Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
1.
Pract Radiat Oncol ; 13(6): e475-e483, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37482182

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to develop and assess the effectiveness of an affordable smartphone-based virtual reality (VR) patient education platform with 360-degree videos produced depicting a first-person patient perspective during the radiation therapy (RT) care path to reduce patient anxiety. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Three disease site-specific (breast, pelvis, head and neck) VR videos were filmed using a 360-degree camera to portray the first-person perspective of a patient's standard RT appointments, including a computed tomography simulation and the first RT treatment session. Instruction is given for possible clinical implementation. Patient participation was divided into 2 groups: (1) Group A (n = 28) included patients participating before simulation and later after the first treatment, and (2) Group B (n = 33) included patients participating only while undergoing treatment. Patients viewed their disease site-specific video using an inexpensive cardboard VR viewer and their smartphone, emulating an expensive VR-headset. Surveys were administered assessing patient anxiety, comfort, satisfaction, and knowledge of RT on a 5-point Likert-type scale. RESULTS: Patients in Group A and Group B while undergoing treatment both indicated that their anxiety "decreased a little" in the survey, after watching the VR video (Group A, median on a 5-point Likert-type scale, 4 [IQR, 4-5]; Group B, 4 [IQR, 4-4]). The VR aspect of the videos was especially liked by patients while undergoing treatment, with 96.4% in Group A and 90.9% in Group B reporting that the VR aspect of the videos was helpful. All Group A participants believed that the VR videos would be beneficial to new patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our affordable VR patient education platform effectively immerses a patient in their care path from simulation through initial treatment delivery, reducing anxiety and increasing familiarity with the treatment process.


Asunto(s)
Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Realidad Virtual , Humanos , Mama
4.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 22(7): 128-136, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34042253

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Electron radiation therapy dose distributions are affected by irregular body surface contours. This study investigates the feasibility of three-dimensional (3D) cameras to substitute for the treatment planning computerized tomography (CT) scan by capturing the body surfaces to be treated for accurate electron beam dosimetry. METHODS: Dosimetry was compared for six electron beam treatments to the nose, toe, eye, and scalp using full CT scan, CT scan with Hounsfield Unit (HU) overridden to water (mimic 3D camera cases), and flat-phantom techniques. Radiation dose was prescribed to a depth on the central axis per physician's order, and the monitor units (MUs) were calculated. The 3D camera spatial accuracy was evaluated by comparing the 3D surface of a head phantom captured by a 3D camera and that generated with the CT scan in the treatment planning system. A clinical case is presented, and MUs were calculated using the 3D camera body contour with HU overridden to water. RESULTS: Across six cases the average change in MUs between the full CT and the 3Dwater (CT scan with HU overridden to water) calculations was 1.3% with a standard deviation of 1.0%. The corresponding hotspots had a mean difference of 0.4% and a standard deviation of 1.9%. The 3D camera captured surface of a head phantom was found to have a 0.59 mm standard deviation from the surface derived from the CT scan. In-vivo dose measurements (213 ± 8 cGy) agreed with the 3D-camera planned dose of 209 ± 6 cGy, compared to 192 ± 6 cGy for the flat-phantom calculation (same MUs). CONCLUSIONS: Electron beam dosimetry is affected by irregular body surfaces. 3D cameras can capture irregular body contours which allow accurate dosimetry of electron beam treatment as an alternative to costly CT scans with no extra exposure to radiation. Tools and workflow for clinical implementation are provided.


Asunto(s)
Electrones , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Humanos , Fantasmas de Imagen , Radiometría , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador
5.
Clin Breast Cancer ; 21(4): 373-382, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33766533

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the impact of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) or supraclavicular radiation therapy (SCV RT) in women with cT1-3N1 breast cancer (BC) who became node negative (ypN0) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 485 women treated with NAC for BC between 2005 and 2019. Radiation treatment fields were reviewed in detail. Pathologic complete response (pCR) was defined as ypT0/Tis ypN0. Patients who had residual nodal disease were defined as ypN+. Those who achieved complete response in the lymph nodes but not in the breast were defined as ypT+ypN0. RESULTS: After excluding patients with cT4 and cN0 disease at diagnosis, a total of 185 patients with cT1-3N1 BC were included. Patients were more likely to receive PMRT if they had ypN+ disease (P < .001) and/or lymphovascular invasion (P = .03). Patients who underwent lumpectomy were more likely to receive SCV RT if they did not achieve pCR (P = .04) and/or if they had ypN+ disease (P = .01). The 5-year rates of locoregional recurrence (LRR) were 15% for all patients, 14% for patients who attained ypT+ypN0, and 5% for patients who achieved pCR. Of ypT+ypN0 patients (n = 98), 53 received PMRT or SCV RT and 45 did not. For these patients, there were no differences in LRR based on whether a patient did or did not receive PMRT or SCV RT (P = .23). CONCLUSION: Recommendations for or against PMRT or SCV RT after NAC vary based on final pathologic response. We await the results of ongoing randomized clinical trials to help guide clinical decision making in this context.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Mastectomía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Oncol Nurs Forum ; 47(6): 654-670, 2020 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33063779

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Radiodermatitis is a side effect of radiation therapy. Evidence-based interventions to minimize severity or delay progression are important for clinical care. This guideline intends to support individuals with cancer, clinicians, and others in decisions regarding radiodermatitis treatment. METHODOLOGIC APPROACH: A panel of healthcare professionals with patient representation was convened to develop a national clinical practice guideline for the management of radiodermatitis. GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology and the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine criteria for trustworthy guidelines were followed. The Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias tool was used, and certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. A quantitative and narrative synthesis of the evidence was completed. FINDINGS: The panel agreed on eight recommendations and made a conditional recommendation for deodorant/antiperspirant. Aloe vera and oral curcumin had knowledge gaps and were recommended only in the context of a clinical trial. The panel suggested against emu oil, calendula, and nonsteroidal interventions. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: This guideline summarizes evidence-based interventions for the management of radiodermatitis to guide clinical care. SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL CAN BE FOUND AT&NBSP;HTTPS: //bit.ly/2GEwJtT.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Radiodermatitis , Humanos , Radiodermatitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Radiodermatitis/etiología
7.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 29(4): 550-560, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31687866

RESUMEN

Background: Gender-related differences have been found among invited speakers in select professional and medical societies. We examined whether similar disparities existed among keynote speakers, plenary speakers, and invited lecturers in a broad range of medical specialty conferences from 2013 to 2017. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed on 27 U.S. medical specialty conferences for which data were available on plenary speakers, keynote speakers, and/or invited lecturers. For each speaker, gender and degree(s) were determined. Fisher's exact test was performed to compare proportions of women among speakers to Association of American Medical Colleges' (AAMC) physician workforce data on gender distribution. Results: In aggregate, we identified 246 women among 984 speakers, significantly lower than expected when compared with 2015 AAMC data (25.0% vs. 34.0%; p < 0.00001). Compared with AAMC data reported in 2013, 2015, and 2017, women were significantly underrepresented in 2013 (p = 0.0064) and 2015 (p = 0.00004). In 2017, the proportion of women among invited speakers trended lower than AAMC active women physicians but did not reach significance (p = 0.309). Analysis of individual conference data stratified by year indicated that, while the representation of women among all speakers improved between 2015 and 2017, the representation of women among keynote speakers, plenary speakers, and invited lectureships was variable (including zero levels some years during the study period) and remained lower than expected as compared with workforce data for specific medical specialties. Conclusions: Evaluating for and improving disparities is recommended to ensure gender equity among invited speakers across all medical specialty conferences.


Asunto(s)
Congresos como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos Mujeres/estadística & datos numéricos , Sociedades Médicas/organización & administración , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Factores Sexuales , Estados Unidos , Recursos Humanos/estadística & datos numéricos
9.
J Neurosurg Pediatr ; 9(4): 421-7, 2012 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22462709

RESUMEN

OBJECT: Cerebrospinal fluid shunting has previously been associated with hearing loss. Although the mechanism for this is unclear, it is thought that changes in CSF pressure can affect cochlear physiology via endolymph expansion in the setting of a patent cochlear aqueduct. Patients undergoing radiation and cisplatin chemotherapy are at risk for hearing loss. The authors hypothesized that the incidence and severity of hearing loss in patients undergoing radiation and chemotherapy for medulloblastoma would be greater in those with shunts than in those without shunts. METHODS: Baseline and longitudinal audiology data were collected in 33 patients with medulloblastoma who were receiving radiation and cisplatin chemotherapy. Additional data included age, sex, details of shunt placement and revision, and details of chemotherapy and radiation. Hearing sensitivity and peripheral auditory function measures included pure tone audiometry, immittance audiometry, and distortion product evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ototoxicity was determined according to the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association criteria. Severity of hearing loss was determined using the Brock hearing loss grades. Incidence of hearing loss and association with shunting was determined. RESULTS: Thirteen (39.4%) of the 33 patients evaluated had undergone shunt placement. Hearing loss occurred in 14 (70%) of 20 patients without shunts and in 13 (100%) of 13 patients with shunts. The difference between the rates of hearing loss in patients with shunts versus those without the devices was highly significant (p = 0.0008). The odds ratio for hearing loss in patients with a CSF shunt compared with those without a shunt was 23.49 (95% CI 4.21-131.15). Age, side of shunt, evidence of dissemination, diameter of cochlear aqueduct, and treatment protocol did not have a significant effect on shunt-related ototoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests an independent association between CSF shunting and hearing loss in children undergoing treatment for medulloblastoma, laying the foundation for a prospective study evaluating hearing loss in children with shunts who are not treated with ototoxic therapy.


Asunto(s)
Derivaciones del Líquido Cefalorraquídeo/efectos adversos , Pérdida Auditiva/etiología , Audición , Meduloblastoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Meduloblastoma/radioterapia , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Umbral Auditivo , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante , Niño , Preescolar , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Cisplatino/efectos adversos , Potenciales Evocados Auditivos , Femenino , Audición/efectos de los fármacos , Audición/efectos de la radiación , Pérdida Auditiva/diagnóstico , Pérdida Auditiva/fisiopatología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Oportunidad Relativa , Emisiones Otoacústicas Espontáneas , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
10.
Arch Surg ; 145(9): 873-8, 2010 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20855758

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To identify factors independently associated with surgical complications in oncologic and reconstructive surgery and to examine sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy data, along with variables that are typically known prior to definitive resection, for their ability to impact the prediction of need for postmastectomy irradiation (PMRT). DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Mastectomy patients with stage I to III breast cancer treated in 2000 to 2008. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Complication rates of oncologic and reconstructive surgery requiring reoperation and clinicopathologic variables that independently predict complications and/or PMRT administration by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Among 100 of 302 mastectomy patients who underwent PMRT, complications occurred in 44% who underwent immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) and 7% who did not (P < .001). Postmastectomy irradiation independently predicted the occurrence of a complication (odds ratio, 3.3; P < .001). Implants were removed in 31% of patients who underwent PMRT and 6% of patients who did not (P = .005). Three percent of patients with T2 or smaller tumors and zero positive SLN required PMRT. Among those with T2 tumors, 49% with a positive axilla lymph node underwent PMRT. Independent predictors of PMRT need were T2 vs T1 tumors, positive axillary lymph node status, and the number of positive SLNs, with odds ratios of 5.8 (P < .001), 14.5 (P < .001), and 2.1 (P = .001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Postmastectomy irradiation was associated with a high rate of surgical complications and implant loss among patients who underwent IBR. Determining the number of positive SLNs prior to definitive resection and reconstructive operations may reduce complications and implant loss by guiding surgical decision making. Patients with a negative SLN are unlikely to require PMRT. Those with positive SLN(s) are high-risk IBR candidates with a quantifiable PMRT risk.


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Adulto , Toma de Decisiones , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Metástasis Linfática , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Periodo Posoperatorio , Radioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela , Fumar/epidemiología , Pared Torácica/patología , Factores de Tiempo , Dispositivos de Expansión Tisular
11.
J Cancer Educ ; 17(3): 138-41, 2002.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12243218

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) is a commonly used scale to assess a patient's functional status. METHODS: Between September 1999 and March 2000, 117 patients were independently evaluated and assigned KPS scores by both an attending physician and a resident physician at the time of radiation therapy simulation. RESULTS: Both attending and resident median assigned KPS score was 80. Attending and resident KPS scores were identical for 50 patients (43%). When KPS scores differed, this difference was of the smallest incremental value (10 points) in 50 patients (75%). The Pearson correlation coefficient is 0.85, significant at the 0.01 level. CONCLUSION: KPS scoring by radiation oncology attending physicians is similar to that by resident physicians.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Internado y Residencia , Estado de Ejecución de Karnofsky , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales , Oncología por Radiación/educación , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Simulación de Paciente , Radioterapia/efectos adversos , Radioterapia/métodos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
12.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr ; 35(1): 51-8, 2002 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12142810

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study was performed to compare the effects of oral midazolam and oral diazepam, administered with intravenous (IV) meperidine, on pre-procedural, procedural, and post-procedural sedation and recovery in children undergoing diagnostic upper endoscopy. The costs of pre-procedure sedation were compared for the two benzodiazepines. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind study was conducted in 154 children (mean age 96.73 +/- 59.34 months, 53% male) undergoing endoscopy. Oral midazolam (0.5 mg/kg, maximum dose of 20 mg) or oral diazepam (0.3 mg/kg, maximum dose of 10 mg) was given before IV insertion, and with IV meperidine (2 mg/kg, maximum dose of 100 mg) given to all patients just before upper endoscopy. Further "rescue" midazolam doses (to a maximum cumulative dose of 5 mg) were given as needed to achieve a pre-procedure sedation score of > or =2. All patients received intravenous propofol for procedural sedation. Patients were evaluated for the efficacy and safety of pre-procedural sedation, sedation during upper endoscopy, and recovery following completion of the procedure. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between study groups for level of pre-procedural sedation, need for midazolam rescue in endoscopy, effectiveness of procedural sedation, occurrence of adverse events, and recovery parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Oral midazolam and diazepam, in conjunction with IV administration of meperidine, provide comparable, effective, and safe premedication for children undergoing upper endoscopy. The cost of midazolam was substantially higher than diazepam.


Asunto(s)
Adyuvantes Anestésicos/administración & dosificación , Diazepam/administración & dosificación , Endoscopía , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Meperidina/administración & dosificación , Midazolam/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Diazepam/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Costos de los Medicamentos , Endoscopía/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Meperidina/efectos adversos , Midazolam/efectos adversos , Pediatría , Medicación Preanestésica
13.
J Transcult Nurs ; 13(1): 6-11, 2002 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11776018

RESUMEN

Utilizing storytelling to transmit educational messages is a traditional pedagogical method practiced by many American Indian tribes. American Indian stories are effective because they present essential ideas and values in a simple, entertaining form. Different story characters show positive and negative behaviors. The stories illustrate consequences of behaviors and invite listeners to come to their own conclusions after personal reflection. Because stories have been passed down through tribal communities for generations, listeners also have the opportunity to reconnect and identify with past tribal realities. This article reports on a research intervention that is unique in promoting health and wellness through the use of storytelling. The project utilized stories to help motivate tribal members to once more adopt healthy, traditional life-styles and practices. The authors present and discuss the stories selected, techniques used in their telling, the preparation and setting for the storytelling, and the involvement and interaction of the group.


Asunto(s)
Actitud Frente a la Salud/etnología , Comunicación , Folclore , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud/etnología , Educación en Salud/métodos , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Indígenas Norteamericanos/psicología , Mitología/psicología , Curriculum , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Modelos Educacionales , Motivación , Evaluación de Necesidades , Investigación en Evaluación de Enfermería , Proyectos Piloto , Salud Rural
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...