RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Primary endobronchial actinomycosis is exceptionally uncommon and can be misdiagnosed as unresolving pneumonia, endobronchial lipoma, bronchogenic carcinoma or foreign body. Predisposing factors are immunosuppressive conditions, chronic lung diseases, poor oral hygiene or foreign body aspiration. CASE PRESENTATION: We reported a case of 88-year old woman with a 4 days history of mild exertional dyspnea, productive cough with purulent sputum and fever up to 37.8 °C, who developed left sided endobronchial actinomycosis in absence of any pre-existent risk conditions; endobronchial de-obstruction and specific antibiotic treatment were performed with success, achieving a full resolution of the disease, with bronchoscopy playing a key role in the diagnosticand therapeutic pathways. CONCLUSIONS: This case raises the necessity for increased awareness in the management of endobronchial lesions and in cases of suspected endobronchial actinomycosis; bronchoscopy plays a key role in the diagnostic and therapeutic process; prompt recognition of this entity can expedite proper treatment and recovery.
Asunto(s)
Actinomicosis/complicaciones , Actinomicosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Atelectasia Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Atelectasia Pulmonar/etiología , Actinomicosis/diagnóstico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Biopsia , Enfermedades Bronquiales/complicaciones , Enfermedades Bronquiales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Bronquiales/tratamiento farmacológico , Broncoscopía/métodos , Tos/etiología , Femenino , Fiebre/etiología , Humanos , Atelectasia Pulmonar/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Literature lacks on sex differences in acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Therefore, the aim of our study was to provide information about sex difference in thromboembolic burden, prognostic assessment and outcomes of PE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed and compared differences between females and males retrieving data of a multicenter, observational, retrospective, cohort study aimed to analyze characteristics of PE patients admitted in Internal Medicine wards of Tuscany, Italy. RESULTS: 272 (60.1%) of 452 patients enrolled in the study were females. Females were older than males (76.6 ± 12.0 vs. 73.5 ± 13.4 years, p = 0.0005). Mean length of hospital stay was longer in females (11.3 vs. 9.5 days, p = 0053). Reduced mobility was more frequent in females (46.3% vs. 35.5%, p = 0.0322), whereas COPD and active cancer were in males (20% vs. 9.9%, p = 0.0034, and 39.4% vs. 23.8%, p = 0.0004, respectively). Incidental diagnosis of PE was performed more often in males compared to females (19.3% vs. 11.4%, p = 0.0289). No sex difference was found in diagnostic approach, despite females underwent more often to legs ultrasonography compared to males (90.7% vs. 79.4%, p = 0.0008). Both all cause and PE-related mortality were higher in males (12.2 and 8.3% vs. 7.7 and 5.1%, respectively), despite difference was not significant. Females were found to have more likely central PE and distal deep vein thrombosis compared to males (57.7% vs. 43.8%, p = 0.0039, and 22.9% vs. 13.9%, p = 0.0206, respectively). None difference was found in shock index and median simplified PESI score between females and males, whereas according to 2008 ESC prognostic model females were more likely to be categorized at high or intermediate risk than in males (81.5% vs. 71.5%, p = 0.0159). Echocardiographic right heart dysfunction was found more often in females than in males (56.5% vs. 44%, p = 0.0124). No sex difference was found neither on acute treatment nor in prescription of vitamin K antagonists at hospital discharge. Bleeding events were significantly higher in females compared to males (4.7% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.0189). CONCLUSION: Understanding the difference between females and males is of utmost importance for physicians who manage acute PE in clinical practice. Females present major pulmonary thromboembolic burden, more frequently right heart dysfunction and treatment-related bleedings but lower in-hospital mortality than males. Our study could implicate that management of acute PE should be tailored according to sex. Prospective studies are warranted to better clarify this topic.
Asunto(s)
Embolia Pulmonar/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Embolia Pulmonar/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Prognostic stratification of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) remains a challenge in clinical practice. Simplified PESI (sPESI) score is a practical validated score aimed to stratify 30-day mortality risk in acute PE. Whether prognostic value of sPESI score differs according to sex has not been previously investigated. Therefore the aim of our study was to provide information about it. Data records of 452 patients, 180 males (39.8 %) and 272 females (60.2 %) discharged for acute PE from Internal Medicine wards of Tuscany (Italy) were analysed. sPESI was retrospectively calculated. Variables enclosed in sPESI score, all cause in-hospital mortality and overall bleedings were compared between sexes. Moreover, predictive ability of sPESI score as prognosticator of all cause in-hospital mortality was tested and compared between sexes. sPESI score 0 (low risk) was found in 17.7 % of males and 13.6 % of females (p = 0.2323). We didn't find significant difference in sPESI scoring distribution. Age ≥80 years (51.4 vs. 33.8 %, p = 0.0003) and heart rate ≥110 bpm (23.5 vs. 14.4 %, p = 0.0219) were found significantly more prevalent in females, whereas active cancer (23.8 vs. 39.4 %, p = 0.0004) and cardio-respiratory diseases (19.8 vs. 27.7 %, p = 0.0416) were in males. All cause in-hospital mortality was 0 % in both genders for sPESI score 0, whereas it was 5.4 % in females and 13.6 % in males with sPESI score 1-2 (p = 0.0208) and 22 % in females and 19.3 % in males with sPESI score ≥3 (p = 0.7776). Overall bleedings were significantly more frequent in females compared with males (4.77 vs. 0.55 %, p = 0.0189). In females overall bleedings ranged from 2.7 % in sPESI score 0 to 6 % in sPESI score ≥3. Predictive ability of sPESI score as prognosticator of all cause in-hospital mortality was higher in females compared to males (AUC 0.72 vs. 0.67, respectively). In real life different co-morbidity burdens in females compared to males. Females seems to be at lower risk of all cause in-hospital mortality for sPESI score ≤2 but at higher risk of bleeding, irrespective from sPESI scoring. Predictive ability of sPESI score seems better in females.
Asunto(s)
Embolia Pulmonar/mortalidad , Caracteres Sexuales , Enfermedad Aguda , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Cardiopatías/mortalidad , Hemorragia/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The burden perceived by caregivers of patients with dementia is a fundamental prognostic aspect in the history of the disease. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the internal consistency of the Caregiver Burden Inventory (CBI), a scale used to quantify burdens in different aspects of a caregiver's life, and the influence of patients' and caregivers' characteristics on its different dimensions. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 419 demented patients and their caregivers were evaluated in 16 geriatric centers in Italy. Cognitive status and behavioral disturbances were assessed by the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), respectively. Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) were also evaluated. Comorbidity was assessed by the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS). The severity of dementia was evaluated by the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) score. Caregiver distress due to the behavioral problems of the patient was assessed by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Distress, a subscale of the NPI which evaluates stress caused by each behavioral disturbance of the patient, and by the Brief Symptom Inventory which evaluates anxiety and depression. Burden was evaluated by the CBI. RESULTS: The CBI showed very high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha value > 0.80). Factor analysis showed that the items clustered into four dimensions, and not five as originally proposed. Multiple regression analysis revealed that patients' behavioral disturbances and disability were the major predictors of the time-dependent burden; the psychophysical burden was explained mainly by caregiver anxiety and depression. CONCLUSIONS: The CBI proved to be an effective multidimensional tool for evaluating the impact of burden on many aspects of caregivers' lives.