Subjective perception of visual field defects using random noise-moving images in patients with glaucoma: A comparison of computer graphics and analog noises.

PURPOSE: Random noise-moving images (noises) can make glaucoma patients with no subjective symptoms aware of visual field abnormalities. To explore this concept, we developed a noise using computer graphics (CG) and investigated the difference in the subjective perception of visual field abnormalities between CG and conventional analog noises. METHODS: We enrolled individuals with glaucoma (205 eyes), preperimetric glaucoma (PPG; 19 eyes), and normal eyes (35 eyes). For a CG noise, a series of still images was made by randomly selecting five monochromatic tones on 2-mm square dots, and these images were drawn at 60 frames per second (fps) to create a noise-moving image. The participants were asked to describe their perceived shadows on a paper. The results were categorized as follows based on the pattern deviation probability map of the Humphrey field analyzer (HFA): "agreement," "partial agreement," "disagreement," and "no response." The glaucoma stage was classified into four stages, from M1 to M4, based on the HFA's mean deviation. RESULT: The detection rates (agreement and partial agreement) were 80.5% and 65.4% for the CG and analog noises, respectively, with CG noise showing a significantly higher detection rate in all glaucoma eyes (P < 0.001). The detection rates tended to increase as the glaucoma stage progressed, and in Stage M3, these were 93.9% and 78.8% for the CG and analog noises, respectively. The PPG eyes did not exhibit subjective abnormalities for both noises. The specificity values were 97.1% and 100% for the CG and analog noises, respectively. CONCLUSION: The CG noise is more effective than the analog noise in evaluating the subjective perception of visual field abnormalities in patients with glaucoma.

Measurement of paracentral stereopsis using a new method with the binocular open perimeter imovifa® in normal adults.

PURPOSE: No method to quantitatively evaluate stereopsis within the 15º visual field has been clinically established. We developed a program to measure paracentral stereopsis and evaluated its feasibility in visually normal participants. STUDY DESIGN: Experimental investigation METHODS: Ten visually normal volunteers with stereopsis of 60 arcseconds or better were included. The Stereo Eccentricity Analysis (SEA) program for stereopsis measurement across the visual field was integrated into the binocular visual field analyzer imovifa®. Subjects with established binocular stereopsis detected a stereoscopic circular target presented with crossed disparity on random dots at the fovea, 3°, 5°, 10°, and 15° on the 45°, 135°, 225°, and 315° meridians. The subjects performed two tasks for measurement in the periphery: a detection task by pressing the response button when the circular target was perceived and a localization task by tilting a joystick to indicate in which quadrant the circular target was perceived. The duration of the target presentation was 500 ms. RESULTS: The stereo thresholds at 0º and 3° did not significantly differ. The thresholds at 10º and 15º were significantly higher than at 0° (P < 0.01). While no inter-individual threshold difference was observed at the fovea, the difference was large at 15°. The stereo thresholds for the detection and localization tasks also did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION: With the SEA program, paracentral stereopsis can be measured and the stereo threshold increases with eccentricity. The SEA program appears to be a feasible clinical method to evaluate paracentral stereopsis.

Optical coherence tomography findings of the peripheral retina in patients with congenital X-linked retinoschisis.

Introduction: Congenital X-linked retinoschisis (XLRS) presents as macular retinoschisis/degeneration in almost all patients and as peripheral retinoschisis in half the patients. Although the optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings of macular retinoschisis have been well investigated, those of peripheral retinoschisis have rarely been reported. This study aimed to report the ultra-widefield OCT findings of the peripheral retina in patients with XLRS. Methods: Medical records of 10 Japanese patients (19 eyes) with clinically and/or genetically diagnosed XLRS were retrospectively reviewed. Funduscopic, electroretinographic, and OCT findings were reviewed and evaluated. Some were also genetically evaluated for the RS1 gene. Results: OCT of the macula revealed schises and/or cystoid changes in the inner nuclear layer (INL) and outer nuclear layer. In contrast, OCT of the peripheral retina revealed schises and/or cystoid changes in the INL in eight eyes (44%), and/or splitting in the ganglion cell layer (GCL) in 10 (56%) of the 18 eyes with clear OCT images. No schisis or cystoid changes were found in the peripheral OCT images of eight eyes (44%). A 16-year-old boy presented with retinal splitting of the GCL and INL of the inferior retina, although he had no ophthalmoscopic peripheral retinoschisis. Genetic examinations were performed on three patients, all of whom had reported missense mutations in the RS1 gene. Conclusion: In XLRS, peripheral bullous retinoschisis results from GCL splitting in the retina. One of the 10 patients with XLRS showed intraretinal retinoschisis in the GCL in the inferior periphery, which was unremarkable on ophthalmoscopy (occult retinoschisis). Although both peripheral bullous retinoschisis and occult retinoschisis showed splitting/cystic changes in the GCL, further studies are needed to determine whether occult retinoschisis progresses to bullous retinoschisis.

A new static visual field test algorithm: the Ambient Interactive ZEST (AIZE).

Visual field (VF) test is one of the most vital tests in the diagnosis of glaucoma and to monitor the disease worsening. In the past couple of decades, the standard automated perimetry (SAP) test takes a major role in VF test for glaucoma patients. The SAP has been demanded to finish a test in short time without sacrificing accuracy. In this study, we developed and evaluated the performance of a new perimetric algorithm (ambient interactive zippy estimation by sequential testing (ZEST): AIZE) by computer simulation. AIZE is a modification of the ZEST procedure that utilizes the spatial information (weighted likelihood: WL) of neighboring test locations, which varies from the distance to the tested location, to estimate a visual threshold. Ten glaucomatous and 10 normal empirical visual field (VF) test results were simulated with five error conditions [(3% false positives (FP), 3% false negatives (FN)), (9% FP, 9% FN), (15% FP, 15% FN), (3% FP, 15% FN), (15% FP, 3% FN)]. The total number of test presentations and the root mean square error (RMSE) of the estimated visual sensitivities were compared among AIZE, the non-weighted test (WL = 0) and the fixed-weighted test (WL = 0.33). In both glaucomatous (G) and normal (N) VFs, the fixed-weighted test had the lowest number of test presentations (median G 256, N 139), followed by the AIZE (G 285, N 174) and the non-weighted test (G 303, N 195). The RMSE of the fixed-weighted test was lower (median 1.7 dB) than that of the AIZE (1.9 dB) and the non-weighted test (1.9 dB) for normal VFs, whereas the AIZE had a lower RMSE (3.2 dB) than the fixed-weighted test (4.5 dB) and the non-weighted test (4.0 dB) for glaucomatous VFs. Simulation results showed that AIZE had fewer test presentations than the non-weighted test strategy without affecting the accuracy for glaucomatous VFs. The AIZE is a useful time saving test algorithm in clinical settings.

Differences in Factors Associated With Glaucoma Progression With Lower Normal Intraocular Pressure in Superior and Inferior Halves of the Optic Nerve Head.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate risk factors for progression in the superior and inferior hemi-visual fields (hemi-VFs) and the corresponding hemi-disc/retinas in eyes with normal tension glaucoma (NTG). Methods: A 5-year prospective follow-up of 90 patients with NTG with untreated intraocular pressure (IOP) consistently ≤ 15 mm Hg was conducted. The IOP and Humphrey Perimeter measurements and disc/retina stereo-photographs were taken every 3 and 6 months, respectively. Risk factors for progression in the superior and inferior hemi-VFs and in the superior and inferior hemi-disc/retinas were investigated. Results: The mean total deviation values decreased at -0.50 ± 0.76 and -0.13 ± 0.34 dB/year in the superior and inferior hemi-VFs, respectively (P < 0.001). In the superior hemi-VF, the risk factor for faster progression was greater long-term IOP fluctuation (P = 0.022). In the inferior hemi-VF, the risk factors were disc hemorrhage (DH), greater myopic refraction, body mass index (BMI), and vertical cup-to-disc ratio (v-C/D; P < 0.05). The progression probability was 47.7 ± 6.0 and 17.7 ± 4.7% at 5 years in the superior and inferior hemi-disc/retinas respectively (P < 0.001), and DH was a risk factor for progression in both (P = 0.001). Conclusions: In NTG eyes, greater BMI, myopia, and v-C/D are characteristic risk factors for faster progression in the superior half of the optic nerve head (ONH), whereas long-term IOP fluctuation is the significant risk factor in the inferior half of the ONH, whereas DH is a risk factor in both. Translational Relevance: Different risk factors were identified in superior and inferior hemifields in NTG eyes.

Fundus autofluorescence, optical coherence tomography and electroretinography abnormalities in a patient with digoxin retinopathy that resemble those in KCNV2-associated retinopathy.

BACKGROUND: Digoxin related retinal toxicity causes blurred vision, photophobia, central scotoma, color vision abnormality, and electroretinography (ERG) abnormalities. Here, we report a case with transient abnormalities in vison, in which fundus autofluorescence (FAF), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and ERG findings resembled those in KCNV2 (potassium voltage-gated channel modifier subfamily V member 2)-associated retinopathy. CASE REPORT: An 89-year-old woman presented with complaints of acute blurred vision, nyctalopia, photophobia, and color vision abnormality. She received digoxin for tachycardia induced by atrial fibrillation for a month. The fundi showed a faint white ring at the fovea, which showed hyperfluorescence in FAF. OCT showed a thickened EZ in the macula. A dark-adapted (DA)-30 ERG showed a reduced and "squaring (trough-flattened)" a-wave, and a delayed, supernormal b-wave, resulting in a high b/a-wave amplitude ratio. The digoxin dose was reduced following an elevation in serum levels. Five weeks later, her visual acuities improved, and abnormal hyperfluorescence on FAF disappeared. After 6 months, no visual symptoms were reported. The ellipsoid-zone thickening in OCT improved; however, the b/a-wave amplitude ratio on DA-30 ERG remained high. The b-wave in LA-long-flash ERG was initially reduced, which improved after correction of serum level of digoxin. CONCLUSIONS: The patient's clinical findings resembled those of patients with KCNV2-associated retinopathy or temporal hyperkalemia. These disorders appear to have a common pathogenesis, which may be related to abnormal extracellular potassium levels in the retina. The on-bipolar cells seemed to be more affected than the off-bipolar cells in digoxin related retinal toxicity.

Measurement of Fixational Eye Movements With the Head-Mounted Perimeter Imo.

Purpose: Although visual field testing is conducted with the subject gazing at a fixation target, constant minute eye movements, called fixational eye movements, do occur during fixation. We examined dynamic changes in fixational eye movements associated with stimulus presentation during visual field testing. Methods: We used the head-mounted perimeter imo, which is capable of measurement under binocular conditions, with the frame rate of its fixation monitoring camera improved to 300 Hz, to assess fixational eye movements in 18 healthy individuals. We measured changes in fixational eye movements during testing under monocular and binocular conditions and analyzed these changes based on the bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA). We also assessed the changes in the horizontal and vertical microsaccade rates separately. Results: Both the BCEA and horizontal microsaccade rates were higher at 400 to 600 msec after stimulus presentation than during stimulus presentation (P < 0.01). Additionally, the BCEA and vertical microsaccade rates were significantly lower in the binocular condition than in the monocular condition (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively). We did not observe a significant correlation between the test locations and microsaccade direction during visual field testing. Conclusions: Fixational eye movements, especially vertical microsaccade rates, were lower in the binocular condition than in the monocular condition. Visual field testing under binocular conditions is a useful method for suppressing fixational eye movements and stabilizing the fixation during testing and may improve the reliability of the test results. Translational Relevance: Visual field testing under binocular conditions can make the fixation more stable during the testing compared with monocular conditions.

Effect of Sensitivity Disparity Between the Two Eyes on Pointwise Monocular Sensitivity Under Binocular Viewing in Patients With Glaucoma.

PRCIS: A difference between monocular sensitivities measured with and without occlusion was observed in glaucoma. Monocular sensitivity without occlusion could have been affected differently by binocular interaction due to the sensitivity disparity between both eyes. PURPOSE: To investigate the influence of sensitivity disparity between both eyes on visual field results under binocular viewing in glaucoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen glaucoma patients tested by Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) and imo were reviewed retrospectively. On the basis of their HFA results, we defined the eye with a better HFA-MD as "the better eye" and the fellow eye with a worse HFA-MD as "the worse eye." Depending on the pointwise pattern deviation (PD) of both eyes, all evaluated test points were classified into 4 groups: normal PD in both eyes (N/N), normal PD in the better eye but abnormal in the worse eye (N/A), abnormal PD in the better eye but normal in the worse eye (A/N), and abnormal PD in both eyes (A/A). Using imo, which can measure sensitivity with and without occluding the nontested eye, the better eye's sensitivities with and without occlusion were compared in each group using weighted data. The weight was derived by applying the inverse probability weighting. RESULTS: Monocular sensitivity without occlusion was higher than that with occlusion in N/N (P<0.01) and the opposite was observed in A/A (P<0.05). No significant sensitivity difference between both conditions was seen in N/A or A/N. In N/A, the points showing a higher sensitivity without occlusion decreased as the sensitivity difference between both eyes increased. CONCLUSIONS: A difference between sensitivities measured with and without occlusion was observed in glaucoma. Owing to the sensitivity disparity between both eyes, monocular sensitivity without occlusion could have been affected differently by binocular interaction.

Spatial and Temporal Relationship between Structural Progression and Disc Hemorrhage in Glaucoma in a 3-Year Prospective Study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the spatial and temporal relationship between disc hemorrhage (DH) and structural progression in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in a 3-year prospective study. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with POAG and intraocular pressure of ≤18 mmHg on monotherapy with prostaglandin analogs. METHODS: Fundus photographs were taken at baseline and every 3 months for 3 years. Disc hemorrhage and structural progression were detected independently by flicker chronoscopy. If present, clock-hour disc locations in the right eye format and colocalization were determined. Statistical comparisons were based on mixed-effects models accounting for the correlation between different disc sites within the same eye and between fellow eyes in the same patient. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Relationship between DH and structural progression at the same site. RESULTS: Among 195 eyes of 115 patients, DH appeared in 85 sites in 65 eyes (33.3%) and was most frequently at the 7 o'clock disc location (29.4%, P < 0.0001). Structural progression occurred at 63 sites of 52 eyes (26.7%) comparably in both superior and inferior hemidiscs, which was mostly detected as widening of the retinal nerve fiber layer defects (RNFLDs). Temporal RNFLD widening was common, whereas nasal widening occurred exclusively in the vertical quadrants (P = 0.035). Of 41 progression sites in eyes with DH, 28 sites (68.2%) had both DH and progression. Progression sites with DH were less common in the superior quadrant than in the inferior and temporal quadrants (P = 0.011). Eyes with DH had a significantly higher risk of progression than eyes without DH (hazard ratio, 3.72; P < 0.0001). For 63 progression sites, DH recurrence and more visits with DH at the progression site were significantly associated with shorter time to progression from baseline (P = 0.021, P = 0.017, respectively), whereas colocalization of DH and progression were not. CONCLUSIONS: In a 3-year prospective study with a Japanese POAG cohort, the relationship between DH and RNFLD and the pattern of RNFLD progression differed by disc location. The association between more frequent DH at the progression site and shorter time to progression indicates that DH may reflect vulnerability to same-site structural deterioration.

Comparison of head-mounted perimeter (imo®) and Humphrey Field Analyzer.

PURPOSE: The head-mounted automated perimeter imo® is a new portable perimeter that does not require a dark room and can be used to examine patients in any setting. In this study, imo 24plus (1-2) AIZE examinations were compared with previous Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) 30-2 (SITA standard) examinations within the same patient. PATIENTS AND METHODS: imo examinations (either head-mounted [i-H] or fixed [i-F] type) were performed in patients with glaucoma or suspected glaucoma who had already experienced HFA five or more times. Measurement time and correlations of mean deviation (MD) and visual field index (VFI) values were compared between groups for HFA, i-H, i-F, and imo total (i-T). Fixation loss (FL), false-positive (FP), and false-negative (FN) detection rates were compared. The percentage of binocular random single-eye tests under possible non-occlusion conditions using imo was determined. Mann-Whitney U test was performed, and Spearman's rank-order correlation coefficient was calculated. RESULTS: The inclusion period was July to December 2016. Among 273 subjects (543 eyes), 147 (292 eyes) were tested with i-H type and 126 (251 eyes) with i-F type. Mean MD values for HFA and i-T were -6.1±7.8 and -6.2±7.1 dB, respectively. Mean measurement times for HFA, i-H, i-F, and i-T were 15.23±2.07, 10.47±2.11, 11.04±2.31, and 10.54±2.19 minutes, respectively (P<0.01 for HFA vs i-H/i-F). Total mean measurement time was shorter by 30.8% for i-T vs HFA. Correlation coefficients of MD and VFI were R 2>0.81 for HFA vs i-H and i-F. FP and FN detection rates were significantly higher with i-T than HFA; there was no significant difference in FL. Binocular random single-eye tests were possible in 85% of cases. CONCLUSION: imo reduced measurement time by 30.8%. imo VFI and MD values were highly correlated with HFA. As i-F and i-H types produced similar results, imo can be used in accordance with the patient's situation.

Utility of CLOCK CHART binocular edition for self-checking the binocular visual field in patients with glaucoma.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Car accidents caused by drivers unaware of their visual field (VF) defects under binocular vision have become an issue. We developed a simple self-check chart (CLOCK CHART binocular edition (CCBE)) to help patients with glaucoma recognise their abnormalities in the binocular VF and evaluated its usefulness. METHODS: The chart has four targets displayed at 10°, 15°, 20° and 25° eccentricities. The examinee gradually rotates the chart 360° clockwise. At every 30°, the examinee confirms the fixation and indicates if all four targets can be seen. This study enrolled 88 eyes of 44 patients with glaucoma (mean age, 64.4±13.1 years) and 64 eyes of 32 visually normal individuals (mean age, 32.0±8.4 years). Except the CCBE test, static VF testing using the Humphrey field analyser (HFA) Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm-Standard 30-2 and binocular Esterman programmes was also performed for the subjects with glaucoma. RESULTS: VF abnormality was defined as two or more contiguous points with a sensitivity of <10 dB within the central 30°. The CCBE test had sensitivities of 85% and 82% with respect to the HFA and Esterman results, respectively. We also used the British VF standards for Group 1 (car/motorcycle) drivers, and a sensitivity of 88% was obtained for the CCBE. The chart had a specificity of 100% for the visually normal subjects. CONCLUSION: The CCBE test enables drivers with glaucoma to notice their VF abnormalities under binocular condition. The application of this simple self-check method appears promising for occasions such as driver licensing.

Factors Associated with Progression of Japanese Open-Angle Glaucoma with Lower Normal Intraocular Pressure.

PURPOSE: To characterize the natural history and define the risk factors associated with the progression of normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) in Japanese patients who were followed up closely without treatment. DESIGN: Prospective 5-year study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with NTG with intraocular pressure (IOP) consistently ≤15 mmHg without treatment at baseline. METHODS: Visual field (VF) examinations were performed every 3 months, and disc/peripapillary retina photographs were taken every 6 months. Patients were followed up without treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Deterioration in VF was defined by reference to Guided Progression Analysis Software of the Humphrey VF Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm 24-2 (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany) and disc/peripapillary retina deterioration as adjudged by 3 independent observers. Life table analysis was used for evaluating the time to disease progression, as defined by VF or deterioration of the optic nerve head structure. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify risk factors for glaucoma progression. RESULTS: We enrolled 90 patients (mean age, 53.9 years; baseline IOP, 12.3 mmHg; mean deviation [MD], -2.8 decibels [dB]). The MD slope averaged -0.33 dB/year (median, -0.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.44 to -0.22). Glaucoma progression probability at 5 years was 66% (95% CI, 55-78), as defined by VF deterioration or disc/peripapillary retina deterioration (criterion 1): 52% (95% CI, 37-60), as defined by VF deterioration (criterion 2), and 50% (95% CI, 38-71), as defined by disc/peripapillary retina deterioration (criterion 3). Presence or history of disc hemorrhage (DH) (P < 0.001), long-term IOP fluctuation (P = 0.020), and a greater vertical cup-to-disc ratio (v-C/D) (P = 0.018) were significant predictors for progression defined by criterion 1. Long-term IOP fluctuation (P = 0.011) and a greater v-C/D (P = 0.036) were significant predictors for progression by criterion 2. Presence or history of DH (P = 0.0018) and long-term IOP fluctuation (P = 0.022) were significant predictors for progression by criterion 3. CONCLUSIONS: In Japanese patients with NTG with mean baseline IOP of 12.3 mmHg without treatment, estimated mean MD slope for 5 years was -0.33 dB/year; probability of glaucoma progression based on VF or disc/peripapillary end points at 5 years was 66%. Presence or history of DH, long-term IOP fluctuation, and greater v-C/D significantly contributed to progression.

Comparison of monocular sensitivities measured with and without occlusion using the head-mounted perimeter imo.

PURPOSE: Using a head-mounted perimeter imo that can measure monocular sensitivity with both eyes open, we investigated the difference between monocular sensitivities measured with and without occlusion of the fellow eye and if the difference was influenced by eccentricity. METHODS: Using the perimeter imo, monocular sensitivities with/without occlusion and binocular sensitivity were measured and compared. Three test conditions for monocular sensitivity without occlusion were: with/without a fusional fixation target, and a binocular random single eye test in which the target was randomly presented to either eye and the examinee was not aware of the tested eye. Within the central 25° visual field (VF), 29 points located at the fovea and on the 45°, 135°, 225°, and 315° meridians with 3° intervals were tested. Differences among the four monocular sensitivities with/without occlusion were further evaluated at the fovea, within and beyond the central 5° VF. RESULTS: Sixteen visually normal volunteers (mean age, 28.6 ± 4.6 years) were included in this study. Except at the fovea, monocular sensitivities measured without occlusion were significantly higher than those with occlusion (P < 0.01). No significant difference was seen among the three monocular sensitivities without occlusion (P = 0.82). CONCLUSIONS: Except at the fovea, monocular sensitivities measured with and without occlusion significantly differed. This indicates that without occlusion, binocular interaction is activated and affects not only binocular sensitivity but also monocular sensitivity.

The effect of concentric constriction of the visual field to 10 and 15 degrees on simulated motor vehicle accidents.

PURPOSE: Traffic accidents are associated with the visual function of drivers, as well as many other factors. Driving simulator systems have the advantage of controlling for traffic- and automobile-related conditions, and using pinhole glasses can control the degree of concentric concentration of the visual field. We evaluated the effect of concentric constriction of the visual field on automobile driving, using driving simulator tests. METHODS: Subjects meeting criteria for normal eyesight were included in the study. Pinhole glasses with variable aperture sizes were adjusted to mimic the conditions of concentric visual field constrictions of 10° and 15°, using a CLOCK CHART®. The test contained 8 scenarios (2 oncoming right-turning cars and 6 jump-out events from the side). RESULTS: Eighty-eight subjects were included in the study; 37 (mean age = 52.9±15.8 years) subjects were assigned to the 15° group, and 51 (mean = 48.6±15.5 years) were assigned to the 10° group. For all 8 scenarios, the number of accidents was significantly higher among pinhole wearing subjects. The average number of all types of accidents per person was significantly higher in the pinhole 10° group (4.59±1.81) than the pinhole 15° group (3.68±1.49) (P = 0.032). The number of accidents associated with jump-out scenarios, in which a vehicle approaches from the side on a straight road with a good view, was significantly higher in the pinhole 10° group than in the pinhole 15° group. CONCLUSIONS: Concentric constriction of the visual field was associated with increased number of traffic accidents. The simulation findings indicated that a visual field of 10° to 15° may be important for avoiding collisions in places where there is a straight road with a good view.

Distribution and Progression of Visual Field Defects With Binocular Vision in Glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the distribution and progression of glaucomatous visual field (VF) defects with binocular vision. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Subjects were 167 patients (average age, 67±10.7 y) with glaucoma who received the Humphrey 24-2 VF test (SITA-Standard) for the 2 eyes. Using the Best Location Algorithm, patient's binocular integrated VF (IVF) was calculated from their Humphrey 24-2 results. Of 167, 77 subjects (average age, 68±11.0 y) also underwent monocular/binocular Humphrey Esterman tests. Patient's stage of glaucomatous VF loss was classified by the Esterman Disability Score for each test, and the distribution and progression of the defects with binocular vision was evaluated for each stage. The frequencies of the defects in the upper and lower halves of the VF were also investigated. RESULTS: With the IVF, the glaucomatous VF defects were most frequently found around the Mariotte blind spots and the Bjerrum areas and extended to the periphery. With the binocular Humphrey Esterman VF, the defects were most frequently found around the bitemporal and Bjerrum areas. The IVF results showed 31%, 49%, and 20% of the patients with the earliest glaucoma having defects in the upper, lower, and both halves of the VF, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Glaucomatous VF defects with binocular vision were frequently found at the Mariotte blind spots in the central VF and around the bitemporal areas in the periphery. They appeared to have distributions and progression different from those of the defects with monocular vision previously reported.

The interpretation of results of 10-2 visual fields should consider individual variability in the position of the optic disc and temporal raphe.

AIMS: To clarify the anatomical relation between the optic disc and temporal raphe and to examine how these are related to test points in the 10-2 visual field test pattern. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: For 22 eyes of volunteers with normal vision (+0.75 D spherical equivalent 7.88 D), a volume scan was used to obtain en-face images from a plane fitted to the inner limiting membrane using optical coherence tomography (OCT). The clearest en-face retinal nerve fibre (RNF) image was chosen for each subject and superimposed on fundus photographs using blood vessels for alignment. Individual landmarks (disc, fovea and visual field blind spot) were then used to superimpose the Humphrey Field Analyzer 10-2 visual field on the OCT image to compare with the RNF image. RESULTS: The average disc-fovea-raphe angle was 169.4°±3.2°. Both the disc and temporal raphe were located above the horizontal midline (ie, were inferior in visual field space). For the 10-2 test pattern superimposed on the OCT image, in 54.5% of eyes, the temporal inferior test points adjacent to the horizontal midline mapped to the anatomical inferior hemifield. In 22.7% of eyes, nasal inferior test points adjacent to the horizontal midline mapped to the anatomical inferior hemifield. This mapping is opposite to typically assumed. CONCLUSION: The position of the disc and raphe affects the mapping between structure and function with respect to superior and inferior hemifields. Individual differences in the position of the temporal raphe should be considered when mapping between structure and function for the 10-2 test pattern.

Exploring Test-Retest Variability Using High-Resolution Perimetry.

PURPOSE: Test-retest variability (TRV) of visual field (VF) data seriously degrades our capacity to recognize true VF progression. We conducted repeated high-resolution perimetry with a test interval of 0.5° to investigate the sources of TRV. In particular, we examined whether the spatial variance of the observed sensitivity changes or if their absolute magnitude was of more importance. METHODS: Sixteen eyes of 16 glaucoma patients were each tested three times at 61 VF locations along the superior-temporal 45° meridian using a modified protocol of the Octopus 900 perimeter. TRV was quantified as the standard deviation of the repeats at each point (retest-SD). We also computed the mean sensitivity at each point (retest-MS) and the running spatial-SD along the tested meridian. Multiple regression models investigated whether any of those variables (and also age, sex, and VF eccentricity) were significant independent determinants of TRV. RESULTS: The main independent determinants of TRV were the retest-MS at -0.04 dB TRV/dB loss (P < 0.0001, t-statistic 5.05), and the retest-SD at 0.47 dB spatial variance/dB loss (P < 0.0001, t-statistic 12.5). CONCLUSIONS: The larger effect for the spatial-SD suggested that it was perhaps a stronger determinant of TRV than scotoma depth per se. This might support the hypothesis that interactions between small perimetric stimuli, rapidly varying sensitivity across the field, and normal fixational jitter are strong determinants of TRV. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Our study indicates that methods that might reduce the effects of jagged sensitivity changes, such as increasing stimulus size or better gaze tracking, could reduce TRV.

Test Conditions in Macular Visual Field Testing in Glaucoma.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the suitable visual field (VF) test conditions (target size, test type, and eccentricity) for the macular region, we investigated the correlations between the ganglion cell layer (GCL) thickness and 6 VF test results. METHODS: We tested 32 eyes of patients (61.1±9.2 y) with preperimetric (6), early-stage (16), and moderate-stage (10) glaucoma. The VF tests included 3 SAP (the 10-2 HFA using SITA with target size III [HFA SITA (III)], full threshold with size III [HFA FULL (III)] and size I [HFA FULL (I)]) and 3 visual function-specific perimetry tests (the 10-2 SWAP, 10-2 flicker, and 10-2 Humphrey Matrix). The GCL and inner plexiform layer (GCL+IPL) thickness was measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) with a macular 7×7 mm cube scan (3D OCT-2000, Topcon). The coefficient of determination (r) for the correlation between visual sensitivity and the GCL+IPL thickness was calculated for each test at eccentricities 0 to 5 degrees, 5 to 7 degrees, and 7 to 10 degrees using linear and quadratic regressions. RESULTS: All 6 tests showed the strongest correlation with the GCL+IPL thickness at 5 to 7 degrees. The respective r (linear) and R (quadratic) for HFA SITA (III), HFA FULL (III), HFA FULL (I), SWAP, Flicker, and Matrix were (0.40, 0.50), (0.43, 0.53), (0.44, 0.46), (0.51, 0.51), (0.33, 0.34), and (0.52, 0.52). CONCLUSIONS: As compared with the frequently-used SAP with a size III, SAP with size I and the function-specific perimetry tests (especially the Matrix) could be more suitable for testing the macular region.

Effects of head tilt on visual field testing with a head-mounted perimeter imo.

PURPOSE: A newly developed head-mounted perimeter termed "imo" enables visual field (VF) testing without a fixed head position. Because the positional relationship between the subject's head and the imo is fixed, the effects of head position changes on the test results are small compared with those obtained using a stationary perimeter. However, only ocular counter-roll (OCR) induced by head tilt might affect VF testing. To quantitatively reveal the effects of head tilt and OCR on the VF test results, we investigated the associations among the head-tilt angle, OCR amplitude and VF testing results. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: For 20 healthy subjects, we binocularly recorded static OCR (s-OCR) while tilting the subject's head at an arbitrary angle ranging from 0° to 60° rightward or leftward in 10° increments. By monitoring iris patterns, we evaluated the s-OCR amplitude. We also performed blind spot detection while tilting the subject's head by an arbitrary angle ranging from 0° to 50° rightward or leftward in 10° increments to calculate the angle by which the blind spot rotates because of head tilt. RESULTS: The association between s-OCR amplitude and head-tilt angle showed a sinusoidal relationship. In blind spot detection, the blind spot rotated to the opposite direction of the head tilt, and the association between the rotation angle of the blind spot and the head-tilt angle also showed a sinusoidal relationship. The rotation angle of the blind spot was strongly correlated with the s-OCR amplitude (R2≥0.94, p<0.0001). A head tilt greater than 20° with imo causes interference between adjacent test areas. CONCLUSIONS: Both the s-OCR amplitude and the rotation angle of the blind spot were correlated with the head-tilt angle by sinusoidal regression. The rotated VF was correlated with the s-OCR amplitude. During perimetry using imo, the change in the subject's head tilt should be limited to 20°.

The role of specific visual subfields in collisions with oncoming cars during simulated driving in patients with advanced glaucoma.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To assess the role of specific visual subfields in collisions with oncoming cars during simulated driving in patients with advanced glaucoma. METHODS: Normal subjects and patients with glaucoma with mean deviation <-12 dB in both eyes (Humphrey Field Analyzer 24-2 SITA-S program) used a driving simulator (DS; Honda Motor, Tokyo). Two scenarios in which oncoming cars turned right crossing the driver's path were chosen. We compared the binocular integrated visual field (IVF) in the patients who were involved in collisions and those who were not. We performed a multivariate logistic regression analysis; the dependent parameter was collision involvement, and the independent parameters were age, visual acuity and mean sensitivity of the IVF subfields. RESULTS: The study included 43 normal subjects and 100 patients with advanced glaucoma. And, 5 of the 100 patients with advanced glaucoma experienced simulator sickness during the main test and were thus excluded. In total, 95 patients with advanced glaucoma and 43 normal subjects completed the main test of DS. Advanced glaucoma patients had significantly more collisions than normal patients in one or both DS scenarios (p<0.001). The patients with advanced glaucoma who were involved in collisions were older (p=0.050) and had worse visual acuity in the better eye (p<0.001) and had lower mean IVF sensitivity in the inferior hemifield, both 0°-12° and 13°-24° in comparison with who were not involved in collisions (p=0.012 and p=0.034). A logistic regression analysis revealed that collision involvement was significantly associated with decreased inferior IVF mean sensitivity from 13° to 24° (p=0.041), in addition to older age and lower visual acuity (p=0.018 and p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the inferior hemifield was associated with the incidence of motor vehicle collisions with oncoming cars in patients with advanced glaucoma.