Disability, Health-Related Quality of Life and Mortality in Lumbar Spine Fusion Patients-A 5-Year Follow-Up and Comparison With a Population Sample.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective follow-up study. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the effect of lumbar spine fusion (LSF) on disability, health-related quality of life and mortality in a 5-year follow-up, and to compare these results with the general population. METHODS: 523 consecutive LSF operations were included in a prospective follow-up. Disability was assessed by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and HRQoL by the 36-item Short Form (SF-36) questionnaire using the physical and mental summary scores (PCS and MCS). The patients were compared with an age-, sex-, and residential area matched general population cohort. RESULTS: The preoperative ODI in the patients was 46 (SD 16), and the change at 5 years was -26 (95% CI: -24 to -28), p < 0.001. In the population, ODI (baseline 13, SD 16) remained unchanged. The preoperative PCS in the patients was 27 (SD 7), in the population 45 (SD 11), and the increase in the patients at 5 years was 8 (95% CI: 7 to 9), p < 0.001. The patients did not reach the population in ODI or PCS. The baseline MCS in the patients was 47 (SD 13), and the change at 5 years 4 (95% CI: 3 to 7), p < 0.001. MCS of the females reached the population at 5-year follow-up. When analyzing short and long fusions separately, comparable changes were seen in both subgroups. There was no difference in mortality between the patients (3.4%) and the population (4.8%), hazard ratio (HR) 0.86. CONCLUSIONS: Although the patients who had undergone LSF benefited from surgery still at 5 years, they never reached the physical level of the population.

Reoperation Rates Following Instrumented Lumbar Spine Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the cumulative reoperation rate and indications for reoperation following instrumented lumbar spine fusion (LSF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: LSF reduces disability and improves health-related quality of life for patients with several spinal disorders. The rate of instrumented LSF has drastically increased over the last few decades. The increased incidence of LSF, however, has led to increased reoperation rates. METHODS: The data are based on the prospective LSF database of Tampere University Hospital that includes all elective indications for LSF surgery. A total of 433 consecutive patients (64% women, mean age 62 years) who underwent LSF in Tampere University Hospital between 2008 and 2011 were evaluated and indications for reoperations were rechecked from patient records and radiographs. The most common diagnosis for the primary surgery was degenerative spondylolisthesis and the mean follow-up time was 3.9 years. The cumulative incidence of reoperations and the "time to event" survival rate was calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: By the end of 2013, 81 patients had undergone at least one reoperation. The cumulative reoperation rate at 2 years was 12.5% (95% confidence interval: 95% CI: 9.7-16.0) and at 4 years was 19.3% (95% CI: 15.6-23.8). The most common pathology leading to reoperation was adjacent segment pathology with a cumulative reoperation rate of 8.7% (95% CI: 6.1-12.5) at 4 years. The corresponding rates for early and late instrumentation failure were 4.4% (95% CI: 2.7-7.0) and 2.9% (95% CI: 1.9-7.1), respectively, and for acute complications, 2.5% (95% CI: 1.4-4.5). CONCLUSION: Although previous studies reported that early results of spinal fusion are promising, one in five patients required reoperation within 4 years after surgery. Patients and surgeons should be aware of the reoperation rates when planning fusion surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Quality of life and disability: can they be improved by active postoperative rehabilitation after spinal fusion surgery in patients with spondylolisthesis? A randomised controlled trial with 12-month follow-up.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to investigate the effectiveness of the postoperative 12-month exercise program compared to usual care on disability and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients after lumbar spine fusion surgery (LSF). METHODS: Altogether, 98 patients with isthmic (31) or degenerative (67) spondylolisthesis were randomised to exercise therapy group (EG) (n = 48) or usual care group (UCG) (n = 50) 3 months after LSF. EG patients had home-based progressive strength and aerobic training program for 12 months. UCG patients received only oral and written instructions of exercises. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and HRQoL (RAND-36) were evaluated at the time of randomization, at the end of the intervention and 1 year after intervention. RESULTS: The mean ODI score decreased from 24 (12) to 18 (14) in the EG and from 18 (12) to 13 (11) in the UCG during intervention (between-groups p = 0.69). At 1-year follow-up, 25 % of the EG and 28 % of the UCG had an ODI score ≥20. No between-group differences in HRQoL change were found at any time point. The mean (95 % CI) physical functioning dimension of the HRQoL improved by 10.0 (4.6-15.3) in the EG and by 7.8 (2.5-13.0) in the UCG. In addition, the role physical score improved by 20.0 (7.7-32.3) in the EG and by 16.4 (4.4-28.4) in the UCG during the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The exercise intervention did not have an impact on disability or HRQoL beyond the improvement achieved by usual care. However, disability remained at least moderate in considerable proportion of patients.

Changes in health utility, disability, and health-related quality of life in patients after spinal fusion: a 2-year follow-up study.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal database study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate changes in health utility, disability, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients undergoing spinal fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Recently, measuring disability, HRQOL, and health utility has become important when defining the value of surgical interventions. METHODS: Data of spinal fusion patients from a prospective longitudinal database were analyzed. Health utility was captured by SF-6D (six dimensional health state classification from the 36-dimensional Short Form Health Survey) score, disability by Oswestry Disability Index, and HRQOL by the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey. The changes in these scores were compared between the groups during the 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: Altogether 242 patients were stratified into 5 groups according to the surgical indication: degenerative spondylolisthesis (n = 140), isthmic spondylolisthesis (n = 39), spinal stenosis (n = 23), disc pathology (n = 15), and postoperative conditions (n = 25). The mean age varied from 48 years in isthmic spondylolisthesis group to 66 years in the groups with degenerative spondylolisthesis or spinal stenosis. Preoperatively, the surgical indication subgroups differed significantly from each other according to utility, disability, and the physical component summary score of the HRQOL. Isthmic spondylolisthesis group had the best and the group of postoperative conditions the worst preoperative values. Nevertheless, the SF-6D, the Oswestry Disability Index, and the physical component summary in all diagnostic groups had improved significantly already by 3 months of follow-up, and the improvement remained stable until 2 years of follow-up. Interestingly, the biggest improvement in Oswestry Disability Index (-27), physical component summary (13) and SF-6D (0.19) was found in a group with disc pathology. The mental component summary score values were similar preoperatively (P = 85), and the improvement in the mental component summary was significant in the groups with degenerative olisthesis, spinal stenosis, and postoperative conditions. CONCLUSION: The 5 surgical indication groups showed significantly different scores preoperatively in health utility, disability, and the physical aspect of HRQOL. At 2 years, however, all groups benefitted from the fusion surgery significantly. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

The prevalence of depressive symptoms before and after surgery and its association with disability in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of depressive symptoms and disability pre-operatively, at 3 months and at 1 year after lumbar spine fusion surgery. METHODS: Data was extracted from a dedicated lumbar spine fusion register, giving 232 patients (mean age 62 years, 158 females) who had undergone instrumented lumbar spine fusion. The frequency of depressive symptoms and disability was evaluated using the Depression Scale (DEPS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). RESULTS: Depressive symptoms were found in 34, 13, and 15 % of the patients pre-operatively, at 3 months and at 1 year after surgery, respectively. The mean DEPS score decreased from 16.2 to 8.6 (p < 0.001) in patients who had depressive symptoms pre-operatively, and from 6.1 to 3.8 (p < 0.001) in those patients without pre-operative depressive symptoms. The mean ODI values pre-operatively, at 3 months and at 1 year after surgery were 53, 30, and 23, respectively, in patients with pre-operative depressive symptoms and 41, 23, and 20 in those patients without pre-operative depressive symptoms. The differences between the groups were statistically significant at all time points (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: One-third of our patients with chronic back pain undergoing spinal fusion had depressive symptoms pre-operatively. The prevalence of depressive symptoms decreased after surgery. Although disability remained higher in those patients who had reported depressive symptoms pre-operatively, disability did decrease significantly in both groups post-operatively. Thus, there is no need to exclude depressive patients from operation, but screening measures and appropriate treatment practises throughout both pre-operative and post-operative periods are encouraged.

Decreased disability is associated with improved perceived quality of life following spinal fusion.

PURPOSE: To assess the disability and relationship between functional status and health related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients in the early recovery phase following spinal fusion. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study. Since 2008 data of spinal fusion patients have been collected prospectively in two Finnish hospitals. In August 2009, complete data of 173 patients were available. The measurement tool of disability was the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and it was also examined in the framework of International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) using body functions and structures, activities and participation components. RESULTS: Preoperatively the mean total ODI was 45 (SD17) and mean (95% confidence interval) change to 3 months postoperatively was -19 (-22 to -17). When the ODI was linked to the ICF, there was a 55% improvement in the body structure and functions component and a 44% improvement in both the activities and the participation components. However, 25% of the patients still had the total ODI score over 40 three months postoperatively. Preoperatively, the mean (95% CI) Physical Component Summary Score (PCS) of the Short Form 36-questionnaire (SF-36) was 27 (26 to 28) and the mean Mental Component Summary Score (MCS) of SF-36 was 47 (45 to 49). Postoperatively the improvement was 9 (95% CI: 8 to 11) in PCS and 6 (95% CI: 4 to 7) in MCS (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Spinal fusion is successful in the early recovery period in terms of reduction of pain and disability. The significant changes in the ODI were seen in all three components of the ICF model. In addition, improvement in functioning was significantly related to positive change in HRQoL. Still there is a subgroup of patients having marked disability needing more intensive rehabilitation and follow-ups.