Strategies for prevention and treatment of SARS-COV-2 infection in patients with chronic kidney disease: Literature review.

COVID-19 has proven to be particularly aggressive in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The lower immune response rate and the greater susceptibility to progress to severe forms of the disease have contributed to this phenomenon, which has persisted in the post-vaccination era of the pandemic. Paradoxically, CKD has been excluded from most clinical trials of the main therapeutic tools developed against SARS-CoV-2. However, experience in the use of these drugs has been accumulating in different stages of CKD, supporting their use with guarantees of efficacy and safety. The objective of this review is to gather all treatment indications for COVID-19 in the different phases of the disease, tailored to CKD in its various stages, including renal replacement therapy.

The Uricosuric Effect of SGLT2 Inhibitors Is Maintained in the Long Term in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

(1) Background: Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) increase uric acid excretion. The intensity of uricosuria is linked to glycosuria. (2) Methods: We aim to analyze the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on urinary fractional excretion (FE) of uric acid and glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) in a single-center retrospective study with patients with T2DM and CKD who started on treatment with SGLT2is. Patients on renal replacement therapy or with glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP1) analogs were excluded. Subgroup analysis was performed according to the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), the SGLT2i molecule, the main comorbidities, and concomitant treatment. As a secondary objective, the study analyzed the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on uricemia levels. (3) Results: Seventy-three patients were analyzed, with a mean follow-up of 1.2 years. Uric acid and glucose FE significantly increased after the initiation of SGLT2is. This increase remained stable during the follow-up without differences among eGFR groups. No significant reduction in uricemia was observed. However, a trend towards a decrease was observed. (4) Conclusion: The use of SGLT2is in patients with CKD and T2DM is associated with an increase in uric acid FE, which maintains stability irrespective of glomerular filtration loss at least during 24 months of follow-up.

Impact of different COVID-19 waves on kidney replacement therapy epidemiology and mortality: REMER 2020.

BACKGROUND: Kidney replacement therapy (KRT) confers the highest risk of death from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, most data refer to the early pandemic waves. Whole-year analysis compared with prior secular trends are scarce. METHODS: We present the 2020 REMER Madrid KRT registry, corresponding to the Spanish Region hardest hit by COVID-19. RESULTS: In 2020, KRT incidence decreased 12% versus 2019, while KRT prevalence decreased by 1.75% for the first time since records began and the number of kidney transplants (KTs) decreased by 16%. Mortality on KRT was 10.2% (34% higher than the mean for 2008-2019). The 2019-2020 increase in mortality was larger for KTs (+68%) than for haemodialysis (+24%) or peritoneal dialysis (+38%). The most common cause of death was infection [n = 419 (48% of deaths)], followed by cardiovascular [n = 200 (23%)]. Deaths from infection increased by 167% year over year and accounted for 95% of excess deaths in 2020 over 2019. COVID-19 was the most common cause of death (68% of infection deaths, 33% of total deaths). The bulk of COVID-19 deaths [209/285 (73%)] occurred during the first COVID-19 wave, which roughly accounted for the increased mortality in 2020. Being a KT recipient was an independent risk factor for COVID-19 death. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 negatively impacted the incidence and prevalence of KRT, but the increase in KRT deaths was localized to the first wave of the pandemic. The increased annual mortality argues against COVID-19 accelerating the death of patients with short life expectancy and the temporal pattern of COVID-19 mortality suggests that appropriate healthcare may improve outcomes.

Statins and antiplatelet agents are associated with changes in the circulatory markers of endothelial dysfunction in chronic kidney disease. / El uso de estatinas y antiagregantes se asocia con cambios en los marcadores de disfunción endotelial en la enfermedad renal crónica.

BACKGROUNDS AND PURPOSES: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease. In CKD patients the mechanisms involved in, endothelial damage and the role of different drugs used on these patients are not completely understood. The aim of this work is to analyze the effect of statins and platelet antiaggregant (PA) on endothelial microvesicles (EMVs) and other markers of endothelial dysfunction. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Cross-sectional study of 41 patients with CKD 3b-4 and 8 healthy volunteers. Circulating levels of EMVs, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and advance oxidized protein products (AOPPS) were quantified and the correlation with different comorbidity variables and therapeutic strategies were evaluated. RESULTS: EMVs are increased in CKD patients as compared with controls (171.1 vs. 68.3/µl, P<.001). It was observed a negative correlation between age and EMVs. Statins and PA were associated with a reduction in EMVs and VEGF levels, independently of the serum total cholesterol levels (TC). The levels of AOPPS and VEGF were not different in CKD vs. controls. CONCLUSION: CKD is associated with a change in EMVs, VEGF and AOPP levels. The treatment with statins and PA normalizes these values to almost the observed in controls and this effect is independently of the prevailing TC level. These findings explain the existence of the pleiotropic effects of statins and PA which deserve further studies.

Recommendations for vaccination against pneumococcus in kidney patients in Spain.

UNLABELLED: Invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) is a serious problem in some risk groups: patients with stage 4 and 5 chronic kidney disease, stage 3 CKD undergoing immunosuppressive treatment, nephrotic syndrome or diabetes. These individuals are more susceptible to infections and more prone to suffering more severe and worsening symptoms. Vaccination is one of the strategies for preventing IPD, although vaccination coverage in this group at present is lower than desired. Currently, there are two vaccinations for adults. The polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23), used for decades in patients over the age of 2, includes most serotypes (23), but it does not generate immune memory, causing the immune tolerance phenomenon and it does not act on nasopharyngeal colonisation. The conjugate vaccine (VNC13) can be used from infancy until adulthood (advice in patients over 18 years old received approval from the European Medicines Agency in July 2013) and generates a more powerful immune response than PPSV23 against the majority of the 13 serotypes that it includes. The 16 scientific societies most directly associated with the groups at risk of IPD have discussed and drafted a series of vaccination recommendations based on scientific evidence related to pneumococcal vaccination in adults with underlying conditions and pathologies, which are the subject of the document “ CONSENSUS: Pneumococcal vaccination in adults with underlying pathology”. This text sets out the vaccination recommendations for the chronic kidney disease population.

Non-heart beating donors.

BACKGROUND: Several groups have demonstrated that non-heart beating donation is a viable source of organs for transplantation. However, the theoretically worse graft function and survival of the kidneys obtained from non-heart beating donors (NHBDs) is still a matter of debate that has led to consider them as marginal donors for kidney transplantation. METHODS: In this report, we compare the outcome and course of 83 kidney transplants from NHBDs with those corresponding to 3177 adult cadaveric heart beating donor (HBD) transplants performed over the same period in our country. Graft and patient survival were estimated by means of Kaplan-Meier analysis. In addition, groups were compared using Cox proportional regression. RESULTS: The delayed graft function (DGF) rate was higher on NHBD transplants than in HBD kidneys (58.8 vs 28.9%, P<0.0001). However, in 1998, where the highest number of NHBD transplants was performed, graft function estimated by serum creatinine levels at 3 months and 1 year, was significantly better in the NHBD transplant group (1.42+/-0.45 vs 1.66+/-0.66 and 1.45+/-0.59 vs 1.62+/-0.64, respectively, P = 0.01 and 0.07). Graft survival at 2 years was 97%, 95% at 4 years and 84% at 6 years for NHBDs and 97, 90 and 84%, respectively, for HBDs. Interestingly, DGF was a risk factor for worse graft survival in HBDs but not on NHBDs. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that, in our study, both graft function and graft survival of NHBD kidney transplants are at least similar to those from HBD transplants. Therefore, NHBDs should be considered as a viable source of non-marginal kidneys for transplant.