RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Learning is optimised when postgraduate trainees engage in clinical tasks in their zone of proximal development (ZPD). However, workplace learning environments impose additional non-learning goals and additional tasks that may lead to trainees engaging in tasks that do not fall within their ZPD. We do not fully understand how trainees select clinical tasks in the workplace learning environment. If we knew the goals and factors they consider when selecting a task, we could better equip trainees with strategies to select tasks that maximise learning. We explored how postgraduate trainees select clinical tasks using echocardiography interpretation as a model. METHODS: Canadian General Cardiology residents and Echocardiography fellows were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews. Aligning with a theory-informed study, two independent researchers used a deductive, directed content analysis approach to identify codes and themes. RESULTS: Eleven trainees from seven Canadian universities participated (PGY4 = 4, PGY5 = 3, PGY6 = 1 and echocardiography fellows = 3). Goals included learning content, fulfilling assessment criteria and contributing to clinical demands. Trainees switched between goals throughout the day, as it was too effortful for them to engage in tasks within their ZPD at all times. When trainees had sufficient mental effort available, they selected higher complexity tasks that could advance learning content. When available mental effort was low, trainees selected less complex tasks that fulfilled numerically based assessment goals or contributed to clinical demands. Trainees predominantly used perceived complexity of the echocardiogram as a factor to select tasks to achieve their desired goals. CONCLUSION: Postgraduate trainees select tasks within their ZPD that enable them to maximise learning when they perceive to have sufficient mental effort available and workplace affordances are adequate. These findings can inform individual and systemic strategies to maximise learning when selecting tasks.
Asunto(s)
Educación Médica , Aprendizaje , Humanos , Canadá , Evaluación Educacional , Lugar de Trabajo , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Competencia ClínicaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Inpatient addiction medicine services (AMS) were developed in response to the growing needs of hospitalized individuals with substance use disorders (SUDs). AMS aim to enable timely initiation of pharmacologic treatment, build hospital capacity to support patients who use substances, and facilitate transition to community services. As an emerging service being adopted in hospitals across North America, the model of care, populations served, substance use trends, and clinical trajectory has not been widely described. This work aims to characterize patients accessing care through the AMS, establishing predictors for clinical trajectories in hospital including patient-initiated discharge (PID) and hospital re-admission. METHODS: Using a retrospective cohort design, we describe all patients seen by the AMS between 2018 and 2022 across four hospitals in Hamilton, Ontario. Patients seen by AMS were hospitalized and qualified for a SUD based on DSM-V criteria. The study used descriptive statistics to describe the cohort, where appropriate adjusted time-to-event survival models were constructed to identify predictors for hospital re-admission. RESULTS: Patients seen by the AMS (n = 695) frequently lacked access to primary care (47.0 %) and less than half (44.3 %) were receiving community addiction services on admission. The majority met criteria for opioid use disorder (OUD), with injecting being the primary consumption route (54.8 %). Patients exhibited high acuity, with 34.2 % requiring critical care measures. Provision of OAT substantially increased to 77.9 % of patients (29 % on admission). PID occurred in 17.8 % of patients and was significantly associated with an admitting diagnosis of suicidal ideation, infection, heart failure, and distinct substance use profiles including methamphetamine, fentanyl, and heroin use (p < 0.05). PID conferred a 66 % increased risk for re-admission (Hazard-Ratio: 1.66; 95 % CI: 1.08, 2.54; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Patients served by AMS primarily include individuals with OUD presenting with the associated medical complications and substantial deficits in the social determinants of health (e.g., high housing insecurity, poverty, and disability). PID occurs among 1 in 5 people and is associated with higher rates of re-admission. By identifying individuals at higher risk of adverse outcomes, these results provide an opportunity to improve outcomes in this high-risk, high-vulnerability population.
Asunto(s)
Medicina de las Adicciones , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pacientes Internos , Pronóstico , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Ontario/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Many men presenting with testosterone deficiency do not have access to a primary care provider. We sought to integrate primary care into initial urological evaluation to better identify and manage undertreated comorbidities. METHODS: New patients presenting with testosterone deficiency were offered primary care provider evaluation within a men's health center between October 2019 and 2022. Data collected from the electronic health record included age, race, BMI, access to prior primary care provider, new diagnoses, prescriptions, and referrals. RESULTS: Eighty-one men were evaluated over the 3-year study period. Thirty-three men (41%) did not have a preexisting primary care provider. Older men were significantly more likely to have a preexisting primary care provider (OR 1.06 [95% CI: 1.02-1.10], P < .001). Hispanic men were significantly less likely to have an existing primary care provider (OR 0.16 [95% CI: 0.03-0.84], P = .01). Forty-eight men (59%) established continuity of care. Newly diagnosed comorbidities included hypertension (41%), obesity (37%), hyperlipidemia (27%), obstructive sleep apnea (25%), depression (23%), and diabetes (14%). Forty-one patients (51%) were prescribed a new medication. Twenty-one patients (26%) were referred to nutrition, with mean BMI decrease of 1.75 kg/m2. Twenty-six patients (32%) underwent sleep medicine evaluation for obstructive sleep apnea. Twenty-seven (33%) and 37 patients (46%) received a flu vaccination and immunization updates. Eleven patients (14%) were referred for screening colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of integrated primary care and urology evaluation for testosterone deficiency. This comprehensive model results in improved outcomes including increased access to subspecialty referrals, objective weight loss, treatment of new diagnoses, updated immunizations, and cancer screening.
Asunto(s)
Hipogonadismo , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Urología , Masculino , Humanos , Anciano , Testosterona/uso terapéutico , Hipogonadismo/diagnóstico , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/tratamiento farmacológico , Atención Primaria de SaludRESUMEN
Language discordance poses a barrier to effective physician-patient communication, and health care outcomes, such as patient satisfaction, can be associated with language barriers experienced by Spanish-speaking patients. This exploratory study assessed specific aspects of communication between 128 Spanish-speaking primary care patients and their physicians (primary English speakers without an interpreter present). The rating scale developed for this study was used by five raters, who listened to audiotapes of each of these medical visits. Patients and physicians completed measures of visit satisfaction. Results indicated physicians with better Spanish-language skills were less frustrated with medical visit communication and more connected to their patients; patients whose physicians were rated as having better Spanish-speaking ability reported having greater choice in their medical care. Patients whose physicians spoke more Spanish were more satisfied with the information given by their physicians. Physicians rated as having better Spanish-speaking ability were more likely to say they could not understand all the patients wanted to tell them. These data support the importance of language concordance in physician-patient communication and awareness of potential communication barriers between physicians and patients.
Asunto(s)
Satisfacción del Paciente , Médicos , Humanos , Lenguaje , Comunicación , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Barreras de Comunicación , Atención Primaria de SaludRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Competency-based medical education (CBME) led to the widespread adoption of workplace-based assessment (WBA) with the promise of achieving assessment for learning. Despite this, studies have illustrated tensions between the summative and formative role of WBA which undermine learning goals. Models of workplace-based learning (WBL) provide insight, however, these models excluded WBA. This scoping review synthesizes the primary literature addressing the role of WBA to guide learning in postgraduate medical education, with the goal of identifying gaps to address in future studies. METHODS: The search was applied to OVID Medline, Web of Science, ERIC and CINAHL databases, articles up to September 2020 were included. Titles and abstracts were screened by two reviewers, followed by a full text review. Two members independently extracted and analysed quantitative and qualitative data using a descriptive-analytic technique rooted in Billett's four premises of WBL. Themes were synthesized and discussed until consensus. RESULTS: All 33 papers focused on the perception of learning through WBA. The majority applied qualitative methodology (70%), and 12 studies (36%) made explicit reference to theory. Aligning with Billett's first premise, results reinforce that learning always occurs in the workplace. WBA helped guide learning goals and enhanced feedback frequency and specificity. Billett's remaining premises provided an important lens to understand how tensions that existed in WBL have been exacerbated with frequent WBA. As individuals engage in both work and WBA, they are slowly transforming the workplace. Culture and context frame individual experiences and the perceived authenticity of WBA. Finally, individuals will have different goals, and learn different things, from the same experience. CONCLUSION: Analysing WBA literature through the lens of WBL theory allows us to reframe previously described tensions. We propose that future studies attend to learning theory, and demonstrate alignment with philosophical position, to advance our understanding of assessment-for-learning in the workplace.
Asunto(s)
Aprendizaje , Lugar de Trabajo , Humanos , Evaluación Educacional/métodos , Retroalimentación , Educación de Postgrado en MedicinaRESUMEN
People with dementia have an increased risk of contracting severe forms of COVID-19. Although in worldwide vaccination programs priority has been given to older people, having taken the vaccine does not totally eliminate the risk of contracting COVID-19 when one is in close contact with unvaccinated people. Thus, family caregivers' choices to remain unvaccinated against COVID-19 could have potentially lethal consequences for their relatives. To our knowledge, this study represents the first attempt within the international literature to analyze COVID-19 vaccine uptake among family caregivers of people with dementia and to identify some of the psychological factors, related to COVID-19 and vaccination behavior, that could facilitate or hinder vaccine uptake. Contact information for family caregivers was obtained from five different centers and associations throughout the Italian territory. Data were collected from 179 respondents during July-September 2021 using a cross-sectional web-based survey design. More than 75% of the respondents indicated that had been vaccinated against COVID-19 and reported receiving vaccine information mainly from print or electronic newspapers (86%), followed by TV (81%) and families (64.2%). In multivariable logistic regression analyses, worries about unforeseen future effects was significantly related to COVID-19 vaccine uptake, indicating that family caregivers concerned about potential side effects of vaccines were less likely to have been vaccinated against COVID-19 (OR = 0.60, CI = 0.40-0.89). Openness to experience was also related to COVID-19 vaccine uptake, with family caregivers higher on this trait being less likely to have been vaccinated against COVID-19 (OR = 0.83, CI = 0.71-0.98). Implications for targeting of vaccine-related messages are discussed.
RESUMEN
The psychosocial impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on human life is well-known. Although vaccine protection represents an effective way to control the spread of the virus, vaccination hesitancy may decrease individuals' willingness to get vaccinated, including among cancer patients. Therefore, the objective of the current study was to examine the predictors of cancer patients' intentions to receive COVID-19 vaccinations and vaccine uptake, using and integrating the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) and the health belief model (HBM). A sample of 276 Italian cancer patients (54% female and 46% male) ranging from 19 to 85 years (M = 49.64, SD = 11.53) was recruited by administering an online questionnaire. The current study results showed that cancer patients with higher trust in health authorities tended to have vaccine-positive subjective norms, perceived that vaccination was under their control, and viewed COVID-19 vaccines positively. On the other hand, the perceived risk of COVID-19 was related to subjective norms but not to perceived behavioural control or attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination. The current study reveals that TPB variables can function effectively as mediators between perceived risk, trust, and intention to vaccinate but at different levels. Together, these findings suggest that effective interventions (both public health messaging and personal medical communications) should focus on enhancing trust in health authorities, while at the same time endeavouring to highlight subjective norms that are vaccine-positive.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasias , Vacunas , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Intención , Masculino , Vacunación/psicologíaRESUMEN
Despite the massive volume of scientific evidence on the benefits of immunisation, vaccine hesitancy is still a global health threat and represents an obstacle to controlling the spread of viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 and its associated COVID-19. Thus, the present study aimed to adapt and validate an Italian version of the Vaccination Attitudes Examination (VAX) scale. The Italian version of the scale (VAX-I), along with validation measures (general health perceptions, perceived sensitivity to medicines, intention to get the flu vaccine, and trust in health authorities) were administered to a sample of 534 Italian participants aged 18 to 87 (M = 32.41, SD = 15.35). The original version of the VAX scale was translated into Italian using a back-translation method. The parallel and confirmatory factor analyses showed that the scale's four-factor structure fits the data well, as in the original version. Reliability coefficients indicated that the VAX-I scale showed good internal consistency and measurement invariance results demonstrated that the VAX-I scale is stable across gender. Construct validity was supported by the significant negative correlation with general health perceptions, intentions to get the flu vaccine, and trust in health authorities, and the weak but significant and positive correlation with perceived sensitivity to medicines. Overall, the VAX-I scale appears to be a valid instrument to assess vaccine hesitancy in the Italian context. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12144-022-03209-5.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The incidence of opioid-related fatality has reached unparalleled levels across North America. Patients with comorbid hepatitis C virus (HCV) remain the most vulnerable and difficult to treat. Considering the unique challenges associated with this population, we aimed to re-examine the impact of HCV on response to medication assistant treatment for opioid use disorder and establish sex-specific risk factors affecting care. METHODS: This study employs a multi-center prospective cohort design, with 1-year follow-up. Patients aged ≥18, receiving methadone for opioid use disorder were recruited from a network of outpatient opioid addiction treatment centers across Southern Ontario, Canada. Patients with ≥50% positive opioid urine screens over 1 year of follow-up were classified as poor responders. The prognostic impact of HCV on response was established using a propensity score matched analysis. Sex-specific regression models were constructed to evaluate risk factors for treatment response. RESULTS: Among participants eligible for inclusion (n = 1234), HCV was prevalent in 25% (n = 307). HCV patients exhibited significantly higher rates of high-risk opioid consumption patterns 35.29% (standard deviation 0.478). Sex-specific examination revealed females with HCV incur a 2 times increased risk for high-risk opioid consumption behaviors (female odds ratio: 1.95, 95% confidence interval 1.23, 3.10; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study establish the link between HCV and poor treatment response, with differentially higher risk among female patients. In light of the high potential for overdose among this population, concerted efforts are required for distinguishing the source for sex-based disparities, in addition to establishing trauma and gender informed treatment protocols.
Asunto(s)
Hepatitis C , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Hepacivirus , Hepatitis C/complicaciones , Hepatitis C/tratamiento farmacológico , Hepatitis C/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Ontario/epidemiología , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos/métodos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/complicaciones , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 is an international public health crisis with more than 132 million infections worldwide. Beyond acute infection, emerging data indicate patients diagnosed with COVID-19 may experience persistent sequelae similar to survivors of sepsis or acute respiratory syndromes, including mobility limitations and fatigue. However, there is limited evidence on the trajectory of functional recovery in those hospitalised with COVID-19. The primary aim of the Coronavirus Registry Functional Recovery (COREG-FR) study is to understand the trajectory of functional recovery among individuals hospitalised for COVID-19 over the medium (up to 6 months) and longer term (6-12 months) that will guide clinical care and optimal management of serious COVID-19 illness and recovery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: COREG-FR is a multicentre longitudinal cohort study. We will enrol a minimum of 211 adults age 18 years and older with COVID-19 from five hospitals. Participants will be followed from admission to hospital as an inpatient, to hospital discharge, and at 3-month, 6-month, 9-month and up to 12-month post-hospital discharge. We will conduct telephone interviews at ward admission and discharge, and telephone interviews plus in-person assessments of physical function and lung function at all remaining follow-ups. Our primary outcome is the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care mobility scale measured at all time points. We will conduct linear mixed effects regression analyses to explore determinants of functional outcomes after COVID-19 illness. Subgroup analyses based on age (≤65 vs >65 years), frailty status (Clinical Frailty Scale score ≤4 vs >5) and variants of concern will be conducted. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: COREG-FR has been approved by Research Ethics Boards at participating sites. We will disseminate this work through peer-reviewed manuscripts, presentations at national and international meetings and through the established COREG website (www.coregontario.ca). COREG-FR is designed as a data platform for future studies evaluating COVID-19 recovery. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04602260; Pre-results.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Adolescente , Anciano , Hospitalización , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Infective endocarditis (IE) is a severe and highly prevalent infection among people who inject drugs (PWID). While short-term (30-day) outcomes are similar between PWID and non-PWID, the long-term outcomes among PWID after IE are poor, with 1-year mortality rates in excess of 25%. Novel clinical interventions are needed to address the unique needs of PWID with IE, including increasing access to substance use treatment and addressing structural barriers and social determinants of health. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: PWID with IE will be connected to a multidisciplinary team that will transition with them from hospital to the community. The six components of the Second Heart Team are: (1) peer support worker with lived experience, (2) systems navigator, (3) addiction medicine physician, (4) primary care physician, (5) infectious diseases specialist, (6) cardiovascular surgeon. A convergent mixed-methods study design will be used to test the feasibility of this intervention. We will concurrently collect quantitative and qualitative data and 'mix' at the interpretation stage of the study to answer our research questions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board (Project No. 7012). Results will be presented at national and international conferences and submitted for publication in a scientific journal. CLINICAL TRAIL REGISTRARION: Trial registration number: ISRCTN14968657 https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN14968657.
Asunto(s)
Endocarditis/complicaciones , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/complicaciones , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Endocarditis/terapia , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Selección de Paciente , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/terapiaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Surgical therapies for symptomatic bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are many, and vary from minimally invasive office based to high-cost operative approaches. This Guideline presents effective evidence-based surgical management of male lower urinary tract symptoms secondary/attributed to BPH (LUTS/BPH). See accompanying algorithm for a detailed summary of procedures (figure[Figure: see text]). MATERIALS/METHODS: The Minnesota Evidence Review Team searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and AHRQ databases to identify eligible studies published between January 2007 and September 2020, which includes the initial publication (2018) and amendments (2019, 2020). The Team also reviewed articles identified by Guideline Panel Members. When sufficient evidence existed, the body of evidence was assigned a strength rating of A (high), B (moderate), or C (low) for support of Strong, Moderate, or Conditional Recommendations. In the absence of sufficient evidence, information is provided as Clinical Principles and Expert Opinions (table[Table: see text]). RESULTS: Twenty-four guideline statements pertinent to pre-operative and surgical management were developed. Appropriate levels of evidence and supporting text were created to direct urologic providers towards suitable and safe operative interventions for individual patient characteristics. A re-treatment section was created to direct attention to longevity and outcomes with individual approaches to help guide patient counselling and therapeutic decisions. CONCLUSION: Pre-operative and surgical management of BPH requires attention to individual patient characteristics and procedural risk. Clinicians should adhere to recommendations and familiarize themselves with criteria that yields the highest likelihood of surgical success when choosing a particular approach for a particular patient.
Asunto(s)
Disfunción Eréctil/cirugía , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Prostatectomía/normas , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugía , Disfunción Eréctil/diagnóstico , Disfunción Eréctil/etiología , Humanos , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/diagnóstico , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/etiología , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/orina , Masculino , Tamaño de los Órganos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Próstata/patología , Próstata/cirugía , Prostatectomía/efectos adversos , Prostatectomía/métodos , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicaciones , Hiperplasia Prostática/diagnóstico , Hiperplasia Prostática/patología , Medición de Riesgo/normas , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Urología/métodos , Urología/normasRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a histologic diagnosis describing proliferation of smooth muscle and epithelial cells within the prostatic transition zone. The prevalence and severity of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in aging men are progressive and impact the health and welfare of society. This revised Guideline provides a useful reference on effective evidence-based management of male LUTS/BPH. See the accompanying algorithm for a summary of the procedures detailed in the Guideline (figures 1 and 2[Figure: see text][Figure: see text]). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Minnesota Evidence Review Team searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and AHRQ databases to identify eligible English language studies published between January 2008 and April 2019, then updated through December 2020. Search terms included Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and keywords for pharmacological therapies, drug classes, and terms related to LUTS or BPH. When sufficient evidence existed, the body of evidence was assigned a strength rating of A (high), B (moderate), or C (low) for support of Strong, Moderate, or Conditional Recommendations. In the absence of sufficient evidence, information is provided as Clinical Principles and Expert Opinions (table 1[Table: see text]). RESULTS: Nineteen guideline statements pertinent to evaluation, work-up, and medical management were developed. Appropriate levels of evidence and supporting text were created to direct both primary care and urologic providers towards streamlined and suitable practices. CONCLUSIONS: The work up and medical management of BPH requires attention to individual patient characteristics, while also respecting common principles. Clinicians should adhere to recommendations and familiarize themselves with standards of BPH management.
Asunto(s)
Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/diagnóstico , Hiperplasia Prostática/diagnóstico , Urología/normas , Suplementos Dietéticos , Humanos , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/etiología , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/terapia , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/orina , Masculino , Próstata/patología , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicaciones , Hiperplasia Prostática/patología , Hiperplasia Prostática/terapia , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Estados Unidos , Agentes Urológicos/uso terapéutico , Urología/métodosRESUMEN
Perceived stress among university students is a prevalent health issue directly correlated with poor academic performance, poor sleep quality, hopelessness, compromised physical and mental health, high risk of substance abuse, and suicidal ideation. Tamarkoz, a Sufi meditation, may reduce the impact of stressors to prevent illness among students. Tamarkoz is the art of self-knowledge through concentration and meditation. It is a method of concentration that can be applied to any task. The method is said to discipline the mind, body, and emotions to avoid unintended distractions. Therefore, it can be used in daily life activities, such as studying, eating, driving, de-stressing or in Sufism, seeking self-knowledge. This study was an 18-week quasi-experimental design with pre-intervention, post-intervention and follow-up assessments in the experimental group, a wait-list control, and a third group that utilized the campus health center's stress management resources. Participants, university students, had no prior exposure to Tamarkoz, and there were no statistically significant differences among groups on baseline measurements. Using a generalized linear mixed model, significant increases in positive emotions and daily spiritual experiences, and reductions in perceived stress and heart rate were found in the experimental group compared to the other two groups. Tamarkoz seems to show some advantages over the usual stress management resources offered by a student health center.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration Date: (03/04/2018); ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03489148.
Asunto(s)
Emociones/fisiología , Meditación/psicología , Espiritualidad , Estrés Psicológico/terapia , Rendimiento Académico/psicología , Adulto , Femenino , Frecuencia Cardíaca/fisiología , Humanos , Masculino , Salud Mental , Calidad de Vida , Religión y Psicología , Automanejo , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Estudiantes/psicología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Hospitals are a critical touchpoint for people who use drugs (PWUD). However, hospital policies, both formal and informal, can have a detrimental impact on PWUD in acute care settings. Introducing new policies, or revising existing policies that inadvertently harm or stigmatize PWUD while hospitalized, could be an effective harm reduction intervention for this high-risk population. This paper explores seven areas where institutional policy change could improve the hospital experience of PWUD: (1) use of nonprescribed substances in hospital, (2) supporting inpatient addiction consultation services (3) in-hospital supervised consumption spaces (4) supply and distribution of safe drug use equipment and naloxone, (5) role of security services and personal searches, (6) use of hospital restrictions, and (7) involvement of PWUD in policy development.
Asunto(s)
Preparaciones Farmacéuticas , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Reducción del Daño , Hospitales , Humanos , PolíticasRESUMEN
In January 2021, Israel started vaccinating healthcare workers (HCWs) and individuals older than 65 years with COVID-19 vaccines. Scientific literature points to vaccine hesitancy as being a major health concern. During time of pandemics, increased consciousness of health behaviors may be encountered. The current study aimed to assess attitudes to general vaccines and to COVID-19 vaccines in particular among adult (>18) Israeli general public, and among Israeli dentists and dental hygienists. Cross-sectional surveys were filled out by a total of 501 participants (361 Israeli adults >18 years, 73 dental hygienists, and 67 dentists). Along with basic demographics, participants responded to the Hebrew VAX, COVID-VAX and HCS scales. Group comparisons were analyzed using t tests and ANOVAs with Scheffe's test used for post hoc comparisons. Dental hygienists demonstrated significantly higher anti-vaccinations approaches than both dentists (p < 0.01) and the general public (p < 0.05). In all groups, attitudes towards the COVID-19 vaccines were more negative compared to attitudes towards general vaccines, with hygienists demonstrating significant negative attitudes compared to dentists (p < 0.05). The general public (p = 0.56) and hygienists demonstrated increased health awareness compared to dentists (p < 0.05). As health awareness has increased during the COVID-19 pandemic primary strategies to combat vaccine hesitancy should be implemented in the general public, and in particular, an dental teams.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Israel , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , VacunaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Trainees in acute care specialties often grapple with the decision to perform an invasive procedure in a rapidly decompensating patient, for whom the benefits and risks are inherently uncertain. The difference between trainees who know when to act and when to seek supervision and those who do not is often linked to individual trainee psychological and cultural perceptions of uncertainty. But how much comfort with uncertainty relates to the situational context rather than the trainee traits is underexplored. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to explore trainee actions around decompensating patients and assess the degree to which invasive intervention and supervision seeking depend on situational certainty or individual trait-based perceptions of uncertainty. METHODS: A total of 41 internal medicine residents completed a survey to measure anxiety related to uncertainty using the Physicians' Reactions to Uncertainty (PRU) tool and to measure uncertainty avoidance using the Values Survey Module (VSM) before responding to 14 written emergency situations. Half of the scenarios contain sufficient diagnostic certainty to warrant aggressive intervention, and half lack sufficient diagnostic clarity to offset the risk of intervention. Mixed multivariable modeling was used to identify the relationship between planned invasive intervention, situational uncertainty, and trait-based perceptions of uncertainty measured in the PRU and VSM. RESULTS: Trainees' first actions were appropriate in 60% of cases. Multivariable modeling suggested that situational certainty was more predictive of upfront intervention (odds ratio [OR], 30.5; P < 0.0001) than trait-based PRU (OR, 1.22; P = 0.05) and VSM (OR, 1.73; P < 0.0001). Similarly, situational certainty was more predictive of reduced supervision seeking (OR, 0.20; P < 0.0001) than trait-based PRU (OR, 2.03; P < 0.001) and VSM (P = not significant). CONCLUSIONS: Situation-specific certainty was more strongly correlated with invasive intervention in cases of decompensated patients than individual trainee traits. Focusing on trainee contextual understanding of procedural risk-benefit ratios in decompensating patients holds more promise for improving trainee actions and supervision seeking than tackling their perceptions around uncertainty.
RESUMEN
Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS) involves sudden multiorgan dysfunction from thrombosis due to antibodies that cause platelet activation and endothelial dysfunction. Treatment variably combines anticoagulation, corticosteroid use, therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), and high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). A 42-year-old male with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) presented with severe thrombocytopenia, encephalopathy, cardiac ischemia, and acral purpuric cutaneous lesions. CAPS was identified and he received heparin infusion, methylprednisolone, and IVIG. On day 7 he developed new purpuric lesions on his right foot despite detectable arterial pulses representing new microthrombosis refractory to IVIG. He was treated with TPE which resolved the right foot ischemia and eventually his CAPS. To our knowledge, this is the first patient with CAPS reported that failed initial treatment with IVIG and subsequently had excellent response to TPE. Our observations also support recent literature indicating that onset of thrombocytopenia in APS is a warning of progression to CAPS requiring treatment escalation.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome Antifosfolípido/tratamiento farmacológico , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapéutico , Intercambio Plasmático/métodos , Adulto , Humanos , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/farmacología , MasculinoRESUMEN
Introduction: Pediatric patients, especially neonates and infants, are more susceptible to adverse drug events as compared to adults. In particular, immature small molecule drug metabolism and excretion can result in higher incidences of pediatric toxicity than adults if the pediatric dose is not adjusted.Area covered: We reviewed the top 29 small molecule drugs prescribed in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units and compiled the mechanisms of their metabolism and excretion. The ontogeny of Phase I and II drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters (DMETs), particularly relevant to these drugs, are summarized. The potential effects of DMET ontogeny on the metabolism and excretion of the top pediatric drugs were predicted. The current regulatory requirements and recommendations regarding safe and effective use of drugs in children are discussed. A few representative examples of the use of ontogeny-informed physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models are highlighted.Expert opinion: Empirical prediction of pediatric drug dosing based on body weight or body-surface area from the adult parameters can be inaccurate because DMETs are not mature in children and the age-dependent maturation of these proteins is different. Ontogeny-informed-PBPK modeling provides a better alternative to predict the pharmacokinetics of drugs in children.