESULTS: Of the 594 patients included, the majority (82%) had both BASDAI≥4 and ASDAS ≥2.1. The frequency of ASDAS ≥2.1, if BASDAI<4 was much larger than the opposite (ie, ASDAS <2.1, if BASDAI≥4): 62% vs 0.8%. Compared to patients fulfilling both definitions, those with ASDAS ≥2.1 only were more likely to be male (77% vs 51%), human leucocyte antigen B27 positive (79% vs 65%) and have a higher C reactive protein (2.9 (SD 3.5) vs 2.1 (2.9)). Among bDMARD-treated patients (n=359), responses across subgroups were globally overlapping, except for the most 'stringent' outcomes. Patients captured only by ASDAS responded better compared to patients fulfilling both definitions (eg, ASDAS inactive disease at 3 months: 61% vs 25% and at 6 months: 42% vs 25%). CONCLUSION: The ASDAS definition of high disease activity is more inclusive than the BASDAI definition in selecting patients with axSpA for bDMARD treatment. The additionally 'captured' patients respond better and have higher likelihood of predictors thereof. These results support using ASDAS≥2.1 as a criterion for treatment decisions.

Biologic therapy use and pregnancy outcomes in women with immune-mediated inflammatory rheumatic diseases.

INTRODUCTION: Concerns about the side effects and interactions of biologic drugs with reproduction and pregnancy have been always an issue between experts. The safety of these therapies during conception and/or pregnancy is not fully understood. The aim of this study was to assess the exposure to biologic drugs before and/or during conception/pregnancy and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with rheumatic diseases. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study of pregnancies reported in women with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases registered at the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Registry (Reuma.pt) and exposed to biologic drugs. Data concerning fetal and maternal outcomes (live birth, spontaneous abortion, neonatal and intrauterine death, intrauterine growth restriction, premature delivery, congenital malformations, neonatal lupus, voluntary or medical interruption of pregnancy, disease flares and need for treatment with other drugs) was extracted. RESULTS: In total, 69 pregnancies from 56 females were analysed, the majority with the diagnosis of spondyloarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis. In almost half of the cases (n=32, 46.4%) the biologic was stopped for pregnancy planning, in 31 cases (44.9%) it was stopped when pregnancy was diagnosed and in 6 pregnancies (8.7%) biologic therapy was maintained, at least until the 2nd trimester. There were 76.8% of live births and 22% of spontaneous abortions. Congenital anomalies were reported in 2 newborns. CONCLUSIONS: In half cases, it was decided to stop biologic therapy in the family planning period. Using biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs before and/or during pregnancy doesn't seem to affect the overall maternal and fetal outcomes. Pregnancy planning and treatment options should be discussed and a shared decision should be established between physician and patient.

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Osteoarthritis Quality of Life (OAQoL) questionnaire for use in Portugal.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most prevalent rheumatic disease and is a leading cause of decreased quality of life (QoL). The OA Quality of Life questionnaire (OAQoL) is an OA-specific patient-reported outcome measures. The aim of this study was to translate and validate the original UK English version of the Osteoarthritis Quality of Life (OAQoL) questionnaire into European Portuguese. The translation of the questionnaire was carried out according to a dual panel methodology (bilingual panel followed by lay panel). This was followed by cognitive debriefing interviews (CDIs) with OA patients to assess comprehension and relevance of the translated questionnaire. Finally, a validation survey was conducted to assess its psychometric properties. The Portuguese OAQoL, a comparator scale (the Nottingham Health Profile-NHP) as well as questions relating to demographic and disease information were administered to OA patients. A sub-sample of patients also completed the Portuguese OAQoL two weeks later, to assess test-retest reliability. The internal consistency, construct validity and known group validity (according to perceived OA severity) of the scale was also assessed. Both the bilingual and lay panels consisted of five individuals and no major difficulties relating to the translation process were identified. A total of ten patients with OA participated in the CDIs. The mean time to complete the questionnaire was 5 min. These interviews revealed that the Portuguese version of the OAQoL was clear, relevant and easy to complete. Finally, 53 OA patients (44 females; mean age of 67.6 years) completed the validation survey. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.87, demonstrating high internal consistency. Test-retest reliability, assessed by Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, was 0.86. Moderate correlations were found with the majority of the NHP sections, providing evidence of construct validity. Significant differences in OAQoL scores were found between patients who differed according to their perceived OA severity, providing evidence of known group validity. The Portuguese version of the OAQoL is a valid and reliable questionnaire that can be used to assess QoL in OA, both in clinical practice and for research purposes.

[Ozone Therapy in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review]. / Ozonoterapia na Osteoartrose do Joelho: Revisão Sistemática.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review in order to examine the effectiveness of ozone therapy on knee osteoarthritis. The objectives were to evaluate the effect over time of ozone therapy in terms of knee pain, functional improvement and radiographic progression. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A search was carried out on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Web of Science databases to identify randomized and controlled studies focusing on this association. The following descriptors were used in English: ozone therapy, knee osteoarthritis. A descriptive summary and quality assessment was made of all studies included for analysis. RESULTS: Six randomized and controlled studies were identified. The risk of bias assessment demonstrated that one study was considered as having a moderate risk of bias and the remainder a high risk of bias. No quantitative analysis of the data was performed, as the studies included were not sufficiently homogeneous. The participants in the studies were generally elderly patients with mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis. DISCUSSION: The variability of ozone therapy and the comparators demonstrates that there is no standardized therapy. Few studies reported adverse effects, and where they occurred, they were mild and associated with the procedure. CONCLUSION: Ozone therapy proved effective in the short-term in relation to placebo and when combined with hyaluronic acid, but it was not superior to other current treatments. More randomised and controlled studies are needed to evaluate the risks/benefits of ozone therapy, both in the short term and the medium/long term.

Introdução: O presente estudo teve por objetivo realizar uma revisão sistemática de forma a analisar a eficácia da ozonoterapia na osteoartrose do joelho. Os objetivos visaram avaliar o efeito temporal da ozonoterapia na dor no joelho, na melhoria funcional e na progressão radiográfica.Material e Métodos: Realizou-se uma pesquisa nas bases de dados PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus e Web of Science a fim de identificar estudos aleatorizados e controlados que tratassem dessa associação. Utilizaram-se os seguintes descritores em língua inglesa: 'ozone therapy', 'knee osteoarthritis'. Realizou-se um resumo descritivo e avaliação de qualidade de todos os estudos incluídos para análise.Resultados: Identificaram-se seis estudos aleatorizados e controlados relacionados com o objetivo deste trabalho. A avaliação do risco de viés mostrou que um estudo foi considerado como risco moderado de viés e os restantes como risco alto de viés. Não se realizou a análise quantitativa dos dados pois os estudos incluídos não foram suficientemente homogéneos. Os participantes dos estudos eram em geral doentes idosos com osteoartrose do joelho leve a moderada.Discussão: A variabilidade nas intervenções de ozonoterapia e comparadores, demonstra que não existe uma terapêutica estandardizada. Foram poucos os estudos que relataram os efeitos adversos, e quando aconteceu, estes eram ligeiros e associados ao procedimento.Conclusão: A ozonoterapia mostrou eficácia a curto prazo, em relação ao placebo e quando combinada com ácido hialurónico, sem ser promissora em relação aos restantes tratamentos vigentes. É importante que novos estudos aleatorizados e controlados avaliem os benefícios/riscos da ozonoterapia tanto a curto como a médio/longo prazo.