Response to Comments on "Soybean photosynthesis and crop yield is improved by accelerating recovery from photoprotection".

We recently demonstrated that accelerating the relaxation of nonphotochemical quenching leads to higher soybean photosynthetic efficiency and yield. In response, Sinclair et al. assert that improved photosynthesis cannot improve crop yields and that there is only one valid experimental design for proving a genetic improvement in yield. We explain here why neither assertion is valid.

Soybean photosynthesis and crop yield are improved by accelerating recovery from photoprotection.

Crop leaves in full sunlight dissipate damaging excess absorbed light energy as heat. This protective dissipation continues after the leaf transitions to shade, reducing crop photosynthesis. A bioengineered acceleration of this adjustment increased photosynthetic efficiency and biomass in tobacco in the field. But could that also translate to increased yield in a food crop? Here we bioengineered the same change into soybean. In replicated field trials, photosynthetic efficiency in fluctuating light was higher and seed yield in five independent transformation events increased by up to 33%. Despite increased seed quantity, seed protein and oil content were unaltered. This validates increasing photosynthetic efficiency as a much needed strategy toward sustainably increasing crop yield in support of future global food security.

The histone H4 lysine 20 demethylase DPY-21 regulates the dynamics of condensin DC binding.

Condensin is a multi-subunit structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) complex that binds to and compacts chromosomes. Here, we addressed the regulation of condensin binding dynamics using Caenorhabditis elegans condensin DC, which represses X chromosomes in hermaphrodites for dosage compensation. We established fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) using the SMC4 homolog DPY-27 and showed that a well-characterized ATPase mutation abolishes DPY-27 binding to X chromosomes. Next, we performed FRAP in the background of several chromatin modifier mutants that cause varying degrees of X chromosome derepression. The greatest effect was in a null mutant of the H4K20me2 demethylase DPY-21, where the mobile fraction of condensin DC reduced from ∼30% to 10%. In contrast, a catalytic mutant of dpy-21 did not regulate condensin DC mobility. Hi-C sequencing data from the dpy-21 null mutant showed little change compared to wild-type data, uncoupling Hi-C-measured long-range DNA contacts from transcriptional repression of the X chromosomes. Taken together, our results indicate that DPY-21 has a non-catalytic role in regulating the dynamics of condensin DC binding, which is important for transcription repression.

Expansion of the Spore Surface Polysaccharide Layer in Bacillus subtilis by Deletion of Genes Encoding Glycosyltransferases and Glucose Modification Enzymes.

Polysaccharides (PS) decorate the surface of dormant endospores (spores). In the model organism for sporulation, Bacillus subtilis, the composition of the spore PS is not known in detail. Here, we have assessed how PS synthesis enzymes produced during the late stages of sporulation affect spore surface properties. Using four methods, bacterial adhesion to hydrocarbons (BATH) assays, India ink staining, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) with ruthenium red staining, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), we characterized the contributions of four sporulation gene clusters, spsABCDEFGHIJKL, yfnHGF-yfnED, ytdA-ytcABC, and cgeAB-cgeCDE, on the morphology and properties of the crust, the outermost spore layer. Our results show that all mutations in the sps operon result in the production of spores that are more hydrophobic and lack a visible crust, presumably because of reduced PS deposition, while mutations in cgeD and the yfnH-D cluster noticeably expand the PS layer. In addition, yfnH-D mutant spores exhibit a crust with an unusual weblike morphology. The hydrophobic phenotype from sps mutant spores was partially rescued by a second mutation inactivating any gene in the yfnHGF operon. While spsI, yfnH, and ytdA are paralogous genes, all encoding glucose-1-phosphate nucleotidyltransferases, each paralog appears to contribute in a distinct manner to the spore PS. Our data are consistent with the possibility that each gene cluster is responsible for the production of its own respective deoxyhexose. In summary, we found that disruptions to the PS layer modify spore surface hydrophobicity and that there are multiple saccharide synthesis pathways involved in spore surface properties.IMPORTANCE Many bacteria are characterized by their ability to form highly resistant spores. The dormant spore state allows these species to survive even the harshest treatments with antimicrobial agents. Spore surface properties are particularly relevant because they influence spore dispersal in various habitats from natural to human-made environments. The spore surface in Bacillus subtilis (crust) is composed of a combination of proteins and polysaccharides. By inactivating the enzymes responsible for the synthesis of spore polysaccharides, we can assess how spore surface properties such as hydrophobicity are modulated by the addition of specific carbohydrates. Our findings indicate that several sporulation gene clusters are responsible for the assembly and allocation of surface polysaccharides. Similar mechanisms could be modulating the dispersal of infectious spore-forming bacteria.

Contributions of crust proteins to spore surface properties in Bacillus subtilis.

Surface properties, such as adhesion and hydrophobicity, constrain dispersal of bacterial spores in the environment. In Bacillus subtilis, these properties are influenced by the outermost layer of the spore, the crust. Previous work has shown that two clusters, cotVWXYZ and cgeAB, encode the protein components of the crust. Here, we characterize the respective roles of these genes in surface properties using Bacterial Adherence to Hydrocarbons assays, negative staining of polysaccharides by India ink and Transmission Electron Microscopy. We showed that inactivation of crust genes caused increases in spore relative hydrophobicity, disrupted the spore polysaccharide layer, and impaired crust structure and attachment to the rest of the coat. We also found that cotO, previously identified for its role in outer coat formation, is necessary for proper encasement of the spore by the crust. In parallel, we conducted fluorescence microscopy experiments to determine the full network of genetic dependencies for subcellular localization of crust proteins. We determined that CotZ is required for the localization of most crust proteins, while CgeA is at the bottom of the genetic interaction hierarchy.