Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 30(4): 469-480, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38160753

RESUMEN

SCOPE: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a ubiquitous opportunistic pathogen considered one of the paradigms of antimicrobial resistance, is among the main causes of hospital-acquired and chronic infections associated with significant morbidity and mortality. This growing threat results from the extraordinary capacity of P. aeruginosa to develop antimicrobial resistance through chromosomal mutations, the increasing prevalence of transferable resistance determinants (such as the carbapenemases and the extended-spectrum ß-lactamases), and the global expansion of epidemic lineages. The general objective of this initiative is to provide a comprehensive update of P. aeruginosa resistance mechanisms, especially for the extensively drug-resistant (XDR)/difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) international high-risk epidemic lineages, and how the recently approved ß-lactams and ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations may affect resistance mechanisms and the definition of susceptibility profiles. METHODS: To address this challenge, the European Study Group for Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance (ESGARS) from the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases launched the 'Improving Surveillance of Antibiotic-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Europe (ISARPAE)' initiative in 2022, supported by the Joint programming initiative on antimicrobial resistance network call and included a panel of over 40 researchers from 18 European Countries. Thus, a ESGARS-ISARPAE position paper was designed and the final version agreed after four rounds of revision and discussion by all panel members. QUESTIONS ADDRESSED IN THE POSITION PAPER: To provide an update on (a) the emerging resistance mechanisms to classical and novel anti-pseudomonal agents, with a particular focus on ß-lactams, (b) the susceptibility profiles associated with the most relevant ß-lactam resistance mechanisms, (c) the impact of the novel agents and resistance mechanisms on the definitions of resistance profiles, and (d) the globally expanding XDR/DTR high-risk lineages and their association with transferable resistance mechanisms. IMPLICATION: The evidence presented herein can be used for coordinated epidemiological surveillance and decision making at the European and global level.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Infecciones por Pseudomonas , Humanos , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , beta-Lactamasas/genética , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/epidemiología , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/microbiología , Pseudomonas , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/genética , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/uso terapéutico , beta-Lactamas/farmacología , beta-Lactamas/uso terapéutico , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana
2.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 76(8): 2172-2181, 2021 07 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33993273

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteraemia is a common and serious infection. No consensus exists regarding whether definitive combination therapy is superior to monotherapy. We aimed to evaluate the impact of combination therapy on mortality. METHODS: This was a multicentre retrospective study (nine countries, 25 centres), including 1277 patients with P. aeruginosa bacteraemia during 2009-15. We evaluated the association between ß-lactam plus aminoglycoside or quinolone combination therapy versus ß-lactam monotherapy and mortality. The primary outcome was 30 day all-cause mortality. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted, introducing combination as a time-dependent variable. Propensity score was conducted to adjust for confounding for choosing combination therapy over monotherapy. RESULTS: Of 1119 patients included, 843 received definitive monotherapy and 276 received combination therapy (59% aminoglycoside and 41% quinolone). Mortality at 30 days was 16.9% (189/1119) and was similar between combination (45/276; 16.3%) and monotherapy (144/843; 17.1%) groups (P = 0.765). In multivariate Cox regression, combination therapy was not associated with reduced mortality (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.64-1.53). No advantage in terms of clinical failure, microbiological failure or recurrent/persistent bacteraemia was demonstrated using combination therapy. Likewise, adverse events and resistance development were similar for the two regimens. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective cohort, no mortality advantage was demonstrated using combination therapy over monotherapy for P. aeruginosa bacteraemia. Combination therapy did not improve clinical or microbiological failure rates, nor affect adverse events or resistance development. Our finding of no benefit with combination therapy needs confirmation in well-designed randomized controlled trials.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia , Infecciones por Pseudomonas , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios de Cohortes , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Am J Crit Care ; 25(1): 68-75, 2016 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26724297

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the utility of a multiplex polymerase chain reaction system (SeptiFast) and blood cultures for detecting bacteria and fungi in blood samples from patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. METHODS: In a prospective observational study, whole blood samples for SeptiFast testing and for culture were collected on admission from all patients with severe sepsis or septic shock admitted to the intensive care unit between July 2011 and September 2012. SeptiFast results were compared with blood and other culture results. RESULTS: The probability of at least 1 microorganism being isolated at 6 hours was 13-fold higher with the SeptiFast test than with blood cultures (relative risk, 13.5; 95% CI, 5.05-36.06). Unlike culture results, SeptiFast test results were not associated with previous antibiotic consumption. The median time to the first positive blood culture result was 17 hours; SeptiFast results were available in 6 hours. SeptiFast detected genetic material from potentially multiresistant microorganisms in patients whose blood cultures showed no growth at all. CONCLUSIONS: The SeptiFast test provided quicker microbiological diagnosis and identified significantly more microorganisms than blood cultures did, particularly when samples were collected after antibiotic therapy had started or infections were due to resistant bacteria and yeast.


Asunto(s)
Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , ADN Bacteriano/sangre , ADN de Hongos/sangre , Hongos/aislamiento & purificación , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa Multiplex , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Anciano , Bacteriemia/sangre , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Bacterias/genética , Coinfección/sangre , Coinfección/diagnóstico , Coinfección/microbiología , Diagnóstico Precoz , Reacciones Falso Negativas , Femenino , Fungemia/sangre , Fungemia/diagnóstico , Fungemia/microbiología , Hongos/genética , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Técnicas Microbiológicas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Sepsis/sangre , Sepsis/microbiología , Choque Séptico/sangre , Choque Séptico/diagnóstico , Choque Séptico/microbiología , Factores de Tiempo
4.
BMC Infect Dis ; 12: 245, 2012 Oct 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23038999

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study is to analyze the factors that are associated with the adequacy of empirical antibiotic therapy and its impact in mortality in a large cohort of patients with extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)--producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. bacteremia. METHODS: Cases of ESBL producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) bacteremia collected from 2003 through 2008 in 19 hospitals in Spain. Statistical analysis was performed using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: We analyzed 387 cases ESBL-E bloodstream infections. The main sources of bacteremia were urinary tract (55.3%), biliary tract (12.7%), intra-abdominal (8.8%) and unknown origin (9.6%). Among all the 387 episodes, E. coli was isolated from blood cultures in 343 and in 45.71% the ESBL-E was multidrug resistant. Empirical antibiotic treatment was adequate in 48.8% of the cases and the in hospital mortality was 20.9%. In a multivariate analysis adequacy was a risk factor for death [adjusted OR (95% CI): 0.39 (0.31-0.97); P = 0.04], but not in patients without severe sepsis or shock. The class of antibiotic used empirically was not associated with prognosis in adequately treated patients. CONCLUSION: ESBL-E bacteremia has a relatively high mortality that is partly related with a low adequacy of empirical antibiotic treatment. In selected subgroups the relevance of the adequacy of empirical therapy is limited.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/tratamiento farmacológico , Escherichia coli/enzimología , Infecciones por Klebsiella/tratamiento farmacológico , Klebsiella/enzimología , beta-Lactamasas/metabolismo , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Bacteriemia/mortalidad , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Escherichia coli/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/microbiología , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Klebsiella/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Klebsiella/microbiología , Infecciones por Klebsiella/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , España , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...