Comparison of therapeutic agents' short-term effects on facial and scalp actinic keratosis: A network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Care for actinic keratosis (AK) can be improved with more knowledge on the relative of effect of indicated therapies. OBJECTIVES: Using network meta-analyses, we quantitatively determined the comparative "short-term" effects of interventions in adults with facial and scalp AK. METHODS: On February 28, 2023, evidence from the peer-reviewed literature was systematically obtained from OVID, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov. We analyzed data from studies published in English, of a trial design, and investigating the effect of an actinic keratosis monotherapy. Patient complete clearance, patient partial clearance or lesion-specific clearance across adults were analyzed at 8-12 weeks after therapy. Patient complete clearance pertained to proportion of participants who experienced complete clearance of actinic keratosis lesions; patient partial clearance corresponded to percentage of subjects who achieved at least 75% clearance of actinic keratosis lesions; lesion-specific clearance represented the percentage of all lesions that were cleared. In the main (i.e., base) analyses, nodes were analyzed only at the level of the agent. RESULTS: Data from a total of 84 studies were used-across which 22 active agents were identified. Estimates of interventions' surface under the cumulative ranking curve rankings and (pairwise) relative effects were estimated. Across the three outcomes, fluorouracil 5% was ranked the most effective. CONCLUSIONS: Our work is the first to provide information on covariate-adjusted relative effects of actinic keratosis therapies- including the more recently reported treatments-for the face and scalp; this knowledge may help physicians and patients make more informed decisions.

Brodalumab: 5-Year US Pharmacovigilance Report.

INTRODUCTION: Brodalumab is a human interleukin-17 receptor A antagonist indicated for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in adult patients who are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy and have failed to respond or have lost response to other systemic therapies. Although the US prescribing information for brodalumab includes a boxed warning regarding suicidal ideation and behavior, no causal association has been demonstrated. Here, we summarize 5 years of pharmacovigilance data, from August 15, 2017, through August 14, 2022, reported to Ortho Dermatologics by US patients and healthcare providers. METHODS: Prevalence of the most common adverse events (AEs) listed in the brodalumab package insert (incidence ≥ 1%) and AEs of special interest are described. Brodalumab exposure was estimated as the time from the first to last prescription-dispensing authorization dates. Data were collected from 4744 patients in the USA, with an estimated exposure of 5815 patient-years. RESULTS: Over 5 years, 11 cases of adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular events were reported (0.23 events/100 patients), a rate lower than that experienced by patients in the international Psoriasis Longitudinal Assessment and Registry. There were 106 serious infections. No serious fungal infections were reported. There were 40 confirmed and 2 suspected COVID-19 cases, with no new COVID-19-related deaths. Of 49 reported malignancies among 42 patients, 3 were deemed possibly related to brodalumab. No completed suicides and no new suicidal attempts were reported. CONCLUSION: Five-year pharmacovigilance data are consistent with the established safety profile reported in long-term clinical trials and previous pharmacovigilance reports, with no new safety signals.

Brodalumab is an injectable treatment approved for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in adults who lacked response to previous treatments. In the USA, brodalumab is only available under a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy for increased suicidality risks; however, findings from 5 years of real-world safety data have demonstrated a lack of association. In this report, we discuss safety findings reported by US patients and healthcare providers for 4744 patients treated with brodalumab over 5 years. Joint pain (known as arthralgia) was the most common safety finding, with 122 cases reported over 5 years. Other safety findings of interest across 5 years included 106 serious infections (defined as prolonged infections or infections requiring treatment), 54 cases of depression, 49 cases of cancer (in 42 patients), 40 confirmed cases of COVID-19, and 11 cases of major cardiovascular events (such as stroke or heart attack). No completed suicides occurred throughout 5 years, and no new suicidal attempts were reported in year 5. In indirect comparisons with safety data from patients with psoriasis receiving or eligible to receive similar treatments, brodalumab was not associated with an increased risk of serious infection, cancer, major cardiovascular events, or inflammatory bowel disease. Taken together, these data are consistent with safety findings from long-term clinical trials and previous safety reports of brodalumab.

Rosacea Core Domain Set for Clinical Trials and Practice: A Consensus Statement.

Importance: Inconsistent reporting of outcomes in clinical trials of rosacea is impeding and likely preventing accurate data pooling and meta-analyses. There is a need for standardization of outcomes assessed during intervention trials of rosacea. Objective: To develop a rosacea core outcome set (COS) based on key domains that are globally relevant and applicable to all demographic groups to be used as a minimum list of outcomes for reporting by rosacea clinical trials, and when appropriate, in clinical practice. Evidence Review: A systematic literature review of rosacea clinical trials was conducted. Discrete outcomes were extracted and augmented through discussions and focus groups with key stakeholders. The initial list of 192 outcomes was refined to identify 50 unique outcomes that were rated through the Delphi process Round 1 by 88 panelists (63 physicians from 17 countries and 25 patients with rosacea in the US) on 9-point Likert scale. Based on feedback, an additional 11 outcomes were added in Round 2. Outcomes deemed to be critical for inclusion (rated 7-9 by ≥70% of both groups) were discussed in consensus meetings. The outcomes deemed to be most important for inclusion by at least 85% of the participants were incorporated into the final core domain set. Findings: The Delphi process and consensus-building meetings identified a final core set of 8 domains for rosacea clinical trials: ocular signs and symptoms; skin signs of disease; skin symptoms; overall severity; patient satisfaction; quality of life; degree of improvement; and presence and severity of treatment-related adverse events. Recommendations were also made for application in the clinical setting. Conclusions and Relevance: This core domain set for rosacea research is now available; its adoption by researchers may improve the usefulness of future trials of rosacea therapies by enabling meta-analyses and other comparisons across studies. This core domain set may also be useful in clinical practice.

Vaccination recommendations for adults receiving biologics and oral therapies for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: Delphi consensus from the medical board of the National Psoriasis Foundation.

BACKGROUND: For psoriatic patients who need to receive nonlive or live vaccines, evidence-based recommendations are needed regarding whether to pause or continue systemic therapies for psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate literature regarding vaccine efficacy and safety and to generate consensus-based recommendations for adults receiving systemic therapies for psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis receiving nonlive or live vaccines. METHODS: Using a modified Delphi process, 22 consensus statements were developed by the National Psoriasis Foundation Medical Board and COVID-19 Task Force, and infectious disease experts. RESULTS: Key recommendations include continuing most oral and biologic therapies without modification for patients receiving nonlive vaccines; consider interruption of methotrexate for nonlive vaccines. For patients receiving live vaccines, discontinue most oral and biologic medications before and after administration of live vaccine. Specific recommendations include discontinuing most biologic therapies, except for abatacept, for 2-3 half-lives before live vaccine administration and deferring next dose 2-4 weeks after live vaccination. LIMITATIONS: Studies regarding infection rates after vaccination are lacking. CONCLUSION: Interruption of antipsoriatic oral and biologic therapies is generally not necessary for patients receiving nonlive vaccines. Temporary interruption of oral and biologic therapies before and after administration of live vaccines is recommended in most cases.