RESUMEN
Ticks are vectors of many human and animal pathogens, and represent a major threat to public health. In recent years, an increase in tick-borne diseases has been observed, and new strategies are therefore needed in order to control tick numbers and reduce human tick bites. In the present study, we adapted the previous tick repellency bioassay based on the exploration behavior of the tick, using the ToxTrac software and video-tracking, to compare the repellent effect of two compounds on the tick Ixodes ricinus: N,N-diethyl-methyl-m-toluamide (DEET), and butenolide, flupyradifurone (FLU). We found that when applied alone, 10% DEET or FLU have no/or low repellency effect. But, the combination of both 10% DEET and FLU demonstrated a significant repellency effect against I. ricinus, similar to the repellency of 20% DEET. Using membrane microtransplantation, we evaluated the effect of DEET and FLU on native acetylcholine receptors expressed on the tick synganglion. We found that DEET has no effect on acetylcholine-evoked currents, but significantly reduced nicotine-induced current amplitudes. FLU induced an ionic current but was not able to reduce acetylcholine or nicotine evoked currents. The combination of both DEET and FLU strongly reduced nicotine-evoked currents. Finally, we demonstrated that our recording device for repellency, as well as the use of membrane microtransplantation, could be used as methods to study the mode of action of active compounds on ticks.
