Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Obstet Gynaecol ; 41(1): 7-20, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32312121

RESUMEN

Endometriosis, defined as the presence of functional endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity, presents mainly with pelvic pain and infertility. Acute abdominal pain in non-pregnant patients with endometriosis might be minimised as a typical feature of the disease, while endometriosis is rarely considered in the differential diagnosis of acute abdominal pain. Our objective was to conduct a systematic review of the current literature of cases of acute abdomen/acute abdominal pain in non-pregnant endometriotic patients. We performed a PubMed/MEDLINE search of studies published from January 1990 to December 2018, selecting English language reports and series of non-pregnant patients with acute abdomen and histological confirmation of endometriosis. The studies were revised by two independent authors. Data were abstracted and compiled for analysis. Fifty articles reporting 62 patients were identified. The complications were classified according to anatomical sites in bowel, urinary tract, and genital organs emergencies. Rarely was the first diagnostic hypothesis endometriosis, misdiagnosis was frequent. The time frame from symptoms onset to management was often long. This is the first systematic review evaluating acute abdomen/acute abdominal pain in non-pregnant endometriotic patients. These conditions are rare but possibly life-threating and require prompt diagnosis and emergent medical or surgical treatment.


Asunto(s)
Abdomen Agudo/diagnóstico , Endometriosis/diagnóstico , Abdomen Agudo/etiología , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Errores Diagnósticos , Dismenorrea/diagnóstico , Dismenorrea/etiología , Endometriosis/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos
2.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 28(1): 42-49, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32283326

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and potential usefulness of near-infrared imaging (NIR) with indocyanine green (ICG) to assess ureteral perfusion after conservative surgery (ureterolysis or nodule removal) for ureteral endometriosis. Any changes to the surgical plan regarding intraoperative ureteral stent placement after NIR-ICG evaluation and early postoperative outcomes were recorded. DESIGN: Prospective case series study. SETTING: Tertiary level referral center for endometriosis and minimally invasive gynecology. PATIENTS: Consecutive symptomatic women scheduled for laparoscopic conservative ureteral surgery for ureteral endometriosis. INTERVENTIONS: After ureterolysis or nodule removal, residual perfusion of the ureters with regular caliber and peristalsis was evaluated through NIR-ICG imaging. Ureteral perfusion grade was defined as absent, irregular, or regular. Time required for NIR-ICG assessment, interoperator agreement regarding ureteral perfusion grade, any changes to the surgical plan after NIR-ICG evaluation, perioperative complications, and clinical-radiologic outcomes at early follow-up were recorded. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 31 ureters were examined with NIR-ICG imaging after conservative ureteral procedures. ICG assessment required 5.4 + 2.3 minutes. No complications related to fluorescence imaging were observed. Local ischemia supporting ureteral stent placement was suspected in 5 ureters (16.1%) at white light. Of these, 2 (40.0%) presented regular fluorescence; thus, ureteral stent placement was avoided. In the remaining 3 (60.0%), NIR-ICG confirmed irregular or absent fluorescence, requiring ureteral stent placement. Interoperator agreement regarding NIR-ICG evaluation was high. At a 3-month follow-up, all procedures were clinically and radiologically successful. CONCLUSION: NIR-ICG imaging after conservative surgery for ureteral endometriosis seems to be a feasible, safe, and useful tool to assess ureteral perfusion and guide surgical decision, together with other visual cues at white light. However, this approach needs to be validated by further larger and controlled studies.


Asunto(s)
Endometriosis/cirugía , Verde de Indocianina , Laparoscopía , Uréter/irrigación sanguínea , Uréter/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Ureterales/cirugía , Adulto , Colorantes , Femenino , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios , Estudios Prospectivos , Espectroscopía Infrarroja Corta
3.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 302(3): 665-670, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32506173

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic excision of endometriotic lesions in obese women. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data involving consecutive women scheduled for complete laparoscopic removal of macroscopic endometriotic lesions between January 2012 and November 2018. Operative time, laparotomic conversion rates, complication rates, and length of hospital stay were recorded. RESULTS: One thousand two hundred thirty women were enrolled and divided into two main groups, according to the World Health Organization classification of obesity, obese (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2) and non-obese (body mass index < 30 kg/m2). During the study period, 91 (7.4% of overall study cohort) obese women underwent surgery. At univariate analyses, significant differences between the two groups were found in terms of age, rates of severe endometriosis, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification ≥ III, and different surgical procedures. Significant differences in terms of median operative time [125 (interquartile range (IQR) 85-165) in obese group vs 110 min (IQR 75-155) in non-obese group, P = 0.04] were observed. There were no significant differences between the obese and non-obese groups with respect to the other variables of interest. After adjusted multivariable regression models for potential confounders, difference in operating time (coefficient of 13.389; 95% CI 1.716, 25.060) was still found to be significant. CONCLUSION: In our tertiary care referral center, laparoscopic removal of endometriosis is feasible and safe, except for a slight increase of operative time and conversion rate.


Asunto(s)
Endometriosis/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Obesidad/complicaciones , Adulto , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Análisis de Regresión , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; 49(4): 101697, 2020 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32018043

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Rectosigmoid endometriosis and Dolichocolon can both present with a triad of chronic abdominal pain, constipation and bloating. The relationship between these two pathologies is unknown. The present study aims to determine the frequency of DC in women with rectosigmoid endometriosis and its possible impact on pre- and post-operative symptoms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on 113 consecutive patients submitted to magnetic resonance imaging enema and subsequent complete surgical removal for symptomatic rectosigmoid endometriosis between June 2015 to June 2018. Dolichocolon is an anatomic variant characterized by redundancies and lengthening of the colon. We divided our study population according to its presence or absence. The two groups were compared in terms of demographic data, surgical findings and pre- and post-operative clinical variables. Pain symptoms were assessed through numerical rating scale from 0 to 10. Bowel complaints included constipation, bloating and diarrhea. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients (31 %) presented a dolichocolon at magnetic resonance imaging enema. The two groups were comparable in terms of demographic data, pre-operative clinical variables and surgical findings. At 6-month follow-up, there was a significant improvement of symptoms, except for constipation and bloating in dolichocolon group. In particular, we observed with a statistical difference (p < .05) the persistence of constipation and bloating in dolichocolon group compared to non-dolichocolon group. CONCLUSIONS: Dolichocolon was observed in one third patients with rectosigmoid endometriosis and could influence surgical outcomes for rectosigmoid endometriosis in terms of relief of bowel symptoms.


Asunto(s)
Colon/patología , Enfermedades del Colon/patología , Enfermedades del Colon/cirugía , Endometriosis/cirugía , Enfermedades del Recto/cirugía , Enfermedades del Sigmoide/cirugía , Adulto , Enfermedades del Colon/fisiopatología , Estreñimiento , Diarrea , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor , Enfermedades del Recto/patología , Enfermedades del Recto/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades del Sigmoide/patología , Enfermedades del Sigmoide/fisiopatología , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
J Ultrasound Med ; 39(7): 1253-1259, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31944342

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To describe the ultrasound (US) features of intraligamental myomas (IMs) using Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment group standardized terminology. METHODS: This was a retrospective monocentric study. A total of 125 consecutive women with a preoperative US diagnosis of a myoma located close to the uterine isthmus (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages 5, 6, and 7) from 2016 to 2019 who underwent laparoscopic or laparotomic myomectomy or hysterectomy were included for study analyses. The US data were retrieved from US reports and stored digital images by 2 authors. Ultrasound features of myomas were described according to Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment terminology. Clinical data for the study population were retrieved from the patients' records. RESULTS: Nineteen women with a surgical confirmation of an IM were included in the study group; the remaining population constituted the control group (n = 106). Non-uniform echogenicity was detected in 17 of 19 (89%) of IMs compared to 26 of 106 (25%) fibroids in the control group (P < .001). The presence of shadowing was detected in 12 of 19 (63%) IMs compared to 94 of 106 (89%) cases in the control group (P = .004). Intraligamental myomas were more vascularized tumors compared to myomas in the control group (P = .004). Transvaginal US showed high specificity for the diagnosis of an IM (0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.96). CONCLUSIONS: On US imaging, IMs appear as vascularized solid tumors with nonuniform echogenicity; cones of shadows were less frequent in IMs than the control group, and this finding can help in the differential diagnosis. Knowledge of their specific US features could help sonographers make an accurate diagnosis, allowing them to plan correct surgery and avoid severe complications.


Asunto(s)
Leiomioma , Mioma , Neoplasias Uterinas , Femenino , Humanos , Leiomioma/diagnóstico por imagen , Mioma/diagnóstico por imagen , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ultrasonografía , Neoplasias Uterinas/diagnóstico por imagen
6.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 27(1): 100-106, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30849476

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate appendiceal endometriosis (AE) prevalence and risk factors in endometriotic patients submitted to surgery. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A tertiary level referral center, university hospital. PATIENTS: One thousand nine hundred thirty-five consecutive patients who underwent surgical removal for symptomatic endometriosis. INTERVENTIONS: Electronic medical records of patients submitted to surgery over a 12-year period were reviewed. We assessed any correlation between demographic, clinical, and surgical variables and AE. In our center, appendectomy was performed using a selective approach. Appendix removal was performed in case of gross abnormalities of the organ, such as enlargement, dilation, tortuosity, or discoloration of the organ or the presence of suspected endometriotic implants. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: AE prevalence was 2.6% (50/1935), with only 1 false-positive case at gross intraoperative evaluation. In multivariate analysis using a stepwise logistic regression model, independent risk factors for AE were adenomyosis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.32-4.68), right endometrioma (aOR = 8.03; 95% CI, 4.08-15.80), right endometrioma ≥5 cm (aOR = 13.90; 95% CI, 6.63-29.15), bladder endometriosis (aOR = 2.05; 95% CI, 1.05-3.99), deep posterior pelvic endometriosis (aOR = 5.79; 95% CI, 2.82-11.90), left deep lateral pelvic endometriosis (aOR = 2.11; 95% CI, 1.10-4.02), and ileocecal involvement (aOR = 12.51; 95% CI, 2.07-75.75). CONCLUSION: Among patients with endometriosis submitted to surgery, AE was observed in 2.6%, and it was associated with adenomyosis, large right endometrioma, bladder endometriosis, deep posterior pelvic endometriosis, left deep lateral pelvic endometriosis, and ileocecal involvement.


Asunto(s)
Apéndice/patología , Enfermedades del Ciego/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Ciego/cirugía , Endometriosis/diagnóstico , Endometriosis/cirugía , Adulto , Apendicectomía/efectos adversos , Apendicectomía/métodos , Apendicectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades del Ciego/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Endometriosis/epidemiología , Endometriosis/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Análisis Multivariante , Prevalencia , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
7.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 27(6): 1324-1330, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31672590

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare 2-year follow-up intestinal function and quality of life (QoL) between women with temporary protective ileostomy (PI) and recanalization and women without PI after colorectal segmental resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). DESIGN: Prospective observational exploratory study. SETTING: Tertiary level referral center for minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection and PI because of DIE between January 2015 and January 2018; an equal number of women without PI were matched according to age and anamnestic findings to serve as controls. INTERVENTIONS: Realization of a PI or immediate recanalization in patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were considered for the analyses: 18 in the PI group and 18 in the non-PI group. Baseline intestinal function and QoL were evaluated using 2 validated questionnaires. The main reasons for ileostomy were colpotomy (66.7%), ultralow bowel anastomosis (27.8%), concomitant ureteroneocystostomy, and positive Michelin test result (5.6%). The mean interval between first and second surgery in the PI group was 3.7 ± 1.7 months. Perioperative severe complications included 1 stenosis of colorectal anastomosis in 1 woman in the PI group and 1 perianastomotic abscess in the non-PI group; overall the complications were comparable between the 2 groups. At the 2-year follow-up from recanalization, bowel function and QoL improved from baseline, with no statistical differences between the groups (Knowles-Eccersley-Scott-Symptom delta: 5.9 ± 9.3 in the PI group vs 7.7 ± 10.2 in the non-PI group, p = .6; Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index delta: 16.0 ± 27.5 vs 19.2 ± 24.7, p = .7). CONCLUSION: Temporary PI after colorectal resection for DIE does not seem to influence patients' bowel function and QoL at a median follow-up from recanalization at 2 years.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Colon/cirugía , Endometriosis/cirugía , Ileostomía , Intestinos/fisiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Calidad de Vida , Enfermedades del Recto/cirugía , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Enfermedades del Colon/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/efectos adversos , Endometriosis/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/fisiopatología , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/prevención & control , Humanos , Ileostomía/efectos adversos , Ileostomía/métodos , Ileostomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Intestinos/fisiopatología , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Enfermedades del Recto/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Anticancer Res ; 39(6): 3141-3146, 2019 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31177160

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIM: Breast cancer treatment represents a substantial amount of health-care costs and has a negative impact on womens' psychological health. Day-Surgery managment (DS) is a favorable alternative to a classic inpatient setting. In our prospective study we evaluated DS-treatment feasibility in terms of patient satisfaction, same-day-discharge rate, surgical-reintervention rate, psychological impact and costs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We operated on 131 early breast cancer patients in DS. Surgical outcomes were evaluated. In 64 DS-treated breast cancer patients, psychological outcomes were analyzed using validated psychometric questionnaires and comparison was made with a corresponding group of women treated as inpatients. RESULTS: The same-day-discharge rate was 95.4%. No patient required readmission. The surgical-reintervention rate was 6.2%. DS-treatment significantly reduced anxiety (p=0.05) and depression (p=0.01) and afforded cost savings of 49%. CONCLUSION: DS-treatment of early breast cancer was feasible, with low reintervention rate, reduced anxiety and depression, high patients' satisfaction and substantial financial savings.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Mastectomía , Salud Mental , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/psicología , Ansiedad/etiología , Ansiedad/psicología , Neoplasias de la Mama/economía , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Ahorro de Costo , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Depresión/etiología , Depresión/psicología , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Mastectomía/efectos adversos , Mastectomía/economía , Mastectomía/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Satisfacción del Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Reoperación , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 238: 120-124, 2019 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31132690

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of Dienogest (D) and Norethindrone acetate (N) in symptomatic women with ovarian endometriomas, analyzing the efficacy in reducing endometrioma size and symptom relief and drug tolerability. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study including 135 symptomatic women with ultrasonographic diagnosis of ovarian endometrioma. Women were divided into two groups: 1) women who received D 2 mg/day (group D); 2) women who received N 2.5 mg/day (group N). Women were evaluated at therapy prescription and after 6 and 12 months of treatment: transvaginal ultrasound was performed to assess the mean diameter of endometriomas, a Visual Analogue Scale was used to rank endometriosis related symptoms (dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, chronic pelvic pain). The main outcome measure was the comparison between the 2 groups in terms of variations in endometrioma size and endometriosis related symptoms during the follow-up. Drug tolerability was also analyzed in terms of side effects. RESULTS: A reduction in ovarian endometrioma size was observed during treatment in both groups, with no significant differences between groups D and N. Endometriosis related symptoms decreased in both groups, but the decrease was significantly higher in group D than in group N for all symptoms, both at 6 and 12 months of treatment. Regarding drug tolerability, uterine bleeding/spotting and weight gain were reported more frequently by women in the group N than women in the group D, both at 6 and 12 months of treatment. CONCLUSION: Progestin therapy with D or N appears to be effective in reducing the size of endometriomas and related symptoms, with a greater effect on symptoms relief and higher tolerability in women treated with D.


Asunto(s)
Anticonceptivos Hormonales Orales/uso terapéutico , Endometriosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Nandrolona/análogos & derivados , Noretindrona/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades del Ovario/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Nandrolona/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos
10.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 26(6): 1110-1116, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30414996

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare long-term surgical, clinical, and functional outcomes between conservative and radical surgery in patients with rectosigmoid endometriosis (RSE) and preoperative intermediate risk of segmental resection. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: Endometriosis tertiary level referral center, St. Orsola Academic Hospital, Bologna, Italy. PATIENTS: Three hundred and ninety-two patients with RSE presented for complete macroscopic surgical excision between January 2004 and January 2017. INTERVENTION: Assessment of laparoscopic bowel shaving, discoid excision, or segmental resection for the treatment of RSE. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The 392 patients were divided into 3 groups according to surgical technique: shaving (n = 297; 75.8%), discoid excision (n = 33; 8.4%), and segmental resection (n = 62; 15.8%). Preoperative characteristics, surgical data, short- and long-term complications, and rates of proven and suspected recurrence were assessed. The segmental resection group had a higher rate of short-term complications compared with the discoid and shaving groups (17.7% vs 9.1% vs 5.4%, respectively; p = .004). The median follow-up time was 43 months (range, 12-163 months). Suspected and proven RSE recurrence rates showed no statistically significant differences among the 3 groups. There also were no significant differences concerning the rate of de novo chronic constipation and urinary retention. CONCLUSION: To date, there is no consensus regarding the choice between radical (segmental resection) or conservative (shaving, discoid excision) surgical management for RSE, particularly for patients with preoperative intermediate risk of bowel segmental resection (the gray zone). Our data suggest that conservative surgery is preferred over radical surgery in patients with RSE in the gray zone risk category, resulting in similar suspected and proven RSE recurrence rates and associated with fewer short-term complications.


Asunto(s)
Endometriosis/cirugía , Enfermedades del Recto/cirugía , Enfermedades del Sigmoide/cirugía , Adulto , Estreñimiento/epidemiología , Estreñimiento/etiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Endometriosis/epidemiología , Endometriosis/patología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Enfermedades del Recto/epidemiología , Enfermedades del Recto/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades del Sigmoide/epidemiología , Enfermedades del Sigmoide/patología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...