Socioeconomic impact of treatment with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluate the socioeconomic impact of treatment with biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: We analysed data retrospectively from the prospective observational CorEvitas RA Japan Registry (March 2016-February 2020). Patients were categorised into paid workers (PWs) and home workers (HWs) and further based on drug classes. We assessed medication persistence, treatment outcomes, health care resource utilisation, and socioeconomic impact over 12 months, including direct (drugs and health care resource utilisation) and indirect (loss of productivity) costs. RESULTS: Overall, 187 PWs and 114 HWs were identified. Over 12 months, medication persistence was high, treatment outcomes improved, and outpatient visits reduced in both groups. Following treatment initiation, direct costs increased, whereas indirect (loss of productivity) costs decreased in both groups. The unadjusted socioeconomic impact [Japanese yen (JPY)] increased across all drug classes in PWs (range: 29,700-151,700) and HWs (range: -28,700 to 83,000). Adjusted change in monthly socioeconomic impact was JPY 29,700-138,900 for PWs and JPY -28,000 to 92,800 for HWs. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis, the socioeconomic burden increased across patient groups and drug classes. The decrease in indirect (loss of productivity) costs partially offset the increase in direct costs.

Exploring steroid tapering in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder treated with satralizumab in SAkuraSky: A case series.

BACKGROUND: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare, chronic, autoimmune disease, characterized by astrocytopathic lesions in the central nervous system (Beekman et al., 2019; Fujihara et al., 2020). The main aim of NMOSD maintenance therapy is to reduce the frequency and severity of relapses and minimize future disability (Fujihara et al., 2020). Oral corticosteroids are used long-term to prevent relapses, but are associated with serious complications (Kessler et al., 2016; Kimbrough et al., 2012). In the SAkuraSky study, satralizumab reduced the risk of relapse in patients with NMOSD compared with placebo, with comparable rates of serious adverse events and infections between treatment arms (Yamamura et al., 2019). Here, we report on 16 patients who tapered their steroid dose during the openlabel extension (OLE) period of SAkuraSky. METHODS: SAkuraSky was a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind (DB), placebo-controlled study of satralizumab in combination with immunosuppressive therapies (ISTs) in patients with NMOSD. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive 120 mg subcutaneous satralizumab or placebo in addition to a stable dose of their baseline IST. After completing the DB period or experiencing relapse, patients could enter the OLE period. In the OLE, all patients received satralizumab, and IST doses could be tapered at the investigator's discretion. We assessed the different steroid tapering patterns and their impact on relapse and safety. Patients were considered to have tapered their steroids if their steroid dose at the clinical cut-off date (CCOD: February 18, 2020) was lower than on the first day of the OLE. Annualized relapse rate (ARR) was calculated as the number of relapses divided by the total number of patientyears at risk. RESULTS: Overall, 36 patients receiving oral corticosteroids entered the OLE, of whom 16 tapered their steroid dose. The mean age (range) at baseline was 44.9 (16-73) years, all 16 were female, 14 (88%) were Japanese, and 15 (94%) were AQP4-IgG seropositive. None were receiving any additional ISTs. Patients tapered their steroids from a median of 10 (range: 5-25) mg/day at OLE baseline to 2.75 (0-15) mg/day at the CCOD. Three patients discontinued steroids entirely, and all three remained relapse free. One patient who remained relapse free had temporary increases in steroid dose. Three relapses were observed in two patients who tapered steroids during the OLE; all three relapses required treatment. One of the relapses occurred shortly after a drop in steroid dose from 25 to 10 mg/day. The ARR for steroid-tapered patients was numerically lower in the OLE period than the satralizumab group in the DB period. The safety profile of satralizumab was in line with the overall SAkuraSky population. Two serious infections were observed in steroid-tapered patients in the OLE, both in the same patient: one event (hepatitis E) occurred before the patient began tapering their steroid dose; and one event (influenza) occurred while the patient was tapering. CONCLUSION: During the OLE of SAkuraSky, 16 patients tapered steroids and the ARR did not increase from the DB period. Patient numbers limit interpretation.