The association between number of learners and pharmacist and technician levels of burnout.

PURPOSE: Little is known about the relationship between learner load and pharmacist and pharmacy technician burnout. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the association between burnout and the number of learners (residents, students, and new employees) assigned to pharmacists or pharmacy technicians. METHODS: A validated survey to measure burnout and professional fulfillment was administered to employees of a university health system's pharmacy service in 2019. A threshold analysis determined the optimal cutoff for number of learners trained that maximized the ability to predict binary outcomes. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used, and effect sizes between percentages were reported. Finally, the adjusted associations between number of learners and outcomes were assessed using logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 448 pharmacy staff members were included in the analysis. Of those, 57% (n = 254) worked in ambulatory care, 27.4% (n = 122) worked in an inpatient setting, and 15.7% (n = 70) worked in infrastructure. Pharmacists working in an inpatient setting who reported training 4 or more learners per year indicated significantly higher rates of burnout than those training fewer learners on both a single-item burnout assessment (64.3% vs 31.0%; P = 0.01; effect size, 0.68) and a 10-item burnout assessment (54.8% vs 13.8%; P = 0.01; effect size, 0.91). Similar results were not observed in pharmacists working in ambulatory care and infrastructure positions or in pharmacy technicians. CONCLUSION: Added precepting and training responsibilities may be associated with higher levels of burnout among pharmacy team members, particularly inpatient pharmacists.

Burnout, professional fulfillment, sleep impairment, and self-compassion within an academic medical center pharmacy department.

PURPOSE: To examine the prevalence of burnout, professional fulfillment, sleep impairment, and self-compassion within an academic medical center pharmacy department across varying job titles and practice settings. METHODS: In fall 2019, pharmacy staff completed a REDCap-based survey that consisted of a validated instrument relating to burnout, professional fulfilment, sleep-related impairment, and self-compassion. Burnout was measured by both single-item and extended 10-item questions on the survey. Survey outcomes from each domain were compared between pharmacists and pharmacy technicians/interns, as well as among practice settings (inpatient, ambulatory care, and infrastructure). RESULTS: A total of 593 surveys were completed by pharmacy personnel, representing a preliminary response rate of 71.8% (593/826). A total of 505 survey responses were analyzed (235 [46.5%] for pharmacists and 270 [53.5%] for pharmacy technicians/interns). Inpatient pharmacists reported the highest level of burnout (50.7%), followed by ambulatory care pharmacists (29.3%) and those working in infrastructure (24.3%). Pharmacy technicians working in infrastructure reported the highest level of burnout (36.4%), followed by inpatient (30.8%) and ambulatory care (28.3%) pharmacy technicians. There was no association between job type or location and burnout according to both single-item and 10-item burnout measures. A higher rate of burnout, sleep impairment, and decreased self-compassion and a lower rate of professional fulfillment were observed for inpatient pharmacists compared to pharmacists in ambulatory care or infrastructure. Except for higher rates of reported professional fulfillment, a similar trend was observed for pharmacy technicians. CONCLUSION: Burnout was reported across the pharmacy team regardless of practice site.

Communication Disparities between Nursing Home Team Members.

Optimal care in nursing home (NH) settings requires effective team communication. Certified nursing assistants (CNAs) interact with nursing home residents frequently, but the extent to which CNAs feel their input is valued by other team members is not known. We conducted a cross-sectional study in which we administered a communication survey within 20 Utah nursing home facilities to 650 team members, including 124 nurses and 264 CNAs. Respondents used a 4-point scale to indicate the extent to which their input is valued by other team members when reporting their concerns about nursing home residents. We used a one-way ANOVA with a Bonferroni correction. When compared to nurses, CNAs felt less valued (CNA mean = 2.14, nurse mean = 3.24; p < 0.001) when reporting to physicians, and less valued (CNA mean = 1.66, nurse mean = 2.71; p < 0.001) when reporting to pharmacists. CNAs did not feel less valued than nurses (CNA mean = 3.43, nurse mean = 3.37; p = 0.25) when reporting to other nurses. Our findings demonstrate that CNAs feel their input is not valued outside of nursing, which could impact resident care. Additional research is needed to understand the reasons for this perception and to design educational interventions to improve the culture of communication in nursing home settings.