Beverage Consumption Patterns among U.S. Adolescents and Adults from a New 24-h Beverage Recall Survey Compared to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2017-2018.

Beverages are major dietary components of the United States (U.S.) population. Understanding the current consumption pattern of beverages is an important element in supporting healthy diets. Our objective was to assess the validity of the 24-h beverage consumption recall data collected in 2021 through a self-administered online questionnaire (referred to as the American Beverage Association-Brandscapes Worldwide survey, ABA-BSW) by comparing it to the 24-h dietary recall data collected in the 2017-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Summary statistics on the reported consumption amounts and consumption occasions (COs) of 13 beverage types (e.g., bottled water, carbonated soft drinks (CSD), tea, and others) by participants aged 13-64 years were compared between ABA-BSW (n = 20,553) and NHANES (n = 4437). The average daily consumption amount among consumers of all 13 beverage types combined was higher in ABA-BSW than in NHANES (1903 mL/day vs. 1704 mL/day). Within each beverage type, the average daily consumption amounts among consumers were generally lower in ABA-BSW except for CSD, plant-based drinks, and still juices and fruit-flavored drinks. Compared to NHANES, ABA-BSW participants reported consuming a wider variety of beverage groups, a higher number of COs per day, and lower consumption amounts within a given CO. Overall, beverage consumption patterns observed in ABA-BSW and NHANES were generally similar, supporting the design and implementation of the former survey. Further, the ABA-BSW data provide additional information on the within-day temporal beverage consumption patterns among adolescents and adults in the U.S. Differences in the observed consumption patterns between the surveys may be the result of various factors, including the survey implementation method, a consumption pattern shift between the survey time periods, beverage type availability, and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on dietary patterns.

Impact of problematic internet use on the self-esteem of adolescents in the selected school, Kerala, India.

BACKGROUND: Internet use is one of the essential tools of our present-day society whose impact is seen on adolescents such as increased use of the internet because they have free easy and daily access to the internet. Problematic internet use has become a global phenomenon that causes serious problem to the affected individual leading to impairment in psychological well-being. AIM: The present study aims to assess the level of problematic internet use and self-esteem among adolescents in selected schools, Kochi, Kerala, India. SETTING: The study conducted in Private Aided School, in Kothamangalam Thaluk of Ernakulam Dist., Kerala. METHOD: The study with the cross-sectional design was conducted for a period of one month among 60 students and participants were selected using non-probability, convenient sampling. The samples were provided with a self-administered questionnaire after obtaining written consent from their parents and the students. RESULT: Karl-Pearson coefficient indicated a significant negative correlation between self-esteem and Internet addiction (r = -0.649 and p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The use of internet has been found to have a powerful impact on adolescents, especially in areas of self-esteem, and at times, it may affect their social life and relationship with the family.

Effectiveness of a Nurse-Led Intervention for Adolescents With Problematic Internet Use.

The current study assessed the effect of an intervention on problematic internet use (PIU), biopsychosocial functioning, and academic performance in 100 adolescents with PIU in grades 9 and 11 in Ernakulam District, Kerala, India. Students from four comparable schools were randomly assigned to experimental and wait-list control groups after being screened for PIU. The experimental group participated in a 10-week intervention and parents of these adolescents were provided with two sessions. The wait-list control group received the intervention after the posttest. A PIU questionnaire, sociodemographic data, internet usage pattern, a biopsychosocial functioning tool, and academic performance were used to assess participants at baseline and immediately after and 3 months postintervention. Findings revealed significant differences in PIU; physical, psychological, and social functioning; and academic performance immediately and 3 months postintervention (p < 0.05). Thus, the intervention was effective in reducing PIU among adolescents and improved their physical, psychological, and social functioning and academic performance. [Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 58(7), 16-26.].