Flupenthixol versus risperidone: subjective quality of life as an important factor for compliance in chronic schizophrenic patients.

OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this paper was to compare the effects of flupenthixol and risperidone on subjective quality of life and attitude towards medication in chronic schizophrenic patients with mainly negative symptoms. In a spectrum ranging from its typical end "haloperidol" to its atypical end "clozapine", flupenthixol has typical and atypical characteristics. METHODS: The effects of flupenthixol versus risperidone were investigated in a multicenter, double-blind trial, whereas subjective quality of life was assessed by means of the EuroQuol-Visual Analogue Scale and the patient satisfaction questionnaire. The attitude towards medication was assessed by means of the Drug Attitude Inventory-30 (DAI-30). RESULTS: Mean daily dose of study medication was 6.6 (SD 2.9) mg/day flupenthixol and 3.6 (SD 1.2) mg/day risperidone. Both groups showed a significant improvement regarding subjective quality of life and positive attitude towards medication. Especially the categories "control of their thoughts", concentration and "feeling better in general" ameliorated in both groups. In the flupenthixol group, the "ability to cope with stress", "feel more relaxed" and the "ability to achieve something" improved significantly more than in the risperidone group. CONCLUSIONS: (1) The spectrum of schizophrenia can be treated effectively with different neuroleptic treatments. (2) Flupenthixol especially improves the ability to cope with stress, the ability to achieve something and feeling more relaxed. (3) Subjective quality of life significantly increased with no difference between the groups.

Nosocomial pneumonia: a cost-of-illness analysis.

BACKGROUND: We investigated incremental cost of nosocomial pneumonia (NP) from the perspective of a hospital and health insurance funds. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The incremental cost was determined by calculating total costs for pneumonia patients and controls using prospective and retrospective matched-pairs analysis with 29 and 37 matched pairs, respectively. RESULTS: Compared to controls, patients who developed pneumonia had to be on artificial ventilation 5 days longer, needed markedly more intensive care with 6.55 additional days in intensive care. Excess cost per pneumonia patient amounted to DM 14,606 (95% CI: DM 5,285-23,927) from the hospital's perspective and to DM 7,988 (95% CI: DM 5,281-10,894) according to statutory insurance charges. According to the retrospective anaLysis carried out on the neurosurgical and neurological intensive care wards, pneumonia patients were ventiLated 5 days longer than patients without pneumonia, needed more intensive care over 30 days and had an additional 14.03 days of intensive care and 10.14 more days in hospital. Excess cost per patient was DM 29,610 (95% CI: DM 23,054-36,174) from the hospitals perspective and DM 18,000 (95% CI: 14,885-21,020) according to the statutory insurance criteria. CONCLUSION: The study gives insight into the structure of incremental cost caused by NP and shows that based on a conservative cost calculation the incremental cost per NP patient is higher for the hospital than for health insurance funds which indicates a significant financial deficit for the hospital. Antibiotics and microbiology together only contribute 6.8% to incremental cost. Therefore in a cost saving initiative their close relationship to length of hospitalization must be considered.

Treatment outcomes in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: comparison of macrolides and moxifloxacin from the patient perspective.

Moxifloxacin, a new respiratory quinolone, was compared with the macrolides azithromycin, clarithromycin and roxithromycin in a cohort study to assess clinical, safety and health-related outcomes of these antimicrobials in general practice settings. In total 332 patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) each received one of the antimicrobial agents for a standard short course of therapy. Random allocation of therapeutic agents occurred by centre, not individuals, and the drugs were prescribed in an open manner. In addition to clinical evaluation by their physicians, all patients kept daily diaries to assess AECB symptoms over the study period, therapy received and quality of life. The overall clinical response rate was 96% and all four regimens were well tolerated. After 14 days there were no significant differences between the study groups, but analyses of patients' daily evaluations of certain AECB specific symptoms showed a faster response rate in the moxifloxacin group.

[Socioeconomic relevance of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis in the Federal Republic of Germany. A prospective cost of illness study]. / Zur sozioökonomischen Relevanz akuter Exazerbationen der chronischen Bronchitis in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Eine prospektive Krankheitskostenstudie.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Prospectively determined data on costs of chronic bronchitis were not yet available for the Federal Republic of Germany. The purpose of the burden-of-illness-study conducted in the Federal Republic of Germany from October 1996 to March 1998 was to calculate direct and indirect costs of chronic bronchitis as well as its acute exacerbations per patient and year. Furthermore, the health-related quality of life of the patients was determined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The burden-of-illness-study was conducted as an open, not randomised surveillance study. The evaluation based on 785 patients (55.4% male, 44.2% female, 0.4% unknown; mean age 60 years) who were treated by 147 general practitioners. 755 patients could be included into the cost analysis. RESULTS: Per patient and year direct costs of chronic bronchitis amounted to DM 1112.27, the calculation of indirect costs resulted in DM 959.09. 41.4% of direct costs were due to drug acquisition, hospitalisation costs shared 31.6% and costs for physicians' fee amounted to 20.6%. The severity of chronic bronchitis revealed significantly different results in cost analysis: per patient, mild disease lead to direct costs of DM 387.86, moderate disease to DM 802.62 and severe disease to DM 2224.40. This result was caused by higher costs for drug acquisition and hospitalisation costs due to chronic bronchitis in higher stages of severity. Indirect costs were calculated by applying the human-capital-approach: 45.8% of indirect costs were due to time-off-work, nursing costs amounted to 23.7%. CONCLUSION: The costs of chronic bronchitis have a considerable impact on the total costs of the health care system of Germany.

Cost-effectiveness analysis for statin therapies in the primary prevention of coronary heart disease in Italy.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this analysis was to compare the costs, benefits and cost effectiveness of two dosage regimens of cerivastatin (0.2 and 0.4 mg/day) with Italian National Health Service (NHS) reimbursed comparative statins in the primary prevention of coronary heart disease in Italy. This study is part of a broader analysis undertaken in five European countries. DESIGN AND SETTING: A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) was performed, as the interventions have the same treatment objectives but vary in terms of magnitude of effectiveness. This CEA compared alternative treatments both in the NHS and from societal perspectives. PATIENTS: A coronary heart disease risk assessment model, based on intervention study data from the Lipid Research Clinics Coronary Primary Prevention Trial, was used. This was augmented with demographic, disease, life expectancy, pharmacological and economic data for patients with coronary heart disease in Italy. RESULTS: In terms of average cost effectiveness, our analysis showed that cerivastatin 0.2 mg/day compared favourably with pravastatin 20 mg/day, and compared similarly with simvastatin 20 mg/day in all age groups studied. The study also demonstrated that cerivastatin 0.4 mg/day compared favourably with both simvastatin 40 mg/day and pravastatin 20 mg/day. These results were consistent for both the NHS and societal perspective.The incremental cost per life-year gained [in 1998 Italian lire (L)] of simvastatin versus cerivastatin ranged from about L40 million [or Euro (Eur)20 658] to greater than L650 million (or Eur335 697). Cerivastatin 0.2 mg/day was more cost-effective than pravastatin 20 mg/day, while the incremental cost per life-year gained for cerivastatin 0.4 mg/day versus pravastatin 20 mg/day ranged from L11.1 million (or Eur5733) to L31.8 million (or Eur16 423) in the three age groups (35 to 39 years, 50 to 54 years and 65 to 69 years) for both perspectives. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study showed that in primary prevention, average cost-effectiveness ratios of cerivastatin compared favourably with those of the other pharmacological interventions available on the Italian market.

Reprasentative Studie zur Verteilung schizophrener Patienten auf medizinische Versorgungseinrichtungen in Deutschland.

On the basis of a representative paper and pencil survey with office based psychiatrists, neurologists, psychiatric out-patient clinics and psychiatric wards/hospitals it is shown that in Germany in 1997 about 136,000 adult patients with diagnosed schizophrenia (F20 according to ICD 10) are attended by specialists. 75.4% of these patients are in attention of office based specialists, and 21.3% are attended by out-patient clinics. According to the details of psychiatric wards and hospitals, 3.3% of the patients are under long term (> 1 year) medical attention at hospitals. The amount of schizophrenia patients being under attention of specialists corresponds to 0.21% of the German population > 18 years. For patients who receive out-patient treatment it is shown that they are under medical attention at hospitals for average 22 days per year, and for 3.4 days they are under medical attention at rehabilitation centers.

[Direct and indirect costs of schizophrenia]. / Die direkten und indirekten Kosten der Schizophrenie.

In the present study the costs of schizophrenia in Germany were studied using the "bottom up" prevalence-based method. In a random sample of 180 schizophrenic patients stratified according to the most important care institutions, direct and indirect costs were retrospectively documented for a 12-month period. Depending on the place of recruitment and the extent of care provided, total yearly costs result between about DM 33,000 for a patient treated predominantly on an outpatient basis and about DM 126,000 for a patient requiring hospital care and about DM 135,000 for a patient in job rehabilitation. The direct yearly treatment costs were, as expected, lowest for patients recruited in the private practice of a psychiatrist and predominantly treated on an outpatient basis (DM 5,788), and were the highest in the psychiatric hospital (DM 64,661) and in job rehabilitation (DM 79,996). In the patients recruited in the outpatient domain, doctors' fees and medication together were responsible for only 4.5% of the total costs, whereas the indirect costs (e.g., through work incapacity) were responsible for 87% of the total yearly costs. For methodological reasons the total costs caused by schizophrenic psychoses in Germany per year can at present be estimated only roughly. A conservative estimate is between 8.5 and 18 billion DM per year. The study shows that schizophrenia is a very expensive illness, the direct and indirect costs of which are on the whole comparable to those of the common somatic illnesses. Therefore, also for economical reasons, sufficient financial means should be invested in the research and treatment of this severe illness.